Archived threads in /co/ - Comics & Cartoons - 1545. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
Ralph Dibny is back
Is Sue still raped by Riddler?
>>81017925
She started getting her memory back last issue.
I wouldn't call it rape since he's having consensual sex with a partial-amnesiac and it's not like he knew her before.
What?
What will be the next film released from Disney Vault?
>>81017732
mowgli/bagira sex tape
Come on, Disney.
Song of the South.
You set up the perfect pretense for an apology about the past behavior of your company with Zootopia.
COME ON.
>>81018178
Come on, /co/
You all know the words.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bWyhj7siEY
What went right?
>>81017338
Everything except the final battle.
>nothing happens
>the movie
Having a clear idea of a beginning, middle, and end and not watering down the plot with extra unnecessary shit.
Great casting.
Emphasis on fun and accessibility, not pretentious.
Contemporary.
Still the best superhero movie ever made.
Since it's Wednesday, can we talk about pull lists instead of shitty movies?
What are you reading from the Big 2 these days?
>New Avengers
>Illuminati
>Lucifer
Was Ultimates, Dr Strange and Hercules.
Have essentially dropped Hercules and am starting to consider dropping Strange.
Just big 2?
Grayson
Starfire
Jl3k1
Prez
Gotham Academy
We are Robin
Constantine
American Alien
Robin
Red Hood
Batman
Tech
Midnighter
Vision
The rides over, overall thoughts on Gordon Batman?
I didn't care for any of the stories written with him. Found them all to be pretty mediocre. And this will sound pretty nebulous, but he didn't really feel much like Jim Gordon to me.
Pushing him in every book so we have heroes say not muh Batman was dull as fuck.
>>81016732
He was awful.
The new Batman for Rebirth
>>81016297
Subpar
Inc suit still the best of the past few years
>>81016297
I like it
>A redesign that isn't based Troika
Looks like we've got a few more years of shitty looking Batman.
>ruined Man of Steel
>from reviews he killed BVS
Why does he still on DC movies?
>>81015743
People have already started getting pitchforks and the movie hasn't even released domestically.
>>81015743
Someone who laughs at capefags being permavirgins can't be bad.
>>81015766
Have you read the reviews?
Man, fuck Snyder and WB. I wanna get into Marvel now.
Recommend me some good Avengers and Captain America comics, /co/.
>>81015460
Thats retarded.
>company makes bad movie but comics are gine
>oh i know as opposed to just ignoring the movie and continuing to read comics ill just read amother companies comics
>>81015460
>Thats retarded.
Who say that comic book fans aren't?
>>81015460
>there are only DC and Marvel
Why did you lie to me /c/?
This series is honestly fun and Jason & Roy are the best bros.
>>81015272
Literally kill yourself funfag.
>/c/
But they are not cute anime girls
>>81015272
I enjoyed the action comedy part of it at 1st to anon, I figured hey it isn't great and there'll be a new writer on soon who can make the book actually interesting and build on the success of UtRH, and the new fans Jason got from that. That was 5 years ago. 5 years of narration boxes. 5 years of Roy being a retard, and Jason being a frat boy, of the story barely moving forward. I now hate the series, and I say this as a Jasonfag.
New Avengers TRAITOR!!!
>>81015226
I should've seen this coming, but god damn it, I like this character.
>>81015253
I don't think she's doing anything malicious. I think she just wants to calm things down.
So, is she leaving the book?
>first CGI movie to come up with an actual lovablr art style and cutesy art style in ages
>is an unfunny raunchy shitfest
GODDMANIT HOLLYWOOD, YOU HAD ONE FUCKING JOB!!!!
They always had "one fucking job". Do you expect anything less from that gaggle of suits and executives?
>>81015161I can't wait for it. Stay mad, /co/
>>81015161
>lovable and cutesy art style
it's the same art style as in every other CGI animated movie
how is that one supposed to be special?
Peach juice, /co/?
>Poo poo pee pee: the villain
THAT SOUNDS ABSOLUTELYPEACHY
>>81015067
I just learned about that, what is the deal with it?
1. Daredevil
2. Spider-Man
3. The Punisher
4. Captain America
5. Blade
Spider-Man
Captain America
Daredevil
Iron Fist
Superman
No real order except that Spidey is always number one
>>81014868
None of them had capes, OP.
The closest thing would be when Blade and Puns would wear those edgelord Columbine longcoats.
Marvel:
Spidey
Daredevil
Moon Knight
Iron Fist
Machine Man
(also anti-heroes like Frank, Elektra, Taskmaster)
DC:
Superman
Batman
Wally
Hal
Question
Beetle and Booster
What if. Just WHAT IF.
After the critical response for BvS and possibly similar results for upcoming DC movies, the Warner execs just go "Fuck it, lets hire the guy who worked for Marvel" and they get Whedon to direct the Justice League? A hail mary, wild card play.
Obviously WB would make sure Whedon doesn't over overstep it with the quips and the whedon dialogue, but how does it sound?Say what you want about the guy, but he knew how to handle a bunch of divas at once....even if it just worked the one time
>>81014587
He quit because he didn't like the huge pressure. He'd been basically doing the job for five years shepherding both projects to completion, you can't really blame him for wanting to step off.
Also I think you're underestimating the public here. They know a cash-in when they see one; it'll keep them away. If they think you're making a formulaic copy - right down to the same director - they'll stay away.
Face it, he had his chance to do Wonder Woman and they said no....
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Whedon's not terrible, /tv/ is just full of man-children.
I can easily overlook Age of Ultron given Marvel's past at micromanaging their films and his track record with several shows.
But no, they're going to double down on the strategy they already have. Nobody gives a shit about bad reviews: people want the Bats, they're gonna get the Bats. Just like AoU doesn't mean shit for the Civil War hype.
>>81014636
>Whedon's not terrible
get some taste jesus
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-hill/disney-controversial-cartoon-characters_b_1028420.html
>that time where Disney — at great expense — reframed several scenes in The Lion King (So that — when the VHS version of this 1994 theatrical release finally hit store shelves — the hyenas who were parading in front of Scar in that animated feature’s “Be Prepared” number wouldn’t look quite so much like Nazi stormtroopers passing in review for Hitler)
Wait, what did the original shot look like?
I thought that was the point.
>>81014382
>what did the original shot look like
there were huge banners on the cliff face behind scar and and the hyena's had arm bands
in that bit in the middle of the song where scar just talks the hyenas salute with a loud sig heil
>>81014382
>huffpo
Not clicking that.
Anyway yes, the whole nazi lion scene was intended, so what.
Why this author thinks he deserves my click over something that is so obvious?
