Whats up with that /x/? anyone got experience with it? is it just some bullshit? i want to know more.
Pic related
>>15875676
I'm not sure what else there is to know, it's a pretty straightforward conspiracy theory. There's never any solid evidence that such practices exist beyond the vague bullshit like in your image. Just remember that you yourself are not worth pursuing for any sort of matter. Keeps you feeling sane, and makes you realize that there's a lot of self-centered idiots on this board.
>>15875689
But what i don't get is why would they follow me because i googled it?
>>15875676
>yes I totally know this is true cuz I totally didn't just make it up
>no rly guis this didn't happen to me or anyone I know, I have no proof, I just know
this is why conspiracy theorists have no credibility whatsoever.
Post spooky underwater creatures.
Shit, if these things are underwater, i don't want to get in a pool ever again
>>15869460
Hey /x/, can we get another trucker story thread going? they seem to have the best road stories around.
If we have any trucker bros willing to share anything spoopy or just plain weird, I'd be more than willing to listen.
bumpin for truckers
>>15858335
Bumping.
Didn't know this was a thing.
Sounds very interesting.
Always figured truckers would have some pretty interesting / spooky stories, driving across the country at all hours of the night.
>>15858335
bumping for trucker and taxi bro stories.
Hi! As I don't know elsewhere to ask this, I'm doing it here... Does anyone here by any chance knows WHERE or HOW to go to other dimensions...? I´m dead serious!! Anyone who has been able to found sources to support this? I think the key to all these may be at the deep web, unfortunately I don't know how to access it (Without risking my pc).
Many 4channel people has done it and posted their results at the /b/...
IMO most of the posts I read here are real the other 1% trolls :)
If you wanna make fun, well that's life...But please share as well real information. I do appreciate your time and help for reading this post.
>>15863763
URANUS
>>15863763
Despite all the bullshit you will read in this thread there is no proof that interdimensional travel is even possible nor is there even any indication to the topologies of other dimensions yet.
>inb4 some vibrational bullshit about crystals
I'm from the future. I'm not here physically my consciousness has been cloned, uploaded and transmitted back as a signal to 4-Mar-2015. The signal will terminate in 27 hours. I physically reside in the year 2497.
I'm here to relay information to a specific person (a resident of your time period ) who will read this thread be affected by it and start a chain of events that will reverberate to my time.
You are all living in THE most pivotal time period in human history. There will be several events that will transpire in the next 75 years that will change everything for all of us.
I will try to answer any questions you have providing no paradoxical risk results from divulging the information to you.
>>15870556
Go away nobody likes you.
>>15870562
Not important.
are there role-playing threads in 2497?
captcha: meepu
Sup /x/. I've been hearing lots about Psychokinesis lately. What's your opinion guys? Personally I think that it's a load of shit.
Not true. You can move some objects with your mind or even start a fire.
I "trained" a lot when I was younger. One thing I can tell you, the phenomenon is real. At one point I was able to slightly move a pencil on my desk. I don't have any proof tho. Shit does take a toll though, it's exhausting. If you're interested start with psiwheels. Google it.
>>15860309
Replying to my own post. I had solid proof, recorded with my laptop webcam, but that shit was lost when the laptop pepsi'd (do not buy a HP product, ever). I used to film my success and shit got real numerous times. At the time a site like PsiPog existed, dunno if it is still around, but that was centered around psychic powers pretty much.
School me on MKultra
>>15821291
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra
>>15821291
>NEVER TRUST AN AMERICAN
Never ever
>>15821291
Ultimately, it was more about inducing torture and extracting confessions than it was about mind control; the mind control programs were largely a failure.
Similar research is still being clandestinely carried out by the US government, now mostly in other countries where there is less of a risk of exposure; although major progress has been made in memory fabrication and erasure, "mind reading", and implantation of suggestions and commands, all such methods require invasive surgery, long therapy, or willing consent, tend to be unreliable with an unacceptably high rate of relapse or recovery, have substantial side effects or clearly identifiable indicators, or are otherwise not suitable for covert deployment. The only thing likely to come out of it in the near future are medical treatments for PTSD.
Over at >>No.15829946 we devised an experiment, where 8 of us, including Vexed, the experimenter, meditated to a sigil drawn by one of us, and then tried to project images to eachother.
It went wrong.
'anna' sensed bad vibes the whole time.
>we begin experiment
>im meditating to the sigil
>feels really evil, as if its forcing itself onto me
>drawing it in my head, keeps getting quicker
>after 10 minutes, the experiment states that we project an image, given to us by Vexed, to the other 6
>i do this for my 2 minutes
>i sit a recieve for the other 6, 2 minutes each
>come back to our chat, all has gone to shit
>4 of us is missing, vexed is getting annoyed
>vexed leaves
>vexed returns, complaining of nausea, headache
>others too
>some got very evil feelings come their way
we fucked up, but how?
you guys reading this who were in the experiment, write your experiences below please, i cannot write everything right now
im feeling really uneasy, like i cant get out of bed or else ill be very venerable
vexed, if you read this, comment with your tripcode please
I drew the sigil for the experiment, it was this
i was participating in the experiment. when i started maditating on the sigil i eventually saw it in flames like it was in hell or something. after the experiment i felt really nauseous and a really bad vibe was going through me.
>>15832998
Its been determined that not everybody was using the same sigil
moar like this! also, general spooky stories thread (pictures appreciated)
self bump
Not sure what type of stories you want. Does /x/ like creepypasta anymore?
>>15826542
i'd gladly accept it
Last Halloween we did that time-travel experiment. It didn’t work, but it was fun—all of /x/ working together to try something crazy. So perhaps we could do some other experiments.
This one isn’t about time-travel, but it’s a little more down to earth and has a higher chance of working. The theory is that if we were to all meditate on the same thing, our minds would become synchronized or telepathically linked. By our combined willpower, we might be able to use psychic abilities that are too weak for a single mind to use. One group already tried this http://www (dot)worldpeacegroup.org/washington_crime_study.html . I haven’t researched it too deeply, so I don’t know if it’s bullshit or not, but it would still be interesting to try. Maybe a sigil-fag could draw us up a sigil that we would all meditate on. Or maybe we could devise a complicated ritual that we would all perform at the same time.
Other ideas for experiments?
>inb4 this is stupid and won't work.
Probably. But what else are you going to do on a saturday night?
>>15829946
Heard about people doing this and forming a crop circle in a field with their minds.
>>15829946
I am down to use the power of the conscious mind to alter the reality of the subconscious universe.
Maybe create a god
They already started that with the Ellis sigil.
Let's try this one for our experiment. It's /X/ in a circle.
hi /x/,
The other month me and my friends found a channel that we assumed was some kids shitty vfx channel. Turns out its probably some fucked up paedo. They have like 5 channels and post stuff related to the kids show lazy town with a girl dressed up as characters from it, we assumed this was the person behind it the whole time but we were wrong. We kept looking into the channel and we ended up finding lots of edited videos of vloggers and such, which at first we assumed were her but her stories in the comments changed each time. We eventually noticed her channel url said "mike" in, which creeped us out a bit. We kept searching, and found a shit load of things. Eventually we found this piece of fucked up shit and that was enough to assume it was a weird view botting pedo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg_fGcjG04s&feature=youtu.be
Here are some more really messed videos we found:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg_fGcjG04s&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEkHajY5ItU&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P49XyvwSzHM&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eh9Q6cBPGYc&feature=youtu.be
Then we found this channel, his only liked videos are "christina blacks" and his name is mike, so we guess this is him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pa5htWygz2g&feature=youtu.be
Obviously this guy has some bad mental issues or some shit as this is creepy as fuck and looks like its straight out of a creepy pasta, and the fact there is like 4 channels with different names is just fucked up. Any ideas on what we should do?
Oh god, the voice they're talking about it clearly him
yeah they post weird lazytown videos every day.
found another channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTfWrzH8dCkyC1asVeZdq_g is this some weird pedo secret club
I'm really not a regular 4chan user but I've been on /x/ a few times and this is kind of freaking me out and idk where else to go, so... yeah.
Anyway basically there's some kind of weird warp effect going on in my room?? I was just browsing the web earlier and didn't even notice anything strange, i got up to get a snack and when i came back there was just... I don't even really know how to describe it, its like some kind of really subtle distortion thing going on?? I took a picture of it but like, it didn't disappear or anything, it's still there and I'm looking at it right now. This is really weird and honestly I'm really into science and stuff but I'm completely fucking stumped (I'll attach the pic I took, if that helps, though its kind of hard to see). Anyone have any ideas??
Can I get a bright red circle or neon arrow for my blind ass? I don't see shit, yo.
There's nothing there. Maybe you're just tired. Get some rest and stay off of the internet for a while, ok?
touch it, op
Succubus thread being remade since last one 404'd.
>>15782411
That game was great, completing lists of things to do caters to my autism.
>Previous threads
http://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/15706814/
http://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/15742617/
http://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/15757737/
So... is there some risk, or are you guys in it for the kink?
God-tier movie thread
please no spoilers
>>15778693
>inb4 that movie sucks
Well hell, I liked it
at least it's not /x/'s favorite movie VHS
(1 of 8)
Hey, you. You're life is not real. It's not something I can prove to you conclusively in an objective way, since everything you take in with your senses is internal to this reality, but I intend to set you on the right path to understand this. I'm going to give you the reasons why you should doubt your current reality, and some information for further research.
First off, there is the Simulation Argument. This was an argument orginally made by physicist, philosopher, and professor, Nick Bostrum. I won't give you his argument exactly, but a modified version of it. Look him up if you want the original. But, essentially, it can be viewed as this:
1) Intelligent life, such as humans, will increase in technology to the point where we can make realistic simulations, basically virtual realities. This assumption seems obvious, given that we are getting better at this all the time, computer technology and display technology is ever increasing. Your experience is just signals sent to your brain; it seems reasonable that with advanced enough technology you could feel like you're in a real world, while experiencing a video game or something like it.
2) When we get the technology to create virtual realities, we will want to do so. This assumption also seems obvious, since we all love video games, and constantly use educational software.
3) We will have reasons to create more than one simulation. This also seems obvious, since we have thousands of different video games, weather prediction software, physics simulations, etc. already. And, we have millions of different copies of these running right now. It is no stretch of the imagination to see why we will have millions of virtual realities, when our technology has reached that point effectively.
>>15790463
(2 of 8)
What is the conclusion to draw from these assumptions? One day, there will be millions of virtual realities, and only one objective reality. Since you have no way to tell which one you're in while you're in it, you are statistically very unlikely to be in the one-in-a-million "real" world. It is almost a statistical guarantee that you are in a virtual world.
>Maybe one day OP, but we don't have that technology yet.
We already try to do historical reconstruction. We already do computer simulations of past weather and geological events, as well as astronomical events. We are interested in simulating the past. Bostrum refers to "ancestor simulations", essentially humans recreating their past in virtual simulations for a number of reasons. There will be more simulations of this "now" there will be actual "now"s. This time, 2015, right now, if you are experiencing it you are still more likely to be in a simulation than in the objectively real world.
And that's just assuming that humans are real and this time really happened. Perhaps this is an entertainment simulation, a program representing a reality that never really happened. Then it doesn't matter what our technology looks like. You have no way to know for sure right now.
>But I would know if I were in a simulation. I'd still have memories of the real world before the simulation, and of starting this simulation.
Would you? When you dream every night, do you always remember your waking life, and having gone to sleep? Can you always tell you're in a dream, even when the dream gets ridiculous? And do you remember how you started experiencing this reality? Do you remember starting this game or being born? Or do your memories merely start at some point in middle childhood, already playing this reality?
>>15790465
(3 of 8)
It can't be proven conclusively that you are in a simulation, because any proof that you get would be internal to the simulation - i.e. any evidence you get shown in a video game is just computer data in the video game and not real. However, there are some signs you can look at to start the thought process on this. You don't know how this is being simulated on computers in the real world, you don't know what the programming must look like, you don't know how the computer hardware works, you don't yet know for what purpose this simulation is being run, you don't know if your concept of anything is 100% true out in the real world.... but, you do know what a simulation is, and so you should be able to draw some parallels between what is happening in this "reality" and what you'd expect from a virtual reality.
Do you know anything about quantum physics? If not, you should go look it up, it's fascinating. The problem with quantum physics is that we know it works - every experiment is successful - but it doesn't seem to make any sense. The field of quantum physics started with the 'double-slit experiment' (start your research there; it's impossibly confusing and interesting for most physicists). I won't go over all the details of this experiment (you will find it very well explained all over the internet), but essentially what they found is this - matter doesn't seem to exist as matter until someone observes it. Electrons, photons, (and with later experiments we found this to be true with atoms and molecules) seem to exist as nothing but probability waves, almost like information, until we observe it and suddenly it is matter. It's called wave-particle duality, please look it up if you don't know about it.
>>15790469
(3.5/8)
If you've never heard of this, it will sound like I'm making it up. But, you've heard of Schrödinger's cat, right? If so, that was just an analogy for this concept. The state of matter literally cannot be known before it is observed, because it functions like it doesn't exist as anything more than information until it is observed.
Something like this happens every time you play a video game. If your PC had to load an entire game in order to play it, we'd have very small games. The trick to make the most of the hardware is to keep the whole game as data on your harddrive/disc/whatever, load the data that you have immediate access to, and only render what is being displayed on the screen. That boss, your character, the castle you're in... it only exists as you see it when you look at it. You turn around, it's no longer on the screen, and then it's just data. Turn back around, and there it is again, acting as though it had been there the whole time. Same thing in this universe.