HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
I FUCKING LOVE SHYAMALAN
So what's the tweest?
>>64418250
is it me or is that a really nice looking cover
Did you pull yourself off to Deanna Dunagan's lewd buttock display?
What does this mean?
>>64418119
only 90's kids will remember baneposting
Baneposting is for all ages though.
Pretty accurate. What's the [h3] thing though?
>And I am so going to kill BIll.
What did she mean by this?!?
she was going to kill bill who was a character in the movie
>>64418101
Nobody knows, it's one of the most incomprehensible lines in cinematic history
She's going to pay off her credit card debts.
What went right?
everything
>>64418089
Why didn't they have some kind of Fail Safe (1964)?
>>64418089
PRECIOUS BODILY FLUIDSno but really, it's great from start to finish
what the fuck man
What does the spider mean
>>64418066
Muh sexual repression
>>64418066
>he still thinks there are spiders
>>64417902
Kill, fuck, marry
Rey, Luke, Anakin
>>64417902
Fuck, marry, kill
Name a funnier man.
>>64417895
All of them. Tim Jewdicker is a meme.
Go to bed, Tim.
Chappelle is the only living person who comes close and he isn't doing shit nowadays
Anyone here still collect for VHS?
would love to see any recent finds/your collections ^_^
How do you deal with the quality?
I can't even watch DVD anymore.
Is this your local library? Mine still has a nice selection of VHS, as well as plenty of DVDs.
here, rate mine
DAE occasionally get these two confused?
>>64417781
All the time
All throughout Three Kings I thought I was watching Mark Wahlberg
>DAE
Add leo as well
How did this movie cost $410Milion?
How did Man of Steel cost $225Million?
Cause this movie needed to cram in 5 other people to compete with Marvel that's clearly blowing DC out of the water.
Ben came in and told them the script was shit and had them rewrite it. Kinda have hope for the movie because of him. This delayed the filming and delays cost a ton of money.
Have no clue. The effects look like shit
Which of these movies should I watch now?
Im leaning more towards a 2015 movie, but if there is anything else in there worth watching over one of the 2015 movies then by all means recommend it
>>64417584
Watch Blazing Saddles and wonder why we can't have movies like this anymore.
>>64417584
bumpo
Sicario
This movie was superior to A New Hope. Prove me wrong
In some ways it was better and in some ways it was worse.
Overall, I would say A New Hope is better as a standalone film. The pacing is smoother and less frantic, the plot stands on its own and doesn't rely at all on nostalgia, and it doesn't end on a cliffhanger. A New Hope is a classic while The Force Awakens is just good.
I really wouldn't recommend seeing The Force Awakens. I'd probably consider it worse than the prequel trilogy at this point.
The movie us too safe. The plot is almost exactly the same as A New Hope, but without any of the charm that the characters in ANH had.
Rey is a Mary Sue of the highest degree, and never has to face any problem she can't solve in a few minutes. Finn really serves no purpose. Kylo Ren is not a threatening villain, apart from the opening crawl. Where Vader was a mob boss, Kylo Ren us a school shooter that blares Evanescence and Linkin Park 24/7. It's pretty bad when the best character was a storm trooper with a stun baton.
Where humor was attempted, it takes you out of the movie, rather than flowing with it as in previous installments. It's the same humor as any other cookie-cutter movie made today, and those cookies are getting stale.
There's all sorts of references to the original trilogy that make the movie feel like its supposed to be a parody, not a sequel. These references, of course have nothing to do with lore or world-building. Instead, they reference parts of Star Wars you'd know from browsing your News Feed, so you don't have to see previous movies to get them.
On top of it all, the movie can't stand alone, and that's one of the biggest failures a movie can have. The references ensure that you must have some (though not extensive) knowledge of Star Wars prior, and the plot leaves you with questions that won't be answered until the next episode is out.
Oh, and the soundtrack was lackluster. I'd be more forgiving if it had a track on par with Duel of the Fates or Binary Sunset, but it doesn't.
It's a bad movie, but it's not even an enjoyable sort of bad like those SyFy original movies. It's just disappointing.
-takes no risks
-incredibly weak pretty boy villain. even acknowledges his inferiority to vader as the new big bad.
-whole thing is a marketing scheme. new R2D2=new plush dolls, etc. even star wars themed oranges. give me a break
-uninteresting heroes
-more than ever the force is used to explain away plot holes
-no ability to stand on its own. total nostalgia fest. huge chunks of run time are wasted to these moments (i.e. any scene with han solo)
-movie is too long without enough substance to justify its length
-overall lackluster and not daring
Who is the bigger hack?
Lucas at least finished his work
George
What does "hack" mean?
Just got finished watching this with the GF, and she wants to know if I liked it. Was it good?
>>64417276
this is a joke, right?
decide for yourself.
>2015+1
>not marathoning it
Her bull's opinion is more important than ours
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3382374/Star-Wars-Force-Awakens-passes-Titanic-box-office-686-4m-set-overtake-Avatar.html
James Cameron better get up to date on his shit to churn out Avatar sequels in two years to retake the top from Star Wars: Carbon Copy of Episode IV
>Jim, save us from awful sequel rehash with your soap opera epic meta-narrative George Lucas is sure to love after "white slavers" Freudian slip
Oh great, more Dances with Wolves in space.
Domestic means shit, retard.
Worldwide box office is the one that matters.
>>64417242
While worldwide is the coveted record, isn't domestic box office way more profitable?
