What will this even be about?
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/05/05/dear-white-people-tv-series-gets-green-light-netflix/
>muh POC
Muh black wall streetMuh Tulsa riotsWEWE
OPRESION!!!
>>69173465
Battle of the worst actresses edition
Who /House Targaryen/ here?
>yfw the entire ToJ fight is a minute long.
>http://www.comicbookmovie.com/captain_america/captain_america_civil_war/box-office-captain-america-civil-war-a141374
>CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR Falls Short Of BATMAN v SUPERMAN On Thursday Evening
>Civil War dropped harder than fucking BvS
JUST
>marveldrones and evans poster nowhere to be found
Wow. Doesn't it have a 95% fresh score?
How did batman v superman, the worst superhero movie in decades (according to critics) beat civil war?
But which movie had more hilarious one-liners?
Checkmate DC
>get hair of nemesis
>make polyjuice potion
>drink polyjuice potion
>wait for it to kick in
>stalk crush until you find her alone
>"Petrificus Totalus!"
>proceed as planned
Considering the school is full of outrageously hormonal teenagers, how often do you think stuff like this happens?
>>69174336
just as easy as it would be to go postal, just mumble some words and your wand turns into a railgun
but that's what huffelpuff is for, to put all the potential killers under one roof and keep a close eye on them
>>69174336
Would your cum not reverse from the persons you were polyjuiced as back to your own when the spell ended?
>>69174336
Doesnt petrificus totalus freeze the flesh, so you wouldnt be able to open up her puss or boothole, it would be like fucking a steel wall.
The Deadly Assassin edition.
Only companion-less outing for the Doctor in the classic series, first story set entirely on Gallifrey, return of the Master, first mention of Rassilon, story that triggered Mary Whitehouse more than any other... You mention it, this serial has it. But is it as good as they say? And above all, is there really any need to specify that an assassin is deadly?
ELDRAD MUST DIE: >>69147367
The Non-Lethal Assassin
>>69174279
Reminder that Cloister is Melanon, and probably cats too. He gets his schizophrenic kicks trolling /who/
>>69174413
Spoken like someone who has never read a Cloister post in their liofe.
Jon and Ygritte edition
Old
>>69170872
First for Jon
4th for MORDHAU
>>69173507
>>>/v/
Thank you
>Captain America: Civil War confirms our national dumb-down. While the mainstream media pretzel themselves over the presidential primaries, Marvel Studios has steadily accomplished a rejiggering of the American public’s cultural and political consciousness. Civil War completes this devolution in its story of superhero combat where one faction of pop icons, led by Captain America/Steve Rogers (Chris Evans), faces off against another faction, headed by billionaire genius Iron Man/Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.).
>As momentary adversaries, Captain America and Iron Man almost represent the schism that now divides American voters, politicians, and pundits. I say “almost,” because the film’s comic-book premise doesn’t inspire reflection upon the dire seriousness of our current ideological civil war.
>If anything proves the triviality of Hollywood’s comic-book franchises, it is this disregard of the class realities that truly separate Americans. Working-class poster boy Steve Rogers has no common cause with wealthy authoritarian Tony Stark; the superficial show of patriotism that binds them doesn’t erase the difference between the former’s grunt-worker sacrifice and the latter’s aristocratic expertise. It’s the ultimate sentimental cynicism when Captain America’s devotion to his dangerously conditioned childhood friend Bucky/Winter Soldier (Sebastian Stan) — who represents war’s emotional cost — is used to evoke ambivalence toward the military, while Stark’s authority celebrates the Military (and Hollywood) Industrial Complex.
>Is it overreaching — or being humorless — to recognize and critique a piece of entertainment that takes America’s schism lightly? Will fanboys — or for that matter film critics — ever understand that Marvel Studios has engineered a cultural coup that prevents viewers from thinking? How did we get here?
>Since comics and graphic novels became popular as counterculture, adolescents have been encouraged to reduce mainstream politics to their own sentimentality. Thus, Marvel’s various superheroes appeal to teenage rebellion: Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson), Falcon (Anthony Mackie), War Machine (Don Cheadle), Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner), Vision (Paul Bettany), Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen), and the others personify juvenile sensibility. They remain trivial, even as their divisions play out in serial chase scenes, explosions, and technological butt-kicking. Each one’s predicament represents a denial of the moral complexities that come with maturity. Fear of growing up is implicit in both the devious terrorist plots of supervillain Zemo (Daniel Brühl), who harbors childhood dreams of vengeance, and the supercilious wit of Tony Stark, the George Soros/Steve Jobs–type to whom the superfreaks all feel indebted. (As Stark, Downey achieves the same promiscuous waste of talent as hammy British actors of old.
>Despite the supergeeks’ arguing either against working for the restrictive capitalist government or for their own sense of doing right and correcting injustice, the fact is, nothing here has gravitas. Civil War is politics as adolescents misperceive social/global crisis. This has been going on for so long (ever since Hollywood realized the bounty to be had in cajoling comic-book culture’s ready audience; since, say, the 1978 Superman film, then 1989’s Batman) that, by now, the brainwashing is complete. The trivializing has grabbed such hold that when a genuine pop artist like Zack Snyder deepens comics lore into visionary, moral art (the profound Man of Steel and Batman v Superman), many fanboys, and critics, react with anger, resentment — and ignorance.
>To praise Civil War as entertainment is to accept its puerile conflicts. This is the moral reduction that has happened to American youth culture in the wake of the generational dissents of the Vietnam War. Movies as violent as the Marvel flicks are not pacifist but are proof of anti-military sentiment — such as became evident in the confused Ferguson protestations about “militarized police,” a foolish, redundant term exploited by manipulative media outlets and politicians. Civil War furbishes aggression simply to excite viewers who are as programmed as poor Bucky.
>In a similar sense, Civil War exploits recent political trends such as Black Lives Matter. Black actress Alfre Woodard (whose portrayal of a comically psychotic wench was the only convincing characterization in 12 Years a Slave) appears as a grieving mother who blames Stark — standing in for the Military Industrial Complex — for the death of her child, a promising youth with a 3.6 grade-point average. Woodard’s “Who’s going to avenge my son?” shamelessly taps the illusion of Michael Brown, Freddie Gray, and Tamir Rice as Boy Scouts and potential Rhodes scholars. That’s way out of bounds.
>This pandering passes for political relevance among non-thinking viewers. So does the film’s multiracial superhero team, especially new inductee Chadwick Boseman (superb as Jackie Robinson in 42 and James Brown in Get On Up) as the offensively named Black Panther, a pseudo-African potentate who possesses suspiciously feline/feminine powers of vengeance. Black comics fans are an immediate target of Marvel Studios’ exploitation. Note the scene where Black Widow, played by the white, ultra-sexy Johansson, is confronted by Black Panther’s aide, a Nubian queen with fore and aft protrusions and powerful swagger. She threatens Black Widow: “Move or you will be moved!”
>This patronization is consistent with Marvel Studios’ political infantilizing. The vigilante Avengers’ inability to avoid collateral casualties when fighting the bad guys raises the global body count. These blithe depictions of tragedies precipitate the film’s basic ideological quarrel, similar to that in the powerful Batman v Superman. Yet Civil War’s evaluation of this dilemma, of what’s at stake in American politics, is petulant and trite. Stark critiques the roguish Rogers: “Even when he’s wrong, he thinks he’s right. That makes him dangerous.” This tempts a Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren–style American self-reproach, just as Sanders is the model for an early scene of Stark at MIT funding every student’s research proposal. It’s alarming — if not offensive — to see an entertainment film feed this fatuousness to juvenile moviegoers so as to shore up their political fancies.
Guess the movie: post a snapshot taken at 01:00:00
any good or just babadook tier?
>>69171539
Witch is great. Best horror movie I've seen in a long time, but thats probably not saying much. No jump scares so if you're into that sort of stuff you won't like this.
Haven't seen Babadook, movies /tv/ loves are generally terrible so I don't rush out to see them.
It's good
>>69171539
The greatest, sexiest ass of all time. She has the best ass I've ever seen in my life.
This triggers the Baratheonfags
Old thread
>>69163678
>>69163678
>>69168196
>post yfw R+L=J turns out to be wrong
Euron is good.
Is it true then, are we going to see authentic frog nipples?
I don't want any damn vegetables
Good thread.
Anybody else sick of this shit yet?
things arent good anymore ever and i dont want to be here anymore because people make me not want to be around
I miss him.
>>69166490
>Enough to get folks tweeting excitedly
Is there anyone who likes this casting? Even kikebook normies hate it.
You now remember seeing this on the shelf at Blockbuster
>>69162018
Sheeit, my town didn't get a Blockbuster until '95. I saw it all the time at local mom and pop video stores though.
>>69162018
I honestly don't remember seeing that in a video store and I remember a good lot of them. Must be coincidence.
It's really fucking crazy. I had no idea what was going on up until the very end.
Some bitch had eyes for nipples
I got a Game of Thrones tattoo during season 3
I didn't think it would go so downhill...
I bet there are shitloads of people with GoT tattoos bro, don't let it get you down.
>>69161487
I watch nothing new, same shit over and over. And nothing good.
https://medium.com/electric-literature/can-anyone-stop-j-k-rowling-from-george-lucas-ing-harry-potter-ed5e82586db9#.ufnzj3ly5
so apparently people are getting tired of rowling pandering to her readers by revising shit like dumbledore being gay and hermione being black because "they're whatever the reader wants them to be!"
should this kind of stuff be more strongly implied in the books or the movies at the latest? is it wrong to keep some aspects of the story vague so the reader can make their own interpretations? is rowling a genuine writer or just a hack?
>>69160356
its hard to strongly imply hermione was white any more than what was already there. rowling is just a hack is all
>>69160356
what if for every pander she made to fans, she did something shitty to her characters, like
>dumbledore is gay
>dumbledore is also incredibly racist
>hermonie is now black
>hermonie is also pedophile
would that balance it out?
>>69160356
> is it wrong to keep some aspects of the story vague so the reader can make their own interpretations?
This is ok and sometimes absolutely necessary for the material to have "replay value".
I think it is cool if it is hinted at in the books that Dumbledore is gay, but the fact that Rowling acknowledges it makes it stupid.
Also Hermonie being black is stupid.
![1_oSDVZeA3n9vDB6cY0DUXzw[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/md3c6GJ.jpg "1 oSDVZeA3n9vDB6cY0DUXzw[1]")