Why can't we post WebMs encoded in VP9?
The mods hate freedom.
The mods hate fags.
It's a meme gun
Hiya, check it out.
>>>/v/324966460
Second fucking thread, user warned for continuing videogame discussion. Just to continue discussion from previous thread. Not a "general", not anything of the sort. Just a second fucking thread linkin the previous one because of videogame discussion. NO GO BACK TO /vg/ YOU CANT DISCUSS GAMES ON /v/.
Meanwhile fucking neptunia threads where there is no discussion and just waifu posts are fine, template ruggarel threads are fine, offtopic threads are 100% A-OK, Anita/feminism threads are a fucking established presence. BUT NOT FUCKING VIDEOGAMES NO. Your fucking mods are user-hating jackoffs who've never played a game in their life.
>>419093
Cry about it.
They should do this kind of thing more often. The mods aren't strict enough with /v/.
and now the attention-whoring fuckwad closed the thread after everyone complained that he was an idiot
but no, that neptunia thread still going strong
Daily reminder that /qa/ should be removed. Here's a few reasons why:
1. Nobody knows about this board
2. It encourages crossboard cancer
3. People give their opinions on boards they normally wouldn't visit
4. Hiro seems to think that this board is somehow the voice of all of 4chan
Site discussion is good, but not in this format. Instead, every board (maybe except for /b/) should have their own discussion page of sorts;picrelated.
If you would want to suggest a new board or global feature you'd do it in /feedback as usual.
>>419039
Discussion page could even be in text format
>1. Nobody knows about this board
too many people know about it, tbqh
>2. It encourages crossboard cancer
so do /v/, /pol/, [s4s], /b/, /tv/
>3. People give their opinions on boards they normally wouldn't visit
so? there's nothing stopping them from visiting the discussion board of a board they don't visit and giving their opinion.
>4. Hiro seems to think that this board is somehow the voice of all of 4chan
i really don't think he takes every suggestion as "the voice of all of 4chan"
>>419067
>too many people know about it, tbqh
Le sekrit club amirite
>so do /v/, /pol/, [s4s], /b/, /tv/
Still doesn't make it not cancerous
>there's nothing stopping them from visiting the discussion board of a board they don't visit and giving their opinion
But fewer people would do that
>i really don't think he takes every suggestion as "the voice of all of 4chan"
Obviously not every suggestion, but he has made many decisions based on the opinions on this board. Splitting /d/, /lit/ and renaming /asp/ etc, without even making a thread on the respective boards beforehand.
You never gave me a reason why having a discussion page on every board wouldn't be a better idea than having /qa/
Location: South Korea
4chan has been quite slow for me in the last couple of months, and I'm wondering if it's a location issue or are people from other countries experiencing the same problems.
For example, if I go to load page 0 right now it will take about 5-6 seconds. Large threads with a lot of images are even slower.
>>419026
Your government is monitoring your access of dangerous terrorist and pro-North Korean websites.
You're fucked.
Why do jannies of /int/ delete on topic threads promoting international discussion?
Because you post shitty anime pictures on a board not about anime.
>>419018
>projecting
There should be a /deviant/ board for all the weird fetishes that don't belong on other boards.
Same, it should be called /d/.
>>418996
Yes, because /d/ is full of cuck and real life traps threads. Life must be difficult being on the high end of the retardation scale.
>>419009
Yes, because /qa/ is where mods actually listen to your whining. Life must be difficult being on the high end of the retardation scale.
Can somebody here teach me how to play risk here in 4chan?
LOL
XD
>>418928
Did you know whenever someone posts something I don't like it means they are from Reddit?
Guess where you need to go back to
>>418928
90% of the "go back to reddit" is posted by redditors to desensitize everyone to the point where I'm supposed to think it's "mature" to accept them.
Textbook reverse psychology. But I won't be fooled that easy reddit. You hear me? I'm wise to your game.
/pol/ is leaking again
>>>/g/52568084
This was reported hours ago. Now it's up to 200 replies and they're trying to dox individuals and organize another raid against their SJW boogeyman.
Can someone please keep this shit off /g/? Just because these dipshits post with some vague pretense related to technology doesn't mean it's technology.
>>418877
>i don't know how to hide threads i don't like: the thread
>>418877
I feel so bad for you OP i truly do.
>>418877
>/g/
>reported
Haha, you're cute.
Let's face it, /g/ is lost, not even mods care about keeping it decent.
remove /his/. it's /pol/-lite with no traffic. anything that can be discussed on /his/ can be discussed on /pol/ with more than a couple posts every hour
also, give /pol/ a 500 post bump limit. it's one of the top 3 or 4 highest traffic boards.
/his/ is one of those things that looks good on paper but in actuality there's no real need for it.
>>418721
Shut up.
>>418722
dubs confirm
>>418722
Kill yourself.
What would happen to /pol/ if Trump wins?
What about if he loses?
I don't know, I'm not big into science fiction
Trump losing is impossible the meme magic is too strong don't forget most beanie voters are too young to vote lol
>>418640
Seven samurai. Noice.
I don't think it will change much either way.
I was apparently on /tv/ for like 20 minutes just now before realizing it wasn't /co/. This has gotten more than a little out of hand.
Why are there no rules about keeping live action shows off the board about cartoons when we already have an entire board specifically for them? How could this possibly be a controversial decision?
>>418629
There are rules and they were decided years ago by his holy mootness himself. Content matters, not medium.
It's not /co/'s fault /tv/ is so awful they have nothing to do but talk about other boards' topics.
>>418679
>There are rules
It's not really a rule in the same way /a/ has a rule explicitly allowing live-action threads.
>they were decided years ago
There weren't as many cape tv shows and movies years ago and the threads about them on /co/ weren't entirely off-topic
>>418629
>comics and cartoons
>comics
The source material is comics, that's what matters here. Not like /co/ ever has more than 5 worthwhile threads on the board at any time anyway
How much traffic would 4chan lose if there were no porn boards?
a bit.
If it wasn't for /s/, I wouldn't have been here.
50%
>keep up porn threads, consolewars, ecelebs, and half A press threads
>delete a /v/GA like its CP
What is the point?
Video games are for children.
>>418090
I agree for the most part, but that doesn't change the fact that moderation on /v/ is strange.
>mods keeping up 0.5x A press threads
dont jinx it, they were deleting them for days and they only now seemed to have stopped. Let us have our fun.
So why is there no /fur/ board?
Everybody said that if furries were allowed to post that it would kill the site, but they could post on /b/ and they never hurt anyone.
Then they said that if they were allowed to post off of /b/ that it would kill the site, but then /trash/ was made, and we're still here.
I'm starting to think that this whole "no furries" rule is pretty pointless.
>>417485
>I'm starting to think
Fully disagree.
Simply because of the absolute shitstorm it would create with non-furries. /trash/ was a way to subtly add a furry board without the biggest shitposters actually noticing that a furry board was added.
We have a furry board... It's called /mlp/. And you can post porn for that on /aco/ as far as I know.
