Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 144. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
does it fuck shit up? is the shit even devastating?
>>30485554
if the enemy has Anti air weapons, the AC130 isn't very effective.
if U don't have AA, ur gonna get fucked up
>>30485554
Been there, done that. Saw an AC130 wipe out an enemy position in short order. It was too fucking cool to even describe.
its a glass cannon basically.
its hard to imagine a plane being able to deliver more devastation over a longer time-frame.
Its also hard to imagine a more vulnerable plane.
What's a good price on one of these I'm in az on vacation but lube in nm my gf had been eyeing then for a while and cabeles had one for 250
>>30485434
>but lube in nm my gf
wat
>>30485547
I know right? Raw is best.
"...I'm in Arizona on vacation, but live in New Mexico..."
I just wanted to let
You know that THIS
IS
THE
GREATEST handgun ever made. The Colt Single Action Army. Six bullets... More than enough to kill anything that moves.
>>30485287
You're pretty good
I love the feeling of slamming a long silver bullet into a well greased chamber
Is that the old guy from Abe's Oddysey?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oa9CtYH5I5o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hb4wyWpjMss
Uh.
This guy's got some fucking cahones.
That's a nice little instructional video for Afghans or other third worlders I suppose. Kinda funny knowing this was filmed in 2010 Bagram; that dude was probably 50 feet from Green Bean Coffee.
It's faster and safer to just thermite or counter charge those things though. The intelligence value for collecting them is pretty nil, so there's no real gain in going about disarming them.
>>30485376
Yeah. He seemed to imply that him disarming it by hand wasn't just him, and that it was a semi-regular thing, which confused me.
Just give these guys XM25s and explosive rounds.
They can standoff and pop UXO. Instead of trying to dick around.
My dad told me these are terrible - is he right?
>>30485268
Does he have one he doesnt like? Ill take it.
To the /k/ user around the world can we see some foreign Arsenals, fellow Americans do not post.
>inb4 Interpol
>>30485218
Nowhere but America has guns silly
Sure, but you could've just started an arsenal thread and asked to include our nationalities? Not sure what you gain from a separate thread.
Anyway, belgian here.
>>30486182
Belgians can't own guns. The EU took them all away.
But seriously, How is that CZ? I've been wanting to buy one for a little
O/k/, so I've got the itch for a new pistol but seen plenty of threads bitching about CZ pistols and would prefer not to get honey dicked. Not sure if it's the actual pistols or the users/fans that are the issue. Are the 75/SP01's to be trusted or avoided? Before polysperg I'm looking for DAT STEEL frame only. Give it to me raw
>>30485082
they work but or more maintenance intensive than modern guns. cz cant make a fucking spring that lasts. if everything's maintained its a nice gun thats comparatively heavy since its steel with a hard to rack slide. its hard to rack since its smaller but its easy to compensate. ergonomics are godlike enough for people to ignore the flaws.
stock triggers are mediocre to pretty decent the more you shoot the smoother it gets. aftermarket triggers are godlike.
for practical use buy a glock for range use cz...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>30485172
Wanted a CZ for a bit started looking at CGW upgrade packages which has only made it worse. Would run it through it's paces, once at 2k rounds send it off for either pro or defensive offerings.
Previously had a Jericho and regretted trading it off. The CZ tool marks wouldn't bother me long as it functions, springs are replaceable and maintenance is a enjoyable hobby when it comes to pistols. Thanks for the feedback
>>30485339
oh if you do plan on doing a lot of self maintenance buy the safety model. the decocker is a royal pain in the ass to reassemble. the omegas let you swap between having safety or decocker installed but the aftermarket isnt there yet. you wont find omega custom triggers etc.
Eyyyy, newfag to the world of firearms here. What would /k/ recommend as a nice first handgun?
-$500 or less (but preferably not hi-shits)
-Chambered in .45 ACP or lower
-not an m67 hand grenade
pic unrelated
RIA has affordable 1911s. Glock has some .45 pistols. Those are the common ones I can think of.
I wanna fuck that pumpkin.
>>30485018
Is there a reason you want .45acp? Your selection goes down quite a bit with that ammo. Either way get a Glock trade in or RIA 1911.
What should I do, /k/?
>>30484902
>Not living near a reservation to buy fireworks at
Why even celebrate the 4th
>>30484902
Burn it all
>>30484902
>TNT
Go to an actual fireworks store.
Are these guns any good?
>>30484893
Jamomatics with shitty magazine-mounted sights.
>>30484893
yes
![640hvar_zps4dcb6a4b[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/SCJ9XDx.jpg "640hvar_zps4dcb6a4b[1].jpg")
Were the rockets of the time not able to fly straight enough to be used against ships?
You watch ww2 footage of airplanes attacking ships. It is torpedo planes and dive bombers.
I think, why didn't they put a torpedo sized rocket on the planes and shoot the rockets from up high to hit thinner top armor?
>Were the rockets of the time not able to fly straight enough to be used against ships?
They were used against ships and U-boats all the time.
Why didn't you look it up before making stupid assumptions?
If you're going to put a torpedo sized rocket on a plane to attack ships, you may as well just use a torpedo
>>30484696
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiny_Tim_(rocket)
https://youtu.be/GV7MQ1DIqy4
So the Remington R51 is officially back.
>failures to eject, failures to extract, failures to feed, double feeds, bulged cases, beats the shit out of the shooters hand
>"At least the sights aren't falling off this time!" ...they're still just as loose and poorly fitted, Remington just put a set screw in them to keep them on instead of manufacturing them better
Is anyone really surprised? At least it isn't firing out of battery and spitting...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>30484652
I'll stick to my original Remington 51
>>30484652
shitty guns, fat hands.
I don't own, or want either.
>>30484652
>unsupported chamber
>that brass
Absolutely fucking disgusting. No fucking reason for them to have not figured out how to at least do that part of the gun correctly.
Thinking about purchasing my first firearm.
What do you think about this thing?
What was your first firearm?
Think I can do any better in California?
Am super broke - Not trying to spend more than $600
>>30484631
hijacking thread, what gun could i buy for 100? would prefer handgun or shotgun to a rifle.
>>30484654
Fuck you, thread terrorist.
>>30484631
don't know what you can find in california, but get a Ruger 10/22 instead if you can. I got hands on that Mossberg and it's the most disgusting thing I've ever touched. and that includes Jennings and Hi Points
What's the best multi tool for /k/ related stuff?
Are there any multi tools made specifically for the range?
>>30484604
leatherman mutt if you have an AR
that's pretty much it
oh and there's a special multi tool for sage stocks
>>30484604
If you want a big one. Leatherman supertool is fucking amazing. It has everything and I haven't broken a thing on mine.
>>30484604
You posted pic related. I love my Wave, never had an issue and nothing has broken on it. Got it in 2012 I think.
What does /k/ think of pic related? are they could guns? Can you use modern 7.62 nato with killing them slowly?
>>30484445
come back when you know how to use google, kid.
>>30484474
Google results on this are conflicted as fuck.
>>30484445
Not a real Garand
