How autistic are you exactly? edition
Get regional flags here:
https://github.com/flaghunters/Extra-Flags-for-4chan
>>57618662
>not having svalbard
how new are you?
>>57618662
Not very, though I've only been going a week and two rules I've set myself is that I'm not allowed to have flags pointed to in here and I cant do "ctr+f RARE" in a thread.
Makes it more fun
>>57618736
Very new senpai, only been collecting 11 days :^)
Just wanted to continue the thread pls no hate
>>57618662
6.5 - 7/10
> How autistic are you exactly?
>>57618861
Doing pretty well m8, I like your color scheme
Still no fucking Yemen and what regional map should i make next?
>>57618861
6/10, good colors.
Sup lads
Feel like starting a new collection where I only save flags that give me (You)s
Not now though
>>57618861
>russia
>europe
>>57619039
meant >>57618970
>>57618970
You have the template for that?
can someone post the template?
>>57619039
>Greenland
>Europe
And
Russia is Europe and Asia
>>57618970
7/10
>>57619018
+ one (You) this post
I'm actually planning to start a collection with flags only collected from /flag/tism threads.
>>57619039
7/10
>>57619208
and 77% is asia
>>57619208
To be fair, Russia is like 95% Asia by landmass even though most civilization is Europe. And since this is map, Asia is best way to go for Russia. Definitely right on Greenland tho
>>57619018
(You) for NC and USA :^)
>>57619304
>>57619266
Welp. Guess I'm wrong by 18%.
>>57619266
And Greenland Is 100% NA
>>57619375
yeah, as you can see i can read.
>>57619518
Congrats i am proud :)
>>57619561
Can you share the template for the multi colored one?
>>57619561
seems to be easy making you proud.
>>57619638
Only for you
>>57619680
are you gay?
>>57619635
Just use different collors for each continent
>>57619725
Nope
>>57619779
why being in the closet? >>57619680
>>57619829
It is only easy for you to make me proud
>>57619875
since you don't know me, the attraction can only be explained with some homosexual fantasy.
>>57619680
Was having him make you proud part of your plan?
>>57619944
I am sorry to break your hart but no
>>57619983
Maybe, maybe not
rip this thread
frogposters have arrived
>>57620494
Easter?
>>57620022
it's not like i judge gays, you are free to come out of the closet.
>>57619266
Why does that map not have isle of man?
I've been to the countries in green. Very sad I do not have vintage libyan flag. Can some one please share theirs?
so.. the newf(l)ag from the last thread is reporting in..
where do i get the more flags thing? with the regional flags
and can someone post the blank world map?
>>57623867
see >>57618708
>>57623710
because someone deleted it.
>>57623808
You forgot to add the uae flag to the map, you only coloured it in.
Bumping with ma collection.
God dammit, Is there someone who has minor outlaying Islands. I have old Libya but no Minor outlaying isles
>>57624125
forgot to add Oman to blue... well doesn't matter.
>>57623867
so i installed the more flags thing, take my berlin flag if you want
>>57624534
why is it empty? how do i change it?
>>57624596
delete .png when it asks for region
>>57624716
it doesnt asks for region anymore
>>57623867
this is the blank template i use
Uzbekistan
>>57623911
This is mine.
>>57625640
Template?
>>57625829
Two posts above me
>>57624887
Click "Set up extra flags" and type in Berlin if that's your region.
>>57623961
god bless
Is that guy offering to make flags still around? I forgot last time, but I'm needing Rhodesia, Carthage, Cherokee, and that rainbow Chilean natives one. It would be greatly appreciated.
>>57618662
R8
what are these
>Fucking Yemen
>Fucking Tajikistan, Turkmenistan
>Fucking Haiti
>FUCKING NICARAGUA
>>57629060
i know that feel
>>57628607
left is the logo of the company that made the flags, right is catalonia
>>57629613
How do you see the company that made the flags?
>>57630622
a quick google brings up "famfamfam" as the company name
R8
>>57630962
No - I mean, there's a flag for the company that makes the flags, meaning that it would have had to have shown up on this website at some point, or the person wouldn't have it on their map.
>>57631071
pls fill in with color
Friendly reminder to always check french, norwegian and dutch posts for stealth flags like Réunion.
pls identify these, just added it to my map
I found a typo in one of british regionals;
midlothian is spelled "midothian" there.
>>57632397
aq old antarctica flag
ly old lybia flag
an netherlands antilles
cs serbia and montenegro
>>57632600
so all unobtainable except for Antarctica?
i should just use the code to get them?
Free bump.
>>57631883
>>57615048
Papua New guinea
>>57623911
Uzbekistan
>>57628585
Mongolia
>>57630232
Kyrgyzstan
only need Delaware for US and New Brunswick and Newfoundland for Canada
>>57633142
everyone here uses flag hunter
>>57633324
a what? link?
>>57633368
https://whatisthisimnotgoodwithcomputers.com/#/flaghunter
>>57632724
they're all unobtainable. you can get an and cs with the code if you'd like to and mark it as unobtainable just like most do with western sahara but ly and aq have been replaced with new flags so you can't manually download them
>>57634108
YES
Autistic enough to add states to my world map...
>>57634301
you gotta step up that state collection pham. browse trump generals on /pol/, or just pol in general
you fuckers ready for me to ruin this rare flag
[spoiler]ayy lmao[/spoiler]
>>57634301
here
take virginia
>>57638054
oh wait
so it doesn't work like that
oh well you need penn
>>57638054
Nice try lad
>>57637750
What did this Anon mean by this?
>>57638361
Thanks for Outerspace PK, would you mind switching to Ceres or Pluto so I can get those?
>>57638438
But it would be cheating to post from a location I'm not actually at :^)
>>57605905
Would like to invite you and others to join this discussion:
https://github.com/flaghunters/Extra-Flags-for-4chan/issues/153
>>57638721
So you're actually in outerspace right now?
>>57638721
They aren't current administrative divisions so yeah, fuck em.
>>57638824
Not physically, but spirtually.
>>57639008
Don't have to be administrative per se.
Are they recognised regions currently? Or mostly historic?
>>57639207
Well if you say so, but maybe you should lay off the shrooms a little.
>>57639207
As far as I can tell they are historic regions but they are starting to be used again but not officially recognised, you decide if they are worthy of being added
>>57639328
Sorry senpai but it wouldn't be fun to just iterate through all of them. That would derarify them all.
>>57639378
Pls help.
>>57639378
Just use random.org and just do even= yes, uneven= no
>>57639487
Makes sense. Btw how complete is your map?
Test.
>>57639741
While it says Outerspace, it just appears blank. To actually get the flag, your IP has to come up as unknown, right now it's looking for a flag for Outerspace, Brazil, which doesn't exist.
>>57639646
Can't do that, the lad deserves a fair answer at least.
>>57639657
Need about 10 more flags to complete.
>>57640109
Very nice.
>>57618662
I did this
>>57640250
>>57629060
>>/sp/66701585
>>57632128
what is this one? um.gif
>>57640484
US Minor Outlying Islands
You will NEVER EVER see it legit, which I must point out is different from it being impossible.
>>57640558
According to FlagRatio there's been 17 posts from there, they could have just been proxies, or they could have been from bored U.S. military personnel.
>sit colored india
just rude
can someone explain what attendance means?
>>57629060
>>>/sp/66701585
How the fuck do you not have nicaragua
>>57640424
>>/sp/666701585
>>57641789
>>>/sp/666701585
>>57618970
>cutting off North and South America at Guatemala
This triggers the central american.
>>57642310
I am so evil :D
>>57642966
He's right though, all of central America, from Mexico to Panama, as well as all of the Caribbean are part of North America.
>>57643140
Guess you are right
south carolina pls post
>>57642310
>>57643140
>cutting off central america before it reaches California
This triggers the Californio
Any regional maps i should make?
http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/flags/
download the flags
>>57643633
Is Ecuador already done?
>>57643943
Nope but ill get on it now
>>57644035
you're great m8
>>57643633
Can you dump your grey-white regional maps?
UK and Brazil, specifically.
I've been editing some into the same style in the meantime. Gotta have everything aesthetic for maximautismal bonus.
>>57644458
fug, just realized I didn't connect Schiermonnikoog to the mainland
>>57643633
I'd really like a gray and white Sweden, even though I don't have many Swedish flags to put on it.
>>57644615
>>57644458
Needs updating tbqh
>>57644458
>>57645153
>>57645240
Thanks a bunch.
I can't really make sense of the UK's administrative divisions, honestly. Like on my map, England is broken into ceremonial counties, so second-order divisions – which is the same as yours, but there are still some differences. Scotland however is divided into council areas (second-order) on mine, and... something else on yours. Wales on mine is split into unitary authorities (second-order) but on yours they're more general.
On both of ours, Northern Ireland is divided into 6 counties – when in reality, it should be 11 districts, and the counties have not been used as official administrative divisions since the early '70s.
>>57646417
FUCKING UNITED KINGDOM REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>57646417
Britain is a very old country. You're talking about a thousand years of relevant history. Countless micro-movements of borders due to local issues and the like. Many years ago, physical terrain also dictated territorial boundaries, i.e. rivers and hills were not easy to get over and so they often form the boundaries. Add that to multiple different groups invading and settling, and a large number of political acts unifying different territories and countries in different time periods, you have a very detailed and confusing system of boundaries.
The USA is the opposite. Large areas of land quickly demarked by a 9(relatively) small number of people results in large, easily defined jurisdictions.
>>57631862
Guy who made the template here
The words are coloured red, which means it's unobtainable. Similar to Western Sahara, in that you have to download it from the URL.
>>57632724
All are unobtainable. Check aq.gif- it's a blank white.
>>57643687
Every single thread there's a sperglord who says some version of this
>>57645240
Where's Amapá and Roraima?
>>57633863
what was it replaced with?
>>57648303
Bloody hell mate
https://s.4cdn.org/image/country/aq.gif
>>57648288
Gotta say its quiet shit i am probably gonna make a better version
>>57640109
If anybody has the old Antarctica flag, would they mind posting it?
>>57649260
I don't have confirmation that there was an old flag in the first place. If there wasn't, I'll have to take the box off the template.
But I've been told this is the one, hence why I put the box there.
>>57649337
I see, thanks mate. If so I wonder why they changed it? That one looks better than the new blank white box.
>>57647903
That's not what I'm talking about, I more-or-less understand the history of the divisions and the countries – see my comment on Northern Ireland's counties.
What I don't understand is why maps of the UK are so inconsistent with displaying these divisions. At any given point, there should be only one set of second-order divisions – the same way that there's only one set of countries, first-order divisions, within the UK, regardless of their individual histories. But for some reason, every map seems to have a mix of first-, second-, and even third-order divisions, sometimes along with a few historical divisions thrown in for good measure.
Could you explain why most modern maps seem to divide Northern Ireland into counties, rather than the districts which have been officially used by its government for almost half a century? Are all these maps made by Republicans, or am I just poorly informed?
For example, my map includes Rutland, the previous map does not. Rutland has been a unitary authority since 1994. It also includes Mid Glamorgan, Lothian, &c. which were established in 1972-3 and devolved in 1994-6. 1972 was when the districts of Northern Ireland were established, and the map shows counties – so is the previously posted map outdated by half a century? But there was no point in which the changes wrought by the Local Government Acts of both Scotland and Wales were in effect, but those of earlier Northern Ireland were not.
The only conclusion I can draw from this is that not only is the previous map nearly 50 years (and many Acts) old, but also an incorrect version – that has somehow survived in such a capacity that it is even used as a template in autism threads on /int/. Even so, that doesn't explain why other maps with current divisions, like the one I posted, still depict the old Irish counties.
So no, it's not that Americans are incapable of understanding how borders work, but thanks for trying.
>>57643943
>>57648288
>>57650549
Forgot an island
>>57650660
Fernando de Noronha is part of Pernambuco. You can just have it off the coast in its usual position, linked to the rest of Pernambuco with a line. Or ignore it entirely. It's not as if it's a special municipality or something.
>>57650765
It has got it own flag, thats why i thought i should of added it in that way
>>57651086
Brazilian cities have their own flags too, and FdN is basically equivalent to a city.
Some thread with a kenya flag just 404d
>>57653648
Hawaii
>>>/pol/70487639
Namibia
low energy flag thread
>>57657597
Such is every flag thread
Everyone post their rarest to spice the thread up.
Remember. Don't save these ones.
Only illegitimate fags collect illegitimate flags.
>>57657979
Statistically this is the rarest I have.
>>57657979
Based on total number of posts this is mine.
>>57657979
>>57644559
You don't have to, each island has a seperate flag now
>>57659082
It's a region map, so each region should be able to be painted in one click, regardless of what flags there are. That's how it's always been.
>>57659141
You're right, I'm not fully awake yet
>>>/pol/70502429
new caledonia
My roommate has seen me collecting flags, he doesn't seem to fully understand what am I doing, but since he just thinks I'm playing with flags or shit, he's now seen my true autism I always managed to hide. Fugg
>>57662022
>not living alone
>>57662022
Nothing wrong with that?
is this rare?
>>>/pol/70506498
>>57662218
Moderately uncommon I'd say.
>>57662218
yeah, 6% attendance
>>57662246
>6% attendance
>rare
Amateur tBh
>collecting flags also from sp and pol
you are not autistic enough desu, my flags were from int only.
>>57662276
>6%
>not rare
delusional tBh
>>57662316
Generally I cannot consider anything with an attendance above 5% rare.
I see Mauritius a lot, which might contribute to why I don't say it's very uncommon.
>>57662361
6% really isn't the definition of a lot.
>>57662421
>I see Mauritius a lot
Was I making reference to the 6%?
>>57662492
since it's the same topic, you automatically do.
>>57662564
Elaborate. I was making a subjective statement, which was meant to be separate from the statistic.
>>57662585
you can't see something a lot, when it's fact, it isn't showing up a lot.
>this guys weight is 50% above the average
>personally i think it's under the average
that's not how it works.
>>57662668
It's more complex than you think. The attendance is based on /int/, /pol/, and /sp/.
Do you see Trinidad and Tobago a lot? Or Suriname?
Think about it.
>>57662700
Not only that, attendance is based on ALL active posts.
I only browse posts in the catalog that catch my eye. So you have to take distribution into account.
Mass is a completely different issue, as it is based on a fixed measurement of one physical property that can only be looked at from one perspective.
started yesterday, all is well
also fuck the libyans for having a revolution
refer to this chart to measure the rarity of your flag
>>57662841
That's a heavily inaccurate chart. There are obtainable flags beneath Western Sahara.
Refer to the 'attendance' column of whatisthisimnotgoodwithcomputers.com/#/flaghunter for a more objective viewpoint.
>>57662700
i don't visit /pol/ at all, and barely /sp/.
and yes, trinidad isn't hard to see at all.
>>57662762
>Not only that, attendance is based on ALL active posts.
yeah, that was obvious, and it doesn't support thinking 6% is a lot at all.
>>57662841
no
>>57662881
>trinidad isn't hard to see at all.
Then that's what I will say with Mauritius, and other flags such as Uzbekistan. I've seen them plenty from what I remember, and that makes up the subjective portion of what I consider rare.
>it doesn't support thinking 6% is a lot at all.
What one person considers "a lot" is purely arbitrary. You can't impose upper and lower limits on every such term.
I've always had my own opinions on what percentage should constitute rarity, and throughout the six or seven months I've been collecting it's narrowed down a lot. Now I barely consider anything rare, especially since I've seen many uncommon flags here posting on KC and Yli.
>>57662958
Besides that- >it doesn't support thinking 6% is a lot at all
I did not say 6% is a lot. 6% would be moderately infrequent in regular cases, but that's why I said you have to take distribution into account. Not only that, there's browsing time, and the times at which a certain flag is most active.
>>57662958
>Then that's what I will say with Mauritius, and other flags such as Uzbekistan. I've seen them plenty from what I remember, and that makes up the subjective portion of what I consider rare.
you are comparing 90% with 6%.
>What one person considers "a lot" is purely arbitrary
not it's not. there limits. you can't say rare when speaking about 90% and neither a lot when speaking about 6%.
try telling a judge, you will pay your money fine at once, but then do it in 3 month or whenever.
>I did not say 6% is a lot.
>>57662668
>>57663156
>you are comparing 90% with 6%
I will very confidently say that I see Uzbekistan more than I see Trinidad and Tobago. I do not remember seeing that red-black-red flag at all for the past one or two months, while I have seen Uzbekistan maybe once every week.
You can throw your numerals at me, but does that change my memory?
>not it's not. there limits. you can't say rare when speaking about 90% and neither a lot when speaking about 6%.
I've seen idiots crying "rare" at Moldova and the USVI.
In the meantime, I do not see New Caledonia, for example, as rare.
Do you really not understand subjectivity, or are you just not using your head?
>try telling a judge, you will pay your money fine at once, but then do it in 3 month or whenever.
I don't understand what you're saying here.
>>I did not say 6% is a lot.
>>>57662668
Re-read what I've written in this post and in previous posts.
>>57663156
>>>57662668 (You)
meant >>57662564
>>57663156
>>57663235
How autistic are you exactly, anons?
>>57662841
>no Slovenia
>>57663237
Tell me how I "automatically do". Are you seriously incapable of compartmentalising your thought?
Also, see >>57663235 if that got bumped too high.
>>57663250
Very.
>>57663281
Is being autistic in Singapore hard? It seems like a very high paced, immersive, and social environment
>>57663337
It depends on your definition. I'm seen as the one wanker who's obsessed with international trivia but do I face any problems? No.
Which is why I consider it odd when someone says he's considered weird when he's tidying up his flag collection. There's a culture of academic elitism here and it's not seen as weird or bad at all.
>>57663374
>I'm seen as the one wanker who's obsessed with international trivia
Are you me?
>>57663446
>Are you me?
Tbhfam I never know what to reply when someone says that.
>>57663500
O-oh
>>57663235
>more
more is relative. it can be possible to see tuvalu more than usa. but you don't see tuvalu a lot.
>Do you really not understand subjectivity, or are you just not using your head?
subjectivity doesn't matter, when talking about a topic, that can be answer with facts.
>I don't understand what you're saying here.
that terms aren't purely abritrary at all.
>Tell me how I "automatically do".
if you don't want to ignore previous statements, then there is no other option than replying to the same topic.
>>57663590
>more is relative
>it can be possible to see tuvalu more than usa
EXACTLY what I'm trying to say. Thanks for confirming you understand but are just arguing for the sake of it.
>subjectivity doesn't matter, when talking about a topic, that can be answer with facts.
That depends on what topic it is. See my screencap as an example - what if your topic is something like abstract art? Or how good a food tastes?
>that terms aren't purely abritrary at all.
The limits are.
>if you don't want to ignore previous statements, then there is no other option than replying to the same topic.
I was making two statements about the same topic, but unrelated to each other.
>>57618662
I got a long way to go
>>57663657
>EXACTLY what I'm trying to say.
thanks for confirming you don't read the full post.
>what if
it isn't.
>The limits are.
you are completely, totally and without a doubt right. there is absoutely no error in your thought and it's not possible to contradict it at all.
and i'm not even being sarcastic.
>unrelated to each other.
>topic1: is it rare?
>topic2: is it rare?
>>57663867
>thanks for confirming you don't read the full post.
I did and I find nothing wrong in what I'm saying. You don't see Tuvalu a lot, but if you only browse threads in which Tuvalu posts, and not the USA, you'd say Tuvalu is more common without the statistics to back you up.
>it isn't.
What I'm saying is that it's a spectrum. Not everything is fully subjective, nor fully objective. When it comes to saying something is rare, the word "rare" has no well-defined and agreed-to upper limit. A beginner might consider it to be 50%. A complete grasshopper might say it's 85%. And that's only the objective part of the mental equation.
>you are completely, totally and without a doubt right. there is absoutely no error in your thought and it's not possible to contradict it at all.
>
>and i'm not even being sarcastic.
I'll take that last statement with a pinch of salt- but if you say so.
But if you really are sarcastic- and very much so- please find me an internationally drafted paper that states what the fixed limits, in percentages or figures, of the phrase "a lot" are.
>>unrelated to each other.
>>topic1: is it rare?
>>topic2: is it rare?
I was referring to the statements I was making. They pointed to the SAME topic, as I stated, but they were meant to be unrelated - one about the objective part of the "rarity" issue, and one about its subjective part.
>>57663998
>without the statistics to back you up.
that's right, without being able to back it up.
>A beginner might consider it to be 50%. A complete grasshopper might say it's 85%.
he might say it, and he would be wrong.
>try telling a judge, you will pay your money fine at once, but then do it in 3 month or whenever.
you can replace anyone and anything with judge and money fine.
>But if you really are sarcastic
no i wasn't. i just applied your thinking that no words has limits, which is like you see a doubtful mentality.
>one about the objective part
>>Generally I cannot consider
>>I see Mauritius a lot, which might contribute to why I don't say it's very uncommon.
there is no objective part.
>>57664534
>that's right, without being able to back it up.
But there's no need to. The statistics, in my opinion, only constitute half of how someone would determine whether a flag is rare.
>he might say it, and he would be wrong.
And you would be right?
Who determines who's right? Are you the supreme being of knowledge in this field?
>you can replace anyone and anything with judge and money fine.
I doubt the problem here is the concept, it's your English, which was what I was saying way back when I said I don't understand what you mean.
>i just applied your thinking that no words has limits, which is like you see a doubtful mentality.
Alright then. What I was saying is that you can't say what you think is "a lot" without people saying that's wrong. Different people have different definitions.
>there is no objective part.
Because I wasn't referring to it? The problem with the objective part here is that determining when the statistic is low enough to render a flag "uncommon" or "rare" is subjective in its own right. Which effectively makes the entire process merely pseudo-objective, despite it being fundamentally rooted in numeral percentages.
>>57664720
>The statistics, in my opinion, only constitute half of how someone would determine whether a flag is rare
before i continue:
are you 100% sure about this?
>>57664827
>are you 100% sure about this?
Yes, and that's my personal opinion as I said. If your opinion is that you should purely use time-dependent percentages to determine how rare a flag is in your book, you're free to go ahead.
>>57649525
>Even so, that doesn't explain why other maps with current divisions, like the one I posted, still depict the old Irish counties.
I did it that way due to what flags are available and what people will actually use. If there are flags made for Armagh, Banbridge and Craigavon District Council etc. then perhaps I'll redraw Northern Ireland. Or you could do it yourself.
>>57664883
that's plain stupid.
instead of letting fact influence your opinion, you want your opinion to influence facts.
if you think that's a mentality worth to discuss you are wrong (hint, this is not a opinion).
i'll stop replying now.
>>57665086
>i'll stop replying now.
I've seen the >i'll stop replying now. part but I'll just conclude by saying that the flaghunter website isn't rooted in rock-solid facts, as the statistics are time-dependent.
And in addition, the word "rare" is subjective as well, as there is no authoritarian limit to what determines rarity. Besides that, no one's said the concept of rarity is purely objective, as we've discussed (and I believe you've said so yourself) in previous posts.
>hint, this is not a opinion
But it clearly is! Whether something is worth discussing is obviously subject to opinion. You're demonstrating you don't understand what an opinion is.
But you're not going to read this, so ta-ta anyway.
Rwanda
>>>/pol/70516794
anyone know anything about the bottom ones?
>>57667484
forgot pic
>>57667484
Bottom four are outer space, moon, Ceres and Pluto from the regional flags extension.
>>57662841
What are the flags below the iceberg?
>Old Lybia
>ISIS
>Bouvet Island
>Western Sahara
>USMOI (not unobtainable, I have it in my collection)
>senpai
>Antarctica
>International Waters
Anyone know the others? I've heard that blue/pink one to the right was a joke flag posted on /sp/ once but I can't remember beyond that. Also, what is the one that looks like Israel above Western Sahara?
>>57667611
White one with the Union Jack is British Antarctic Territory.
There's a bunch of other unknown regional flags there too but I don't remember which specific ones they are.
There's also TAAF, Marshall Islands, and Northern Mariana Islands, which are legit places and obtainable.
Whan other regionals should i meke lads?
>>57667535
why are there 2 white flags at the bottom?
if one's antarctica, what's the other
>>57667832
International Airspace.
>>57667720
Thanks f@m, but what does TAAF stand for? And I thought Marshall Islands was the flag at the very bottom of the iceberg?
>>57668004
French Southern and Antarctic Lands. I'm unhealthily obsessed with them.
Yeah, the Northern Marianas and Marshall Islands are on the iceberg - my brightness was too low, so I didn't see that icicle/whatever you call it on the right.
Where is the Italian anon with the regionals? His script was very helpful before you faggots told him to stop posting.
/rarecity/ here for whoever hasn't picked me up yet
also mine
>>57669976
>portugal is african
>India is not poo
You have to relearn your memes friend
>>57670060
t. Albertos Barbopolous
do you actually have Bhutan tho goyim?
>>57670449
Yep I do.
r8
also trying to find turkmenistan
>>57671228
>>>/pol/70516761
You should try getting Nigeria too. It and Senegal are not uncommon.
Here's an Overijssel for you guys
>>57671415
Nope you didn't set it properly.
I have Overijssel though, Australia and the Netherlands are probably the easiest to complete in terms of regions/states/provinces.
>>57671415
if it works, i've just set up the script
>>57671479
Have you completed the Netherlands??
>>57671489
i hope it works now
>>57671504
I've completed first-level admin divisions for the Netherlands, the USA, Australia, and Canada.
I'm aiming for Germany and Poland next.
>>57671544
just copy name without .png.
testing my regional flag
test
>>57672850
Is that Austrias flag inside it?
>>57673009
It appears so, they were part of the Habsburg Netherlands after all.
>>57669976
Has completed nearly all of Africa but no Guernsey wtf
>>57673151
Guernsey isn't that common, one of the two last European flags I've got.
In order not to trigger Dortmund anon I'll use the attendance rates- Guernsey has a lower attendance than fucking Madagascar. So it's really not all that surprising.
started yesterday, am doing pretty well, i got guam
havent updated it though, i havei taly and pakistan
>>57667611
i don't really know, i think the double band is the satellite proxy
>>57673446
>pretty well
>no Italy
I know you're new to this but m8
>>57673551
Satellite provider and anon proxy both get Andorra's flag but when you hover over them they say "Unknown".
>>57673574
>havent updated it though, i have italy and pakistan
did u even read m8
i think one of the reasons is that i already had ireland early on and italy looks similar to ireland's flag
Pope
>>>/pol/70528180
>>57673623
Ach sorry I'm blind.
>>57673446
browse /carib/ to fill up Central America
KEEP THIS THREAD ALIVE
QUICK EVERYONE POST 'BUMP'
>>57674005(you)
>>57673973
thanks for the tip m8
>>>/sp/66717206
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
>>57673973
i mean there's no actual board called carib tho
most of my caribbean countries are from /carib/ threads but i dont know how to find them
>>57674087
/whatever/ refers to a general. You new here (on this board)?
