>>81759362
Rest in peace dear Bubbles,
>>81759362
I thought sugar was the first ingredient to make perfect girls
2016 is the year of Superhero films
what superhero film are you looking forward to?
>>81758996
One that doesn't suck or disappoint. So basically none.
Sure, Marvel's ok, but I've given up as a DC fag. We're humilaited, defeated, and clearly lost the battle. We lost. I'm done trying to excuse the DC movies for their crappiness, but I can't deny it anymore. When something as epic as Batman V Superman is fucking RUINED, you know there's no going back.
I'm fucking done with heroes.
a power rangers flick would be nice
>>81759217
the film will most likely suck.
Why would there be a restaurant in a universe that fears humans implicitly based on a specific human culture?
>>81758707
maybe it's a horror-themed restaurant
>>81758707
Is this an actual line in Monsters Inc?
>>81758747
This.
Remember when Disney ruined the most iconic moment in the original trilogy (Luke fighting Vader for the first time in Empire) with a shitty comic?
Wouldn't be so bad if they didn't insist on making this canon.
>>81758645
Only the movies really matter in terms of canon.
But if you insist on getting butthurt over the EU, Luke fighting Vader is something the new EU has been relatively tame on. This wasn't even a fight. Luke got lucky and escaped.
The old EU had Luke fighting Vader everyday like some kind of Saturday morning cartoon villian.
>>81758645
>Remember when Disney ruined the most iconic moment in the original trilogy (Luke fighting Vader for the first time in Empire) with a shitty comic?
No. Because that comic doesn't ruin the scene in the film one bit. It explains why Vader even knew Luke even existed and who he needed to go after in the first place. It gives context to TESB. The comic makes it better.
>>81758805
>This wasn't even a fight.
Their sabers still touched. It was still a saber duel.
And yes, Disney is insistent on making this canon, so I will insistently complain. That's how this works. They should've been prepared for that.
Bruce Wayne by Janin
>>81758228
Dick is too small, the shoulders need to be bigger. He looks too much like superman aside from the hair.
>>81758228
>Based King and Janin keeping up with the beefcake
King should just come out of the closet already.
You might as well have just posted this right into the gay thread.
Well /co/ as much as i love comics, i can't make comics worth a shit.
so i've decided to share my crap once again, so i may be mocked by my fellow anons.
here's my latest "comic" probably my last.
i realised that as my as love my idea, it's just going to be treated as edgy cringey shit, like my last one. i've decided to make this a little more dumb, cause i just do care anymore.
enjoy rumble town
>>81757587
it sucks dude
>>81757741
of course it sucks, i know it sucks.
maybe draw something to anything else
http://www.ew.com/article/2016/04/12/scooby-doo-reboot-hanna-barbera-warner-bros
But will they be grimdark? I'm assuming they'll be based off the DC reboots announced in January.
IF YOU LOVE THESE SCOOBY SNACKS SO MUCH YOU CAN MOURN FOR THEM
>>81757369
RON'T DO THIS! ROP! ROP!
What if we got a Herculoids movie?
I just saw the SS Blitz trailer.
God I hope this movie isn't bad. That trailer looked so fucking good, I really don't want this to suck because I'm pretty much sold on everything (except Harley). I've even taken to LetoJoker even though I still don't like the look.
Please don't suck.
>>81756626
I hope so too. I'm not sold on some of the designs and stuff but it looks interesting enough that I'll get on for the ride.
>>81756626
Best lower your hopes after BVS and just be pleasantly surprised when it's actually good.
>>81756626
Just watched both(?) trailers for the first time. I agree, Harley looks like the weak link.
Is this a good series? The armor looks cool and I've heard good things about Bendis.
>>81756264
Is this bait?
>>81756264
No it doesn't, no you haven't and nice try.
Saging so you can learn to try harder and be more imaginative when you troll.
>>81756294
He's a troll.
Sage if you must reply, and if you don't know how to sage then don't reply.
>oh crud.
Is he gone for good, bros? Say it aint so :(
With all the shenanigans Hugo Strange has been causing within Arkham, I doubt it.
Strange has turned Arkham into a revolving door.
>>81756066
>Strange treating Gotham as a giant petri dish for psychological experiments
That explains so much about Gotham
>rebooted powerpuff girls
looks like shit
>>81755835
BUBBLES HAS TO FARTSUPERBAD
Bubbles, stop scratching your butt crack.
If it looks, feels, and smells like shit, then it's probably shit.
I was considering something, if they ever wanted to do it. Now, DC versus MK happened, and it was pretty cool. DC clearly won, and is free for the next 100 years from being invaded again because of the usual lockout thing established in the lore of the series.
However, Shao Kahn has shown us there is a loophole in that whole thing a time or two with the whole Sindel thing. Taking a wife from Earth and all that and stake a claim based on her and yadda yadda. Elder gods can't stop that.
Now, if you roll back time a bit to MKX after Shao Kahn's death and before the coup attempt... when Empress Mileena ruled...
...who better for her to approach then this man?
Proposition: The Joker father's a child on her. And with that child, Mileena can invade the DC Realm again.
I totally would love for this to be a plot of a new MK Comic where Empress Mileena is trying to pull the same trick as her father and get the whole crazy situation rolling where she and the Joker work together to conquer the DC Realm.
What do you think, /co/?
>>81755760
Match made in hell, really.
And it could totally work, especially with drama involved of Joker betraying Mileena eventually because fuck it, as much as he wants to see the world burn, he is the mother fluffing Joker.
It would be cool with all the characterization and different reactions, I think, and further interaction and responses to the whole arrangement.
Batman's responses alone would be priceless.
would he call her Smileena?
>>81757546
We can hope so.
ITT we cast the right people to play everyone in in Batman Beyond LA
Bruce wayne is obv played by one these guys
Ben Afflack
Adam West (if he is alive when it would be made)
(there's another man I can't think of his name
Clint Eastwood is Old Man Bat.
>>81755569
That's the guy I was thinking of.
>>81755479
>Adam West or Michael Keaton as Batman
>Brian Cranston as Blight
>Mark Hamil as an old Tim Drake
No clue for Babs and Terry
what went wrong?
Not trusting the source material for starters. So much to mine from the 70's and at the time the film was in production Palmiotti and Grey's god tier run was out. Hell they could have built a franchise just on that
But nope, they gave Jonah super powers and did not take the character seriously. I think this was the time Green lantern came out too and both films has the same plastic just shit something out and the nerds will love it tone.
Its starting to get sad watching Warner Bros shoot itself in the ass in just about every DC property
They didn't make it a western. It was basically unimpressive steampunk with southern accents.
Also, everything >>81755648 said.
Being a DC fan is suffering
>>81755220
Warner Brothers happened. They tend to shoot itself on their own feet a lot more than not.
It is obvious WB confused or even don't like comic book movie in general.
>It's a "Bart bonds with one of his family members" episode
Which ones did you like?
>>81755211
Barthood was fantastic. Wasnt disappointed.
BARTHOOD
IT TOOK 26 YEARS TO MAKE
