What went wrong?
Liberals.
Popularity went to the writers' heads after that break during S1.
they made a pilot and it got picked up.
Mattel brought mom into the toy test group and she freaked!
She made them cover up the obscene tattoos.
>>70897241
What a faggoty gun.
>>70897241
CREA EL MÁXIMO COCODRILO
>>70897241
Would buy desu
Dawn of fishkino
>>70897153
You mean Andrew Stanton made a good movie? Wow, that's new!
More like dawn of childish, gullible nostalgiafags
>>70897153
>94/100 reviewers gave this movie 7/10.
WTF? I wanna be a gangster now!
Are you trying to start a new meme? Because it doesn't work like that
>>70897157
What are you talking about?
I don't know if I missed something, but this was a pretty straightforward basic gangster movie, which makes me think that for a supposed classic, it's overrated. One of those movies that almost every man rates highly just because it portrays manly men doing manly things, ie. the average man's dream life.
Who will play him in the inevitable biopic?
>>70897115
Terry Crews
/thread
>>70897133
this obvs desu
My wife's boyfriend.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_osgrcpes4
Michael Haneke argues against the morality of Downfall and Schindler's List- saying it's irresponsible to dramatise Hitler and The Holocaust in that matter. He says a filmmaker trying to create melodrama out of these characters doesn't given the audience the independence necessary to reach their own conclusions. Haneke says he tries to make his films raise questions, not just give easy answers. Confronting the historical figure on their own.
But isn't it exactly the opposite?
Haneke says he takes his audience seriously enough to give them questions they can mull on their own instead of easy answers- I say Spielberg takes his audience seriously enough to give them answers without presupposing he has a Svengali-like influence on them. Haneke seems to think the audience is full of easily-influenced children, ready to lap up any answer given them, like 5-year olds irresponsibly given opium by cluseless 17th century opothecaries. That shows he DOESN'T respect them- he feels he has to give them something far more palliative than an answer, a question.
The fact is in this comparison Spielberg is the one being more daring, daring to be wrong in his answer, daring in the fact his audience could reject his ideas and disagree with his message, break free of his manipulation- but Spielberg has nobility in the fac the got into the ring. Haneke is being the cautious conservative one, insisting the audience won't be able to handle it if he makes a statement on his subjects, especially Hitler. That's a more old-fashioned view of art, the one-sided view of art, not the modern art as dialogue view of art, that an audience may or may not reject your art and respond to it in their own way.
>>70897074
>oh my god people are talking to me what do I say what do I say uh uh SPIELBERG FUCKING SUCKSNAILED IT
>>70897074
Haneke shows a lack of respect for audiences that is in direct proportion to the latitude he feels they need- like a man who creates a large cage for a gorilla because the gorilla is unpredictable and wild. It is not the man who gives other men extra latitude that is the brave one, it is the coward. It is the normal man who can ride in a cramped elevator to work and feel safe, if inconvenienced, it is the outlier who is claustrophobic and agoraphobic.
Another thing about being a filmmaker that only raises question in his audience as opposed to providing answers is it is the former filmmaker who is less likely to hear his audience's answers and responses- a film that raises questions in the audience may make the audience come up to the director and give his interpretation of the film, but the director can answer every single response with "it's all up to your interpretation." It is very easy to write a riddle that may or may not have a solution, it is much easier to try to solve one. Spielberg, by giving answers, opens himself up to far more loud, frequent, and potent criticism in the "easy answer" he gives that Schindler was a great man who did a great thing- he may be heckled on the treat or by interviewers who insist they have evidence to the contrary that Schlinder was NOT a great man, that he didn't do enough, that he didn't care about the jews, that Spielberg was wrong in this or that historical fact, and that Schindler's answers are or are not wrong. It's easy to say you're raising questions, it is quite another to actually engage with the answers- which Haneke shows disdain for. You cannot have a positive without a negative- Spielberg's approach guarantees you'll have answers and questions, a wide diversity or responses and opinions. Haneke isolates himself from responses like an aging scared agoraphobe who hates going outside because his neighborhood is changing.
>>70897316
At the end of the day Haneke has committed that most forgivable and harmless of vices that all artists have- self-importance. But his unforgivable mistake is thinking this vice is a virtue, and an inarguable fact. Nobody changes their entire life philosophy based on a film no matter who manipulative it is- nobody takes him or any director's opinions that seriously.
He can forgive Haneke's pretensions as sins, but not as virtues.
Haneke might grouse at Spielberg's Schindler's List and say "Who are you to tell the world what to think?" and Spielberg who rightly respond "Who are you to think the world cares what us directors think? Or for that matter that I care what the world thinks? I'm expressing what I think" He makes a mountain out of a molehill, and then insists the mountain is a danger to public health.
Is this...Osbourne Cox?.....
>>70897018
My sides every time at this scene.
>>70897018
I tought you might be worried... about the security of your... shit.
>yfw he thinks it's a Schwinn
>tfw I wanted to watch War and Peace with my family because it's based on an actually great novel, that explores all kinds of philosophical concepts in historical context and it has great production values that show all kinds of art and architecture and whatnot
>tfw found out that they show not only sex scenes but a fully nude explicit shot of some guy's penis because you apparently can't have a TV show without degenreacy anymore
What the hell, /tv/? When exactly did Tolstoy mention this? If not, who put it in and why?
He was outcast by the scientific community for pushing his bullshit pseudo-science.
>Nudity is degeneracy
You will die a virgin. As a waifufaggot who saves pictures of ugly whores on his computer you should have already known that. Kill your shit family and yourself.
>>70896972
It's symbolism idiot
>fucking = war
>cumming = peace
So I just watched it. Any thoughts? I personally loved it. I think its very well written.
>>70896911
Saw an article listing the ways it "Smashed the Patriarchy" and immediately wrote it off 4ever. He apparently lost a good deal of money on it.
>>70896911
lol strap yourself in for some cuck shit, for some /pol/ shit and some JUST shit because of the debt news.
Whats the show even look like Ive only ever seen that image OP posted
yeah sure a quick google search i could find the animation style and the entire series but it goes to show you how poor the marketing was
![Big.Fish.2003.480p.BDRip.XviD-SHiRK[(039427)18-52-10].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/5WXX4qs.jpg "Big.Fish.2003.480p.BDRip.XviD-SHiRK[(039427)18-52-10]")
Post the most typecast actors ever.
>>70896871
I loved him in Devil's Rejects and House of 1000 Corpses
>>70896871
>480p.bdrip
heard he's resentful as hell about it
imagine being Han in this scene
>EL IMAGINA JAJAJAJAJA
>>70896844
>chest bones very pronounced
Was she trying to pay respects to her shoa ancestors?
Whatever happened to Dr. Michio Kaku? I used to see him on Discovery and Science channels all the time. He even had a show where he literally designed a warp drive on his laptop. Whatever happened to that?
alligator got him down in Florida during a speaking tour
>>70896643
He wanted to keep his integrity intact and left when urged to push more liberal propaganda.
>>70896772
source?
What the fuck was the point of this movie?
Why did it have a gay bunker sequence and then turn into an alien movie despite the original cloverfield being about a monster born from pollution
Why does this have cloverfield in the name?
When does jew jew abrams kill himself?
>bunker sequence
That wasn't a sequence, you fucking moron. That was the entire movie.
Can someone briefly tell me what happens? Go into slightly more detail about the end sequence as I want to know whats got everyone so pissed off at it and I want to decide if its worth watching or not
>>70896762
No, fuck you. Just watch the movie, or if nothing else go on Wikipedia and look up the entire plot.
After nine years, you know what I realize?
That the first Matrix was kinda overrated?
>>70896550
That shit posting is bliss?
I want that juicy shaq meat.
i thought she had a russian accent in age of ultron, now in civil war she has an american one?
did i pick this up wrong or miss something here?
Bravo Whedon
>>70896367
She got Americanized.
She got a taste of freedom.
