>Back to the Future 2 took place in the past
>>64342999
Except it didn't you fucking moron. It took place in the future because the present in the movie was the 1980s which means going to 2015 is the future because their present is a different present from our present so even if our present is in the year 30000015 Back to the Future 2 still takes place in the future because it's in a different present from our present.
>>64343216
This post gave me autism.
If you let today pass without watching this film, you're doing yourself a disservice.
>image.jpg
Fuck off.
>>64343191
>I'm too stupid to reverse image search
Back to reddit
pretentious Western culture hating queer suggestion
Why are Kiwis such terrible film makers?
they arent
>>64343039
are you going to post proof?
>>64342911
they are pretty bad at everything, except rugby and beating their wives.
Do you have more respect for directors that write their own films/movies/flicks/kino?
>>64342889
Yes, as long as they have final cut
>>64342889
I can't respect any man that would be seen in public with sandals on.
yes. this is why Kubrick will always be a hack.
Don't get me wrong, it's the best show since Boardwalk Empire, but it is just House dressed up as a period drama right?
it's house with consequences = GOAT
House was racist because he was a dick
This guy is racist because it's the norm.
>Take your progressive bullshit experiment someplace else
It's Sherlock-tier quality at best.
Its 2016
>>64342656
>overweight
>star wars shirt
>literal tumblr glasses
>"I'm a feminist" hair style
>bad lipstick
Whoever this person is they are awful
Does that mean the year of degeneracy is over?
>>64342656
>tfw this was all over my facebook feed thanks to the number of 20 and 30-something "strong independent womyn" I'm friends with
One of my exes went so far as to write a literal essay about how empowering it is to be "finally acknowledged" as a Star Wars fan, calling the older movies "sexist trash." Mind you, she already owned a million Star Wars things for years and gushed about how great the original trilogy was while never once bashing it for being "misogynistic."
Just more evidence that this mindset is a fad with millennial women and nothing more. Whether it's here to stay, who knows, but the fact that it's catching on is not helping anyone.
What did /tv/ think of the pilot?
A new cliffhanger bait sc-fi mystery/drama by yours truly Carlton Cuse (boy, I sure know how to pick them), starring Sawyer fromL O S Tand the doc from Prison Break/Rick's wife from Walking Dead.
tl;dr: the story is set in LA several months after an invasion, during the occupation. Collaborators are staffing the secret police that keeps the populace under control. No one knows who the invaders are.. Aliens? Chinese? Time traveling future humans? LA is separated from the outside world by a huge wall. All government and military people have either been eliminated during the invasion or have collaborated, so there's no one left to resist. Josh Holloway is a former FBI and military that has managed to hide himself. Queue the pilot.
Listen, I know there's no story beyond season 1 and it will be written as they go, if it is successful and gets renewed. The pilot is intentionally full of what Cuse calls "mystery" and what I call intentional bait. The problem is, in 2016, when you get the whole season on Netflix instantly... is there a reason to take the bait and wait for crumbs of answers each week?
Still, I will most definitely watch it for my main man Josh Holloway. He is a really cool dude irl and deserve to finally make it in his own show. "Intelligence" sucked and did not do him justice.
Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRLW-qQLMQs
Pilot was released in December, show starts January 14th.
Huh? First time I hear about this thanks Eko. Downloading the pilot now.
Fingers crossed for Josh to make it, he is cute, CUTE!
>>64342754
Enjoy.
This thing is in the pilot... spoiler-ish I guess
>>64342914
Sheeeeeiiiiiit what is it?
Do you have any Star Trek episode guides, /tv/?
Any series.
I never seem to get past the goofy "minor character has a minor problem" episodes.
>>64342555
Just start watching them all and skip the episodes that bore you.
>>64342555
Star Trek Viewing Guide
1. Watch them all, noting the ones you did not like
2. When rewatching skip the ones you noted that you did not like
>>64342555
i would like to add, OP, you should watch them all.
>used to listen to Kermode
>dropped off a couple of years back
>check up on him to see what he's been up to
>favorite film of 2015 is Inside Out
>doesn't even mention Sicario, Ex Machina, Slow West, Revenant, Hard to be a God, Macbeth, Beasts of no Nation, Bone Tomahawk or In the Heart of the Sea
Is he a pleb?
He can only have one favourite film, anon.
He had Godzilla in his top 10 last year.
He fell down the "muh daughters" years ago, and he seems quite comfortable down there.
Never seen a single film by this guy.
Where do I start?
>>64342096
he's overrated pleb shit, don't
Rear Window
he made good flicks
>>64342096
Rope. the movies he did in the 30's are pretty rough and all he does is remake them later anyway
>JLaw too fat for her dress
>"Can I change backstage?"
LOL SO QUIRKY
>dat eddie stare
>>64342082
She was fun, why the hate? Is it because the fa/tv/irgins on here will never have her?
I just can't watch low budget scifi
tried "the expanse" and although there were some cool moments like low gravity sex or gravity torture but HOLY SHIT the way it was shot hurt my eyes
when outside
>>unimaginative game like spaceships and shit
when inside
>>grey lighting on grey walls
>>shit angles, literally WHY
And oh my god when we first see the belt from the inside and its supposed to be this long trackingshot kinda feeling where you see the omgsomodern parts and then we follow a drone into the slums where theres talks of space drugs and a revolt or some shit with a preacher and I was thinking holy shit, this is literally the set from total recall, the one with arnie, when they hire a taxi on mars, even the fucking camera angle was the same and the already mentioned upper parts look like something rendered on ps 1
and motherfucker, they put like 10 trees in a TOTALLY STERILE, WHITE ENVIRONMENT
has anyone ever thought that this would look good? who is designing these shitty sets? I've seen the likes of this and when a scene is so sterile , you know it's gonna be a shis scifi
I had to skip every 5 minutes to be able to finish it. How can people watch shit like this? bad designs, the story I can't say much about, I'm sure it will have some ok moments but basically if I die without watching this I will be like "I'm ok with that,because that was boring and disgusting" and I will not even say the acting is bad, because it had the fucking breaking bad henchman guy in it, he couldn't save the scene so basically if I had to watch the whole season, I would have gauged my fucking eyes out.
1/10
>>64341871
If low production quality is off putting to you how will you ever appreciate arthouse films
Autism, ADHD and plebeian baked to a one bait post.
>>64341895
>arthouse
I like arthouse, really.
My problem is with motherfucking low budget scifi. I'm not saying it can't be done, but that 99% of it would make sufficent torturing devices. Because it's set in the future, because it's supposed to make you believe what you see and make you wander like 'whoa, that is amazing' like the speeders in star wars, but NO. With low budget its KILLING THE SOUL of any potential storytelling.
oh and sorry, meant to give a 0/10 but I'm thinking mostly in a 1 to 10 scale, my mistake
so again 0/10 for the expanse for killing the child in me
Anyone looking forward to seeing BBC One's adaptation of War and Peace?
>Anyone looking forward to seeing BBC
Stopped reading there, you fucking cuck
it's gonna be a classic
classic
l
a
s
s
i
c
IT'S 2016
CAN WE DROP THE STAR WARS THREADS ALREADY ?
From my point of view it's still 2015!
>>64341450
It came out two weeks ago.
>>64341450
If you can drop the misogyny and racism.
It is 2016, after all, you neanderthal.
![ef7c12d124389af00a9d3651935531d0[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/udGsydD.jpg "ef7c12d124389af00a9d3651935531d0[1]")
>IT BELONGS IN A MUSEUM
>Rumors of Chris Pratt and even Bradley Cooper possibly assuming the titular role of Indiana Jones were laid to rest as of October 27th, 2015 with confirmation from the studios attached that Harrison Ford would be reprising the role of Indy.
Harrison Ford belongs in a fucking museum.
>>64341289
I hate Bradley Cooper's face
At least Pratt seems cool irl
