Is >>>/qst/ still considered a trial board? When will /tg/ be free of the bane of questfags filling the front page with their autism, wasn't the whole point of /qst/ to save boards like /tg/ from this cancer?
>>571327
Questfags refuse to go to /qst/ because /qst/ attracted users from around the site and questfags share /tg/'s elitism and thus don't want to associate with the rabble. A possible solution would be to delete the board, then stealth relaunch it and only share of its existence through /tg/. Probably a dumb idea, though.
>>571367
/qst/ isn't a containment board.
There has been much discussion on my board, /pol/, as to the reach and influence we actually have.
What are the statistics on 4chan's user base by board?
How many unique visitors does each board get?
How much traffic does each board get in relation to each other?
Are there stats on the male/female demographics by board? (Just for curiosity)
There are rough stats at: https://catalog.neet.tv/stats.html
However these don't provide info on unique visitors, and the data doesn't include all the boards.
There have been screencaps of various stats going around, but these are about 3 years old and not representative of today; demographics have changed a lot.
Any information you can give would be very helpful.
>.01 Saudi Arabians visit /a/
I wonder if he's got a waifu
>>571266
This image is from 2014.
/pol/ is almost as big as /v/ now considering how many newfags that board brings.
>>571266
>What are the statistics on 4chan's user base by board?
You can get a rough estimate by using post speed, but that won't get you too far.
>How many unique visitors does each board get?
Impossible to know. You will never see how many lurkers there are even if you try to estimate by post speed.
>How much traffic does each board get in relation to each other?
Post speed could be a good estimate of this but, again, you don't know how many people just lurk.
>Are there stats on the male/female demographics by board?
How would these states even be obtained?
FWIW, 4chan uses google analytics, but
a) users can block the analytics scripts
b) Hiro will never disclose these openly
The best you can do is see the ads page and the statistics there.
Can we please get a Wrestling board /wwe/ for all the wrestling fans
Can we please get a glassblowing board /blow/ for all the blowjob fans?
>>571242
what's wrong with /asp/
>>571321
They don't like PROFESSIONAL wrestling because it is a staged and scripted show. The wrestlers are no more performing a sport than stuntmen on TV shows.
Also, they crowd out precious axe-throwing threads. But, I don't think that is a legitimately complaint, so disregard it.
Can we get a /depression-anxiety-loser-social failures-timid-shy-suicide-male-only/ board and with strong rules and moderation so it can't be turned into /r9k2.0/??
/r9k/ was supposed to be a heaven for social outcasts and now it's a fucking disgrace, i wish it could be fucking nuked to hell but i see that it's working as a containment board for the human garbage that posts there.
Please, i don't wanna go to reddit, SAS forums and wizardchan (even though it's good, it's too fucking slow).
>>571238
>/r9k/ was supposed to be a heaven for social outcasts
no faggot, /r9k/ was meant to be a board for original content instead of shitty rehashed advice dog cancer memes like /b/ was when /r9k/ was originally created. it wasn't intended as your fucking safe space for virgins, jesus christ, go to wizardchan.
t. someone who was there in 2008
>>571241
It wasn't intended for virgins because, like, 80% of 4chan was made by virgins.
Nowadays we have this kind of people here.
Imagine how much of a loser you have to be that even /r9k/ is too normal for you
The whole normie/robot thing is just so EMBARRASSINGLY teen.
Is it okay to image dump on-topic photos on boards that don't really do image dumps? Will they count as spam/flooding?
There aren't any rules that say anything about this (sorry if I missed it).
Such as?
it's okay unless you post something a mod or janitor doesn't like.
>>571156
Photos of foreign countries (maybe people) on /trv/ or /int/
I wouldn't really call /fit/ a board made for image dumping, but they tend to have some threads like posting fit girls that don't get deleted when that shit should probably be in /s/ or something.
Are there even people from 2003 around still?
At least half
>>571078
ban 40% of this thread
namely him>>571081
Is this not a question that has an answer?
Best final boss battle of all time desu
>>571064
what's the best first boss battle of all time desu
>>571065
Iudex Gundyr
ENOUGH
>image.jpg
>>571045
dumb frogposter
4chan is a frog website
deal with it.
only redditors hate frogs
Can americans be banned from /pol/, please? Or better just ban them from the entire site?
Americucks are the most ignorant, deluded and plain stupid creatures I've even seen. Can't have any decent discussion without them meddling and start shouting stupidity and non arguments and boasting about their "freedoom" derailing everything. They claim to be 'redpilled' yet the stupid and autist rethoric always comes from dem fucking yanks.
Not even canadians are like that. Science should reclassiy americans under the hominid genus as something far, very far away from the homo sapiens.
Seriously fuck you stupid amerishit subhumans
>inb4 some dumbo takes the bait
sure. Ban all Anglos.
Keep this shit on /pol/, please.
Why aren't drawthreads moved to /i/? It's one of the slowest boards on the site, with threads lasting for years, and half of those threads are a single person dumping art that they drew for other sites. Moving drawthreads to /i/ would fix this problem.
I have always wondered this, myself. Why the fuck can there be drawthreads on any board? That isn't on-topic, even if you say you'll draw pictures of the board's designated shit.
>>570989
Speeding up a board artificially is a bad thing. Also boards like /i/, /gd/, /3/ and /po/ are slow because the people on those boards are posting original content (which takes time to produce)or are looking for references, not trying to have idle conversation. just leave them be.
>>571015
Drawthreads from all around the site would benefit from cutting down on the chatter and drama.
Perhaps the easy-going nature of /i/ would set a good example and people wouldn't need to post filler to keep their thread alive.
What does being low test and high test mean?
>>570924
They're buzzwords that downplay the fact that they're attracted to ugly cunts
>>570924
My taste = right.
Your taste = shit.
Prove me wrong.
>>570924
Nothing. It's just shitposting.
Is it even possible for /v/ to recover? The board culture is completely fucked.
No, it went downhill years ago, now it's just "le ebig banter board" for redditors to come and unwind.
A step in the right direction would be banning all the retarded console-wars posts(i,e. the ones with the tfw/wojak images), purge frogposts and kill the whole "let's call everyone a shill" thing.
>>570787
>/v/
>recover
Not by a long shot
>>570790
still leaving out quite a bit of cancer from there...
THAT IS HOW BAD THE SITUATION IS.
Tell your stupid mods to stop deleting eroge threads on /v/. There's nothing in the rules stating they can't be there so long as the images posted remain safe for work and they've been on /v/ ever since it was created. Things have only changed as a few mods have taken out a vendetta over the last year.
Maybe, just maybe, porn is better suited to a porn board. /h/ perhaps?
>>570674
They are video games. There are many subjects on this website that are suited to more than one board.
>>570675
Global rules overrule board rules.
Is this a question that has an answer?
I don't know
Ambiguous
this chat is moving so fast, no one will notice im half gay some times every noun and ten I are my cats ears and it walks around like nothing halfpint I want to get drunk with SEND HELP people but I don't like them apples are not edible but kinda I guess.
Does that answer your question?
>Banned from /pol/ for three days for off topic posting
Seriously? People get away with liberal use of words like 'kike', 'nigger' and 'faggot' all the time on there, but an off topic post warrants a three day ban? Utter pisstake.
>>570507
>shitpost
>get banned
>wooooooooooooow
>>570515
Wasn't even shitposting lad.
>seriously?
Yes, seriously.
News Flash: janitors are worthless in those boards
