Global Rule 3 is supposed to apply on /news/, in fact I think that was the whole point to give users a board to discuss news without rants about dindus and niggers in every thread. But there's still people calling Mohammad Ali a nigger, or talking about dindus every time there's a shooting, or a post referring to Obama as a "homosexual coon" in the title. Reporting these does nothing.
Is /news/ officially another board where the rules don't apply now?
do you report them? does /news/ have a janitor yet? i think the mods have more important things to do than deleting minor racist name-calling.
yeah I hope so /news/ gets a decent moderation team. I really tired of those polturds hating on niggers.
>>591616
I report them so do other people. Mods there just don't care so the board is turning to shit. More trolls every day because there's no moderators. You don't even need to go into the comments, the one calling Obama a homosexual coon is in the title of the post, and has been up for weeks now.
>>591604
Also can they start enforcing the "must be news" rule?
Random washed up celebrity says that Trump is racist is not "news", it's just a political discussion
Well the rbt archive for /mu/. /cgl/ and /g/ is officially dead
Unlike others, rbt was really useful due to lots of /mu/ share threads, but what do now?
>>591591
Like you do now, sit on your ass and wait for something to happen.
>>591591
slsk
>>591591
These boards are shit anyway. They don't deserve an archive.
wut
No youtube eceleb shit. It's advertising (whether you're aware of it or not).
>>591506
This is dumb. Linking to absolutely anything other than 4chan would be advertising by these standards.
>>591505
Got enough addons there m8
Um, guys. /tv/ is broken. Please fix it right now, I have a really ebin response to an anon who asked Jon Snow should marry and I really need to post it.
>>591295
...Is it Bran? I bet it's Bran, isn't it?
It hasn't even begun
>>591301
>r u a greensight?
I do not understand at all why there are id's only on some boards.
Every board can benefit from it, except maybe /b/ just because it's /b/ and who cares.
But definitely boards like /tv/ /g/ etc. need them just for shilling purposes. I've seen so many obvious same persons selling products be it a macbook or a tv show or movie.
Othen than that, its gets annoying having people pose as you when you are trying to speak to someone else in a thread, or even when trying to differentiate between who is who in a thread.
id's do not remove anonymity at all. You are still anonymous with an id - you are just unable to samef*g and ruin thread after thread.
http://www.strawpoll.me/10747890
Don't forget to vote in the strawpoll^
I agree with OP 100%
This isn't just board culture, dude
This is fucking site culture
Anonymous is part of 4chan. It is literally one of the things that makes 4chan 4chan. Reddit and Tumblr? They require accounts. 4chan doesn't
4chan is also anonymous. That has led to the creation of the hacktivist group Anonymous, a group that has affected real world events many times. And you want to change that?
How exactly would quality be "improved" anyway? Stop shilling? People can still shill in other threads. Being able to identify samefags would ruin threads. There's a reason namefagging is cancerous
Ban everyone who says "kys"
ban everyone except me
kys
kys
[spoiler]though I agree wordfilter when?
All professional wrestling discussion should occur on "/pro/". Including discussion of shows such as Monday Night RAW or Impact Wrestling, as well as older wrestling. Wrestling video games and related memorabilia should be discussed as well. I believe making this board would solve the /asp/ problem greatly and would allow for alternative sports to get their board back.
Can't you just go to /tv/?
It's all scripted anyways, it's a soap opera for retards.
>>590703
They don't want us either. Making a board is the best solution.
>>590704
or you just fuck off?
please let the /wwe/fags have their own little board they've killed /asp/ and we want it back
>but what about the shitposting
it's a containment board
>but it's not big enough for a board
and pokemon and papercraft and origami are?
just do it already
if mlp got a board so should pro wrestling
>>590636
yes hiro pls
85% of 4chan users are convinced that the checking of another man's digits is an organic solution ,like letting wrasslefags post anywhere or just keep ignoring it
>>590636
You don't make boards for every little problem that occurs. Only fucking children do that. There are tons of ways to deal with wwefags and you choice the easiest and most retarded one.
Containment boards are also bad, go against the site, retarded and the concept of 'containment' does not exist on 4chan.
Can mods please move more threads to /trash/ instead of just banning and deleting?
/trash/ being a defacto fur board is nice, but it was more entertaining when it had things other than furry porn.
This.
Also there is no reason that users should be able to open threads on /trash/ and bump threads.
>>590663
Agreed. Furshit should be banned on trash too, to prevent /trash/ from becoming /fur/.
>>590768
Thanks to /trash/, furshit posting on all the boards I browse is at an all-time low. It's win-win.
>you have been banned from all boards
see ya in 90 seconds.
What's the point of banning people?
>>590586
If you break a rule and you get caught then you get banned. It's as simple as that.
have fun switching IPs again
>>591179
OP's point is that it's extremely easy to avoid a ban
Bring back visible sage for 4chan pass users. That way more people are encouraged to buy passes.
That's a retarded idea.
>>590454
Your parents: "Let's have a child"
>>590499
It took you over an hour to come up with that comeback OP? I'm a little disappointed in you honestly.
Why not just ban reaction images entirely?
People only get mad at them anyway
>>590383
What?
You can argue that "reaction images" fall under the heading of "image macro," considering the etymology of the term, and as such ARE against the rules.
But nobody follows the rules anyway, if they're "having fun." Not the users nor the mods. So, even if it were expanded and explained with new wording, it would not be enforced.
How do we stop the globalist conditioning /qa/?
>>590360
Become Super Saiyan.
WHAT THE ACTULE FUCL
AFTER I POSTED THIS I GOT THIS
Hello, /qa/. Given how generals have been rapidly growing since moot's departure and continue to grow during Hiroyuki's reign, I've slowly started to ask myself what exactly has been their purpose given their popularity on certain boards and my own. I've observed popular threads being turned into 24/7 generals about a specific topic in which the discussion and post quality within rapidly deteriorates due to the nature of the threads(24/7, kept alive by off-topic discussion/questions and what some refer to by 'stealth' bump; That would be bumping a thread via inane or asinine questions that everyone on the thread already has the answer to, or has no relevance to the topic at hand which are the most common, those being hypothetical questions) and are soon constant circlejerking and shitposting threads that discuss everything but the topic itself.
Has any general-style thread in your most visited board served an actual purpose, /qa/?
>>590297
I don't hate the doctor who general on /tv/. I'll post in it occasionally when the show is airing and you can actually discuss the show to some degree. Also, there's five decades of that show, so theoretically they would have something realted to doctor who to talk about most of the time. i haven't looked at it recently though so i have no idea what it's like right now.
from lurking /int/ I can tell you that their generals are just /pol/ in other languages + facebook-Tier meme spam. I'd like to mention the Swedish, British and the German general as the worst threads on this entire board.
On /a/ there's only two generals I would say are useful. The Daily Japanese Thread, which is a pretty valuable resource that has helped me learn Japanese, and the drawthread, which generates OC related to the board.
The rest can go though. Absolutely no reason there needs to be a Jojo thread up 24/7, or a Titan thread, or a MonMusu thread, etc. Wish the mods would ban these people outright.
I keep hearing that 4chanX is a botnet. Is there any evidence or is it just a meme?
>>590203
A botnet for what
>>590207
I'm not sure exactly, maybe for harvesting personal data or maybe to attack other sites. These things have ways of getting "purposed" only after a botnet has spread around enough.
>>590221
So basically you're a gullible, paranoid ignoramus who lacks even the basic knowledge to examine the code for 4chan X, which is freely available to anyone who wants it, yet insists it must be malicious despite the fact that nobody has flagged it as such. Yes there is clearly a massive conspiracy to silence every single programmer on Earth from talking about the 4chanX botnet, that's why nobody has exposed it in the 8 or so years the script has been going. Please continue to to not use it, you're doing the right thing.
![hello-my-name-is-1428915-m[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/2ZTLwkN.jpg "hello-my-name-is-1428915-m[1]")
![daniels-advice-6[2].gif](https://i.imgur.com/PCWhZek.gif "daniels-advice-6[2]")
