Archived threads in /mu/ - Music - 4297. page
- Home
- Board: /mu/ - Music
- Reading: Archived threads in /mu/ - Music - 4297. page
gonna give it a listen, what should I expect?
>>60306148
french house wankery
>>60306148
Kinda like Daft Punk
>>60305018
absolute shit
Well, this was a bit disappointing.
it's fucking terrible
Why, because you don't like halfway decent pop music?
>>60306138
>>60306153
>wah Claire's not edgy anymore
It's really fucking good.
What does /mu/ think of these two?
>implying Garfunkel contributed anything of note.
>>60306128
>implying they are not a staple in American music history
y wont u fuckers admit they are good. best at anything? probably not but they still had some mad tadlent
I think so. I love how different he is. He just doesn't give a fuck. It's great. Love his darkness.
>>60305931
salem are better
>>60305931
how's being an eminem rip off unique ?
kill yourself tbqh
Hey /mu/. Was wondering what you guys would think about an album that is just recordings of someone lip-syncing songs?
I wouldn't consider it ASMR, because the person isn't actually singing.
Thoughts?
>>60305833
wait wat
like, just the sound of the person's lips moving?
That's fucking awful
I'm sure a few morons will call it 'revolutionary' though.
Original songs or 'covers'? And would they just move their mouth or actually employ air?
What's your excuse for not liking Gorillaz? Do you seriously not enjoy fun?
dude, this album is awesome. I don't really understand the hate flame they get. your post is gonna get shit on, btw...prepare for tons of pretentious assholes...
they were my favorite band when i was a teenager, now my taste has changed a little bit but a i still can enjoy (tho i admit that their image was a huge parte for why i liked them so much)
i think that its good pop/indie/whatever and have hopes for their next album
I like them though. Blur is the one /mu/ hates.
ITT: Pitchfork darlings that no one cares about anymore
>>60305785
I like the first few tracks
Not much the rest desu
Do you listen music on lossless format, /mu/?
sometimes
but most of my stuff is in 320kbps
>>60305672
why is peacock so perfect, bros?
i take flac and convert it to 192kbps aac just so i know i had a good source file
Production Resources:
>Pastebin - Links, books, videos, articles, tutorials and stuff
http://pastebin.com/pYGCLu6q
>/prod/ wiki - still looking for contributors (wink, wink, WINK)
http://mu-sic-production.wikia.com
There's a severe lack of DAW descriptions in the wiki. If you're good with your tool of choice, consider writing a paragraph about it.
>Mixing Secrets and misc resources from previous thread
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/64bx81yayqzch/Production
Previous thread:
>>60279916
Remember to use clyp.it to post your tracks/WIP : posting a clyp.it is just providing sound for a question, posting a soundcloud link is making self-advertisement and the thread doesn't need that.
Remember to check other peoples' clyp.it links to keep the thread healthy.
I've asked this one before
>wanna make techno music
>know very little music theory
I was rec' to learn minor scales, so I went ahead and learnt major scales as well. I guess there will be things I will pick up as I read more, but is there anything else theory-wise that I should know to make techno/house music?
I already know sound synthesis, my DAW and mixing
thank you
trying to imitate Sebastian's method of sampling.
where he gets the sounds, how he arranges them, etc the whole process of what he's doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMwbHf_S9jY
>>60305697
Did you learn about chords, the circle of fifths, and common chord progressions for house/techno music?
Cringe thread!!
get a load of this faggot guys
What musicians browse /mu/?
>>60305436
>implying
Desu Guripusu does I believe
Rec, rate, guess personality... do whatever.
>>60305388
joplin rice - spine adagio part II & the prince
>>60305388
Thanks for the recs anon! What's your favorite album from your collage? I haven't checked any of those out but they look interesting
>>60305485
Fuck. >>60305717
was meant to be a reply to you....
If any of these albums is your AOTY, you need to get the fuck out of /mu/.
>>60305365
bait
i guess i need to leave. bye guys
>>60305365
Don't forget that Pleb Shits album
ITT: music you don't understand the appeal of at all
Mine has to be pic related- it's like someone set out to make the cheesiest possible rock and succeeded beyond their wildest expectations
>>60305336
The Ramones. All their songs sounds exactly the same. 3 chords poorly played again and again. I know many amateur bands with 15 years kids playing who can do it better.
>>60305336
I would agree with any DT post-1999, but Images & Words is objectively a canonical classic.
People who like their modern stuff just tend to be the kind of people who are easily impressed by odd signatures and long songs and don't really think much past that (and then proceed to think they have "enlightened" taste because of it)
>>60306266
They're only significant in context.
Wilco, Ben Carson has more personality and energy. A bunch of moderately talented artists playing normal sounding music with a few odd melodies thrown in here and there. Overrated as shit.
THE MUSIC TECH GURU IS IN. WHADDYA WANNA KNOW?
Is Art Angels a 9/10 or a 10/10?
recording from a home amplifier set for guitar,
music prgrams
chord sequencers...
how to fix a broken neck on a Warlock
>>60305343
2/10 - would not bang
