Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 340. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
When we already don't use stealth bombers for anything, and don't need to due to other parts of the nuclear triad being more capable of taking down enemy threats, why are we building yet another new, admittedly smaller, strategic bomber? What the fuck are we going to use it on?
>>30229125
>why are we building yet another new, admittedly smaller, strategic bomber?
Because the B-2's are going on 30 years old.
>>30229125
>When we already don't use stealth bombers for anything
Kill yourself.
Not only were they integral to past wars, you dont try to achieve parity with your foes.
>>30229147
We also don't use bombers for anything anymore.
>>30229154
Yes, when we used F117s to shit on the Taliban back in 2004 sure, but today we don't actually use our bombers for anything. This isn't desert storm anymore, we have far more applicable missiles that will do the job better.
So we all know that the Irish are excellent fighters. High pain tolerance, angry, deep seated inferiority complex that causes them to crave fisticuffs like a Jew lusts for gold.
But are they good at war?
This is a historical question that I'm asking on /k/ because /his/ are a bunch of Marxist faggots.
I know that it took the English hundreds of years to conquer them and Ireland is practically in their backyard. What wars have they fought in the modern era? Didn't a bunch of Irish sign up with England in WW2?
What is their reputation in...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
nobody cares o'connor, go get your ass beat at the pub and contemplate life from the dumpster you sleep in
>>30229032
>What wars have they fought in the modern era?
The Irish were fighting against the English for independence up through the 1920s. Then there was the Depression, WWII, and the Cold War. That doesn't leave a lot of time for fighting random wars.
>>30229043
post tank hunters/Panzerjäger
Would this strange Brit modded rifle be legal in NY and California?
It uses the first trigger pull to fire and eject; the second to chamber the next round. This means it is not *self loading* in under UK law, hence legal.
But is that semi auto under US/states law/s? If not then surely its a better alternative to bullet buttons and funky stocks.
nobody cares califag
https://youtu.be/vRZmSsPRAN4?t=30s
This video explains the cycling in more detail.
>>30228647
You will care if Hillary gets elected.
What are your thoughts on railguns?
>>30228528
Cool beans.
Looking forwards to seeing them in the next five years or so.
>>30228528
They better come fucking soon
>>30228528
Portable versions when?
Why do so many operators have itchy as fuck-looking thick beards in hot places like Afghanistan?
Sign of masculinity among the local yokels.
Clean beards don't get itchy anon. Can confirm it's no big deal, worked in Egypt for years with a beard.
Beards aren't itchy and its about form over function
You can't be operator if you don't look operator
So I was set on getting a Glock 19, when the guy at the LGS pulled this one down. I wanted to do some due diligence before just going Glock. With a budget being very close to or less than 500USD, which one and why /k/?
FWIW, This is my first handgun, but I have much experience with 10mm and .380ACP. Just want a reliable all around gun for range/home/carry.
>>30228499
Shoot both at a range that has rentals. Then decide. 19 is fine. I carry my glock less and fnx more now but carried a glock for probably 5 years.
>>30228499
I like thoes Springfield remakes, the xd series. ~$500. I got the xd .45 first, then the xdm 9. The 9 is easier to carry, but the .45 isnt exactly difficult.
2022 is too fat to conceal. It's meant to be a duty weapon. They should also be at least $100 cheaper than a glock. I bought mine new for $350 a while back. They are good guns, the 19 still be more versatile though.
Whats the best backpack for conceled carry??
An inside the wasteband holster.
>>30228329
This right here, me bredrin
>>30228334
fpbp
Hunters of /k/, let's say you had the option to travel back to the late-1800s/early 1900s to go hunting along the western coastal regions of North America, from Oregon all the way up to Alaska.
While you cannot use any obvious technology that would reveal your future origins (no modern fabrics, no optics, no rangefinders, etc.) you are allowed to take any bolt action rifle from modern day that would not look too out of place, along with a reasonable quantity of ammo for it.
What rifle would you pick, and what caliber? What choice of current time period sights...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Nugget, glorious 7.62
Glorious rifle is not of need pathetic optic
7.62 is hunt at all range
Glorious russian design is never of the aging
>>30228316
I'd take a Gewehr 98 and I'd go find conflicts to fight in.
Hunting humans is a thing, right?
Well let's go kill of some short ass little napoleonic fucktards.
Gotta wonder how France would respond to ANY of the napoleons having been assassinated.
Oh, and I'd use irons.
>>30228337
> Not necking up to the 9×53mmR
Do you even hunt 200kg+ game, comrade?
My new toy... the umarex fuel .22. I clocked it at about 810 fps
Thoughts?
>>30228296
Break actions are inconvenient at best when it comes to bench shooting.
Umarex is basicly Walther isn't it
>>30228363
Same manufacturer
Washington / cascadia thread
I'll open this up with urgent worries! Just heard on the radio news that WA politicians are going to try and most likely succeed in limiting ccw permits to copythe California where it will become may issue if you can prove you need a concealed weapon. Because you are being stalked or threatened. This is fucked and we need to fight now to prevent this!!
When will these Soviet commies fuck off out of our country and leave us alone? I hope trumpet gets in office and creates a nation wide ccw system.
If we would've just nuked Russia like good Americans we wouldn't be dealing with communist brain washing today.
>>30228433
>retardation: the post
Good weather for a another protest in Olympia.
How come the nazi's were so far ahead of their time?
http://yaooke.com/2016/06/10/nazi-super-science-top-15-crazy-and-influential-german-aircraft-and-prototypes/
>>30228096
Because they made first contact.
>>30228100
Yes, the jet engine, the first cruise missle and research into heavy water were so fucking racist. Facts don't stop being facts because you don't like them and the Wunderwaffen programs made some total shite, but also made some amazing weapons.
No wait, that's kind of close to a refutation of your point, so I'll just say:
Fuck off back to /r/hurtfeelings you revisionist shit.
Great minds+Facist government = brilliant country
Consider that you don't have to worry about the money, would you ?
>>30228083
Nope. I don't even like Glocks.
>>30228083
1. I don't like glocks.
2. The Prosecuting attorney would have a field day with you shooting someone with a 50 Cal.
>>30228083
>Consider that you don't have to worry about the money, would you ?
As in somebody is going to hand me one of these slides, or the whole thing? What about the ammo?
Or are you saying that I'm rich so I don't "have to worry?" Well that's fucking stupid because you don't stay rich by wasting your money on retarded meme shit.
In either case I would shoot one, as for as buying one if I "didn't have to worry about the money," probably not.
What would it take for Russia to actually matter again?
>>30227662
Not being corrupt. This seems to be the issue that holds back countries.
>>30227662
A functional, robust economy.
>>30227662
$100+ per barrel for starters
How does your country's police deal with armed assailants?
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f5a_1465460024
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=26e_1458640590
how Aussies respond to Terrorist attacks.
by going full CSGO
Without trying to kill them, if at all possible. Pic died to his wounds, video was shot in the leg.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=de9_1386101466
>>30227642
usa
we shoot them dead, hopefully before they just kill themselves
