Archived threads in /co/ - Comics & Cartoons - 453. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
I've been reading New X-Men the past few days and just finished #146.
You know. THAT part.
I never understood why it was seen as such a big deal before but having now experienced it first hand... yeah, it's fucking stupid at face value.
What was the story behind the decision again? Was it always the plan or did Grant have to do a rapid rewrite for some reason? It feels so rushed, not to mention nonsensical. We'd seen this dude's internal monologues before FFS.
I recall that Bendis added to the convolution later on but forget the details.
>>83796001
It was always the plan. And yes, it turned out to be so retarded that Claremont himself retconned it right away.
>>83796375
thnx
>>83797898
no prob
Just finished reading this. I don't understand. Is it supposed to be yet ANOTHER portrayal of Trump, this time focusing on his inexperience as a politician?
This is getting boring.
>>83795966
>I don't understand.
You just aren't smart enough to get it, normie.
>>83795996
uhm, what?
>>83795966
I might vote for loki. Trump just said he was meeting with the NRA to prevent people on the no fly list from buying guns. Which hurts him in my mind. Clinton is a piece of shit gun grabber, sanders is a piece of shit gun grabbing commie, green party is shitty gun grabbing commies, and libertarian party ticket is dude weed, lmao, also weak immigration laws and gun grabbing
The Evil Archangel Saga continues...
I don't know how they do it, but their non-humor joke and joke-falling-flat humor and their non-sequiture is pure gold. I don't how to express that correctctly but this is the kind of humor that is the most difficult to master and they nail it perfectly.
it's all ponctuated by a bunch of actual solid jokes. This season final was perfect.
have they confirmed renewal for season 3?
The secret is they just let Norm and Mike talk and then they just transcribe that and work it into a plot.
>>83795893
No, but they fucking better.
>>83795893
The trick is you think at the beginning of the show that just Pigeon is the bad one. BUT THEY ALL IN THEIR OWN SPECIAL WAYS ARE ALL HORRIBLE PEOPLE. It's kind of awesome really and when you put such people all together. They can do some truly monstrous things, it's great and awful at the same time. Also most of the people they interact with are shit piles too. But then it's really people just being people.
![RRC1Wraparound[1].jpg_00b2d5.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/WUnKCzW.jpg "RRC1Wraparound[1].jpg_00b2d5.jpg")
So we can all agree that this is Ennis's best work, right?
IDK it is fantastic but plenty of his mini series have been.
>>83795179
Hitman and Punisher were better. Fury MAX - My War Gone By probably was as well.
Links to DL?
Where there's a whip, *whu-peesh* There's a way
TWO DESERTERS?
>>83795107
>JohnnyTestsoundeffectsdirector.jpg
>Your half brother will never force you and your people to march across a frozen wasteland.
ITT: Character that are hard to explain and normal movie goers will never get.
--also her name should have been Archmage
>Darkforce manipulation
I'm out!
Why wasn't this series good?
It's by the same people who made Batman: TAS, one of the best cartoons of all time, yet Superman: TAS feels typical of kids shows at that time. The dialogue even feels dumbed down.
And it isn't because they can't write Superman, he was great in Justice League.
>>83794879
The comic adaptation that we got out of it made the whole thing worthwhile. Legit the best Superman ongoing ever.
>>83794879
>Why wasn't this series good?
It was great, OP. The hell are you talking about?
STAS was great, what are you on about?
All new Inhumans #8
Don't trust Africans
>>83794764
>>83794779
>>83794789
enjoy these slags
So let me get this straight: Poison Ivy gets stuck in a bind and has to get RESCUED by a man (who comes out of NOWHERE with next-to-NO character intro) in her own comic?
What the fuck?
>>83794762
And?
>>83794762
You going to fucking Storytime it?
Does Swamp thing really need a character intro?
say hello to /co/s new waifu
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6PbWhWGUrY
>>83794557
Yeah, Maui's pretty great.
That other girl's not bad either.
>>83794745
Is handkerchief the new fedora?
>>83794385
>all the bitches die
>steve still keeps all the money
Good episode.
I think you mean "pocket square."
Holy fuck that girl looks like she is directly out of go animate
Uncanny Inhumans #10
hey hey kids.
>>83794259
>>83794268
>>83794279
>Detective Comics is the good Batman book
>Action Comics and the main Superman title are better than the main Batman title
Is Rebirth the Reverse New 52?
Also
>Tom King is boring, Humphries is decent
What Bizzaro world is this?
>>83794246
I don't know. I really don't know what happened to Tom King. I can't even say it's editorial mandate, because he's constantly bragged about this being THE Batman story he's wanted to tell. And Vision and Grayson are some of his best work, which were both under editor control.
As for Humphries, he's really just playing it safe. It isn't bad. But it also isn't great.
>>83794434
I wanted to excuse Tom after Batman Rebirth #1, because it was his first issue and he needed to set everything up.
And it was also co-written by Scott Snyder. As much as I love Snyder, sometimes his writing falls flat.
But at this point, it's clear Tom King, for some reason, cannot write Batman.
>>83794541
Maybe he chokes under the pressure of writing an S-list character?
Looks like Marvel is getting serious about Console Games now
>"Is [Spider-Man] a signal of things to come? Oh, yes. Absolutely. And we can’t wait to tell the world about it."
>Over the past few years, Marvel Games' output has been primarily on mobile (Avengers Academy, Contest of Champions, Future Fight), on PC (Marvel Heroes) and for Disney Infinity and Lego games. Marvel fans haven't had their own Batman: Arkham equivalent. But with multiple Marvel console games in development, it sounds...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>83794112
>Ong said Marvel Games has a set of criteria as it looks to work with publishers and developers.
>"What we look at first and foremost is the talent level of partner," he said. "Are they world class in building the games we're talking about? They have to have world-class talent. They have to be able to invest the resources to make that talent sing. Equally important is, do they have passion for the IP they're working on? Do they share...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>83794112
I could go for a decent action game with multiple Avengers, don't even need to get TOO fancy, something on the level of Spider-Man Shattered Dimensions would be fine.
I would also like a less-hyper Marvel fighting game, but I guess that makes me a filthy casual.
