How do you like the costumes in BvS?
How do you like Cavill as Supes and Affleck as Bats?
What about Eisenberg as Lex and Gadot as WW?
What would you like to see? Do you think the movie will end on the two big guys having a moment that starts their friendship? A nod? A handshake? A tender kiss?
I don't like either of the costumes. Batman suit looks like a duct tape and it makes Affleck look fat. Superman suit misses the part what makes him iconic. I don't like casting other than Affleck but movie will be good regardless.
>>80724024
>everything is shit
>movie will be good regardless
>>80723905
>How do you like the costumes in BvS?
Love em. They took a very clever way of defining them but still keeping them both with the spandex and cape with the alternate textures(as we saw with CW Spidey, having a minimalist texture looks like shit in reality) and Bruce having a weightlifter bodytype and Clark having the triangle. I can't really imagine this Bruce without the fat bat though and I do wish Supes had a red belt.
Also Wondy looks great as well
>How do you like Cavill as Supes and Affleck as Bats?
I think Affleck will be great and I hope Cavill gets a better chance to shine in this compared to MoS as I felt the way the story was told did him a dis-service.
>What about Eisenberg as Lex and Gadot as WW?
Expecting him to be great once we see his two faced nature, which I hope before BOYS MMMM
She'll be passable enough
I think they'll have a bonding moment after they save Martha were they'll talk about there parents and Bruce'll remark his mother was called Martha as well. Supes'll give him a hand on his shoulder then they'll have the shake
How does /co/ feel about them?
They are as close to a Saturday morning cartoon hour as it gets nowadays.
Anything that isn't adapted from a New 52 book is decent to great.
Me and my wife enjoy them greatly. Wish marvel would do something too.
>>80723383
Not true, I'm still upset about ASS.
Actually pretty much any attempt at adapting a Morrison story has been bad.
Does Song of the South really live up to the social norm that it's "racist?" In the last few years I've felt like more people are calling out and questioning this notion, especially compared to other media out these days.
I'm hoping someday they'll finally give it the Blu-ray release it needs, or at least air it on Treasures From the Disney Vault.
Even if you find the live action segments boring, the animation is some of the most spectacular the Disney studios have ever put out, James Basketts acting is A+, and the songs are definitely classics thats original forms should be remembered.
It's the whole "glossing over slavery" part that pisses people off, which is understandable, imo. I'm sure it'll eventually get a rerelease someday, most likely in a limited run.
>>80722070
>>80722997
It is ignorant racism rather than hateful racism, which is the kind that you can EASILY stop and deal with by just NOT shying away from it.
Disney hiding from Song of the South has mythologized the racist aspects of it and damaged their companies reputation far greater than actually confronting it, discussing it, and accepting it as racism based in the ignorance of literally 70 years ago.
Frankly, the animated characters were entertaining, and Uncle Remus was likable, and would have been likable still, if they had made his character stronger, and even added touches of the reality of the time to him and the human world.
Also, interestingly, the human villains were both white, and were represented in Remus's tales by Br'er Fox and Br'er Bear, who could be consider white by proxy in that case.
Considering that in that time period many other depictions of Blacks showed them to be drug using rapists and 1 level above wild animals, Song of the South hardly lives up to the racial hype, at least when taken in a rational historical context.
Also, in before tldr
>>80723637
Disney tried to promote the script to the NAACP and other black rights activists before they even filmed it, wanting to get their approval, and they said no, this is really bad, there's a lot that's offensive here and needs fixing. He ignored them and made it anyway without fixing it.
So you can't really say it was ignorant. He was warned.
Is The Incredible Hulk worth watching? I'd like to see the MCU but I find it annoying that Marvel replaced Norton with Ruffalo in the later movies
Nope, the villain is shit and it's 100% inessential to Bruce's character and inconsequential to the MCU overall. The fact that it's not Ruffalo makes it feel totally disconnected from the rest of the MCU too.
If you want to watch a somewhat passable Hulk film feel free to give it a shot. But if your interest is in filling in MCU gaps then don't bother.
>>80722038
It's pretty bad. None of the Banner stuff makes any sense, Betty cucks her actual husband after five minutes of Bruce being back, and Stan Lee turns into a hulk after drinking Hulk blood.
Norton apparently fought hard to make it as shitty as it was.
>>80722169
Actually I take it back, I was trying to not be a ComicbookGuy by calling it somewhat passable. But on further reflection it is a bit shit.
Oh, /co/, do lighten up. Sing something with a little...bounce in it!
BOOTY BOOTY BUTTS EVERYWHERE
WINTER WRAP UP WINTER WRAP UP
SOME
Between Jonas and Clay, who's the worst father?
>>80720696
Clay. At least Jonas was rich.
Clay because my dad actually beat me with a belt and kept lusting after his male friends while ranting about homosexuals, whereas my dad never got me kidnapped by supervillains.
>>80720696
They're both really, really shitty fathers - just in different ways.
what was /co/'s opinions on the Black Panther Animated series?
>>80720532
Awesome opening theme.
Completely forgettable show.
It happened.
>>80720610
Did it really?
![watchmen-theatrical-poster-big[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/TGPMCvN.jpg "watchmen-theatrical-poster-big[1]")
>There are people on this board who thought this was a good adaptation.
>>80720165
One such fag reporting in, sir!
it was alright.
Keyword being adaptation...yes it was a good adaptation.
Think about the whole context. Hollywood, executives, jews, etc. The fact that we got the movie as we got it its a fucking miracle.
I remember seeing a clip of Bye Bye Beavers and was wanting to know if someone had a link and to discuss its impact.
Literally the first result on google for Bye Bye Beavers is the clip.
>>80720600
Its actually just the audio from the clip.
>>80720069
There is no video clip. You were just remembering it because you've heard the audio so many times you've convinced yourself there must be a corresponding video.
How does /co/ feel about this?
The fact that they're not attending Pokey Oaks Kindergarten kind of pisses me off.
I don't get it.
>ACHIVEMENT
So, apparently, there's been a daily Spider-Man newspaper strip running since 1977? And it's still going to this day?
Stan Lee is credited as writer, but I highly doubt he's been writing these daily for 39 years...
>>80719718
Yep. It's really weird. It's still somehow running after all these years. And everything still seems to be stuck in 1977.
It's like the UVB-76 of comics.
Pic related, the writer once took a jab at One More Day.
>>80719718
>>80719790
IIRC Roy Thomas is ghost writer on the comic, and was the one who confirmed the strip's rollback with OMD was a dream sequence right when the story began.
>>80719718
I liked the Black Widow arc.
Why was he so positive that humans destroyed Earth-Prime? Does he think that the Thanagarians aren't capable of destroying an entire planet?
Earth Prime was our Earth all along, and we don't have Thanagarians.
Wouldn't it create world where he succeeded in destroying Earth-Prime?
>>80720864
>>80719543
>>80719497
It doesn't matter.
>Marvel Execs and Editors say after Secret Wars EVERYTHING WILL CHANGE AND THE 616 WON'T EXIST ANYMORE
>really nothing has changed other than a handful of Ultimates now part of the cast
>the universe is still 616
Why do people still waste money on events?
The Secret Wars was such an awful and pointless event. I stopped after issue 4.
>>80719308
Because they're fun
Also no one ever said anything about 616 not existing anymore, in fact i'm pretty sure they strictly say that it's not a reboot multiple times. Why do people keep thinking that these kind of events are? You retards kept saying the same thing about Convergence.
Calling the refugees from 1610 a 'handful of Ultimates' is pretty generous. By my count we have Miles and his supporting cast, Maker... who else? They didn't even use it as an opportunity to import Ultimate Nick Fury to replace Nick Fury jr.
Can /co/ explain what Hyperion is, I tried looking it up, and I got literally 4 different versions that interacted with the regular Marvel Universe in the past, and one who was basically the Ultimate Version of the character.
>>80718691
That's because there's a bunch of different Hyperions across the multiverse, but in most versions, he's an Eternal. The one in current 616 was a Hyperion that was a baby Eternal on planet not!Krypton, that was sent to Earth when not!Krypton blew up.
There are multiple versions of Hyperion running around, or were I'm pretty sure a couple have been killed off. Just think Marvel's Superman, in fact the whole Squadron Supreme is a bunch of DC parallels in the Marvel universe
>>80718762
Who then ended up in 616 when his Earth was destroyed in an incursion.
Alright /co/, which is better?
>>80718584
Baman>Piderman
>>80718584
BTAS by far.
If you posted the '90s Spider-Man show, it would've been a different story.
The one people actually remember.
