>people are upset at the idea of Ghostbusters performing well at the box office
It doesn't look funny and I don't want to see it, but what's the problem with someone else enjoying it? I don't need to have my taste in film validated by sales figures.
>>71598717
because if its a success it will spawn another 2 movies and Ghostbusters will be raped to death.
retard.
If it makes money were just going to get a sequel and more of these shitty remakes
>>71598826
>>71599561
how does this affect you in any way
>I'm queer. I'm gay. I'm homosexual. I'm a poof, I'm a poofter, I'm a ponce. I'm a bumboy, battyboy, backside artist, bugger. I'm bent. I am that arsebandit. I lift those shirts. I'm a faggot-ass, fudge-packing, shit-stabbing uphill gardener. I dine at the downstairs restaurant; I dance at the other end of the ballroom. I'm Moses and the parting of the red cheeks. I fuck and I’m fucked. I suck and I’m sucked. I rim them and wank them, and every single man's had the fucking time of his life.
What did he mean by this?
>>71598573
I think he was explaining how he got aids.
>>71598573
I think he was making an allegory about Westeros and what he was doing to it.
Really makes you think.................................
We properly cast Lara Croft other than fridge boobs
Her voice actor is actually pretty hot and has no problem with getting crazy naked
>>71634905
hawt
>>>/v/
Fuck off already
I just saw this movie with my family. I was really excited about it because I really liked the game, and I thought this movie was garbage. It felt like a Chinese knock-off of a real movie.
Did anyone else see this disappointment?
>>71598469
I saw it the day after I saw Zootopia, and I thought it was pretty coincidental that they both open with a father figure give a cheesy speech about how "You really shouldn't chase after your dreams."
>>71598469
Literally all of the aliens in this movie that aren't characters from the established franchise look like they were from Planet 51 or Antz.
Throughout all this Ghostbusters remake hullabaloo, where was the hate train for the remakes of Robocop and Total Recall?
I felt like I was the only one that was truly livid that two classic Verhoeven movies were being tainted with boorishly CGI driven imitators, and still haven't seen either out of protest.
Yet, people were okay with Total Recall (despite the charisma vacuum that is Colin Farrell) and people even LIKED the new Robocop despite it lacking any good satire (A parody of Fox News and Bill O'Reilly? Oh my god this has never been done before!) and a fun but at the same time, plausibly gritty looking future (ED-209's in Iraq lmao)
So truly, why does the new Ghostbusters get the hate? Why the backlash against reboots now?
No Biel butt/10
Robocop and Total Recall were ultraviolent adult films that not many kids had formative experiences seeing, so they don't have the same nostalgic value of the family-friendly Ghostbusters films.
>>71598448
People did say those 2 remakes were gonna be shit.
And that was it. Everyone knew they were probably right and didn't see the need to argue with them.
>"They're remaking Robocop with a PG13 rating. It's gonna be shit."
>"Yeah you're probably right."
>"They're remaking Total Recall and they're not even setting it on Mars. It's gonna be shit."
>"Yeah you're probably right."
And then comes Ghosbusters
>"They're remaking Ghostbusters with a female cast. It's gonna be shit."
>"WHAT? GET FUCKED YOU MISOGNYIST MAN BABY, I'LL SEE IT TWICE IF YOU DONT SEE IT."
>Argument escalates from there to where we are today
People always shit talk remakes. It's just this time some cunts picked a shitty comedy as their hill to die on.
Anyone watching this kino next Sunday?
Already watched it, also where's wallace
>>71599351
Was it any good? Been thinking about watching it .
I just watched the first episode of this show and came here to post a thread about it.
Why isn't /tv/ talking about The Night Of? I just watched the first episode and it's pure kino. I felt dread, anxiety and a bit of terror for basically two thirds of the episode.
The lead detective, Naz and Turturro are all knocking it out of the park in the acting department.
Is Family Guy's version of this alternate reality accurate?
>>71634410
The ruling class would have found other excuses to keep the majority dumb.
uhuh
retarded shitposter
Yes, Seth McFarlane did extensive research for this gag
He just died of cancer. rip
hack
>>71634155
well shit. I haven't seen anything by him. what would you recommend?
jesus christ everyone is dying this year
ITT: Characters that are literally you
DUDE CULTURAL PESSIMISM LMAO
Are you some kinda weenie
>>71598060
THE WEAK SHOULD FEAR THE STRONG
>>71598090
Maybe he's a GOOBAH
Yeah I'm thinking he is back.
https://youtu.be/waixG1Dhr3w
Has anyone else ever Unjusted so bad bros?
>>71633161
didn't this guy almost die because of booze?
Was Billy Idol in a plane crash?
haha i love memes
ITT: Admit truths no one ever seems to admit
The Star Wars movies are corny as hell and lose all appeal after you turn like 13, but the Indiana Jones trilogy is badass and can be enjoyed at pretty much any age
>>71597872
hmm
no
the 2nd one is shit
only the first and third are good
>>71597931
>the 2nd one is shit
pleb opinion
>>71597872
I thought Indy was an enlightened professor who cared about natives. why then was he stealing their Golden God and destroying their entire culture?
Indy a shit.
So now it's over, is it safe to say this will be the last ever series of current format Top Gear?
>>71597733
>Evans sexual assault charges
FACTS
>>71597733
I didn't even watch it ironically anymore.
Still can't believe they added a fucking offroad section to the race track, with a god damn jump.
>>71597733
forgot it was on. Watching the footy instead
was it any good? Did Chris kick off?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7fP9q_LyDc
>Oh, Jesus, fuck!
>She's peeling me, fucking...
>What the fuck!?
>They are eating children! Fucking children!
>Fuck me, right?
>Run for your fucking lives!
>It will fuck you up for life
LOL100% on rottentomatoes
that war scene was pretty cool, but judging from the cast and directors the humor's gonna be pretty bad
The fucks were added in to make sure parents know it's not a children movie
Hotdog buns don't look like that
![10506907_796242320407475_4699968639431015422_o[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/JM2Ibbe.jpg "10506907 796242320407475 4699968639431015422 o[1]")
>Yes, unless Walt Disney pulls off a miracle overseas, Steven Spielberg’s The BFG will be that rarest of things: A Steven Spielberg box office bomb. The $140 million fantasy film, based on a Roald Dahl book, will earn around $22 million over the July 4th holiday.
>Most people will argue that the star-studded and critically-trashed 1941 was Steven Spielberg’s first box office disaster. And while the film did only make $31 million domestic on a $35m budget, it did make $92m worldwide, thus nearly tripling its budget. So for this argument, I would consider it a disappointment rather than an outright disaster.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2016/07/04/box-office-the-bfg-could-be-steven-spielbergs-first-outright-commercial-flop/#6fd5f34751d6
Why don't goyim like Spielberg anymore? Did they not like Schindler's List?
>>71633007
Was the actual movie any good? Not memein'
>>71633007
I feel like cinema altogether is dying as a medium when paying attention to the sales this year
only generic and mindless movies make money while the actual thought-provoking ones are "disappointments" or even "disasters"
>the bfg
>the big fucking giant
Who allowed this?
![sam-hyde[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/egYTeQX.jpg "sam-hyde[1]")
