Brock Lesnar for new Venom.
>>71864171
If he didn't get sick that time he'd been the goat fighter
>>71864429 get sick that time
>that time
He had been sick for years but it took forever to take hold because he's truly a fucking beast.
I remember there was a line in one of Raimi's Spiderman movies that caused a huge controversy but can't remember what was it. Does /tv/ remember it?
"Mary Jane? Like the drug?"
"Doctor Strange?"
"That's good, but it's taken"
"He stole that guys pizza"
TL;DR
Were Renoir and Welles ripping off earlier examples of deep focus, or did they bring it to another level of quality, incomparable to previous examples? What are some films with incredible real deep focus apart from Renoir and Welles?
Can we discuss deep focus? What I've learned is that starting in the 80s cinema has developed a trend that calls intensified continuity:
1) The average length of each shot in a film has become shorter over the years.
2) Scenes are built up by closer framing.
3) More extreme focal lengths are used.
4) The scenes include an increased number of camera moves.
Master shots where two or more characters hold a conversation have gone out of fashion, lessening the need for deep focus. If more than one plane in the image contains narrative information, filmmakers switch focus instead of keeping both focal planes sharp. In addition, modern sets tend to have less lighting for more comfortable working conditions, and use of deep focus tends to require more light.
>If there is a single word that sums up the difference between filmmaking at the middle of the 20th century and the filmmaking of today, it is "coverage". Derived from television, it refers to the increasingly common practice of using multiple cameras for a scene (just as television would cover a football game).
>That kind of staging is a lost art, which is too bad. The reason they no longer work that way is because it means making choices, real choices, and sticking to them. That's not what people do now. They want all the options they can get in the editing room.
1/2
Usually when you see deep focus being mentioned, the examples of great films that invented it and used it well are The Rules of the Game (1939) and Citizen Kane (1941). HOWEVER I then stumbled upon this very interesting article
http://fredrikonfilm.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-deep-focus-conundrum.html
which says that deep focus was in fact used many times before these two films, and it were Renoir, Welles and Toland who was influenced by previous examples of deep focus and not vice versa.
My questions are:
1) How reliable is this article? Were there really very...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
bumperino
>>71863695
Back then Film actors and Theatre actors weren't so heavily separated, meaning long uncut scenes were second nature to the actors and editors didn't have to put in so much work as the actors drew people into the scene instead of the editing.
Deep Focus wasn't so much a technique as much as a way of facilitating long, uncut wide shots, especially if you planned on camera movement around a room. You didn't want parts falling out of focus mid-take if you were doing the entire shot in one....
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
WHAT WENT WRONG?
Absolutely nothing
>>71863639
It's a prequel and all prequels are shit.
Season 2 didn't have anything as memorable at 1; also didn't end as strong
Still pretty good thoughkim is a qt
Why those references to Lolita and Alice's Adventures in Wonderland? Are they trying to say that Lex is a pedophile?
>>71863447
He also references A Streetcar Named Desire.
>So we don't have to depend upon the kindness of strangers/monsters.
Also The Wizard of Oz.
I thought he was making references to Fallout New Vegas with all that "god is tribal" talk.
What if he is?
Julius Caesar & Alexander The Great liked to fug young boys. All great men in the western traditional experiment with pederasty
Am I the only one that really hates Suicide Squad as a concept?
>Lol so edgy criminals who have to do what we say cause they got bombs inside them cuz we're the big bad evil shady government lmao!
>>71863156
yes
Pretty much
>>71863156
The comics are fun. Not that we'll see any of that in the movie.
Is Mr. Robot some really edgy meme shit or actually good TV show? I want to watch some new shows with my gf and wanted to try it but it seems really tryhard
Is it as le nerdy hacker man as it seems or is it a good show for normies?
How about you watch it and decide for your self
it's a good show, don't believe the /tv/ shitposters.
>>71862896
I wouldn't describe it as "edgy meme shit", but it's definitely not a good show.
>Watch Naked Gun 3
>Frank turns down the chance to fuck a QT trap
WTF
Remember thinking I'd do it when I was 10
he's only disgusted by how curvy that dick is
>>71862809
What was his endgame?
what a mess
yeah I know
Go back
>>71862796
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxV99PYX37c
pretty much
What are some films where you think the main plot has been resolved half way through but the protagonist realises they've been duped and the last half of the film is about uncovering a conspiracy etc
Total Recall
Ignore the rating on imdb. People give it that just because it was made by Uwe Boll and people have not seen his non video game movies which are really good.
Anyway this movie has an amazing twist that you would never have expected.
We Noir now.
>tfw you'll never have a love story with charlotte
why even bother living
>>71862552
You'll never have one because you don't make the effort to find it.
>>71862744
that's not true.. THAT'S NOT TRUE
DELETE THIS
>>71862744
fuck you fuck you FUCK YOU!!! ITS NOT MY FAULT WOMEN DONT FIND ME ATTRACTUVE FUCK OTUYUY
Who are more intelligent:
People who like Hitchcock
People who dont
Bulum
>>71862486
hitchcock is dead, thread is irrelevant
>watching movies from before 2007 (other than fight club)
baka
ITT: Contrarian filters
Did you know it took twelve years to make?
>>71862434
Did you know it's a pretty good movie anyway?
>>71862445
Not true, but did you know it took twelve years to make?
ITT: Meme shows
>>71862058
That show is fucking disgusting. The idea of Netflix shows defining generations fills me with horror and anger.
Your favorite show, you colossal faggot.
>>71862154
Why?
>The first hour of the two-part premiere began to stream a few minutes into the facebook live Q&A session...
>USA then let it be known via Twitter and other platforms that the hour would stream for a limited time via Twitter at 8:30 p.m. ET, Snapchat via the Buzzfeed Discover Channel at 8:45 p.m. and the “Mr. Robot” YouTube channel and via USANetwork.com at 9 p.m.
The first episode is out, what are you waiting for /tv/ ???
https://kat.cr/mr-robot-s02e01-720p-webrip-aac2-0-h-264-knitting-ettv-t12919900.html
I've seen the one from that torrent link and it's only the first part of the premiere. There is supposed to be a part two and it's nowhere to be found.
Did they not stream it or something?
Please go back to redd.it and never comeback
>>71862085
No they just streamed part one.
It was pretty good. Sets up a lot of things nicely.