what's this guys name again?
his name is >>>/b/
I have man boobs just like this guy. Life is suffering. You can't feel comfortable talking to a girl because the first thing you what to bring up is that you have man boobs so you can just get it out of the way instead of having to bombard her with your huge tits when you guys first meet up on a date.
>>70487474
Bub
Is it possible for a twentysomething, kissless virgin to enjoy romcoms?
You can't fully appreciate a rom-com until you've been in a romantic relationship. Just like you can't really understand Star Wars until you've been to outer space.
>>70487371
she cute
>>70487371
YesI do
Posting then out
#2
>>70487210
>someone wastes their time making fake shit for no reason
whats the point?
>>70485306
>>70483371
Jon
Remember to save your spot on the streams before you lose the chance.
>>70487187
It says here your a stannisfag even after his death is confirmed.
Care to explain?
Anyone else looking forward to this? I thought it would be a straight to dvd type of film, but with a decent budget, I wonder if it will be any good.
>>70487153
>roland emmerich post ID4 without mel gibson
nah son
>>70487153
What's the part 1 business on the poster all about?
>>70487180
? Wasn't mel Gibson supposed to be in the thor movies though
About to watch this film, what should i expect?
Epicness
Real magic at the end
>>70487112
Tesla shenanigans.
>J.K. Rowlinghas a message for any Internet “idiots” who took issue with the castingof black actress Noma Dumezweni as grown-up Hermione Grangerin the forthcomingHarry Potterplay:“Hermione can be a black woman with my absolute blessing and enthusiasm.”That’s what shetoldThe Observer, in a new interview published Sunday, about the backlash Dumezweni’s casting inspired from some corners of the Internet.“With my experience of social media, I thought that idiots were going to idiot,” Rowling,no stranger to interacting with people online, told...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>70487098
Seems kinda dumb, but the writers should be free to do what they want
I think it's high time for a black voldemort and death eaters, I'm sick of the slytherins always being represented by FUCKING WHITE MALES, Where is the fucking diversity?
>>70487127
yea writers should be able to write whatever they want, since that's their creative freedom. however, don't expect not be lambasted by fans for retconning shit just because you want to play favor points for this SJW fad.
Let's play a game, /tv/.
>go to http://graphtv.kevinformatics.com
>enter a TV show
>post the resulting graph, but crop out the name of the show
>other anons try to guess which show
no thanks.
>>70487073
Arrow.
That last dot makes it obvious.
Amidoinitrite.webm
Will this be ages 18-27 childhood nostalgia kino?
http://m.imdb.com/title/tt2091256/
directed by nolan
>>70486919
Gay agit prop? No thanks.
>Ed Helms
Why do they do this to us?
Why are there so many Scientologists in Hollywood?
Because it's a religion where your worth is on how much wealth you have.
Same thing with Ayn Rand, Right wing Libertarianism and Anarcho-Capitalism.
Because actors are really dumb, really rich, and their presence attracts starfuckers. So I think Scientologists were actively and deliberately trying to get actors to join
i imagine its hard to get attention or be super edgy when youre already a famous person
What did you guys think of Spectre's opening? Tracking shot aside I thought the scene was impressive. I really loved the atheistic of it.
The whole Day of the Dead thing was really cool.
https://youtu.be/cbqv1kbsNUY
What are some of your favorite opening sequences? Doesn't have to be Bond, it can be anything.
I really liked the opening to Inglorious Basterds as well.
>>70486819
the best Bond opening scene in the worst Bond film
>>70486819
I liked it too.
It's a shame they blew 100 million dollars on it, though. That money could have been spent hiring better writers.
I hate myself for saying this but the opening sequence of JJ's first Trek movie is pure kino.
Is this show any good?
it's prettypreachy
>>70486489
Try watching it.
>>70486538
did you think this was clever or funny when you wrote it? Because it is neither.
Where were you when Amazon Studios saved Hollywood from itself?
I've never seen so many patrician films in one place.
the man in the castles was actually terrible though
>jesse eisenberg, kristen stewart and woody allen
I can't think of a movie I want to see less than whatever that is
What's the one with Rufus Sewell on the top left?
Why do nostalgiafags pretend this is any better than J.J. Abrams' version?
>>70486467
Because of nostalgia.
>it's a TOS thread
Ugh. Is anyone else tired of TOS and TNG threads? They're too overexposed and the memes are too overplayed.
I would happily take any DS9/VOY/ENT thread over any TOS/TNG thread, shitposts and all.
>>70486648
For a month or so I couldn't find anything but DS9 threads. Does it really even matter though? They all devolve into trek generals a hundred posts in anyway.
Why do people hate the film Ive never heard a good reason?? I loved this film yeah there are problems but not 28 percent on rotten tomatoes bad?
I don't know?????
>>70486374
so what if they do, if you enjoyed it, who gives a fuck.
>>70486374
They just don't like Zack Snyder. They go in looking for things to criticize and don't give the movie a chance.