>Trump wants to be seen as a responsible business executive. Ironically, given his hostility toward Latinos and other immigrant groups, his messages most resemble those irresponsible populists who have repeatedly ruined Latin America. On three big macroeconomic issues -- debt, inflation and financial regulation -- Trump would put the United States firmly on the road to becoming Argentina, a once-prosperous country until Juan and Eva Perón took over.
>On debt, Trump believes the more the better. His companies issue a great deal of debt because, in the downside scenario, developers like Trump can find ways to pay less than the face value of what is owed. He recently said this approach is an opportunity the U.S. Treasury is losing out on.
>The U.S. government, however, is not a speculative real-estate company. Alexander Hamilton realized, at the very start of the nation that having the federal government pay its debts in full, as well as assuming the states’ debts, was of fundamental importance. This was crucial not just for public finance but also for the ability of the private credit markets to operate in a reasonable fashion. And this is what Washington has done for more than 200 years.
>“Risk-free debt” is how U.S. debt is described in the world of finance. Once you introduce default risk into those calculations, interest rates would spike for both the government and the private sector.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/iduskcn0y7051?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=5739da9604d3015d59aebeb1&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
>>74171012
So so summarize...
If donald continues to do what Obama has done for 8 years it will suddenly be bad..
Top kek m8
>Obama blows up debt and inflation worsens
>not a problem
>Donald Trump mentions debt and inflation
>suddenly it becomes a problem
Fucking media.
>>74171012
Recession is coming.
Donald even warned of it in one of his rallies.
I have a strong feeling it's all orchestrated. They let a "third party" in the white house then, BOOM, massive recession as the pundants all laugh and jerk off over it while the establishment just says "SEE! SEE WHAT CHANGING THE SCRIPT GETS YOU GOYS?!"
Did this movie end up being a red pill? Or did they twist it and give us a "not all piggies" message.
I don't know but SJWs got ultra butt-hurt:
http://archive.is/ocvAH
>>74170937
>A mediocre animated film is tolerable but subtly injecting reprehensible propaganda beneath all the deliberate noise marks a new low for Sony Pictures.
> To me, there is something deeply disturbing about using a children’s film to mislead them in this way and someone should answer for it.
They dare to say that ? Kek.
>>74170937
I haven't seen it, and I probably won't see it but I am completely sure it will be a "not all m̶u̶s̶l̶i̶m̶s̶ PIGS" message.
I know that most of you here are quite conservative, but I would like to hear more interesting opinions than "The whiter the babies the better".
Abortion seems like a big topic in American politics, personally I don't really mind abortion, atleast when the baby isn't much more than a collection of cells.
Also, I don't really like the idea that irresponsible teens/adults will raise kids, especially when the pregnancy was a mistake, It's like giving the kid a bad future right from the start(Also rape victims who get pregnant).
However, I'm not sure about my position when it comes to a pregnant women and her freedoms, this time I would like to point out alcohol:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/10/nyregion/bartenders-cant-refuse-pregnant-women-alcohol-new-york-city-says.html?_r=0
Should alcohol be illegal to purchase as a pregnant woman? should it be illegal to drink it?
We know Alcohol is bad for the baby, and since we know he's growing up to be a full human some day, would it be too cruel to refuse pregnant women the option to drink?
Should it be restricted to an extent? is wine ok but vodka is no go(for example)?
And generally, how much should the state get involved when it comes to the mother taking care of her body for the sake of the baby?
No comment, but have a bump. I want to see this unfold.
Bumping, waiting for /pol/-like serious discussion
>>74170854
All Jews should give themselves a post natal abortion.
Sanders paid over $400,000 for this ugly vinyl-sided shitbox colonial - and still owes a pile of money on it, even though he is old enough to be retired! With no savings in the bank, if he ever loses re-election to the Senate, he could be foreclosed upon! (if he didn't have such a cushy pension).
Why is Bernie so angry? He's angry because he has failed at life. Yes, he has been elected to the Senate as a Socialist from Vermont - insuring that he has little or no influence on Congress. And he's running for President of the United States, but isn't winning. Ralph Nader ran - a number of times. He's a loser, too.
Why do I say that Bernie is a failure? Look at his tax return from 2014. (why he has not released 2013 or 2015 is not clear, I suspect they might not be pretty). He made close to $200,000 a year with his salary in the Senate and his wife's business income. That's some serious bucks and clearly makes him 1%'er material - if he had bothered to save any of it.
And he's made a six-figure salary for a number of years - well over a decade - and yet still has a mortgage and no after-tax savings to speak of.
And then there are the reports of his credit-card debt - anywhere from $25,000 to $65,000 which he blames on having to pay for his niece's weddings (a man has to pay for his niece's weddings? I didn't know).
In other words, he is fiscally irresponsible.
This is the guy you want to run the country???
>>74170842
>$200,000
>1%
u wot
>>74170988
$200,00 makes you wealthy, maybe not 1% but up there.
>>74170842
He should redistribute some of his campaign funds into his pockets.
> I know I have the body of a weak and feeble woman, but I have the heart and stomach of a king, and of a king of England too.
t.Queen Elizabeth the First.
What did she mean by this?
she meant "I am the sovereign and you shall kill Spaniards for me"
an inbred from 500 years ago is smarter than most people today
>>74170796
the first feminazi
https://gyazo.com/a3876d5c46a6c6ca3aff216900b64b28
Thoughts?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R727Ip76p8
>>74170713
>its 2016
They can't help themselves can they?
>>74170825
It really is the best argument most leftist can come up with....
Red pill me abou Jews. I need a STRONG pill
>>74170617
http://pastebin.com/GkqsuWAH
>>74170617
>sir, the dat boi forced meme isn't gaining any traction on /pol/ what should we do?
>roll out the anti-semitic variant! They'll love it!
>>74170617
>Red pill me abou Jews
It's simple. It all follows from these axioms:
>The Holocaust didn't happen. Only 200,000 Jews died in WW2.
>Israel and Saudi Arabia did 9/11.
>AIPAC is the most powerful lobby in North America.
>Israel and AIPAC was already preparing the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria ... in the 90s.
Unconditionally believe and accept these as fundamental truths when reading news or watching political stuff. After a while you will understand what is going on in the world.
Fucking hell. I just finished my first semester at college.
I have no words to describe how painfull it was to sit through this bullshit.
Degeneracy, leftist propaganda, you fucking name it. It's horrible.
I lack the psychological strengh to do the rest. No way I can keep it up even a year.
What are /pol/ approved alternatives to this cancer?
>>74170587
I was thinking about starting a business, or maybe join France's foreign legion. Not that I fancy emigration, but Canada was pretty much dead the second Trudeau was elected.
>>74170587
Go to a private Catholic school. You'll still find some liberalism there but its the best we have since there are no Orthodox schools.
>>74170926
>Canada
>Catholic schools
I wish I could, but there's only one in the whole province and it's only teaching theology.
It's not like anyone actually cares about that around here, so I doubt I could actually get a job with that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGRjJsFyelU
>>74170431
Who the fuck is that????
Fucken killed my sense of humor forever
>>74170431
That is fake.....
This kinda makes you think, doesn't it?
>>74170363
Both of them are cancer.
>>74170363
Think about building that wall? you bet
don't forget to pay paco
>>74170363
Wall street...who supports letting the migrants in and is against the wall (ironically).
When did you realise The Don was a chessmaster
>>74170310
“Unite to win. Divide to conquer.”
― Donald J. Trump, Midas Touch
Did he out-jew the Jew?
>>74170310
>50%/2 is less than 50%
This is considered chess in America. Here people make their rivals fuck ugly niggers in hotel than call it a rape, this is chess.
>>74170310
It doesn't matter at the end, trump will fail.
NEED JEW MEMES NOW!
MOSTLY INFOGRAPHS THOUGH, DEALING WITH SOME SALTY JEWS ON TWATTER AFTER TYSON FURY'S RED PILLING IN THERE.
Website links and facts equally requested and greatly appreciated!
>>74170267
Bump
>>74170267
What a let down 4cuck...
>>74170267
just look up happy merchant on jewgle you dolt, then click images
/pol/ appreciation thread.
For all the conflict, shitposting, and bants we give each other.
All the Christianity Vs Athiesm(and heathens), Libertarians Vs Nat Socs, USA Vs Everyone Vs Australia, and old fags Vs /Reddit/ refugees.... We all share the same enemies, and our glorious love of bantz.
Post your best /pol/ board material. It's been an honour serving with you.
Seriously, what the fuck is going on? Hillary was supposed to be the definite winner, but in national polls she's fallen almost 5% against Trump in the last month alone, and the debates haven't even started yet. If trends continue at anything like this rate, she's going to lose. What's happening?
>>74170130
She is crooked
>>74170130
She is supposed to lose
>>74170231
this
>>74170130
She's a horrible candidate with a list of negatives a mile long, and has fucked up and sold out in every political position she has ever held.
She has absolutely nothing going for her.
>A noted Princeton University professor has attacked the very notion of transgenderism, saying that the belief “that a woman can be trapped inside a man’s body” is ludicrous and superstitious, with no basis in medical fact.
>Robert P. George, the McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton, sent out a tweet late Sunday evening questioning the science behind the transgender movement, in reaction to the Obama administration’s threatening letter to educators mandating accommodation of gender-confused teenagers.
>>74170078
resignation in 3...2...
>>74170078
>how to spot tenure 101
>>74170123
this
for an ivy league professor he's quite the retard
