How did /pol/ react to this guy when the whole manhunt occurred? Do you think he survived?
>he wasn't there for the dorner happening
one of the greatest moments in /pol/ history
>>74182856
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y79iAX-CZ6M
>C A N T
>O
>R
>N
>E
>R
Hi, guys.
Lately, a few days ago, ukraine won on eurovision 2016. Most sane people perfectly understand that this win was absolutely merited and deserved. But some russian schweines still think that it was bought, rigged and political.
As this is the place where many people from different countries assembled, i ask you to post here your approvals of ukraine and praises of win of such delightful song as jamala's.
Russia won the phone vote. Y'know the actual people watching and not the politically motivated jew-judges.
If you think that ukraine didn't deserve this win, write it as well.
If anything, giving Ukraine the win was probably an insult considering it is Eurovision.
Consider the fact that women tend to date up in order for their offspring to have the best genes possible. If black men are so ugly and undesirable, why are white women increasingly mating with them?
>Teehee daddy will be SO angry!
They're shameless whores who fell for the BBC meme and want to piss off daddy
Did America just annex Australia or something?
What has niggers done to benefit society?
peanut butter
>>74182682
Made lots of Swedish babies
>>74182682
I want to fuck kirino in the ass so bad...
![160302005451-trump-and-hillary-exlarge-169[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/c76Z2NL.jpg "160302005451-trump-and-hillary-exlarge-169[1]")
Shillary or trump
>>74182419
Hillary desu
>>74182419
Hillary of course. Trump wants negotiations and trade with Russia, Hillary wants strong Israel and WW3.
>>74182419
Hillary has twenty years experience overthrowing foreign governments and is heavily funded by defence contractors that need wars to profit.
>Called "The punisher"
> turned Davao City from the "murder capital of The Philippines" to what tourism organisations now describe as "the most peaceful city in southeast Asia"
>Formed death squads to kill criminals
>Called Pope Francis "son of a bitch"
>Force a tourist to swallow a cigarette
>Womanizer hated by feminists
>Joked on rapists
>Joke on disabled people
>Called "Asian Trump"
>In his electoral campaign he promised to kill 100 000 criminals in six months and leave their corpse in the Manila Bay
Now he has become President of the Philippines and after 4 days has asked for death penalty and wants snipers hidden in the cities.
Why he isnt our God, \pol\?
>>74182395
Fuckin champ.
Would vote for AND party with.
\pol\ he is truly God
Censorship is alive and well in Britain.
Story: Daily Telegraph publishes a letter which has over 300 business leaders and CEO's backing Brexit
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/15/eu-referendum-more-than-300-business-leaders-back-a-brexit/
This story has been published on websites like:
The Daily Mail
The Daily Express
Sky News
Belfast Telegraph
Bloomberg News
The Herald (Scottish Paper)
Wall Street Journal
Does it get a mention on the BBC? Nothing on BBC Politics. Nothing on BBC News. Nothing on BBC Business. The only mention is in their paper review where they dedicate just one line to it if you scroll down to the Daily Telegraph's frontpage.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-36299187
And now they're even accepting pro-Remain advertisements on their website for users outside the UK.
On ITV News they have 3 articles on the same fucking story, Boris' remarks about the EU's and Hitler's aims being comparable. Nothing on the 300 businesses backing Brexit.
And nothing whatsoever, as expected, on the pro-EU newspapers like the Guardian, the Indy, and the FT.
If we all make complaints, the BBC will have to respond and post the story.
Here's the link I used to complain
https://ssl.bbc.co.uk/complaints/forms/?lang=en&reset=&uid=126354403
I complained about "Not enough coverage" and I put in my explanation that this was bias by omission, given so many other news websites have covered this story. I also pointed out that the BBC has some positively dull story about 'GCHQ posts on Twitter' on its BBC Politics page. Clearly a letter with 300 businesses backing Brexit is far more important to the general public than what GCHQ does on Twitter.
>And now they're even accepting pro-Remain advertisements on their website for users outside the UK.
Here's the proof.
bump
up
>be politician
>get shot in the head
>have a warship named after you
Americans will defend this
>>74182045
Who cares?
Isn't the joke that the ship is unarmed other than point defense?
I swear I laughed when I heard about this a few years ago, there is kek to be had here, but frankly I don't care enough to dig it back up.
If anything I would have thought Jared Lee Loughner would be a scarier name
Which one is worst?
>>74181864
The English.
Capitalist are greedy.
Jews are manipulative outsiders.
The english are traitors to their own kind.
very little difference if any
>>>/leftypol/
>2k16
>still falling for the wedding jew
Give me one good reason why a 20-35 year old white man should ever get married.
Insurance, citizenship, forming an alliance with your long term enemies by marrying their princess
>>74181859
Because we are real men making a vow to real women to start a real family. We are not MGTOW meninists or cucks. We are the traditional family.
>>74181859
It's a holy sacrament ordained by God.
Your claims that Jews are trying to destroy the white race don't even make sense. Let us for the moment assume that Jews really do control Europe and America, which itself is questionable.
>1. Why would the Jews want to change things? Wouldn't their priority be to ensure that as little as possible changes so that their control will not risk disruption?
>2. If the Jews did want to change things, why would they want to replace easily domesticated white people with Middle-Eastern and African Muslims who by and large despise Jews and Israel?
>3. In particular, consider the changing demographics and voting patterns. The more Europe becomes Muslim, the less it likes Israel. Israel is largely dependent on its Western allies, and while America is the chief ally and is not at immediate risk of becoming Muslim like Europe is, it would still be very significant if in fifty years or so European politicians were second generation Muslim immigrants who hate Israel.
>4. If Jews both control Europe and love money, why would they want to replace the clean, efficient European people (particularly Germans) with lazy, welfare-dependent Middle-Eastern and African people? I don't say that either of those races is lazy, by the way, but I know /pol/ thinks so.
>5. If you count Jew as its own race, Jews have the highest rate of interracial marriage in the world. Why would they ever want to replace hot Swedish chicks with burka-wearing Muslims who, again, hate Jews and Israel?
The actual reason Europe is being flooded with migrants is a result of two things: 1. Everyone has an equal right to want to live in a nice place, and even a European ghetto is nicer than being middle class in most of the countries the migrants are from, and 2. It benefits European politicians (who are by and large not Jews) to be able to claim humanitarianism points while importing people with predictable voting patterns. Jews are at best ancillary to these things.
>bad fashion sense
reported for antisemitism.
>InB4 JIDF plz go, nice try Schlomo, I wonder who is behind this post
>>74181933
kek
>>74181620
..and all the naysayers have to do is say the building was built differently/used different materials
>>74181620
He did it
>muslims unfairly blamed
This sounds great.
why are people so fucking retarded? he has like no chance of winning why would you do this?
>>74181428
those flames are lit tho
This is why we don't employ liberals
He has a 99.9% chance of winning according to leddit, the only website people like this use.
And now if you'll excuse me, I have to go donate my life's savings to make it 100%.
Can we have a good ol' YLYL thread?
I would personally like to request for someone to dump those high quality drawn "SHIEEET" nigga comics that I see circulating these threads from time to time here, always forget to save them, thanks
>>74181387
>>74181548
>>74181594
Kek thanks, keep 'em coming
>Trump wants to leave NATO and ban /pol/
WTF I HATE USA NOW
He doesnt want to ban /pol/, leaving NATO however I hope he does do. You faggots dont get to freeload off us anymore
>>74181355
>leave NATO
He said he MIGHT want to do that. I really doubt he would though. Probably just a bluff to get a negotiating edge.
>ban /pol/
No more need for us once he MAGA. Let's be honest here, /pol is pretty degenerate.
>>74181355
Relax, NATO is obsolete and Poland should not rely on it to guarantee security. It would make more sense for the US to create a new alliance group with Poland and other eastern european nations and cut NATO freeloaders out completely.
