Archived threads in /lit/ - Literature - 501. page
- Home
- Board: /lit/ - Literature
- Reading: Archived threads in /lit/ - Literature - 501. page
Was Heidegger an über-autist for hating small talk?
"...[B]y its very nature, idle talk is a closing off since it omits going back to the foundation of what is being talked about. This closing off is aggravated anew by the fact that idle talk, in which an understanding of what is being talked about is supposedly reached, holds any new questioning and discussion at a distance because it presumes it has understood and in a peculiar way it suppresses them and holds them back."
>>8033881
Heidegger was an insufferable sperglord in general, there's good arguments on how one should deal with small talk but his is not one.
Nothing wrong with being an uber-autist. He's done more for the world than you ever will.
>>8033881
No he's pretty correct. He's not saying to avoid communication, he's saying to avoid trite communication.
>mfw driving 100 miles to steal a copy of Women and Men at a uni
kek. Godspeed, anon.
just wacked off all fucking morning, no regrets
OP here. So the copy is actually in a "special collections" part of the library. I'm not sure what this means and whether or not I will be actually able to take the book. I'm also not a student so I'm sure they're gonna ask for a student ID.
any advice? do i just rush in bank robber style?
why can't America produce good philosophy?
>>8033109
>that image
Wew
Too buzy making money I guess. Not even american.
found the continental :)
go back to your mystical and criptolanguage babble
HOW TO GET PUBLISHED IN 2016:
1. Read everything in sight- the classics, post modernism, poetry, etc.
2. Now, work on your writing. Practice, practice practice. Develop a style.
3. Organize your ideas... Begin writing.
4. Make sure your story involves romance, elements of Greek tragedy, somewhere a Byronic hero, and most importantly- something of political significance...tie in Marxism, and be sensational about it.
5. Now, you're ready for the final step. You will transition to female- mtf trans.
There is no way that you wouldn't get published or at least get attention and scholarship offers from ivy league universities. Just an idea for you impoverished and desperate anons.
>>8032799
this is million dollar info.
>>8032799
Is it ok if I skipped straight to step five?
>>8032982
yes- you can get accepted to any university
If the bible is the literal word of God, then why does God have so many writing styles?
>>8032440
God working through the Authors, God the Holy Spirit, working through many different authors over many different generations.
Each author was a different person so obviously each of their writing styles, genres, subject matter, etc would come out.
Also, it is not the "literal" word of God in the sense that everything must be taken literally, when Jesus spoke of a mustard seed moving mountains, he didn't mean that literally did he?
>>8032445
Wouldn't that imply that God then inspired not wrote the Bible?
>>8032447
Basically, Men wrote the Bible, God worked through man to get it done.
Where do people get the idea God literally wrote the Bible?
Opinions?
>>8032048
I'm not sure what this is.
>>8032048
>Has anyone on /lit/ read this?
no
Please confine all John Green hate to this thread. Post quotes and shit if ya want. Anything minor that doesn't need its own thread should go here. Anything major should go here as well, frankly. Just as long as it's a meme & it's supreme, it's welcome here, ya hear? Treat this thread like the orphanage you were sent to when your mom abandoned you on the street.
C'mon guys, admit it, we may hate him on the inside but we all know he's our secret mascot.
>>8031745
I hate other people so much.
Is he a historian or a bad girl tween romance writer?
How do Americans feel about her? Is this caption true? Any writer who are much better on her topics?
Nigger
least deserving nobel prize winner
>>8030904
She's good bait on /lit/
>Chapter starts with:
>"to say x was having a bad day would be an understatement."
name 1 book that does this
>>8030832
>thread posts start with:
>"name 1 book that does this"
>>8030852
name2thread that does this
Opinions on this book and on black literature in general.
That book was literal trash.
Black literature in general is mostly focused around dindus or "muh racism." There was a black literature thread in here in the past, and pretty much every single good book boiled down to those two concepts.
>>8030797
>Black literature focuses on black people and racism
I mean the racism part is arguably not the only thing they could be talking about but why the fuck would you call it black lit if it wasn't about black people.
are you dumb. read gloria naylor you stupid faggots.
Since some Stormfag /pol/tard has started a thread on "essential nationalist literature" I thought it a good idea to have a thread on essential anarchist *fiction*. There's plenty of great anarchist political science, and I'm sure we've all read Conquest of Bread, ABCs of Anarchism, God and the State, and so on. I'm more interested in seeing whether there's any good anarchist, anti-nationalist *fiction* which I've missed reading.
My list of essential anarchist fiction:
- The Dispossessed by Ursula K. LeGuin
- The entire Elric saga by Michael Moorcock, as well as his Nestor Makhno alternate history stories like The Steel Tsar
- V for Vendetta (the graphic novel) by Alan Moore
- Good Omens by Terry Patchett and Neil Gaiman; not sure if people would consider it explicitly anarchist, but it's definitely humanist and anti-authoritarian
(Please don't post any Ayn Rand crap here. There is no such thing as "anarcho-capitalism." Capitalism is classist, and anarchism has no social classes by definition.)
Sadly, there isn't too much anarchist fiction of which I'm aware.
Unless you're cool with egoism, in which case you could probably say a lot of sword & sorcery fantasy is up that alley. People just doing whatever the fuck they want and sticking it to the man.
Heinrich von Kleist - Michael Kohlhaas
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/11/opinion/if-philosophy-wont-diversify-lets-call-it-what-it-really-is.html?_r=1
what do u think /lit/?
>>8026492
Complete and utter nonsense.
By the way, The Stone in general is a haven for pseudo-philosophy. Avoid.
Trash.
Academics are trash though, so it's not surprising. They think they are forward thinkers for embracing the death of european culture, it's basically the world against european thought.
>Current year.
>He can not study the metaphysical implications of goodpussy.
Diversity please!
Can we have a Portuguese literature and Portuguese critic thread? If yes, just post your work and offer criticism.
Also, I have a question for the Anons who work with poetry:
I have heard many theorists say that the greatest verse metric of our language is the decassílabo, the meter on wich, as you know, Camões wrote Os Lusíadas. However, whenever I pause to ponder on how inferior our poets are (in general, with exceptions, of course) when we compare them to the poets of the English language, I often come to the conclusion that, because English have shorter words and, therefore, can accommodate more thought and imagery into a single poetic line, they usually have more space to work when they write poems. Just do an experiment if you do not believe me or don’t understand what I am saying: try to translate a Shakespearean sonnet into Portuguese, but keep the 10 syllable metric of the decassílabo: you won’t be able to do that, no matter how much you try – the English lines simply accommodate much more words and thoughts.
So, facing this problem, I was thinking: shouldn’t we make of the 12 syllable line meter our top poetic metric? I think we should use more of the Alexandrino (or dodecassílabo) than the decassílabo, and consequently have more space to work with thoughts and imagery.
>>8025047
Will post some stuff to get the thread going:
Por tantas vezes
Já vi, cheirei, provei a guerra que
Os órgãos da sensibilidade em meu cérebro
Estão todos curtidos, todos secos.
O demônio vagou por sobre a Terra
E entre suas pegadas me arrastei.
Vi homens possuídos pela fome
De matar: o crepúsculo da mente,
Quando todos os lobos saem da toca
E em esquilos e lebres a empatia
E o raciocínio minguam, quando os corações
Em frutos de saliva e dentes apodrecem.
Nos rostos enrugados pela fúria
Espumava o animal, o lodo, a besta,
O macaco: nas frontes entortadas
Em maremotos faciais reacendiam-se
As memórias caninas de uma raça
Comedora de sangue, essa peluda
Reincarnação das eras de leis mudas.
E então, em meio à luta, o fumo, o som
O sangue, a cólera, eu parava, olhava
Para o lado, e nos via, e éramos,
Nós todos, canibais.
>>8025263
KUMORI: Parasitas jamais nos roubam de nós mesmos,
Embora se alimentem do que somos.
Podem até sugar as pulsações
De nossos corações rumo ao silêncio,
Mas jamais serão nossos corações;
A sanguessuga que bebe o bater
De nossos peitos pode até engordar
Em víbora, mas não vai ulcerar
A pérola de um cerne honrado e digno
Em cabeça-de-peixe apodrecida.
Você é doce, gentil, vivaz, valente,
E o monstro de seu pai não teve forças
Para plantar um só fragmento sujo
De si mesmo em você.
-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x
YOKO: Fico confusa
Ao pensar nele: é meu pai, e eu devia
Amá-lo, ou sentir pena de seus crimes,
Porém a imagem dele, quando irrompe
Em minha mente a enseba apenas com
Fedor de raiva e medo, e nada mais.
O estupro é uma das obras-primas da violência,
É aquilo que aprendemos a esperar
De Monstros, mas quando seu próprio pai
É quem comete o crime, e numa idade
Na qual ele é ainda o seu herói,
Seu protetor...É como se o seu Deus,
Que você crê tê-la criado com afeto
Infinito, voltasse agora apenas
Para colher seus órgãos como frutos
Quentes, eviscera-la ainda viva
E você, cega, confundisse cultivo
Com amor: que selvagem decepção,
Frustração visceral! É quase como
Ver Deus rachar os céus, rasgar as nuvens
Para buscar você, a sua filha,
Mas não para abraçá-la e confortá-la,
Mas perfurá-la com o espinho de um relâmpago
Por várias horas, rindo da tortura,
Assim como o menino mais cruel
Da aldeia quando encontra um pobre sapo e passa
A picá-lo com um palito ou farpa.
O anjo azedou-se num fauno.
Eu pensava, ao olhar para meu pai:
“Eu achava que dentro de você
Havia tanto amor, tanta alegria,
Tanta beleza...Tola, fui tão tola!
Eu devia saber que você era vazio,
Ou melhor, que era uma caverna escura e fétida,
E sua alma uma gorda salamandra,
Sem consciência, compaixão, carinho
E apego, mas apenas fome cega”.
>>8025266
HARUT: Vou renascer em chamas como a fênix*,
Que possui gratidão e amor maiores
Do que a mãe que dá a luz ao seu bebê,
Sabendo que naquela vidazinha
Que ali chora, vestida com seu sangue,
Jaz a origem de seu amor mais forte,
O ímã e razão de seu viver;
Sim, serei como a fênix, que supera
Esse amor, pois a si mesma da à luz.
Após morrer devora o próprio corpo:
Em rubi espumoso ferve o sangue;
Em novo trigo a carne idosa queima:
O grisalho falcão de cinzas morre
Em águia de ouro, que o próprio sol cega.
-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x
Porém eu me pergunto: mesmo vivos
Nós não estamos sempre sós? E se
Toda a jornada da existência não
Passa de um exercício e treino brando,
Um ensaio adoçado e diluído,
Aulas diárias na arte de partir
Para que, com a solidão da morte,
Nós nos acostumemos, pois nascer
É naufragar em ilha abandonada.
Estamos exilados, todos nós,
Na solidão de nossos próprios cérebros.
Um arquipélago composto por
Bilhões de mentes: eis a humanidade;
Incalculáveis grãos de vida e flocos
De existências que foram salpicados
Sobre golfos sem fundo e mar de abismos –
A distância e mistério intransponível
Entre o tu e o eu. Nós estamos todos
Presos em nossa própria mente e espírito;
Somos ilhas que podem meramente
Ser espiadas, nunca visitadas;
A geografia interna só é tocada
Por telescópios; eus nunca se fundem.
Palavras, gestos, atos: são o odor
E os sons de nossos âmagos, mas nossos
Âmagos, não há quem possa explorá-los
Que não nós mesmos: nossa selva é apenas nossa.
A nossa própria pele é uma perene
Cela insolúvel, pois o eu não tem
Portas, apenas a ilusão de portas.
Who are /lit/s favorite people? You can have up to two per thing. Ill start:
Philosopher:
Kierkegaard, Kant
Political Writer:
Rousseau
Fiction Writer:
Dostoevsky, Goethe
Poet:
Herrick, Blake
Musician:
Chopin
Artist:
Friedrich
>>8024968
Philosopher: hegel, james
Poet: whitman, Blake
Don't think I could decide on just 2 for the other ones desu.
>Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein
>...
>Kafka, Dazai
>Milton, Keats
>Bach, Strauss (classical)
>Bjork, Siouxsie (cont)
>Grimshaw
>>8024968
Philosopher:
Kant, Nietzsche
Political Writer:
Machiavelli, Brecht
Fiction Writer:
Faulkner, Beckett
Poet:
Eliot, cummings
Musician:
JS Bach
Artist:
Goya
>tfw no qt fwb to interview you
do you think deleuze and guattari ever bonked?
>>8013933
They tried to think beyond phallic, Oedipal sexuality so if they did it was probably wild.
