Archived threads in /co/ - Comics & Cartoons - 2588. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
Is this the greatest webcomic of all time?
>>63859568
Leave it to one thread with every update. We really dont want another Homestuck 2.0
>>63859568
no, that's Nedroid
this is now a Nedroid thread
post Nedroid
>>63859568
No, it's pretty bad. Not the worst webcomic ever but definitely not good.
Which episode made you quit the Simpsons? For me, it was Barting Over.
>In this episode, Bart discovers that he used to be a child star in commercials—and that Homer blew all the money he earned. In retaliation, Bart petitions the court to be legally emancipated and move out of the house.
I hadn't really been avidly watching the show for awhile, and just had it on as background noise. But after this one? I finally just stopped turning the show on.
The one with Jonah Hill. They made it so Skinner was a super cool principal until Jonah Hill pranked him really hard and made him an asshole. It makes no fucking sense.
And then I check Wikipedia to get a plot summary and the title of Barting Over and discover that it was written by Andrew Kreisberg, the next writer on Green Arrow.
>>63835638
You made it way deeper than I did
What are some times series made fun of their fanbase?
I know PPG had Utonium and Keane hook up in one episode because they are such a popular pairing. The episode did nothing to shippers.. And the teenage scene was supposed to make fun of fanfic writers writing the girls badly as teens, yet everyone took the interpretations seriously
First one that comes to mind, full of absolutely one-hundred-percent true Usenet comments about Animaniacs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNJ6dFwh8a4
>was supposed to make fun of fanfic writers writing the girls badly as teens
Before continuing is there any statement on record that that was the intent?
Because there is simply too much groundless speculation that something in a cartoon is a comment on something from the internet.
>Cartoon animal character
>Last name is the name of its species
>Sudden surge of video game references
>Almost every recent cartoon has used chip tune/8-bit background music
>>63860901
>actually being bothered by this
>>63860901
>Star is now an animal
/co/ girls feet threat?
:3
>>63856847
Why on earth would anyone have a fetish to feet? Do some people have an unnatural attraction to hands too?
>>63856847
it would be nice, but janitors will delete it pretty soon.
I guess in the meantime let's just try to enjoy it.
OP's picture is a fine example of why i like it. it's not a fetishy thing, it just reminds me of swimsuits and towels and stuff like that.
Is it wrong for someone to say they enjoy Family Guy more than current Simpsons?
>>63851225
why not? family guy's better than ever.
i mean, in terms of comedy. it's STUPIDER than ever but it's also the funniest it's ever been. family guy basically has three phases
1. good, meaningful, clever
2. fucking awful
3. stupid funny
>>63851225
>Is it wrong for me to have an opinion?
>>63851324
Yes.
>"Hey anon."
>"If you're not busy, wanna go see a movie?"
>>63849780
>>63849780
>"Lookin' good, anon."
>>63849780
>63849780
The previous VG Cats seems a bit...racy by Scott's standards.
>>63856212
I don't get it.
>>63856212
No not really.
>human feet
Previous thread:
>>63753675
This is it. We've caught up to the present.
There's been a lot of stuff that's gone down.
And the characters have come through it.
Through it all, this is Life with Archie...
And here we go....
And a character recap for good measure.
The sequel will be disappointing. Not because it'll be a bad movie, but because we've been thinking about it for two years.
Should we stop thinking about it so we have no expectations when they give us a sequel?
why would there be a sequel? it's done. it was perfectly self-contained. no loose threads
>>63795371
>why would there be a sequel?
Because profit.
>>63795319
Apparently Get Wrekt Ralph was in development for years and years and went through many changes before turning out how it did, so I'm not worried if they take their time as long as they have as many good ideas from start to finish as the first final product.
>>63795371
They're just keeping their cards on the table in case they want in next round, it would be a shame to pull out and then realize later they have a really good idea within the WIR universe that might not revolve around the original cast or mess with its success but could still use some of the concepts like game jumping, rules and character roles. Then they'd have to go make a new thing just for that whereas they could just spin-off or prequel or whatever. I mean we're talking about a franchise that has already introduced the idea multiple franchises exist in it, why would you possibly wrap that up? There's infinite potential there. Infinite potential for something to go wrong sure, but infinite potential for something great as well.
Are all Poison Ivy fans this autistic?
https://twitter.com/cameronMstewart/status/491277221274091521
>>63823935
what's autistic about this and why are you making a generalization based on it
>>63824045
>what's autistic about this
You kidding me? She instantly launches into a spiel about how victimized and forgotten Ivy is after learning that Stewart has no plans for her.
She also has over 13k tweets EVERY SINGLE ONE OF WHICH IS ABOUT POISON IVY.
> why are you making a generalization based on it
It's 4chan and it's an easy conversation starter.
This girl REALLY likes Poison Ivy.
ITT: Characters you would kill if you had the chance. I'll go first.
Steven...Yeah, Fucking Steven. Because he get what wants and He is destiny to be some great warrior even through he is a fatass, He is dumb, He is just too nice, Too young, And yet! He somehow saves the day, Maybe I got something against with his design or something.
>>63818950
It's everything man. I hate that little bastard.
Stop samefagging and also stop shitting up every goddamn thread with this.
I can understand not liking the show but goddamn put a cork in it.
at what age does Clarence buy his first fedora?
Clarence strikes me as an unironic propeller beanie kind of guy.
What about him screams "fedora wearer"?
What makes anyone a fedora wearer?
>>63823979
>What makes anyone a fedora wearer?
Typically a sense of intellectual superiority, which Clarence doesn't show.
Does /co/ like redheads?
>>63813133
I think Frankie was my first cartoon crush, thanks to that episode
I don't like hotheads
![cyclops-mv2[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/OjJn65I.jpg "cyclops-mv2[1].jpg")
You have no idea.
its timefilename thread
Who cares if it's /co/ related, right?
