SHOTS FIRED!
>>84145490
>this is what Marvel does to fight Rebirth
topkek, but this is a little petty to be candid comrade. Don't kick the dog when he's already down, Marvel
>>84145587
they make fun of themselves too though. with x-men actors wondering why no one else on sets are talking to them, or spidey saying they will just keep rebooting till they get it right, while his eyes change shape
I
I'm eating a canoli and it's great, I'm about to kill my son!
Ms Borgeanis, I'll kill that literature
>>84145108
OP, I have a confession to make: I'm Steven.
Who else had this shit as a kid?
I found mine and god damn were these magazines awful, but I waited for them every month excitedly
I know they had Yu-gi-Oh and Pokemon magazines as well
>Shrek
>Anime magazine
>On /co/
>>84144326
Are there scans for these anywhere?
So, the New 52 was his attempt to nerf the DC Universe?
>break up longtime romances
>erase friendships
>wipe legacies
>erase Superman (only for him to be replaced by someone who is and isn't Superman?)
Why not just erase superheroes altogether ?
>b8 thread
>guarenteed replies
new 52 is still bad tho
My theory is that he wanted to see how superheroes would function in a darker world and if they could still exist, still be inspirational, still be -- y'know -- HEROES.
Doc's universe had no actual superheroes until he suddenly got powers. It's a closer analogue to our universe than to superhero universes. In that sense, I can't imagine he'd have any interest in attempting to "weaken" the DCU or DC multiverse in general -- they're meaningless to him. But as a science experiment, or as a thought experiment, playing around with the variables makes a lot of sense. And the effect of modernizing the heroes while also making the universe a bit colder/lonelier (the same effect that Doc himself had on his own universe) is something worth studying among idealistic characters.
>>84144307
This isn't bait you fucking dingus
This was almost verbatim his plan from Rebirth
Did the Civil War ever explain where Zemo bought the Rubber Bucky Mask?
>>84144122
He made it.
you're saying it like materials to make masks are rare or something
>>84144205
Do you own a rubber mask making factory that can create a mask capable of fooling a security camera ?
So what does futur hold for them?
Nothing. The Creator owns the rights to the show, and he's agreed that it ended alright. Maybe a collectors edition or something in the future, but that's it.
I kind of wish that Danni could make a new season in the modern day.
obligitaory
Why haven't you met Constantine yet?
I was always really fascinated by those stories, to the point I considered writing Constantine stories in my spare time in an attempt to make it happen to me. Then these threads started showing up. They aren't here all the time, and they're never that popular, and I always see them. Is that you, John? Are you trying to reach me?
I don't know, guess it's because I'm not magical enoughWhy can't magic be real, /co/?Where do I need to look to learn it?
well she only posts on /his/ these days
I miss surly, poorly emotionally adjusted superheroes
A lot of the new characters introduced lately are just... people. Normal ass people. Or worse, nerds. Most of the time their real struggle is adapting to the superhero lifestyle, which was maybe cute when Spider-Man did it in the 60s, but is kind of well-tread territory at this point.
Characters who are kind of messed up are more interesting. Why else do you think Iron Man is the breakout star of the MCU? Batman has frequently been like this in his long run. Wolverine practically codified the archetype, back before he died from overexposure. X-23 used to be, too, before she was turned into a generic action girl.
I don't care if they're women or brown people or Chinese or gay or transgender or dyslexic, I just want some new superheroes who aren't all smiles and social media. The stories themselves don't even have to be particularly grim and gritty, but I like characters who have a bit of grit in their personality.
>>84143763
fucked up heroes are more relatable to me, personally
not because of the hero part, but the fucked up, barely even human part
>>84143763
Might be why he's so based.
>>84143763
how about a hero who starts as all smiles and social media and then gets beaten down to become more messed up?
Was this any good?
>>84143197
Amazing actually
>>84143197
One of the best comics of the year
I actually really enjoyed it
ITT: Your favorite cartoon is rebooted by John K.
Is it good or shit?
>>84142334
/co/mblr will hate anything made by this cismale scum.
>>84142334
It doesn't matter - it'll never be finished.
I don't know. It's not out yet.
I want a new genre of cartoons in 2020.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TqfBEX6QtE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlEb3L1PIco
>>84141993
What genre would that be, anon?
>>84141993
Cute girl.
scooby doo
I remember when I watched this I enjoyed when I was younger and I want to keep that way
CN aired it the other week.
It's shit.
I remember how heavily this was promoted when it first aired.I'm surprised Peter Chung was the man behind this.
The blonde cheerleader was such shit. He should have gone for the thirsty brown girl that wanted his dragonballs.
>wanting to read a comic with the single worst depiction of Superman ever created
>>84140572
That's the charm.
Bumping for interest
ITT: Cartoons series that ended with the bad guy winning.
I'll start
d
>>84140423
That wasn't a bad guy at all. More like an insecure, juvenile asshole.
>Hanna Barabara cinematic universe
>Scooby Doo Reboot
>live action 3D
Fuck this world
>>84139766
Well, Future Quest is GOAT so far. I would love a live action Jonnhy Quest.
It's not live action, learn to read
>>84140964
In OP's defense, it's "a reboot of the Scooby-Doo live-action films" right in that first para.
The only real clue aside from the pretty vague promise that it includes computer generated imagery is Tony "WB Animation" Cervone, but most people probably don't know who that is.
