Post the best shit you got /x/
#1
#2
>>17547572
Woah, someone left a lot of dust on the moon! How weird!
>>17547577
tard
>>17547583
Please point out the mysterious objects, oh wisest of geniuses.
#4
>>17547575
That's a technical error, not literally a a square object, Einstein.
#5
#6
>>17547596
Woah, an alien wearing an astronaut disguise! How mysterious and strange!
>>17547609
Literally a gap created when combining different images into a bigger one. Or NASA are the fucking worst at using their eyeballs, if they haven't noticed a house on the moon. Mysterious!
>>17547587
What am I supposed to see here? Mysterious darkness that the aliens left on the moon?
this ones old and made me laugh
not intended to be serious but I think he was
Bump for interest
>>17547560
Did someone say moon?
>>17548261
>>17547614
Any more info on this?
>>17548261
Hurr durr
>>17547577
Fuck off asshole.
>>17547596
Sauce on this pic?
this is the thread where we can pretend image artifacts and rocks are aliens right? great thread OP!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjLZBrQ-Oq4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QYRVCqwuYI
>>17547624
You're supposed to notice whatever the hell is creating a very long shadow right above the well defined center buttom Crater.
These pictures provide clear, incontrovertible proof that NASA has been lying to the world... there is, in fact, NO green cheese whatsoever on the moon! This is the secret that NASA will kill to keep.
Stay safe, truthseekers
>>17550437
This is always a fascinating incident.
Although I do find it funny that the retards who would talk about this occurrence and claim that it's aliens or some other extraordinary theory are also the ones claiming humans never went to space.
>>17547587
this shadow-generating structure has to be like several miles tall.
cool pic. hope this isn't fake.
>>17548715
>of course, tulpas and skinwalkers are real.
fuck off faggot
>Moon Artifacts thread
good thread, here's my contribution.
>>17541240
>>17543038
>>17543040
>>17543045
>>17543048
>>17543070
reminder - Arizona State University's Lunar and Planetary Laboratory works on all missions of NASA.
>>17547598
it clearly looks like censoring using translucent effect.
do you even Photoshop?
but of course, there's literally thousands of such photos. NASA clearly doesn't give a fuck if people find out about the censoring.
>>17547616
>a gap created when combining different images into a bigger one.
>NASA is so poor they can't snap one more pic in case there is a gap between two images.
you are either stupid, or a paid shill.
in any case, see >>17551612
>>17547610
but what's that blue light in the black sky? i'm sure it's a weather balloon or swamp gas (on moon)
>>17547685
>>17547692
you are trying to derail the purpose of the thread.
but fuck you, NASA shill, the truth will out!
Aint got shit my negev
>>17551586
What object? I don't see anything.
>>17550601
You mean literally just a rock?
>>17552690
do you see that long thin black line?
think how and why it is so long. compare with with crater shadows.
Sure.
>>17551612
If it's censoring, it's the worst fucking censoring I've ever seen. Drawing a square in Paint would be better. If that is the best Photoshop NASA can do, they're the absolute worst at hiding anything.
If they wanted to hide something, they would not have just drawn a gray square
>>17551612
>>17551629
You kids are adorable.
>>17552709
end yourself.
>>17552700
this one looks fake to even me.
>>17552703
yep, like i said, NASA doesn't give a fuck.
May be it's because the normies don't care about a dusty gray moon.
tell me, how many normal people would even bother to look at this pic let alone zoom it and encounter such blatant censoring?
>>17551612
If that's the best you can do with Photoshop, that's just kinda sad. Because thst gray blob is way too noticable to be someone's attempt to cover something up.
So you belive in a conspiracy, but specifically the sloppiness, most poorly made conspiracy in the world. That somehow remains hidden. That's weird.
>>17551612
Your average person who is interested in astronomy and owns a computer?
>>17552723
Crap, meant to reply to >>17552713
>>17552713
That is supposedly the crystal structure they found there before nasa altered the pictures for the public.
>>17552723
>average person
>interested in astronomy
you do not know your average people, mate.
>>17552731
Are you dyslexic? Because I did not write that.
>>17552720
>That's weird.
no, it's NASA being smug motherfuckers and counting on the sheeple to not even care.
we, here on 4chan, are not normal people. we are the exceptional faggots who care too much for a trivial topic to which we can make no difference.
I do not care about the elite hiding the existence of aliens, both ancient and present, from the masses, but i do realize that the technology that can be made readily available can actually bring an end to the 2 year olds dying in war zones.
i'm sorry for being a delusional faggot who don't want innocent kids, muslim or not, to die.
>>17552730
got any verifiable source?
>>17551621
>everyone who don't believe that image artifacts aren't aliens and secret moon bases are paid to do so
Are you really paranoid enough to genuinely believe that?
>>17552744
how many "serious" astronomers have even thought about getting their hands on ultra-HD images to study the moon?
>implying they would come forward even if they encountered anything suspicious.
no one would.
pay checks have an uncanny habit of avoiding the "cooky" fags' pockets.
>>17547575
if this seems normal, natural and perfectly fine to anyone, then i must say we have already failed.
>>17552747
This is /x /, there is never a source.
>>17552746
>if you don't believe that every little flaw or artifact you see are literally aliens, you want kids to die
I am so confused right now.
>>17552747
Some anon posted it from a thread long ago, he had other pics too quite convincing. I'm sure he is still around.
>>17552748
>really paranoid enough
>don't believe that image artifacts aren't aliens
let me break it down for you -
>be moon
>NASA claims - moon is dead, gray, and practically nothing of note happens on it.
>NASA sends rovers and orbiters to click moon's pics.
>NASA censors and doctors dead moon's pics before publishing them to the public.
>hurr durr there is literally nothing to hide
yet the censoring. many of such images are readily available on NASA website. go research, or do not visit such threads.
>>17552750
But these pictures are readily available, even some kid on /x/can find them. So how are astronomers unable to see these pictures?
>>17552754
>every little flaw or artifact you see are literally aliens
WHO ELSE WOULD PUT THINGS ON OUR MOON WITHOUT US KNOWING ABOUT THEM?
WHY ELSE WOULD NASA CENSOR THE IMAGES?
broaden your mind, you need to start asking yourselves some questions first.
>>17552761
You only say that these artifacts are poorly done censoring because you desperately want there to be a cool conspiracy, though. It's just wishful thinking.
>>17552763
>how are astronomers unable to see these pictures?
they are busy looking at stars.
moon has been studied and forgotten. doesn't mean we can forget there's something fishy about so many of the moon images you can download from NASA website.
>>17552768
Again, why are you do sure this is censorship, and not just something weird with the camera? Do you think the lowrez parts on Google maps where you can't get a detailed view because it's literally just the middle of the ocean is censorship too?
>>17552770
what else could these artifacts be then?
>cool conspiracy
suddenly, being on /x/ and expecting something unbelievable is a crime now.
>>17552774
Yeah man seems shills are out in full force
>>17552773
>something weird with the camera
why do you think NASA would not go back and snap a pic or 2 more of the same region to make up for any such "bad-camera" moments? it literally takes one more round around the moon, which the orbiter will do anyway.
>>17552777
Godly trips don't lie
>>17552771
>they are busy looking at stars.
>moon has been studied and forgotten.
Citation needed. Or are you one of those who believes that The Scientists are just a faceless blob paid by The Man, rather than a bunch of different people with different interests and ideas who investigate anything from moon dust and insect sex to cancer and seahorses?
>>17552777
I'm just a dude who doesn't believe that literally everything I see is an alien for me reason, that's all. But it seems that triggers you guys something fierce. Do you get this butthurt every time anyone questions your "theories"?
>>17552779
Because these are probably not their only photos. And why do you think they wouldn't go back and do fix their hilariously bad "censorship", if they wanted to keep things quiet?
Why do you think th
>>17552783
>derailing so hard.
it's okay, man. normies won't find out anyway and even if they did, i wonder if they'd give it even half a thought..
>>17552790
>doesn't believe that literally everything I see is an alien
we are talking about moon.
we are talking about humans never putting anything on the moon which needs to be hidden and censored.
yet we have images showing blatant censoring.
case 1 -
some faggot is playing with us.
in which case, i'm sure some other anon can find ultra-HD super-zoomable pics of that same area of the moon for us to see for ourselves that it indeed is just rocks and sand
case 2 -
there literally is some alien presence on the moon and all nasa can do is hope no one zooms there ultra-HD pics.
>>17552793
>these are probably not their only photos
find me a full moon compilation image of at least 5000 pixels width which does not have any doctoring.
do it to prove to us delusional fags that aliens don't exist.
i beg of you.
Look at this >>17541240, and tell me you don't see censoring.
if there is nothing to hide, there should not be any doctoring necessary.
>>17552806
>it's okay, man. normies won't find out anyway and even if they did, i wonder if they'd give it even half a thought.
Why are you avoiding my questions?
>>17552806
Wait, so I have the burden of proof, yet you can make any claims about aliens you want, without any need to back it up whatsoever? No wonder nobody takes you guys seriously.
>>17552818
why are you avoiding the topic at hand?
who cares what the scientists are doing, when it is clear none of them is looking at the moon as intently as we are?
or may be they are but are being silenced?
you see, this is the beauty of 4chan, people like me can act all retarded and aside from a few "fuck you, you delusional fags" nothing more comes of it.
>>17552828
I bet you consider Nasa as a reliable source.
>>17552828
>without any need to back it up whatsoever
Look at this >>17541240
http://ser.sese.asu.edu/MOON/CLEM_COLOR/farside.tiff
It is a tiff image of the farside of the moon.
The link is from Arizona State University's website.
>verified source of the image
>conveniently large size file for easy zooming.
yet shills here are claiming they can't see shit.
Look, I'm sorry if I made you cry. I'll be more careful about committing the dreadful sin of asking questions and not blindly accepting everything as fact without any evidence. That was apparently insensitive of me. Jeez...
>>17552842
>claiming they can't see shit.
fucking zoom it you retards.
>>17552843
>That was apparently insensitive of me.
you seem like a reasonable person. i would really like your expert opinion on >>17552842
PS you forgot to call me sheeple and demand that I "wake up".
Hugs and kisses.
>>17552849
They do not want you to be spiritually awake, to be aware of the universe around you. You can't think for yourself?
>>17552849
again, >>17552842 is what i really want to talk about now.
my assertion is, the censoring is done by NASA to hide alien objects and structures present on the moon at the time of the clicking of the image.
I would like to believe my source is not easily refutable.
Prove me wrong.
>>17552835
get back on your meds pls
>>17552756
easy cop-out you faggot
>>17552869
Not really attempting to cop-out kind of hoping anon is around to provide links.
>>17552864
Never!
>>17552806
>Find other pictures of the moon to prove that astronomers have no access to these pictures of the moon
Just how high are you right now?
>>17552832 Still not answering the question. Why?
>>17552927
Still avoiding the topic. Why?
>>17552927
>>Find other pictures of the moon to prove that astronomers have no access to these pictures of the moon
yeah, i did not say that.
>why are the astronomers not accessing these pics?
i believe astronomers are being deliberately kept away from pursuing researching the moon by having the work on other heavenly bodies.
>why aren't the astronomers not coming out with such allegations?
if some professional astronomer found anything, i'm sure they are forced to keep mum lest they were sent home packing without a job and a tarnished reputation.
it's not just 4chan where everyone is quick to call you a flaming retard, you know. real life isn't any more forgiving and understanding.
Look, i just FOUND this >>17552842.
the location seems irrefutable to me.
the artifacts do not, at all, look natural to me.
the fact that the images have survived on that server a decade and a half proves how difficult the path forward is going to be.
think about this though - NASA is the only agency which can publish a full, 5400 pixel wide ultra-HD image of our moon.
Now, why would some anon doctor the NASA image and re-publish it, when he knows that this image will be instantly refuted by NASA? If you are saying that I doctored it, then find the original, post it, and send me home with insults befitting the situation.
i bet no one can find me a 5400 pixel wide full image of the moon without any doctoring..
>>17554693
Best I can do with what's on my computer atm.
>>17554776
>3600x4000
>one side of the moon, not the back side, the ALWAYS HIDDEN FROM EARTH side
find the dark side of the moon, mate.
the only reason i'm keen on proving the existence of aliens in our vicinity is because i believe keeping the masses ignorant f such a huge secret is a crime against humanity. People deserve to know.
>>17554857
so you think the FUCKING ALIENS knew that we'd look at the moon with high powered telescopes some day so they built all their shit away from us?
also literally five seconds on google
http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Farside-moon-LRO-hi-res.jpg
I'd post it but it's too big.
>>17554909
FUCK ME
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/04/Moon_Farside_LRO.jpg/6000px-Moon_Farside_LRO.jpg
There's the high-res version.
>>17554909
>so you think the FUCKING ALIENS knew that we'd look at the moon with high powered telescopes some day so they built all their shit away from us?
pretty much.
checking the pic right now.
>>17552690
>>17552695
>>17551586
>>17547587
>>17547624
>>17550601
>>17552692
Its not a shadow. Its just part of the moon that got destroyed when a meteor slammed into it
>>17554917
well, on a cursory look, i've located proof of running water.
also, the composition job is mediocre on this image. that straight line in the middle is looking quite unprofessional.
>>17554917
>wikipedia
>not even color
dropped
get us a NASA one.
>>17547604
What is this?
>>17554956
moon's pencil-dick.
or an alien pillar.
the 1st one is funnier, imo.
>>17554956
A reptilian mind control antenna
Chills every fucking time.
That fucking thing is there right now as we speak.
>>17555129
>"The Phobos Monolith" for those who might not know
>>17555129
Where on mars is this located?
>>17555134
On Phobos eh
Well we could definitely do a Phobos robotic mission to scope it out
>>17555134
>The Phobos Monolith
i wonder who put it there.
Anyway it's probably just a rock.
Look at what a bust the Ceres salt craters were
>>17555138
It's located on Phobos, the moon of Mars.
Buzz Aldrin mentions it in an address.
>>17555146
I also wonder how it got there, and how old it is. For how many millennium have the stars silently wheeled above this structure?
You guys are aware that the moons is positioned above you in the sky, every single night? And that you can actually look at it? With, say a telescope, any time you want? How are NASA supposed to hide anything on the surface of the moon?
>>17548283
IIRC this is referred to as 'the castle' or 'the fortress'. The line you see there is a wire of some sort that's connected to the structure.
>>17547575
Oh my God, PHOTOSHOP.
>>17547609
This one is clearly just censoring the moon's dick.
>>17552761
Holy shit, are you real?
>>17555236
no, i'm a bot hellbent on undermining human agencies so that the machines can take over.
"Matrix shall become real one day!"
Iapetus is a moon orbiting Saturn.
It has a 20km tall wall of ice running the entire circumference. In other images some craters appear hexagonal.
>>17554956
Your mom's dildo.
>>17554693
Why are we asuming that they are doctored? You are using the unproven assertion that the images are doctored to prove the existence of alien artifacts on the moon, in the process justifying why the images were doctored in the first place.
>trusted astronomer finds and publishes photographs proving aliums
>Evidence which chainges everything, and calls the entire US government into question
>Oh darn! Lost my job!
>>17555264
Iapetus is a wierd one
>>17555285
>Why are we asuming that they are doctored?
>assuming
you did not look at the ASU images, did you?
http://ser.sese.asu.edu/MOON/CLEM_COLOR/farside.tiff
it's just 38.5 MBs man, download one and zoom it. tell me it looks natural to you.
ASU = Arizona State university
ASU's Lunar Propulsion Lab works on all NASA missions.
I find no compelling reason for ASU to upload a fake moon image on their server.
I find no compelling reason for ASU to upload a doctored / censored image of the moon if the moon only has rocks and sand. nothing to hide, nothing to see.
>>17555297
No, I can't. I'm using a phone. I obviously don't think censorship would look natural.
"I find no compelling reason for ASU to upload a fake moon image on their server."
What do you mean by "fake"? Are they too reputable to use "fake" images, but still censor them constantly?
"I find no compelling reason for ASU to upload a doctored / censored image of the moon if the moon only has rocks and sand. nothing to hide, nothing to see."
What did I just say about using the claim of censorship as evidence for having something to hide?
>>17555332
>I'm using a phone
ok, find a computer. and when you do, and when you look at the image, you'd know.
we'll talk then. this thread is not going anywhere for a few more days.
>>17555362
Is there something in the photos, or is there some kind of image artifact you claim to be editing? I don't think it will sway me if it is anything like the other photos in this thread.
>>17555380
>image artifact
if you've seen that translucent censoring strip thing, you know what i'm talking about.
check these in the mean time. i cropped the following from the ASU image.
>>17543038
>>17543040
>>17543045
>>17543048
>>17543070
>>17555408
Omg it's fucking because the imagine is assembled from multiple digital photographers you crackhead. The "artifacts" are blank spots where shit overlaps Jesus Christ
>>17555432
>blank spots
>literally 10s of miles broad blank spot, that NASA could not snap pics of again, because is NASA is a poor agency and the orbiter was probably low on gas.
try again.
>>17555264
That's just to keep the White Walkers in the North.
>>17547560
>>17547596
>>17547572
Monitoring station or a reflection in the studio they record this stuff in.
>>17547560
Moon landings explained
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4zTR9ubkD4&nohtml5=False
>>17551629
what? thats just a moon cat
>>17556146
>cat
nigga, dogs are the best, and you know it.
>>17555432
Why would overlapping regions, regions with at least twice as many pictures taken of them compared to the uncensored non-overlapping regions, be blurry and faded out?
Also, many censor blocks in the images are squares, not strips. How would the overlapping edge of a picture form a small square of censored pixels, and not a thin strip?
Also, these censor strips dont look like any kind of photo-merging or layer-overlap that I've ever seen. They look far more like deliberately obscured regions of moon surface.
>>17551612
I feel like /x/ is genuinely the stupidest board on 4chan
>>17556157
keep yourself telling that it won't come true :^)
>>17556577
it is
too many roleplayers and autists
>>17555129
>>17555146
>>17556577
It is.
>>17556245
>They look far more like deliberately obscured regions of moon surface.
Again, why do such a sloppy job, and call attention to the area, instead of just painting or photoshopping over the thing you want to censor? It makes no sense.
>>17557539
Buzz Aldrin is in league with with Satan by encouraging exploration of Mars
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7VBjTjUuTM
>>17555264
BUILD WALL
MUGA
>>17555646
Kek this
>>17557721
>>NASA wouldn't obscure anything and do such a sloppy job.
>>That means they couldn't possibly be obscuring anything, because there wouldn't be any indications.
Disinfo never changes.
>>17558969
that blurry image looks convincing as fuck you schizo.
>>17558977
Okay MoonMoon. Keep spouting your delusions.
Do you guys think anybody has ever busted a nut on the moon?
If we even went there?
If it even exists?
>>17559056
that video is SUPER gay
>heavy ayy lmao conspiracy music
>ZOOMS in on some fucking carbon carbon tiles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLg8swsX190
>alien weed dubstep music elctro
>ZOOMS in on a crater
yah that's a crater.
>>17552777
>>17552777
>>17552777
>>17552777
>>17552777
This. This fucking board is hijacked by these faggots.
>>17559125
>>Now that we've locked the thread, we can play!
Have fun.
>>17559214
A cumrag from the moon would be a moon artifact
>>17556245
Have you ever thought that maybe, just maybe they have the telescope set up to take series of photos from set coordinates, and any slight calculation error may miss those areas of the moon as the telescope moves on to the next series?
It looks as though the sequence the pictures were taken are from top to bottom, then shifted to the left or right, and even possibly the movement of the earth or moon may be throwing off where the photos start, and the blur is just them basically saying "there are parts of the moon here, but during this photo session we were unable to accurately capture them to add to the overall picture."
>>17552746
Nor I. Godspeed lightbringer.
>>17555264
Trump Must be jealous of lapetus
