>Compare a 1975 film to a 1985 film
>You can see there is a vast technical improvement
>You can actively identify which movie is set in which decade
>Compare a 1985 film to a 1995 film
>You can see there is a vast technical improvement
>You can actively identify which movie is set in which decade
>Compare a 1995 film to a 2005 film
>You can see there is a vast technical improvement
>You can actively identify which movie is set in which decade
>Compare a 2005 film to a 2016 film
>The 2016 film looks even worse because of shitty filters, and the majority of practical effects and sets are replaced by CGI shit
>The only way you can identify which film is from which decade is by how much forced diversity and leftist shit is in it
Where did it all go wrong, /tv/?
Avatar.
Avatar ruined movies.
>watch """"kino""""
>looks like it's filmed with 1930s technology
That's complete bullshit though you fucking idiot.
Bran will learn that all that White Walkers want is to get south because north is too cold for them now when winter is coming. People don't understand them.
>>69811568
poor walkers we to add them as rapefugees
I empathize with White Walkers now wtf???
>>69813125
This comment hit too close to home.
Why is this the best Cape movie of all time?
>>69811506
absolute truth.
generincredibles aint got nothing on rebuild of capeshitgelion
>>69811506
>MM names him Titan
>the fucking idiot is using his heat vision to write TIGHTEN in the streets
had a good chuckle
Can someone please enlighten me how come that Vertigo, while was considered a bad film upon release even by Hitchcock himself, with terrible acting and terrible everything, now is praised so much and is number one film in Sight & Sound poll? What actually happened in this 50 years that changed the opinion on this film so much?
>>69811314
taste went to shit, critics were right
>>69811314
critics went to taste, shit were right
Can someone please enlighten me how come that Citizen Kane, while was considered a bad film upon release even by Welles himself, with terrible acting and terrible everything, now is praised so much and is number one film in TSPDT list? What actually happened in this 70 years that changed the opinion on this film so much?
What went so horriblyright?
>>69811118
It was just really fun and didn't take itself too seriously. It knew exactly what it was and was happy just to be that.
>>69811118
>you and me bro, dance off!
the star wars prequels dont have a scene as shitty as this.
the people that enjoyed guardians of the galaxy are the same people that enjoyed the hangover trilogy
Literature and music are the most elevated forms of art, film the least.
>>69810974
Where does theater rank
Stage plays, not musicals
not OP fag but
Books > music > film > comics/graphic novels > video games
>music
>elevated form of art
L M A O
>writers of Captain America Civil War said in the latest interview with Nerdist that they are basically on Tonys side
>not everyone can have the luxury to do what he wants like Captain America and just run away without having any responsibilities
>"It's not easy to do a thing what you don't want to do, but you have to do - i can relate to this"
Team Capfags blown the fuck out
No one supports team captain because he's a fascist.
Let me know when people would be cool with cops running around doing what they want with zero oversight and accountability
>bbbbbut he saved the world
So?
I don't care.
>>69810950
I don't understand the point of the government trying to regulate super human activity. It is an impossible thing to try to control.
Scarlet witch for example could fucking alter reality... how the fuck is the military going to regulate that? At best the accords were just an honor system agreement that weren't going to be upheld anyway. If a superhuman wanted to do something, they were going to do it.
Alright, /tv/, what do you think is going to win stuff?
refn will win the leaf
The Neon Demon
>>69810919
If Refn doesn't win, Cannes will be confirmed irrelevant.
What did she meant by this?
Bump
Bump 1
Is he soon to be JUST?
>>69810739
No.
>>69810739
>How do you want your filmography bro?
enjoy ur ban 4 memes
>What is preventing /tv/ from having webms with sound?
>Would /tv/ threads be better if they had a higher reply limit like /co/? Is there a reason that shit starts getting archived after 300 instead of 400 or whatever?
>Why do the janitors and mods only enforce Rule 1 and 2 shit and ban people of content featuring women?
I started a drunk thread like 2 weeks ago posting a painting of Evangeline Lilly acting autistic on conan and got banned for apparently violating Rule 2. I started the exact same type of drunk thread posting a painting of sad Ben Affleck like 3 weeks ago, and it didn't even get pruned.
People post reaction pics and gifs and webms all the time that may not necessarily "pertain to television shows, movies, actors/actresses, film equipment, etc" with no issue. But I got banned like 5 days ago for posting a picture of Evangeline Lilly confirmed for autism.jpeg as a reaction pic in a reply to some autist whining about sjws or something.
>Why does Evangeline Lilly acting autistic trigger the mods and janitors so much?
>>69810731
>>What is preventing /tv/ from having webms with sound?
Not sure. /sp/ is the same way, I don't get it.
>What is preventing /tv/ from having webms with sound?
Doesn't need.
>Would /tv/ threads be better if they had a higher reply limit like /co/?
No
>Is there a reason that shit starts getting archived after 300 instead of 400 or whatever?
Old default
>Why do the janitors and mods only enforce Rule 1 and 2 shit and ban people of content featuring women?
Forced agenda, triggered misogynists and ugly women.
>>69810731
what's the story on that gif? I was in the thread you started a while back but I don't think I saw an explanation for it
At the end of the film, Glass sees his wife standing before him. He looks relieved, but when the spirit walks away from him and disappears, his face is filled with despair (pic related).
The pleb interpretation is that Glass is at death's door, and he's experiencing an hallucination where his wife beckons him into the afterlife a la the end of Braveheart, where William Wallace sees his wife during his execution. However, David Crow argues, “I do not think Iñárritu is going for something nearly as reassuring or appeasing as that sort of bittersweet closer.” Obviously, the end is open to interpretation. Nonetheless, the film's metaphysical subtext strongly suggests that Glass lives on.
When the final shot fades to black, we still hear his breathing, which continues for several seconds during the credits. “That is because he does not die,” argues Crow. “He is a survivalist at heart, and he did not survive grizzly bears, frozen river rapids, French gunfire, and an odyssey of snow only to give up because his revenge is quenched. Rather, Glass will keep breathing even after the credits end, even if it means he is utterly alone.” Keep in mind, Glass is not mortally wounded. During his fight with Fitzgerald, his enemy slashes his cheek, bites off part of his ear, stabs him in the thigh, then stabs his hand—injuries that would cripple an ordinary man. But Glass is anything but ordinary. A “revenant” is someone who returns from the dead. In Iñárritu's film, Hugh Glass is a legend who continuously cheats death, so there's no reason to believe that he could be stopped by a single man.
Full article:
https://zircillius.com/2016/05/19/the-revenants-silent-story-10-important-details-you-might-have-missed/
you're welcome
>>69810653
I just figured it was some hallucination symbolising some sort of redemption.
The directors message after all was spirituality through pain.
>10 details you might have missed
First of all, I noticed all ten of these things. Secondly, they dont change the fact that the story is shit
>>69810734
Right. it's brief spiritual healing then subsequent emptiness, just like the scene where Glass is reunited with his son in the church. They hug, then the little tree nigger turns into a tree (and Leo wears the same bitchy expression he does at the end of the film). My only point is that he doesn't get die. That would be a comfort that the film never grants him.
What went wrong?
>>69810548
>Ricky Gervais
>>69810556
>>69810548
>Australians
I haven't seen it, buy Ricky Gervais.
>David Hasselhoff — who made hundreds of millions of dollars from “Baywatch”, “Knight Rider” and various other TV shows, movies and other entertainment ventures — says he can’t afford to support his ex-wife anymore because he’s got less than $4k in cash to his name.
>David and ex-wife Pamela Bach are locked in a spousal support war — she’s currently getting $252k a year, but he wants that amount significantly lowered, saying he’s a shadow of his former financial self.
https://www.yahoo.com/celebrity/david-hasselhoff-im-broke-174557769.html
JUST
FUCK
MY
Why doesn't she get more roles? She's such a qt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6znpZ5Ne1ZA
I have a wacky theory on it but I think it was because she was shoved down the throats so much and so often a few years back that a lot of people were like "lol calm down she's not even that beautiful" that her presence became kind of a nuisance
>>69810463
I want to say it's the hair, but people like Viola Davis get roles just fine so idk.
>>69810463
That she is.
She has a good career ATM, so I'd give two shits.
![gerardbutler_color[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/CdiUK7O.jpg "gerardbutler color[1]")
