>sjws are taking over
>batman vs superman
>mark zuckerberg casted as lex
>whiney jewball who cant even fight.
>snyder didnt cast someone like based mulatto lex from cartoons.
did the jews engineer this so they can take over while we fight each other?
>waa boo hoo da mean sjws are ruining my childrens comic book movies!!!
Get a job nigger
>>71954394
>he says posting on 4chan about superhero movies
>>71954370
But Eisenberg Lex IS a Jew stereotype.
Honestly it's not that bad of a channel. It feels like old Vice where they made really good documentaries and not the shit they put out now. I guess it's because this actually costs a lot of money to make. Currently watching a dicumentary about bare knuckle boxing in Britbong land.
>>71954176
I've seen that one
They aren't bad, but a lot of the time (almost all the time) they sensationalize the subject matter and take it to the extreme, so it's more appealing to people. They made one about the UK's Cadets "Child soldiers". It was made out like these kids were being trained for fucking gorilla warfare and ready to be shipped off to Iraq, but the reality is that the Cadets is a shitty little club that serves the same purpose as the Boy Scouts, kids dress up in camo clothes and do drills like marching and shit. They are completely harmless and have literally nothing to do with actual warfare or child soldiers, but the VICELAND guys were acting like it was Kony's child army.
There are also like 20 DUDE WEED LMAO documentaries, which are just cringey tbhfamillia. The same indian dude who gets smashed after taking a single hit off a joint, then acting all retarded for comedic effect. Or they go and show how amazing weed is for children and how it will cure all the world's problems. Targeting their market which is 12-18 year olds watching shit on YouTube instead of an actual documentary
Ratings for the channel are at like 50k avg viewers
>>71954492
WAS H2 BETTER?
THAT SPOT ON THE DIAL HAS ALWAYS BEEN LOW
VICELAND LACKS CONTENT, NOISY IS PRETTY GOOD, HUANGS WORLD IS DECENT
LEFTISM RUNS THROUGH EVERYTHING THOUGH AND THE WEED SHOWS ARE DUMB
Why didn't Iron Man just use the Hulkbuster? He would wreck every single one in Cap's team if he had used it
>>71954106
Because it's designed to only be active around gamma radiation
>I posted it again
would you use a sledgehammer to cut down a tree?
extremely poorly suited for articulation or fighting speed based enemies?
its a comic book by the way
anyone with real powers should be able to crush tony like a tuna can, the same way wanda ripped right through vibranium
What are some recent (5 years) comedy movies that are actually funny ?
the nice guys
>>71954032
ghostbuster (2016)
>>71955638
Go away shill
Good morning!
I am very sorry to interrupt your work, but I have an announcement that requires your immediate attention. At 10:30 A.M. today, I taped a picture of the actor Paul Dano to the wall in front of my desk. It is something I’ve been wanting to do for a while, and I am thrilled to announce that this picture of Paul Dano that I printed off the Internet is now affixed to my wall and I can look at it whenever I wish.
Working in an office can sometimes get monotonous, so I’ve introduced this picture of Paul Dano to my workspace as a way to spice things up a little bit. It also shows off my personality.
I am sure you all have a million questions, so I’d like to try to anticipate and answer some of them here.
Q: Can I come look at the picture of Paul Dano you’ve taped up at your desk?
A: Yes, absolutely. In fact, I encourage anyone who is interested to come take a look at this picture of Paul Dano whenever you’d like.
Q: Do I have to check with you prior to coming to see the picture of Paul Dano?
A: You do not need to make arrangements before coming over to take a look at the picture of Paul Dano. However, during peak hours, you may want the peace of mind of signing up on the schedule to look at the picture of Paul Dano that I will be sharing with all of you shortly via a Google Doc. People who have appointments will get priority.
Q: How many people can look at the picture of Paul Dano at any one time?
A: Given the size of my desk, the size of the picture, and the need to be mindful of my deskmate, Cheryl, please limit the group size to four or fewer at any one time. Exceptions can be made under extenuating circumstances.
Q: Can I whisper, “Wow, Paul Dano,” under my breath while I look at your picture of Paul Dano?
A: Yes, absolutely.
Q: Did you ask Cheryl’s permission before putting up the picture of Paul Dano?
A: Rest assured, Cheryl was consulted before I taped up this picture of Paul Dano at my desk. I originally wanted the picture to be the size of a sexually mature manta ray, and she wanted the picture to be the size of a postage stamp. Luckily, we were able to compromise by settling on the current size (an eight-and-a-half-by-eleven sheet of office printer paper).
Q: I don’t like Paul Dano. Can I look at your picture of Paul Dano but pretend he is a different celebrity in my mind?
A: No.
Q: What is your favorite Paul Dano film?
A: I have never seen a Paul Dano film.
Q: What happens if Paul Dano dies unexpectedly? Will you take the picture down?
A: In the event of Paul Dano’s untimely death, I will leave the picture of Paul Dano up. I have given this a lot of thought.
Q: What happens if, many years from now, Paul Dano dies of natural causes, and his widow personally requests that you take the picture down?
A: This would be a very difficult decision, but I would still leave the picture up. I would take Paul Dano’s widow out to a fancy restaurant to gently explain this to her, and I think she would ultimately understand. I would even pay for the meal, including tip. I don’t think it’s out of the question that we might go for frozen custard or a light pastry after dinner, but I would play that by ear.
Q: Is the picture of Paul Dano in color?
A: No.
There are certainly many topics that I have not covered here, but I hope I’ve hit the major points. Please send me an e-mail or pull me aside in the kitchen and I can address any additional questions or concerns. I cannot reiterate enough how excited I am to look at this picture of Paul Dano every day I come in to work, and I hope you are, too.
Thank you for your time.
>>71953915
Is that you, Paul?
>>71953915
wow, Paul Dano
Israeli here
Since when are blacks the true israelites? This is some top tier WEWUZ pandering isn't it?
>>71953878
This is because of you
>>71953878
WUZ
>It had bad pacing
Is this just a short for "I have no idea what I'm talking about but I desperately want to seem like I do"?
No, it's a genuine criticism sometimes.
>>71953673
>pretentious
>contrived
>it was a mess
What are you implying?
That pacing isn't real or that only dilettantes mention it?
Why can't Nolan shoot a good fight scene?
>>71953595
Because you can't make a fight scene pretentious.
>>71953595
He doesn't understand what a gun does
>>71953595
I don't know about the background fighting, but I really liked the fight scenes between Batman and Bane. It's a nice change from all the shaky cam and hundreds of cuts we get from blockbusters.
Oh don't mind me, just being one of the best starship effects shots of all time.
I would watch all 17 hours of Star Trek: The Motion Picture in theaters just for this scene.
Those shots were ruined by the really shitty splicing of Kirk and Scotty into the shuttlecraft
I think a lot of special effects from decades ago still look great today, even better than a lot of CGI.
Posting a screen cap from the bluray since Google comes up with washedout, low res garbage. It's the lighting. Fuck, that lighting. It look like it's 700 feet long, like you could just reach out and touch it if you were close enough.
Ugliest working female?
>working
She is just being herself, anon.
>what kinda hair you want senpai
>give me that "looney toon character who just got tricked with an exploding cigar"
>say no more
>>71953261
She's genuinely better looking than Quasimodo and Boy George from Game of Redditors.
Who would play them in the inevitable biopic?
>>71953245
Josh Brolin morphs with Clooney
>>71953245
Nazis sure look like they knew how to party.
>>71953866
>Tfw no whorehouse comprised of exclusively the most finely-bred aryan qts from pure germanic stock refined through generations of eugenics to be have the ultimate nordic aesthetics
>48% Top Critics
>Certified Fresh
Is Rotten Tomatoes Shilling this movie?
>>71952988
Yes.
Are you going to start a movement on twitter pretending you care or even know a thing about film now?
>>71952988
Of course they are.
Any movies about Muslims being the good guys?
kingdom of heaven
>>71952985
Batman v Superman.
Munich (2005)
Why do you hate us /tv/?
Were we not a satisfying conclusion? :(
>>71952569
what a shame
fucking disgrace
>>71952569
You're a conclusion to a movie that doesn't exist. Seriously, why are the sequels so dramatically different in style and tone to the gritty and brutal original?
First one was perfect the sequels didn't hold to it.
Is she so fucking loud and obnoxious
>>71952557
Being loud and obnoxious = funny.
>>71952557
Black people in general are loud and obnoxious
Well they could have put some effort into making her an actual character with depth like Ernie Hudson's character in the original Ghostbusters.
But then they said "naaah, let's just make her a giant stereotype"
