FUCK ALABAMA
Bama. (11-1)
2. Oklahoma (11-1)
3. Iowa (12-0)
4. Clempson (Very insecure about their school and their ranking btw) (12-0)
5. Northwest Missouri St. (12-0)
6. Jacksonville State Gamecocks (10-1)
7. Harvard (9-1)
8. Slippery Rock (12-1)
9. Houston (11-1)
10. aOSU (11-1)
the top 4 will remain unchanged. cap it
1. Clemson
2. Bama
3. OU
4. Iowa
Clemson with one loss still gets in over tOSU:
1 more win
2 wins vs top 10
tOSU:
1 win vs 19
???
>>63939674
neither will get in if Clemson loses
>>63939705
im just pointing out its absurd that tOSU fans saying they just need clemson to lose when clemson would still be ahead of them if that occurred
>>63939717
>tOSU
senpai I believe you mean aOSU
>>63939717
I've seen more people saying that they'd be in with an Alabama loss rather than a Clemson loss which they would have a better argument for but they still wouldn't get in
reminder that the fightin k's will run the table next year
>>63939674
UNC gets in at #4 if they beat Clemson desu, with Alabama at #1 if they win dominantly or Iowa at #1 if Alabama isn't convincing and Iowa plays really well in a win over MSU
>>63939827
hahahahaha no they won't
>>63939784
Cant believe they didn't make it in the top 25.
>>63939827
clemson might even get in over UNC with a loss. you have to look at entire resumes, not just one game, even if it is the most recent
>>63939928
yeah that looks much better than ohio state's lineup ::leshiggybatman::
>>63939784
>he thinks the K's have a chance against the G's
G just got that JUCO QB commit that's going to take them to the top
>>63939928
>two FCS teams
why is this allowed?
>>63939960
which is why even with clemson losing, if you were to rank the 3 teams, itd still be
1. Clemson (1 loss to a top 10 team, 2 top 10 wins, 12 total wins)
2. tOSU (1 top 20 win, only loss to another palyoff team)
3. UNC (1 top 10 win, 2 >FCS wins, terrible loss)
>>63939928
good lord i knew that their schedule was poor but i had never bothered to actually look it up
>>63939979
>implying SC is actually better
Stop with this SEC > FCS meme
What are the chances oregon could get aOSU in the fiesta bowl?
>>63940111
Oregon is too shit. We'll get tOSU vs Bootyblasters in the Fiesta bowl
Michigan State will make the playoffs
>>63940155
tOSU vs Stanford in Fiesta
Booty Blasters will play Houston like the G5 team they are.
>>63940155
this
and Stanford will play Northwestern in the Who Gives a Shit Bowl
>These ACC shills on ESPN trying to argue that UNC should get in if they beat Clemson
>>63940185
Im still convinced clemson is in no matter what at this point
>>63940198
No way Clemson gets in if they lose to UNC. That makes literally zero sense.
>>63940198
No way. A loss to UNC so late in the season would kill them. If you're going to lose, you have to do it early in the season.
>>63940214
how? NW is behind stanford with identical records
>this lame ass hype shit before each ranking
Who cares
>>63940226
>head-to-head loss
>no conference championship
How mad are you faggots going to be when Michigan State is #4
>>63940233
these use audio clips of those lame ass espn talking head analysts like its so hype and they matter so much very important
>>63940233
we should have hype shit
our rankings are better anyways
Galloway creams about UNC every week too. UNC is fucking shit
UT 25
fuck off bama shills
>LSU
espn stream?
>ole piss 13
LMFAO
>Vols made it back to their preseason position
>UNC
BTFO
NORTH CAROLINA BTFO
b-b-b-b-but UNC would get in over clemson and tOSU with a win!
tard heels btfo
>Still behind FSU
I fucking told y'all UNC had no shot
>THE CITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
>>63940245
Not one bit
AHAHAHAHAHA ACC AND PAC BTFO
EAT SHIT SHITTERS
Aight. So UNC still gets in if Stanford loses.
Jumping from 10 to 4 is going to happen
CFP committee tryna ruin our poll
>Committee values quality wins
>Alabama 2nd
Iowa meme needs to die
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>63940399
Delusional Kuck confirmed
1. Clemson
2. Bama
3. OU
4. Iowa
5. Michigan State
6. Ohio State
7. Stanford
8. Notre Dame
9. FSU
10. UNC
11. TCU
12. Baylor
13. Ole Miss
14. Northwestern
15. Michigan
16. Oregon
17. OK State
18. Florida
19. Houston
20. USC
21. LSU
22. Temple
23. Navy
24. Utah
25. Tennessee
1. Clemson
2. Alabama
3. Oklahoma
4. Iowa
5. MSU
6. OSU
7. Stanford
8. Notre Dame
9. FSU
10. UNC
11. TCU
12. Baylor
13. Ole Miss
14. Northwestern
15. Michigan
16. Oregon
17. Oklahoma State
18. Florida
19. Houston
20. USC
21. LSU
22. Temple
23. Navy
24.Utah
25. Tennessee
BASED HAWKEYES
>>63940452
>UNC
>#10 with 1 loss
>NoD and Stanford #7 and #8 with 2 losses
WHAT THE FUCK
>3 of the top 6 are B1G teams
WHERE IS YOUR SEC/BIG 12 GOD NOW
How the fuck Iowa good?
Wow.....It's official....if Alabama loses this weekend, there will be no SEC Team in the playoff. The other sec teams are too far out of the top four.
WOW THAT DID SUCK ASS
>>63940468
>FSU lost a team UNC beat
>>63940457
This
>>63940449
>>63940384
Git gud
>see you Saturday
No.1 Clemson and No.4 Iowa for Orange
No.2 Alabama and No.3 Oklahoma for Cotton
>>63940477
Big ten west is less competitive than B1G East....that's why Illinois isn't a bad job.
>>63940490
Don't get shook lil nigga when you're BTFO by half
>>63940500
Nobody would watch Clemson/Iowa
UNC still being disrespected tbqhwaoyf
>>63940516
>>63940500
iowa would move to 3 with a win over MSU
>>63940517
Nice schedule dumbass
>OSU has a chance of getting in without even playing in its CCG
This is everything wrong with this playoff and just college football in general
>yfw Iowa is going to get anally annihilated this saturday
>yfw Clemson Alabama Stanford lose
>>63940500
Iowa/MSU winner will go up to #3
>>63940536
NEBRASKA TIRE BCS BULLSHIT
>>63940502
I guess the B1G East suck ass. Can Stanford get in the playoffs? What do you guys think about Ohio State vs. USC in the Rose Bowl?
>>63940468
>UNC loss was to 3-9 SCAR
>Stanford lost to 14 and 16
>Notre Dame lost to number 1 and number 7
>Both Stanford and ND have played much better schedules
Not that surprsing desu
>>63940507
>Implying the game will be a blowout
This is the B1GCC were talking about... my money is on a close game
>>63940482
>Bama
>losing
Pick 1. If Florida had an offense, then it would be possible but they don't
>X beats Y, therefore X is better then Y
Why do people use this argument so much (i.e Hokies 2014 national champions)
If Clemson and Bama win it will be.
1. Clemson
2. Bama
3. Iowa/MSU winner
4. Oklahoma
>YOU CAN'T WIN THE NATTY IF YOU CAN'T EVEN WIN YOUR CONFERENCE
>HURR WE NEED 8 TEAMS IN THE PLAYOFF
pick 1 and only 1
>>63940536
if Ohio State somehow sneaked in to the playoff and won it all would it be more tainted than Alabama's 2011 natty?
Current Playoff Matchups (projected Vegas spreads)
#1 Clemson -8 over #4 Iowa
#2 Alabama -3 over #3 Oklahoma
>>63940536
they have no chance. 2 spots are already clinched. alabama wont lose and a clemson loss means either UNC or stanford
>>63940568
Should have kept Grier out of trouble. Roll Tide!
>>63940575
We need some meme teams like memphis and houston in it for fun
>>63940568
it seems every year we get one puzzling conference championship game loss.....
perhaps mcelwain has some trick plays lined up.
>>63940536
Yes well with the BCS we'd have Alabama vs Clemson Natty and with 8 teams tOSU is in this is perfect.
>>63940577
Even more so than Iowa winning it all
>>63940563
>This is the B1GCC were talking about... my money is on a close game
>Literally a blowout last year
>>63940582
Believe in holy croc
>>63940557
If Stanford gets in the playoffs then Oregon would go to the Rose Bowl because they are 7-2 in conference while USC is 6-3.
>>63940536
Ohio State's only chance is if Clemson wins, Iowa wins, Alabama loses, and Stanford loses which won't happen
>LSU
>Lol Miss
>UNC
>>63940608
How is a team going 15-0 tainted after winning games against 3 tops 5 teams in a row?
What happens if:
>Clemson (#1) loses to UNC (#10)
>Bama (#2) loses to Florida (#18)
and
>Iowa (#3) loses to MSU (#5)
???
>>63940624
Oh, I forgot about that.
>>63940582
that's simply not a guarantee......
the human element is going to come into play with the committee, who has to look at strength of schedule.
they will pick apart the ACC's overall strength vs. the big ten's this season......
>>63940644
1. Oklahoma
2. MSU
3. Stanford
4. UNC
>>63940644
1. MSU
2. Oklahoma
3. OSU
4. Temple or Houston
>>63940644
All don't make the playoff
>>63940644
Probably
1. MSU
2. Oklahoma
3. Stanford
4. UNC
Friendly reminder that a school can only be good in either basketball or football. No in betweens
>>63940658
i disagree. OSU would absolutely make the top 4 in that situation.
>UNC fans acting surprised
you lost to a 3-9 team and played 2 FCS teams, you're not fucking getting in
>>63940578
Interesting. I think OU matches up with Bama the best, and I might favor them by 1.5
>>63940650
Yeah most did, I'm just an Oregon fan grasping for an unlikely outcome.
>>63940658
If they have UNC at 10 right now and Ohio State at 6, as much as it kills me to say it, I can't see why Ohio State wouldn't get in over UNC in that situation.
>>63940644
1. Choklahoma
2. MSU
3. UNC
4. Stanford
>>63940668
I hate the Gators, but they proved your argument is invalid.
>15
>one spot behind 38-0 northwestern
>B1G east is suffering when you're not elite yet
>>63940641
I'm just shitposting m8. In all reality i'm a UofI Student trying not to let his hopes get to high
UNC is clearly not getting in, if they win Ohio State is in (and deserve to be)
>>63940644
OU is #1
MSU moves up #2
UNC moves up to #3 if Stanford loses #4 if they win
tOSU would be #4 by default if Stanford loses which would be bullshit
>>63940668
>what is 2006 Florida
wow he literally said H2H and conference championships are only tiebreakers
>>63940701
Stanford
>the city of ohio state
>>63940701
Clemson would get in over tOSU still, and Stanford would get in over both
Go Clemson tbhfam
Not trying to play an Ohio school again
Iowa and MSU can tie and we (OSU) get in, right?
>Florida can only score 2 (points) at home
>"people" expect them to beat Bama
aOSU is only going down. they DONT play this weekend. They literally can't go up.
Why are people acting like Ohio State's SoS is way better than UNC's? They had UNC at 63rd and OSU at 58th
I'm conflicted about the current seeding of Alabama and Oklahoma.
On the one hand, I don't want this year's playoff to go by without Stoops and Saban meeting up again just so one of them can make the other extremely butthurt. So in that respect it would be good to be certain that they meet up by seeding them #2 and #3.
On the other hand, this removes the possibility of them meeting in the championship game, and I would love to see them against each other for all the marbles. So maybe somebody else should face them in the semifinals.
>>63940754
>>"people" expect them to beat Bama
They're 17.5 point underdogs, retard
>yfw USC wins and they get into the playoff with 4 loses because muh ratings and history
>>63940765
srsly this. everyone from 6-9 is just a few pips above UNC which is reasonable since UNC hasn't played Clemson yet.
>>63940754
>FSU scored the 2 points for Florida because they felt bad
SEC SEC SEC SEC
>>63940765
this week is UNC's first game against a ranked team and they played 2 FCS teams
>>63940754
>aOSU fans
FIFY
So what happens if Florida and UNC pull the upsets? Ohio State, Iowa, Oklahoma, and who's last? Does UNC get the right to jump all the other teams in waiting?
>>63940793
Clemson is in over tOSU
>>63940793
>iowa
>I think Iowa will beat MSU
>>63940819
Just have them keep doubting. Only fuels them more.
You're all retarded if you think UNC doesn't make it in with a win over #1 Clemson
Everyone is going in about teams not jumping each other next week as if that's how the CFP rankings work.
>>63940833
>10
>>63939649
Damn son
>>63940791
Second*
Pitt was ranked when UNC played them.
>>63940451
Man, the committee really fucked up here.
this is going to be the easiest natty bama has ever won, except for 2012 notre dame.
>>63940819
I don't get why this is so far fetched fucking MSU hasn't been the pillar of greatness this year and I think both are mediocre teams.
>>63940444
You need to die
>>63940760
were you 4 in 2007 or something?
>>63940854
What they have accomplished with the injuries and a shitty secondary is pretty good bro.
>>63940696
>>63940709
NCAAF: W 41-14 vs #1 Ohio State
NCAAB: W 84-75 vs #1 Ohio State
holy shit, they really are the kekeyes
>>63940836
They're 10 without beating a ranked team or having a conf trophy. Winning your 12th straight game against #1 the last game of the season to win a conference on prime time tv is literally the highest value win possible in this system. It doesn't get any better.
how old were you when you grew out of arguing about CF rankings?
>>63940875
we were 2nd nationally in soccer that year too ;__;
>>63940901
>play a heap of shit all season
>play one good team
>get in
Would be a disaster
>>63940901
long literally said championships are only a tiebreaker after resumes are otherwise found to be equal
>>63940906
>being a mature, calm, and well-informed poster on 4chan
>>63940906
15
we don't argue here we post meme images next to bad opinions
Why do people forget that the reason why UNC had 2 FCS schools is because OSU ducked them? One of those was supposed to be UNC vs OSU, but OSU backed out, probably because they wouldn't get the ratings they thought they would.
>>63940922
>TCU and Ohio State last year
If UNC somehow blew Clemson out they're 4.
>>63940922
Righto, you don't think beating consensus #1 makes UNC at least tied with 6-9? Then conference ship leaves only stanford to beat. Will probably come down to how those two teams look in their wins.
>>63940906
How old were you when you lost your passion?
And let's be honest here: every team besides bama is a meme this year.
>>63940854
They're winning in big games this year. Deal with it
>>63940958
that series was for 2017 and 2018 breh
If UNC somehow gets in, they will lose by at least 28 in the playoff. What a joke
>>63940958
because it doesn't change the fact that they played 2 FCS schools. actually it works against them as it's obvious they would have another loss if they played aOSU
>>63940993
they would play bama probably, imagine the carnage
Chicken tender sub incoming.
>NORTHERNERS BTFO
>>63940973
UNC with 2 ranked wins (PITT was ranked when they played) and only one loss, albeit to SC, should get in over any 2 loss team.
>>63941007
It depends if they were playing OSU when they decided to be shit earlier in the year.
>>63941013
>southerners don't know how to take a photo
>>63941016
no one counts rankings when they got the win
Is the Committee worse than BCS?
>>63941025
Nah. OSU would probably beat them regardless.
>>63941029
works for Bama
>>63941030
yea
>>63940958
Ohio State backed out because the B1G is making all it's teams schedule another conference game instead I think is what they said
How long would Richt turn Virginia around?
>>63941039
You have nothing to base this off of besides "lel acc"
>>63941062
>richt
>good
>>63941030
not even close and last year proved that
>>63941030
what if they just instituted the playoff into the BCS rankings?
>>63940973
This. If Stanford loses to USC (my sleeper pick for an upset) and UNC somehow beats Clemson (especially if they did it convincingly) then UNC would make it into the playoffs at #4. UNC would have a win over the former #1 and Ohio State would have a win over #15. UNC would be a conference champion. Just don't think you can justify anOSU in that instance.
>>63940958
"Supposedly" the fear was that anOSU would have to play 9 conference games so they dropped UNC over powerhouse programs like Western Michigan, Hawaii, and Northern Illinois.
UNC has had games canceled by Tennessee, Minnesota, and anOSU in the past decade. I'm not so sure it is their fault that the schedule didn't pan out the way they wanted it to.
If MSU blows out Iowa should they move up past #4?
>>63941063
and an aOSU natty champ last year and everyone returned and a weak UNC schedule with a weak loss but yeah what do i know lel acc
>>63941099
The UNC series was for 2017-18
people can't read apparently
>>63941069
>ACC schedule
He'd at least upgrade the recruiting and would have 2-3 teams at most to worry about.
>>63941028
Sorry I'm usually the one in front of the camera. ;)
>>63941030
Yes which I find to be fucking hilarious
>>63941062
He can't even win getting some of the best recruits in the nation and you think he's going to do it in Virginia of all places?
>>63940993
If they played Bama or OU, the two best teams remaining if Clemson lost, then yeah. They'd have a good shot against Iowa or MSU but there's little chance that game would happen.
>>63940958
>>63941099
Who cares?
>>63941105
Look at it this way. tOSU has looked ineffective in a number of games. On the other hand, UNC has blown out most teams they've played. Your average B1G and ACC coastal team are about on par.
IF UNC wins the ACC championship, there is no way 2 loss FSU and ND get in over the ACC champ who knocked off the number 1 team, is there? What about Stanford?
>>63941110
It got pushed back originally m8
>>63941118
He could easily steal some of VT's players now that Beamer is gone and its the ACC.
I'm only talking about making them a ranked team every year, possible ACC threat, not a natty.
>>63941141
TOSU gets in over them. UNC would have to hope for Alabama loss.
>>63941141
Stanford probably would because they'd be PAC12 champs (which honestly looks better than ACC champ) with an 18 ranked SOS compared to UNC's shitty schedule. Also Stanford lost to two teams in the teens while UNC lost to some shitter.
>>63941125
Iowa and MSU would both bootyblast them.
>>63941172
>tOSU gets in over them
I cannot see why that could possibly be the case.
>>63941141
If UNC beats the team that beat ND and FSU then the committee should rank them above all three. Iowa/MSU will also lose at least one game, and if the loser is MSU then that would be good cause for UNC to jump OSU too.
That's 5 guaranteed spots UNC would move up. They still probably need Stanford to lose to USC if they want to get into the playoffs but it isn't outside the realm of possibility.
>people unironically putting the 't' in front of OSU
>>63940644
Low television ratings
god I hope none of these scenarios happens
I don't want to see another shitty ACC team that doesn't deserve to be in get blown the fuck out in the semifinal
UNC getting in would be a guaranteed blowout for whoever plays them
Oklahoma wins the natty. Cap this. Bet on it. It's happening.
>>63940628
This is true.
Stanford is only ranked as high as they are because 1.) Notre Dame sells and is overrated because of this and 2.) the committee needs a west coast representative if they can force one in so they don't lose a ton of that market.
Is the muh SEC bias meme finally kill?
>>63941135
>Your average B1G and ACC coastal team are about on par
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ok
Help me out here. I'm trying to find UNC's best win. I literally don't even know which one it is. Looks like it's 8-4 Miami who lost to Cincinatti, beat nebraska in OT, beat duke by 3 points.
>>63941271
>UNC getting in would be a guaranteed blowout for whoever plays them
Same with the Iowa literal whos
OSU would booty blast UNC
>>63941321
Pittsburgh, which is only an okay win. Them getting in would be an absolute joke.
Long: Using committee's metrics, Ohio State & UNC's strength of schedule numbers "not close." Ohio State's "clearly superior."
>>63941299
no because LSU is ranked and lol miss is #13
>>63941344
yeah, UNC would bootyblast all of those teams
>>63941321
The Pitt, VTech, and NC State wins shouldn't be overlooked. All road games, Pitt was ranked, Beamer's last home game, and NC State is always hard to beat on the road, especially in this rivalry. The Gtech game also proved UNC can be clutch.
UNC also beat Illinois by more than anOSU beat Illinois tbqh familia
>>63941299
People on twitter are already bitching about LSU and Tennessee were put back in the poll to justify Bama's ranking
Domino's is the GOAT pizza chain. Prove me wrong
>you can't
>tfw the defending national champion is automatically out of the playoff picture because of one loss to what will be a top 3 team by a field goal simply because everyone is rooting against them and is tired of their success
Meanwhile shit Bama who got throttled by the same team less than a year ago gets a free ride because ESPN needs a team in the playoffs
Iowa/UNC natty
CAP IT
>>63941361
src please. the graphic they showed during the selection show said they were very similar.
>>63941361
UNC still played one more game :^)
Big reason why TCU and Baylor didn't get in last year, not just because they were "co-champions".
>>63941387
>UNC also beat Illinois by more
never ever compare blowouts to make an argument. OSU also dominated VT on the road in a game that was hyped for a year
GT and NC State are pure trash
>>63941394
How can anyone be this wrong?
>>63941411
thats the ESPN graphic using their meme ratings, Long is the head of the committee
Facts:
>With a Clemson/Alabama loss, the fourth slot will go to (in order of liklehood): Stanford, UNC, Ohio State
Stanford and UNC would be conference champions, and i'm not sure how you say that UNC has a better resume than Stanford despite the second loss. UNC would need a Stanford loss to get in. Ohio State sleepwalked through most of this season and would not have even played for their conference championship. Ohio State would need losses by both Clemson and Bama to get in.
>Clemson is not getting in if they lose
Not even sure how you autists justify this. Not winning the weakest power five conference and losing in the last week is a recipe for getting left out.
>>63941401
>tfw confirmed MSU/Oklahoma natty game
my body is ready pham
>>63941401
This. Alabama could lose to a bunch of girls playing and still be in. Not even an OSU fan desu
>>63941433
Clemson still has a better resume than Ohio State with a loss
>>63941390
>implying they are wrong
>>63941401
the difference is Bama will be a conference champion while Ohio State won't even be a conference runner up and Bama lost early on and had time to rise back up the rankings and Ohio State didn't
>>63941433
Agree, but I think UNC gets in over Stanford if they look dominant in their win and Stanford just squeaks by.
>>63941433
They shouldn't get in with a win
>>63941433
>Not even sure how you autists justify this. Not winning the weakest power five conference and losing in the last week is a recipe for getting left out.
>weakest power five conference
But anon, Clemson doesn't play in the PAC12
>>63941435
as an tOSU fan I hope you guys do win. B1G has three teams in the top 6 and still gets no respect. Meanwhile, the shit SEC gets propped up by horrible rankings and these nobody conferences are trying to make a case for a 2 loss team to get in if they beat a shit 4 loss side. Maybe maybe a second straight. national title will wake their asses up
>>63941433
>weakest power 5 conference
Clemson moved to the Big XII?
>>63941487
It's too little though
If Clemson loses:
1. Bama
2. Iowa/MSU
3. OU
4. Stanford
If Clemson AND Bama lose
1. Iowa/MSU
2. OU
3. Stanford
4. Clemson or UNC
>>63941459
If they were trying to rig things for the Tide don't you think they'd put in a 9-3 Georgia team who's won 5 of their last 6?
>>63941387
>The Gtech game also proved UNC can be clutch.
No it fucking doesn't, all it does is that they struggled against a shit team.
>>63941506
>an tOSU
>an the ohio state university
>an the
>>63941450
Maybe with an MSU loss that makes tOSU's loss look worse. I just don't see any ACC team other than the champion getting in.
>>63941497
Who are you referring to?
>>63941499
PAC12 and ACC don't even compare in terms of depth. PAC12 might not have a top four team at the top but top to bottom they don't even compare.
>>63941517
Big 12 is probably 1b in terms of weakness. The ACC just has no depth to it whatsoever.
>stanford loses to 2 mediocre ass teams that are now ranked because they play in horrible divisions
>gets to play a crappy team they already dominated for the conference title
>people saying they should jump 1 loss teams to get in
now THIS is some retarded shit right here
>>63941433
>weakest power five conference
I know this is bait but, there's only 2(two) conferences with 3(three) teams in the top 10. I'll wait....
>>63941528
BEST outcome:
If Clemson AND Bama AND Stanford lose:
1. Iowa/MSU
2. OU
3. UNC
4. Clemson
>>63941485
No, the difference is that Bama rode through a soft conference where they were able to sneak into a championship game against an awful team where Ohio State is playing in a conference where their competition is ranked 4 and 5 and their only loss was to one of them by 3 points. Bama lost to Ole Piss
>>63941552
Clemson still has 2 better wins than OSU and one more overall win
>>63941552
Clemson
Winning in a group of six team means shit
>>63941487
Fuck Stanford. They are so fucking overrated.
>getting btfo by Northwestern
>getting btfo by Oregon
I don't care what happens this weekend. They don't belong in the playoff.
>>63941420
nice proof idiot
what's the real GOAT chain?
>still domino's
>>63941564
>UNC Clemson rematch for the natty
kek
>>63941564
I want this doomsday scenario and then a UNC/Clemson rematch in the final.
>>63941387
>The Gtech game also proved UNC can be clutch
lmfao I bet that's not how you'd spin Bama-Tennessee
>>63941506
Let's go baby.
B1G is here lube up faggots.
>>63941536
Most good teams struggle with an inferior opponent or two. UNC proved away @GTech that they can win in the clutch anon.
>>63941558
>>63941581
T H I S
remember this Stanford argument in 2013 too
They are almost at Alabama tier of people just ignoring their losses
>>63941545
>an Ohio State
What if I'm just using the t to identify which OSU I'm speaking of?
>>63941598
But I would. I'm a Bama student f.am
UKULELE
>>63941623
then just say ohio state
>>63941558
>>63941581
If VA wasn't injured Oregon would be in the playoffs with 1 loss tbhfam
>>63941600
Dubs of B1G East + Iowa dominance.
>>63940198
nope, not this late in the season
>>63941615
All all money man. The NCAA wants the west coast market to have a representative in the playoffs. Do you think a kid from California gives a fuck about Clemson vs Alabama?
>>63941655
checked
>>63941600
>B1G West
>>63941565
>Bama's SoS: 5
>Ohio State's SoS: 61
>>63941655
>>63941600
Continued B1G East + Iowa dubs domination.
>>63941660
committee has their own rules which dont always follow conventional wisdom
winning last year at 3 even got you knocked out
aOSU vs Notre Dame will have better ratings that any of the playoff games.
>>63941677
CHECKED
H
E
C
K
E
D
>>63941390
>People on twitter
wow its fucking nothing
reminder that UNC is now /cfb/'s champion
>>63941506
>cheering for a conference
>>63941688
not so surprising when two of the biggest fanbases meet
>>63941600
The east and west should trade Purdue and MSU.
>>63941562
You have to look at the conferences top to bottom though. The ACC drops off heavily after those teams and the PAC12 maintains some depth with teams like Utah, USC, UCLA, and Oregon
>>63941578
say what you want but the committee has said that conference championships will be valued
>>63941704
10 to 4 is habbeding
>>63941675
it's blowing my mind right now
UNC at least has somewhat of an argument because they lost week 1. Stanford lost week 1 and literally JUST lost 2 weeks ago and it's as if it didn't even happen
>>63941697
well, yeah, obviously no one who actually knows his shit is questioning bama's position
>>63940451
>iowa loses
>bama loses
yfw "the"osu sneaks in and wins it all
>>63941719
long literally just head championships are only valued if teams are ties based on other metrics
>>63941600
>MSU, OSU, Michigan,and Penn State all in one division
who thought this would be fair to the west?
>>63941714
MSU would forcibly gangrape their way to the ccg for the next 5 years until Dantonio retires
>>63941719
Being undefeated in the Sun Belt means shit
>>63941720
Can't wait for the butthurt when 10 to 4 occurs.
>>63941387
>tOSU blows out Va Tech in THEIR home
>tOSU dominates Illinois in THEIR home
>UNC goes to OT with Va Tech in their home
>UNC dominates Illinois in UNC's home.
>>63941600
which ones are the legends and which are the leaders?
>>63941733
they did that under the assumption that Nebraska will someday be good again I think.
Which is never gonna happen LEL
>>63941760
like the ACC thinking Miami will be relevant again
kEK
>>63941675
This desu. After the Oregon loss I knew they were only being propped up because of their geographic location. Seeing Stanford get in just because they're on the West Coast would be disgusting.
>>63941733
it is fair. they end with better overall records.
>mfw Bama and Stanford lose
>mfw MSU and OSU both get in the playoff
>mfw MSU-OSU natty
>mfw the shitposting
>>63941786
>tOSU gets revenge against MSU and Clemson and it's 2013 all over again.
>>63941786
this would be amusing
would like to see a proper rematch with Connor Cook playing and without bad weather and cancerous playcalling gimping OSU
>>63941786
>MSU wins
>buckfags fuck off forever
>Be Stanford fan
>Be hype for Pac-12 'ship game
>Literally no one else cares
I fucking hate this fanbase sometimes. I don't think Stanford should be in the CFP (I think they'd get blown out, honestly, their defense is looking mighty shaky since Wazzu) but I do think a Rose Bowl is a good destination for the Card.
>>63941759
There exists a legend of Michigan being good once, or for some extended period of time, but it supposedly happened aeons ago, before recorded history, passed down through mythical stories that became legend. The current leaders and best would be Michigan State and Iowa with aOSU close behind.
>>63941647
I didn't really watch their game against Utah. Would he have prevented Memetah from scoring 62?
You cannot convince me that UNC will have a better resume than Stanford if both win this weekend
>>63941816
>meme band
>meme mascot
can someone explain to me why a conference wouldnt want to unanimously adopt a 9 game conference schedule? doesnt the conference get 1 extra game each on a big name tv network which means more money?
>>63941812
>implying MSU should have won that game
>>63941840
pac fags are delusional
>>63941816
your band is some cringey meme bullshit.
If UNC had been at 8 or 9 would it be that much less of a big deal if they beat Clemson and jump to #4?
>>63941852
because then the SEC cant schedule another cupcake game
>>63941853
>get blown the fuck out in most categories
>only points scored because of MSU shitting themselves
>>63941853
>5 (five) first downs
>>63941860
its more of that theyre behind 2 loss teams like FSU as well
>>63941812
>either team wins
>two B1G teams in finals
>consecutive B1G national titles
>other conferences fuck off forever
>>63941847
Is this accurate?
Jesus Christ.
>>63941853
Reminder that aOSU was literally gifted a touchdown by a dumb returner who tried to catch it with his shoulder.
>implying this isn't setting up to be 2007 2.0 with Ohio State sneaking in at the last moment only to get BTFO
>>63941860
they say the committee starts fresh in the rankings each week so i dont think it matters even if they were at 15th
>>63941879
>>63941812
>>63941805
>>63941798
All reasons why I want it to happen. I want to shitpost.
>>63941877
>if UNC loses they will have essentially the same schedule as FSU but will be forced out of a NY6 bowl
It'll be bullshit and I'm already mad desu
>>63941883
>memeiott
>heisman candidate
>>63941844
>>63941859
>implying the Tree is Stanford's mascot
>implying you're not just a closet Nazi sympathizer because you enjoy goose stepping marching bands doing covers of Taylor Swift songs
Stay pleb
>>63941883
and OSU fucked themselves by straight up not running their usual offense because MUH WEATHER and running QB draws on 3rd and long all game
both teams looked like hot fucking garbage in that game
>>63941868
>>63941874
yea, OSU has fluke games. like va tech last year.
that was one.
>>63941883
>5 (Five) first downs
>>63941916
this triggers the bucknut
>>63941883
First time I've taken a good look at this. Good lord. And MSU still only won on a last second FG...
>tfw I was working that evening
>>63941924
The Stanford band is nothing to be proud of tbqh
>>63941853
>lose to 2 MSU backups
>think you'd beat the starter
>you now remember this game
>>63941736
>MSU would forcibly gangrape their way to the ccg for the next 5 years until Dantonio retires
I'm just saying that for the sake of parity. The ACC has the same issue.
>>63941912
>essentially
UNC doesn't have a single ranked team on their schedule though.
Oh hey, MSU shitposters. Daily reminder that you're a freak play against Michigan away from not having a shot at the playoffs.
At least OSU knows how to defeat our rival. And embarrass them.
>we live in a world where the committee in charge of selecting the best teams has deemed LSU and Tennessee top 25
>>63941945
>JT Barrett has no experience in outQBing connor cook
it's like 2014 didn't happen senpai.
>>63941958
MSU literally beat both of their rivals on the road this year retard
>>63941953
>you now remember when ESPN swore Northwestern was good
>you now remember when ESPN swore Utah was a playoff team
>>63941958
>and embarrass them
OH THEY DID THAT
>>63941955
Alabama has one legitimately ranked team on their schedule
And they lost to them
>>63941982
Number 3 SOS. Explain that, faggot
>>63941958
>implying michigan wasn't more embarassed by webm related than the expected yearly buttraping by aOSU
>>63941969
doesn't matter cause he has literally 0 experience in out QBing random MSU backup QB's #1 and #2
>>63941958
daily reminder of how butt stressed you are
>>63941958
>being this upset that MSU is becoming a powerhouse
your shitposting will do nothing to stop them
>>63941973
What? Ohio state is not your rival. Fuck off you clingy child. We are only rivals with Michigan, and vice versa.
You shouldn't have beat Michigan. We destroyed Michigan. We played a historically bad game and poor playcalling allowed you to have a fluke win and beat us on a field goal.
Other examples of HOW FUCKING LUCKY sparty has been all year? Rutgers spiking on fourth? Almost losing to fucking purdue? Indiana keeping it close?
Ohio State is objectively a better team and you know it shitposters. Academically, we're superior too.
Have fun getting btfo by Iowa and tOSU sneaking into that fourth spot.
>>63942011
yeah, you guys are a basketball powerhouse like UNC. that's about it.
>>63942006
fluke play is the only reason tOSU isn't in playoff contention rn.
>>63941982
>legitimately
lmfao only the teams I want to be ranked count
>>63942004
Easy, the guy running the system that calculates it is named Cletus
>>63942038
>not knowing that anything beyond 20 is just a bubble of 50 interchangeable teams
>>63942020
>implying Ohio State has any room to talk about close wins
>almost losing to a MAC team
>almost losing to Indiana
>>63941982
I know this is a pretty retarded argument but Alabama is visibly better than UNC. I do agree that Alabama and the rest of the SEC are gifted ranks at the beginning of the season to inflate their status as contenders.
Georgia was ranked #9
Auburn was ranked #6
>>63941293
Or they play in the deepest conference and have quality wins and good losses. Fuck off m80
>>63942020
>muh preshus rivalree
Dantonio doesn't care
reminder that game should have ended 14-7
>>63942020
god damn all this buttrage
>Academically, we're superior too
literally michikek tier bringing academics into your argument
>>63942020
>MSU isnt Ohio State's rival
that'll change when the winner of the matchup goes to the championship game every year
>>63942020
>shouldn't
>we
Beat them in a hostile environment
>Fluke win
DOMINATED the trenches and shutdown a "Heisman" Candidate
>Rutgers actually scoring on that play
>Losing to Purdue
>BEAT INDIANA BY 26
>Have fun getting btfo by Iowa and tOSU sneaking into that fourth spot.
I'm excited to watch Ohio State this Satu... pic related
>>63942020
>Ohio State is objectively a better team
>loses head to head, the only true objective measure that exists
top kek
poorfag here, when are the actual rankings released?
>>63942020
>Have fun getting btfo by Iowa and tOSU sneaking into that fourth spot.
How many times do we have to hear this until people give us credit? Year after year it is the same narrative.
>b-but you have to win this time
>n-no wait, you have to win this now
>just watch you'll get btfo next week!
>Clemson wins
>Alabama loses
>Iowa wins
>Stanford loses
who gets in MSU or OSU?
>>63942078
If the Pac 12 is "deep" because they cannibalize each other then the SEC is unequivocally the best conference this year m8.
>>63942020
>tfw Michigan State victories cause this much blueblood anger
truely based
>>63942074
> Auburn started #6
> finished 6-6
Muschamp is a wizard at ruining SEC teams
>>63942126
you and clemson both
>>63942128
theeOSU
>>63942020
>OhCRYio State
>>63942140
It is hilarious man. Hopefully your coach uses it to his advantage too.
>>63942074
They immediately dropped from the rankings when they started looking like shit, though. Every conference has teams get ranked for a while that ultimately shouldn't be; only in the SEC is it a conspiracy
>>63942020
>kekeye tears
Can this become the new copypasta?
>>63942088
No, no it won't change. I heard penn state needs a rival.
>>63942081
But unlike michigan... we win championships.
>>63942079
That same argument against fluke plays should have you guys at 2 losses. reminder that we would win in a rematch and you fucking know it sparty.
>>63942070
the NIU game was always under control. fucking PURDUE. fucking losing to NEBRASKA.
>>63942121
you didn't shut down zeke, he barely got carries. he's a heisman candidate because he wears out defenses and forces big plays. shitty playcalling did not let him do that. if zeke got more carries, would've been 28-17.
>>63942122
So Nebraska should be in the playoffs, using your logic?
>>63942135
i'm not angry.
>>63942126
ok.
>>63942156
sure.
>>63942178
>being this upset
BLOWHIO STATE LOSES TWICE TO MSU
>>63942170
This will trigger kekeye fans
>>63942178
>you didn't shut down zeke
>didn't shut down zeke
>shut down zeke
>shut down
>tfw when ranked again
>mfw Iowa wins and we don't have to deal with the "banter" that's going on in this thread right now anymore
>>63942155
Because with the SEC they're ranked so high that they can lose twice or at the end of the season and still make it to the playoffs.
Not that they'd ever lose when they schedule Charleston Chew High at the end
>>63942178
>That same argument against fluke plays should have you guys at 2 losses. reminder that we would win in a rematch and you fucking know it sparty.
>i-i-if we scored m-more points we would of won, and you know it
B O O T Y B L A S T E D
>>63942178
>fucking losing to NEBRASKA
>fucking losing to the team that lost to NEBRASKA
lyl
>>63941816
your band is goofy but theyre bro tier. when they used to come up here they would hang out in the quad during the week and play music.
>>63942178
lmfao Elliott only got 13 carries against MSU but he got a whopping 2.8 per on them. MSU was shitting on everything OSU was doing. different plays were not the answer
Who /MSU/ here?
https://strawpoll.me/6155510
>>63942230
>iowa
>sos ranked #124
cmon man
>Kekeyes fans are asking for my inner shitposting to be released
>fans of 2 teams that have played equally shitty all year arguing about who would win a shitty rematch of one of the shittiest games of the year
>>63942178
Kekeyes bringing up more excuses for losing to the better team. Keep it up junior. Elliot wasn't doing shit.
>>63942178
No
When you compare teams with similar resumes/rankings, and one beat the other, that becomes the only "objective" metric necessary to decide who is better
>>63942211
>yfw the ohio governor makes an ordinance banning the construction of windmills in the state
>>63942178
>b a c k u p q b ' s
>Z E R O d e f e n s e
>>63942170
is this what a Spartan "man" acts like
>>63942203
here's your reply.
>>63942221
he also had a season low amount of carries
I know math isn't taught in east lansing until grad school, but work with me here sparty.
>>63942227
GO VOLS
>>63942232
nice rebuttal.
>>63942233
transitive property, purdue is better than you.
>>63942238
hey bama fag, shouldn't you be jumping in joy you don't have to lose to us again? nice "average ACT" score your school has. have fun getting BTFO by stoops again, and urban next year.
>>63942250
that was a quality win that year.
>>63942256
>confirmed for not watching ohio state football.
>>63942258
so nebraska is better?
>>63942264
your defense's best performance, right?
>>63942178
You are so fucking mad right now.jpg
>>63941816
Their defense isn't shaky, it is the same as its always been. Stuff guys so they average 2 yards per play, but give up the occasional 70 yard dragon. They just allowed a lot more of them last week.
>>63942074
so you had iowa, unc, northwestern, houston, etc in your top 25 preseason?
When will Texas be good again?
>>63942261
>yfw OSU loses their bowl game while Iowa/MSU wins the natty
>yfw the OSU governor commits sudoku
>>63942278
I'm actually pretty disappointed we don't get to shit all over OSU this year
>>63942278
i'm starting to think you aren't actually a kekeye fan but just like getting (You)'s.
>>63942126
>Tfw Iowa this year
>yfw MSU causes massive amounts of asspain
lel this anon is so unhappy with his life
there there bud, you beat mishitgan, i thought that was all that mattered
>>63942155
>Every conference has teams get ranked for a while that ultimately shouldn't be; only in the SEC is it a conspiracy
But that doesn't explain why Georgia and Auburn(both with a new QBs) are automatically top 10 teams. When they haven't done anything to justify such a ranking in years.
>>63942292
No but if Iowa started the season ranked #6 I would have some concerns.
>>63942231
So other conferences never have preseason/early top 10 teams that sputter out over the course of the year?
LANGFOOOOOOOOOORD
STILL RUNNING
TOUCHDOWN SPARTANS
HOW DO YOU FEEL RIGHT NOW?
>>63942280
i'm fuming. it's unreal how mad i am.
>>63942307
i'd vote for kasich over trump desu
so does anyone actually pay tuition for a michigan state or alabama "education" here?
>>63942317
Your best ranked win is what, LSU at 23? Nice!
you struggled against your rival after scheduling an FCS cupcake, we dominated ours after scheduling a playoff team.
>>63942320
I'm a student and fan. Junior.
>>63942332
it is, hit the reply key m8. playoffs are just icing on the cake.
>>63942344
i saw it live
wasn't triggered
it was cold and rainy. wind conveniently stopped blowing before the final kick.
>>63942344
>bell
>langford
>holmes
my dick
>Dantonio is responsible for massive amounts of asshurt
god i love that man
Sparty, focus on your true rivals. Penn State.
>>63942337
you can only go on the eye test in the preseason its not that big of a deal m8 the best teams will reveal themselves
>>63942373
>calling a team you BTFO a rival
literally Ohio state tier pham
>>63942337
>When they haven't done anything to justify such a ranking in years
Auburn was in the championship game year before last and Georgia, iirc, literally finished last year in the same spot they started this year in
>Ohio State won't make the playoffs
WHAT THE FUCK THIS IS SUCH FUCKING BULLSHIT WE'RE THE DEFENDING CHAMPS WE DESERVE TO GET IN THE MSU GAME WAS A FLUKE WE'RE STILL THE BETTER TEAM
>>63942372
So true. I love every minute of it.
>>63942344
>you now remember Leveon Bell's habbits of hurdling defenders
BASED
>>63942372
I respect Dantonio. He is a good coach, probably a top 3 coach. He's definitely better than Saban, since he can do what Saban is incapable of (beating Ohio State).
>>63942373
our only 'rivals' are those in the way of the B1G my friend.
>>63942278
>GO VOLS
You're damn right. Go Big Orange!
>>63942278
>your reading comprehension
I'm sure you wouldn't have said that Virginia Tech was better than your kekeyes last season despite losing to them. I'm sure you would have said that their overall bodies of work couldn't be compared. In that case (see: Michigan St. vs. Nebraska), a head to head loss isn't an indictment of the winner being better.
In this case of tOSU and MSU, they have similar resumes (same conference, same division, same record), and a head to head loss for tOSU can objectively mean that MSU is a better team and deserves their better ranking
>>63942398
>Le'Veon almost had 2000 yards in 2012
>>63942352
>>>63942332 #
>it is, hit the reply key m8. playoffs are just icing on the cake.
>unironically believing OSU will still make the playoffs
lel
>>>63942344 #
>i saw it live
>wasn't triggered
>it was cold and rainy. wind conveniently stopped blowing before
Found the casual, kind of explains why you still believe they'll get a 4th seed
Screencapped for future shitposting
Dantonio > Meyer desu
>>63942430
m8 i think your 4chan is broken. GO GREEN
FRIENDLY REMINDER THAT A NATTY THIS YEAR MAKES DANTONIO AND MICHIGAN STATE THE BEST B1G TEAM OF THE PAST 5 YEARS
>>63942456
Friendly reminder that Michigan and Ohio State fans will tell us it is a fluke and say we need to win it again next year to validate it. There is no winning.
>>63942409
I'm a Tennessee transfer who goes to Ohio State.
If Tennessee had another shot at Bama, at this point in the season, they'd win. It'll be close but a win this time around.
>>63942410
Nah, I'm using your logic. Va Tech were the true national champs last season. Face it. Purdue > Ohio State too this season. And Houston > Alabama.
>>63942430
please fix the formatting of your attempts at trolling before submitting them/screencapping them.
>>63942432
Equals desu, Dantonio never won a championship though.
>>63942438
You realize that was an MSU shitposter attempting to portray a Buckeye, superior Ohio man?
>this turned into a MSU eternal victory thread
ON THE BANKS OF THE RED CEDAR
>>63942456
too bad theres no fucking way that's gonna happen
So when MSU inevitably wins the natty this year we all agree that they will take their rightful spot atop cfb as a blood blood right?
>>63942376
And you're absolutely right, it's not a big deal but at the same time it kinda is because the SEC doesn't schedule enough OOC games to get an accurate understand on how good the teams in the SEC actually are. For example, LSU struggled against Syracuse big time before pulling away in the second half. A. Either Syracuse is a really underrated teams or B. LSU isn't actually as good as people think.
As it turns out LSU isn't really that good but that's after they lost to Bama, which at the time was a top 10 match up. That game vaulted them into playoff contention
Sorry if my syntax is complete shit
>>63942480
You never answered my question. Did you legitimately get an "education" at Alabama? Did you not do so well in high school? Low ambitions in life?
>this strength of aOSU damage control
>>63942480
>not believing in Michigan State sports
>>63942432
>Equals desu, Dantonio never won a championship though.
No but he turned MSU from a perenial bottom feeder to a championship contender, literally the perfect rebuild
>>63942485
Why not? They already have a great history and will officially be the most successful team of the decade
fuckin sparty's gettin uppity again
>>63942486
all changes starting next year though
>>63942476
THERE'S A SCHOOL THAT'S KNOWN TO ALL
>>63942475
>Tennessee had another shot at Bama, at this point in the season, they'd win. It'll be close but a win this time around.
They probably would. I'm hyped for next year's game at Neyland it's gonna be a good one.
>>63942475
>being a fan of two teams keked by superior teams
>>63942517
They'll be a blue blood when Dantonio retires in 15 years with 4 Nattys
Go Green! Can anyone, over these butthurt Kekeye tears, help me with my homework?
>>63942518
>irrelevant team
Step away from the big boy table, adults are talking right now.
>>63942526
Also Battle of the Bristol, Va Tech got that Memphis coach and might actually be good next year.
>>63942511
>perfect rebuild
>tfw UMass will never have a coach like Dantonio lead them to glory
back to NCAA 14 :(
>>63942499
I did great in high school and kicked ass on the SAT, which allowed me to attend Alabama free of tuition. I now have a high-paying job with my math degree
>>63942476
There's a school that's known to all
Its specialty is winning
And those Spartans play good ball
Spartan Teams are never beaten
All through the game they'll fight
Fight for the only colors
Green and White
>>63942524
ITS SPECIALTY IS WINNING
>>63942541
not at that level yet tbhfam
>>63942541
come on dude, laplace.
>>63942546
Fuck you faggot stay mad little brother
>implying harbaugh wont shrek you next year
>>63942541
i go to an sec school sorry
>>63942594
>big sister mad af
>>63942594
>the buttmad Michigan fan calling someone else mad
Keep it coming.
>>63942518
Hey rival and fellow blueblood fanbase, let's remind Sparty who's actually on top and what two schools are football and academic powerhouses.
>>63942562
>Battle at Bristol
My dad's a long time Tech fan so he'll be rooting for the Hokies. Me and him might go to it.
>mfw thinking about that game.
>>63942521
>>63942594
>Fuck you faggot stay mad
>>63942590
Skipped the last two weeks of DiffEq, these are just Laplace transforms?
>>63942604
Maybe in grad school senpai.
Oh what's that?
>>63942618
>lets remind them of whos a powerhouse
>proceeds to get rekt
>>63942612
>j-just wait till next year
Michigan fans never change their tune.
>>63942572
Dude, with my ACT score alone I would've got a full ride to Bama. Instead, I have a full ride to Ohio State. High paying means different things for southerners I guess.
>>63942618
>Ohio State
>academic powerhouse
MY SIDES
Blowhio Shit is community college tier they'll let literally anyone in
Im ready for saturday
>>63942687
Michigan, don't be like that. For most colleges that actually matter (engineering, business) we are only a handful of spots below in rankings.
>next year l-little brother...
every time
>midwestern state colleges arguing about academics
>>63942632
tfw blake Barnett will be throwin dimes
>>63941840
The Ducks defense gave up in the second half because our offense was playing so badly. I'd venture to say the game would be much closer (though Utah would probably still have won).
>>63942680
>falling for the math degree meme
You new?
>>63942707
>all MSU do is upset teams
>gets accused of choking
u wot m80
>>63942572
I think you misspelled meth m8
>>63942718
When was the last time Michigan State won a national title?
>>63941647
This.
>>63941840
Utah would've been the only loss on the season, >our entire defense was fucking terrible
>>63942680
>Dude, with my ACT score alone I would've got a full ride to Bama. Instead, I have a full ride to Ohio State. High paying means different things for southerners I guess.
Who give a fuck about these things? If you're making good money, why does it matter where you went to school? Do you need a confidence boost that badly?
>>63942652
>josiah price is only 3rd team
baka
>osu fans in this thread
>>63940353
Ole Miss Sugarb Owl confirmed. Hope to see them embarrassed again
Go to hell Ole Miss
>>63942727
6 figures, /sci/ memes
>>63942719
midwest is the smartest region in America soooo
>>63942747
because there's a difference in plateauing at 100k and making good money
>>63942719
Well they are part of the public Ivies.
>>63941010
People said the same thing about Ohio State last year
>Bama will steamroll them
>they literally have no chance against Alabama
>their meme offense won't move the ball against the GOAT Bama defense
>>63942680
I work up north I just went to school down south
>>63942727
I really do though lmao
>post yfw Oregon will never win a Natty
>>63942741
>UM
1948
>MSU
1966
>>63942735
Im just posting it so others can save it for Saturday man
>>63942278
>transitive property, purdue is better than you.
so, purdue is better than tosu too
Iowa still hasn't played anybody at all. Shameful
>>63942747
Because living in Ohio is so shit that the people there attach their self esteem to how good Ohio State is
>>63942741
Michigan grasps onto that joke of a 97 title so hard then precedes to get wrecked hard by OSU thereafter.
>1948
lol even your god Bo couldn't win shit
Woody > Bo
>>63942797
Do you have a Ohio State 2015 National Champs reaction image?
>>63942741
Back to back championships in 65-66. If Michigan didn't win in 97 there last would have been 1948.
>>63941600
READY
>>63942820
nah
>>63942821
>if michigan didnt win in 97
They didnt win, they shared it
>implying that counts
>>63942762
>because there's a difference in plateauing at 100k and making good money
Well how much passive income do you have?
Because how much you make doesn't matter if you don't spend it correctly.
>>63942819
Bo was one of the biggest chokes ever during the 10 year war and several years after he had tons of shots at winning the Natty but always lost the Owl.
498th for go gators
>Iowa's best wins are Wisconsin and Northwestern teams who are overrated
Lol. So many close games to middling teams. Iowa is a meme.
500
>>63942821
>Counting any natties before there was an officially recognized title game and teams could just claim whatever titles they wanted
>>63942834
Good because neither of those two will ever be used
>>63942839
we actually shared it in 65-66 i think
>>63942859
i'm a fucking sham
>>63941824
1997?
>I was 12
>>63942765
>saying public ivy unironically
please kill yourself
>>63942873
Well one of those years MSU and ND were 1 and 2 and they played to a tie which they share the title for that year.
>>63942744
Delusion.
>>63942762
And old guy I met put it in perspective:
"You've got to live within your means. Hell, if you want to, just live in a trailer, drive a Chevrolet Cruize, and get 4 30 packs of beer. Life is good. 2 cases in the kitchen, 2 in the garage. You're set. And hey, that way, when your kids come over, you can give them some of your beer!"
>>63942762
Having less blacks on average doesn't mean your whites are smarter tbhfam
>>63940976
Bama is the biggest of memeteams r-tard.
Why is USC ranked?
>>63943009
Wat kinda trailers have garages?
I really don't get the Bama thing. They aren't that good or impressive overall. They are getting way too much respect because of their recent history. I also don't get Bama fans putting down OSU. They beat you last year, and ran all over you. You should want them in the playoff so you can beat them.
>>63943380
They are just scared of tOSU tbqhwyf.
>>63943107
Because they a good team and they would beat most of the "Power Five" schools at home?
Based Stanford took care of dey biznas
>>63942768
Hey I go to bama currently on a full tuition scholarship. Am from the north and studying mechanical engineering.
>>63940906
>>63943380
>>63943097
>>63942499
*sigh* yall. do I have to remind you every fucking thread?
THREADLY REMINDER that in all but 2 of the most meaningful statistical breakdowns of college football, BAMA is ranked top 4 or BETTER.
THREADLY REMINDER that BAMA has the #1 or "BEST" average ranking amongst all of these statistics.
THREADLY REMINDER that this means OBJECTIVELY, INDISPUTABLY, BAMA IS UNDERRATED by being placed at JUST 2nd PLACE by the COMMITTEE.
If anything at all should change about bama's ranking, assuming they win out, they need to go up. not down.
Also, it's a pretty decent educational institution, especially if you include UAB in the alabama system. Hopefully the people in charge don't continue with their overt actions to turn UAB into a commuter's college/satellite to tuscaloosa.