/cfb/ General
- Home
- Board: /sp/ - Sports
- Reading: /cfb/ General
It's been pretty much agreed upon that Alabama's schedule is weak, right?
So why are they #1 in most of the computers? checkmate atheists
>>63939305
>this OP
Alabama is shiiiiiiiiiiiit
>>63939305
because they're stats look good on paper, but they haven't beaten a team with less than 3 losses and lost to Ole Miss
the SEC is in for another shitty bowl season because all those mediocre teams that got bowl eligible by playing each other are going to get matched up against decent teams and get murdered.
>>63939724
I hope they play oklahoma and get exposed. Saban can't stop the spread!
>>63939815
both Oklahoma and Clemson are matchup nightmares for Bama, with extremely strong front sevens and good to great secondaries so coker's all sec (aka mediocre) passing abilities will be nullified
they both have mobile qbs that will give their plodding d-line men nightmares of all those wind sprints they didn't do and quality receiving corps to exploit the weak secondary of bama
>>63939861
I can't disagree that Bama doesn't matchup well with them offensively if you look at past games. I have a hard time believing Coker could win the game with his arm a la McCarron, if they can shut down Derek Henry. And these mobile QBs have been Saban's kryptonite.
But you are selling Bama's D FAR short. Their defensive line is not "plodding" at all. Alabama has had difficulty in the past because they have not been able to generate pass rush with 4-- they have been mostly run-stopping specialists. Bama has been forced to play zone and given mobile QBs too much time to find holes and create plays. And when they have played man they haven't been able to get pressure and leave the scramble open. Getting too far downfield and lacking quickness has hurt them.
But Saban has made adjustments. Thias is one of the greatest D-lines of all time, especially considering their depth. They have big bodies and quickness. The LBs also play well in space. But the pressure they can get with just 4 has really helped the secondary this year. They absolutely shut down Dak Prescott and didn't let Harris beat them with his legs, to say nothing of how they adjusted against Auburn. This college defense is the best I have seen in my 27 years, maybe just short of 2011 Bama due to lack of depth in the secondary. But Cyrus Jones can shut down a WR (if he plays the ball) and Saban now has the personell on defense to matchup well with any offensive scheme.
But it will all come down to Coker's arm, and I'm not confident there. He holds it way too long. At least he can shake off hits.
>>63939305
Because the computers all agree that Bama's played the toughest schedule of the top 4
>>63939724
Coker is the worst QB in the west outside of Harris.
He's not all SEC. Your hate boner is funny.
>>63941200
come on now he's better than either of the dudes Auburn's trotted out this year
SEC is going to maul in the bowls this year. This year the only weak west team was Auburn.
>>63941224
I suppose you're right about that.
But he is definitely worse than
>Dak
>Kelly
>Allen
>Either TAMU QB
>>63941268
>TAMU
going solely off their play this year he's better than Murray and about tied with kyle Allen
>>63941245
>Arkansas lost to Toledo and tech
>>63939815
>>63939861
>>63940231
Friendly reminder that all the key plamakers on the Oklahoma squad that beat Bama in 2013 are still here, but with arguably the best quarterback in cfb. Saban is praying he doesn't get matched to Oklahoma, since they'd be playing in Dallas which is deep in OU territory.
>Oklahoma lost to fucking Texas
>beat TCU by 1 at home without TCU having Boykin
>beat Baylor without Russell at the helm for the Bears
>w-we'll beat B-Bama, j-just watch, tOSU 2-2-2.0!!!
I'm gonna enjoy puttin my big fat Bama cock down all yalls mouthes
>>63946862
>since they'd be in Dallas
Wrong
So what happens if North Carolina manages to beat Clemson? Playoff chaos, and would be a thrill to see.
is mark richt a good hire?
>>63947016
Alabama wins another fucking championship
>>63947045
I would be more concerned about Oklahoma and MSU than Clemson.
>>63947061
>MSU
There's no way that meme team gets past Iowa
>>63947061
Alabama is built to beat teams like MSU. When is the last time Alabama lost a slugfest? 2011 LSU I believe. Spread teams are what beat Saban.
>>63947227
>When was was the was the last time Alabama lost a slugfest?
Last year's Sugar Bowl
>>63947035
That faggot King of the SEC will tell you no. But as a Georgia fan who doesn't root for other SEC teams, like the aforementioned faggot, he is an ok hire. Basically, if you're a shit to mediocre team then he'd be a good hire. If you want to just make it to a bowl and win a majority of those bowls then yes he is good. If you expect him to come in and win your team a championship, then your going to be disappointed. Personally, I thought he was good and I liked him as a person, I plan on rooting for whatever team he ends up at. UGA fans are babies.
How come we always bring up the ass beating OU gave to Bama, but no one ever mentions the skull fucking Clemson gave OU?
>>63947281
>42-35
>slugfest
And also, OSU is a spread team. We basically copied Oregon's meme offense but with better lineman.
>>63947323
>Russell Athletic Bowl
I actually had to look through Clemson's recent seasons because I didn't even know what game you were talking about. And who cares about an 8-4 OU vs. 9-3 Clemson? Alabama was 11-1 when OU blew them out (exposed them) so it's more relevant because it shows a quality Stoops team > a quality Saban team
Who else here booked their free 50X money multiplier when the tarheels win the ship?
Don't worry it's only dropped to 20X after last week but better act fast before they beat Clemson!
>>63940231
Dan Mullen is an offensive retard so shutting do Prescott means nothing. The only QB you've played all year that runs an even semi comparable offense to OU is Ole Miss and they trounced you.
>>63946896
OU didn't have Mayfield for the TCU game, nor Mixon and Perine for large parts of it.
Stidham is better than Russell.
OU outscored, outgained, and defensively played superior to Bama against Tennessee and we played them on the road. We owned you 2 years ago when our team and coaching staff were far worse and your team was far better.
This next one won't be played in the heart of SEC territory either like it was when we did this to you in the final year of the BCS after calling your shit conference overrated.
SEC has not won a NY6 bowl or better since OU played Bama and shattered the myth of SEC superiority.
>>63947323
>why does no one bring up the fact that an OU offense missing its only receiver starting a shit qb that was paralzyed literally a month prior to the game went against a defense that had the entire OU playbook because oh wait their defensive coordinator had been at OU for over a decade and they lost?
I hope we catch Clemson and complete the revenge tour. Clemson lost 8 starters from last years defense and our offense is bran spanking new
Morning
>>63947103
>MSU
>meme team
>fucking winless UCF did a better job getting a new coach than USC
Damnit. Will we ever win a natty again?
UNC will not make the final four, in any situation
conference championship (in a weak conference) does not outweigh 2 FCS wins. the committee has already shown that teams like tOSU would be favored to move up over UNC
BREAKING: University of North Carolina issues alert for possible armed man on or near campus.
>>63947413
No they didn't. Oregon runs primarily the read option and tempo. In that game, they had Cardale at qb, so that limited the qb runs, making the run game smash mouth down the middle with Zeke. They also didn't start to run tempo consistently until this season.
What the fuck is this?
>>63949540
Damn you mobile version
>>63948232
>Mullen is an offensive retard
Thank you! As a clanga fan, it is frustrating that he calls the shittiest plays at all times. We've had the talent the last 2 years to beat every team we've played but Mullen goes into full safe retard mode when the game is big.
>>63940231
This is a pretty good post.
>>63949545
Pretty sweet hand warmer
>>63949545
Why do they need a handwarmer if the game is in Charlotte?
>>63949690
It'll be in the upper 30s low 40s at night Saturday
>>63949212
They could possibly make it if Alabama also loses & Iowa wins.
Clemson losing puts in Stanford. Bama losing leaves out the SEC.
Then the choice would be between:
1-loss non champ Ohio State
2-loss non champ Alabama
2-loss non champ Notre Dame
1-loss Champion UNC
If MSU wins, now you have another team in the mix, which is a 1 loss runner up Iowa (which may just take tOSU's spot).
Only one of those teams would have a conference title. Depending if they use the letter of the rules, you could not say any of those others are unequivocally better than UNC.
Reminder that bamatards actually think that these are their good wins because they were ranked *at the time of the game*:
>Wisconsin
>Georgia
>Texas A&M
>LSU (still ranked i guess)
> Mississippi State
>>63946624
Alabama won't lose
Clemson won't lose
B1G champ gets in regardless
so literally none of these discussion topics matter
go green
>>63949789
I was looking into it. Clemson and UNC basically have the same teams as last year and Clemson tore apart UNC's defense.
>>63949789
most likely
I think the big 10 champ will probably jump OU, sort of a perk for playing a conf championship.
>>63949821
this tbqh pham
also msu would have the best wins if they beat iowa, yes better than bama and clemson
1. Clemson
2. Alabama
3. MSU
4. OU
>pretending like it will be much different from this
>>>/http://espn.go.com/college-football/forums/
>>63949773
Well Tennessee is ranked now
http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2015/12/1/9832634/georgia-mark-richt-governor
How will he do as governor?
Who wins:
Clemson/OU
Bama/MSU (not bothering with Iowa, Bama would ass rape them)
>>63949977
ou
bama unless MSU can run the ball
>>63949802
I think Mackenzie Alexander will probably be a difference maker
Plus Clemson's d-line has been really disruptive all year
I know it looks like the defense has waded but I think that's mostly from the offense's tendency to put them in a bad spot
>>63949963
I know. But "currently ranked and actually relevant" teams were not prioritized by your typical Bama fan.
>>63949977
Cole Stoudt dissected Oklahoma's defense last year
I can't think that no matter how much they have improved Deshaun Watson won't do better
>>63948232
Tennesde sort of runs a spread and had them against the ropes. Unfortunately for UT, special teams matter
>tfw i actually thought lol piss was going to win the sec west earlier this year
>tfw i also actually fell for the "LSU is good and so is Fournot" meme
>>63949702
>southerners think that is cold
Pretty bored of the Playoff debate by now. Personally I think only conference champions should be considered (and independents with good resumes); there's no point in others playing. You can't be the best team in the nation if you aren't the best team in your conference. No second chances.
Anyways, What potential Bowl match ups are you guys most excited about? If things go as planned (1. clemp 2. bama 3/4. OU 3/4. Iowa/Mich st), I'm pretty pumped to see Stanford v. Iowa/Mich St./tOSU as well as Notre Dame Iowa/Mich. St./tOSU.
The Sugar Bowl, too, will be fun. I hope the meme 12 twelve can fuck over the SEC once again. It should be Baylor versus Ole Miss, and Ole Miss loves being the most inconsistent team in cfb.
>>63950021
The defense is far different with a better secondary and Mike Stoops in the press box. The offense is also completely different and it could have changed the game entirely if the offense could stay on the field (see OU v TCU. TCU basically got infinite downs because Trevor knight would go 3 and out every time, the defense suffered as a result). In any case, I think OU matches up better against MSU and bama better than against Clemson. It won't be an easy win for clemson, and OU will need to go all out.
>>63950071
i like watching notre flamers get btfo in important games
>Gary Pinkle has cancer
>coaches through SJW-controversy a dumpster fire Mizzou team until the end of the season
>Steve Spurrier's South Carolina football program begins to decline
>quits mid-season on his team because 'muh legacy'
what a fucking coward
>>63950062
>northerners willingly live in freezing temperatures
>when you realize Kirby Smart is the best recruiter in the nation
>OSU vs Norte Dame in the Fiesta bowl
>TCU vs Oregon
I can't wait for the booty blasting to commence
>>63949735
UNC has the worst loss
and 2 of their wins are vs. FCS teams
>>63939305
>It's been pretty much agreed upon that Alabama's schedule is weak, right?
uh, no.
http://www.fbschedules.com/2015/12/2015-college-football-strength-of-schedule-rankings-dec-1/
>Sagarin Strength of Schedule – Overall Top 25
1. Iowa State
2. Kansas
3. Texas
4. Maryland
5. Alabama
6. Arkansas
7. California
8. LSU
9. USC
10. Georgia Tech
11. Auburn
12. Oregon State
13. South Carolina
14. Virginia
15. Texas Tech
16. Stanford
17. Arizona State
18. Vanderbilt
19. Notre Dame
20. Oklahoma
21. Washington
22. Ole Miss
23. Pittsburgh
24. Miami (FL)
25. Oregon
>Clemson over UNC
>Florida over Alabama
>MSU over Iowa
>USC over Stanford
Are you ready for Ohio State to make the playoffs? Are you ready for another Urban ship?
**OFFICIAL CFB P5 UNIFORM POWER RANKINGS**
Moderate to Severe Autism Edition
**Elder God Tier**
1. Michigan
2. Notre Dame
3. USC
4. Ohio State
5. Texas
**Great Tier**
6. Penn State
7. LSU
8. Michigan State
9. Alabama
10. Oklahoma
11. Nebraska
12. Clemson
13. Auburn
14. Iowa
15. Georgia
16. Tennesee
17. Florida State (Previously elder god tier until Nike fucked it up)
18. Oregon
19. Florida
**Good Tier**
20. Virginia Tech
21. Boston College
22. Pittsburg
23. Ole Miss
24. Kansas State
25. Wisconsin
26. Minnesota
27. Stanford
28. North Carolina
29. Washington
**Okay Tier**
30. Oklahoma State
31. Texas A&M
32. Colorado
33. North Carolina
34. South Carolina
35. Miami (Previously great tier until Adidas fucked it up)
36. TCU
37. North Carolina State
38. Vanderbilt
39. Arizona State
40. UCLA (Previously elder god tier until Adidas fucked it up)
41. California
42. Baylor
43. Duke
**Questionable Tier**
44. Northwestern
45. Illinois
46. Mississippi State
47. Iowa State
48. Arizona
49. Utah
50. Purdue
51. Washington State
52. Oregon State
53. Virginia
54. West Virginia
55. Arkansas
56. Georgia Tech
57. Texas Tech
58. Indiana
**Ugly Tier**
59. Rutgers
60. Kentucky
61. Missouri
62. Syracuse
**JUST Tier**
63. Maryland
64. Kansas
65. Louisville
Someone give me one good reason why Oklahoma won't win it all this year?
Pro-Tip: you can't
>>63950797
they play an actual defense
>>63950797
They are in the Meme XII which means they don't play defense. Alabama will score at least 70 on them.
>>63950772
Michigan with Jordan brand will be dope shit.
>>63950712
why is the stadium so grimy
>>63947600
That's one way to light 35$ on fire
>>63950928
South Carolinas facilities are shit and their stadium is in the middle of old fairgrounds
>a conference champ can be a tiebreaker with comparable resumes
In what world does a 2 loss Stanford have a "comparable resume" to Ohio State? This shit is maddening. If OSU had 2 losses last year they wouldn't have a prayer of making the CFP, even if they won the championship, it would have been TCU.
How much does the PAC 12 pay the committee?
>>63951031
clearly any team that can be notre dame should get an automatic bid.
>>63951048
I know you're being sarcastic but
>take a look at ND's resume
>oh, it's fucking nothing
if UNC beats Clemson and Stanford leaps us I'm going to be pretty damn pissed and rooting for Stanford to get beaten by 80 points
After this weekend... here will be the playoffs.
1. Clemson
2. Michigan State
3. Alabama
4. Oklahoma
Bama vs Oklahoma for the national title.
Protip: Bama and Oklahoma are the two best teams in the country and the playoffs will have worked.
Roll Tide. See you in January, Sooners.
>mfw in one week USC goes from unranked to Roseb Owl
>>63951031
Why should any team who can't even win their conference be given a shot? All this resume bullshit is retarded. You aren't the best team in the B1G, so you shouldn't be allowed to try your hand to be best in the nation. Didn't earn it. A 4-loss Conference champ has a better claim than you.
>>63951104
Because conferences are arbitrary, wins are not, retard. There is nothing saying that the conferences are of equal quality, they're not.
Isn't the PAC 12 an "academic" conference? Hopefully you understand the logic. You're just spouting memey platitudes with no substance. The committee has always maintained it is first and foremost about finding the best 4 teams in the FBS, not arbitrarily shoehorning as many conference champs in as possible, it's merely a tiebreaker.
>>63951133
Half academic - Stanford, Cal, UCLA, USC, and Washington are all powerhouses, Colorado and Oregon are good, but the rest are shit. Still better than the SEC and B12, though.
>>63951133
>The committee has always maintained
Yes. In it's long and historical run, the committee has showed a true dedication to finding the 4 best teams in the nation.
You're a faggot. Win your games. Win your conference. You're in. Stop crying. You lost late. You fucked up. Have fun playing Houston in the Fuck Nigga Bowl.
>>63951133
Finding the best team in the nation is dumb anyways. Bowl games are about seeing match ups between conferences; seeing a rematch is fucking stupid. That LSU bama game was a travesty.
Winning your conference is the cake, natty is just the icing. You can't call it a successful season if you can't even beat your rivals.
>>63951169
>mfw MSU beats Iowa, UNC keks Clemson and tOSU sneaks in at 4 to rape and pillage like last year
>>63950801
>>63950810
>held 3 of the top 5 offenses in the country to less than half their average yards, two of which were on the road
>effectively shut down Baylor and OK Lite's rushing game
>hurr Bama's gonna kill em RAWL TAHD
The playoffs can't come soon enough, nor can #8.
>>63951208
Clemson would still get in over OSU
>>63950712
damn that's sad. I miss the head ball coach.
>>63951207
um... We beat Illinois, Penn State and TTUN. Those are all of our rivalries.
>>63951231
Not really, see how high ND was ranked for their close "quality loss" to a playoff team? Same with OSU
>>63951208
>implying UNC wouldn't get the #4 spot after going 12-1 and winning their conference
You're not getting in dude. You're going to play Houston. There's always next year.
What? Ohio state is not your rival. Fuck off you clingy child. We are only rivals with Michigan, and vice versa.
You shouldn't have beat Michigan. We destroyed Michigan. We played a historically bad game and poor playcalling allowed you to have a fluke win and beat us on a field goal.
Other examples of HOW FUCKING LUCKY sparty has been all year? Rutgers spiking on fourth? Almost losing to fucking purdue? Indiana keeping it close?
Ohio State is objectively a better team and you know it shitposters. Academically, we're superior too.
Have fun getting btfo by Iowa and tOSU sneaking into that fourth spot.
>>63951231
No, especially if it's a rough loss to UNC. BIG is clearly a much stronger conference than the ACC this year and everyone knows it.
>>63951284
If Iowa BsTFO of Sparty they'll be undefeated and get in. Face it, Brutus, y'all aren't getting in this year, it's confirmed that OU, The B1G winner, and ACC winner are locks, and Bama is all but confirmed. If for some reason Bama loses then whoever wins the Pac will get in over you.
>>63951273
>UNC
>ACC
>2 FCS
>Loss to SCAR, a dumpster fire
No, although I have very little faith in tOSU getting in it's just nice to hope for chaos.
>>63951267
>>63951290
Clemson would have two top ten wins and one more overall win and OSU only has 11 wins and one top 15 win
Muh conference doesn't work when heir resumes clearly show Clemson has better wins
>>63951313
>thinking a 2 loss Stanford has any hope of jumping tOSU in the midst of chaos
Lol no
>>63951323
UNC nor Clemson would get in then
>>63951323
Actually OSUs only ranked win is 19 which is worse than 2 top 10 wins
>>63951313
>Bama loses then whoever wins the Pac will get in over you
Hell no. Stanford has 2 losses and USC has 4.
*****THREADLY REMINDERS****
>There is literally nothing wrong with Taylor Martinez
>Gayker Gayfield is a Kliff Babby.
Bama. (11-1)
2. Oklahoma (11-1)
3. Iowa (12-0)
4. Clempson (Very insecure about their school and their ranking btw) (12-0)
5. Northwest Missouri St. (12-0)
6. Jacksonville State Gamecocks (10-1)
7. Harvard (9-1)
8. Slippery Rock (12-1)
9. Houston (11-1)
10. aOSU (11-1)
>>63951343
I know. Stanford would get in. OSU needs more than Clemson losing because Clemson still would have a better resume
The only way Ohio State gets in is if Bama Clemson and Stanford lose.
Protip: It's not going to happen.
>>63951364
We need Mich State to beat Iowa and UNC or Florida to upset. It's a fucking pipedream but could happen. Lol Stanford has no hope even with Conf champ at 2 losses just stop kidding yourselves
>>63951406
Michigan is 19
>>63951169
>win your games
Exactly Stanford
What kind of shittu conference has a 2 loss "champ"
>losing to Northwestern
Lol if Stanford is let in they're getting slaughtered
>>63951442
Or better yet, hopefully no one drops out of the top 4 so that OSU can continue their annual tradition of exposing the fuck out of the Pac 12 by reaming Stanford
>>63951422
that's not true, look at CFB playoff rankings.
>>63951511
Also, the CFP reasoning for keeping MSU out of the top 4 was because their win against Michigan wasn't "real"
By that logic Michigan has one less loss
reminder that UNC is /cfb/'s champion
post yfw 10 to 4 happens
So is it safe to assume if both Alabama and Stanford lose their respective Championship games. There would be two B1G teams In the playoff. Because I don't see another possible outcome for that situation
>>63951485
>implying Ohio State will play in the rose bowl
I'm afraid i have some bad news. Iowa will be in the Rose Bowl after losing to Michigan state. Ohio State will get to play Houston in the Nobodys Gonna Watch Bowl
>>63951526
Clemson
>>63951535
Lmao no
OSU wins the tiebreaker over Iowa, the Rose Bowl isn't inviting peanuts
Sorry about getting kucked this year again but daddy has to put you limp dick west coasters back in check
>>63940231
If he cant shake off hits youre going to really be in trouble. Coker is going to have to throw the ball if he wants to win.
He wont be playing some crap ass Notre Dame or LSU team.
>>63951565
Clemson is a lock with a win against UNC
OU is already a lock
Alabama spills spaghetti and drops from the top 4
Stanford loses and is removed from Contention.
Iowa or MSU are a lock
This leaves one more spot and the next team in line is tOSU. The only other option is ND and I doubt they jump up 4 spots
>>63951601
Well, no he won't. But he will be playing worse teams than the crap ass lsu. The big twelve is a joke.
How much you wanna bet the same crew who said TCU was getting in over OSU last year are back again saying Stanford gets in over them in the event of an upset? Lmao no one wants to see your meme coast offense get BTFO by Bama
>>63946910
The cotton bowl will be in Dallas and Dallas is basically homefield for OU. It's only 3 hours south of Norman and theres more OU fans than there any Texas school fanbase.
>>63951511
Whatever it is, Clemson still has two better top 10 wins than a win over Michigan
>>63950706
>implying playing a bucnh of mid-tier teams is better than playing a few good teams and some cupcakes.
Are you retarded? Bama has beaten nobody, their schedule is a bunch of west virginias and penn states.
Official Real Life Actual Playoffs That Are Going To Happen So That Ohio State Fans Can Fuck Off ALready
1. Clemson
2. Alabama
3. Michigan State
4. Oklahoma
Alabama vs. Oklahoma for the national championship. Two best teams in the country. Two of the biggest names in college football. The story writes itself.
Better luck next year, faggots.
>>63951084
seeya m8
hope ur right
B00M3R!
>>63941268
So in all actuality, Coker being bad is a meme.
He's undefeated as a starter and hasn't really made too many mistakes. Of course all he has to do is hand it to Henry and throw some bubble screens, but still.
>>63951684
>Le I deserve annual championships because I am Le great Alabama meme
You fuck off cunt
>>63947413
OSU runs a spread option but most of what they run out of it is power, counter, and draw plays. They don't run any tempo at all and most of their plays are essentially gap blocks. There is nothing complicated about it
Alabama got beat because they played better players and better coaches
>>63950036
Tennessee only 60 yards of offense after the first quarter against Oklahoma and thats counting 2OT
>>63950187
He wanted to quit years ago but they convinced him to stay for muh clowney
>>63951737
Actually, bama deserves a shot because they're statistically the best team in the country right now.
aOSU fans:
>Our players are better than MSU's we just picked the wrong calls and that means our team is actually better despite losing the game because of poor coaching
Kek. If your players are elite and you lose because of inferior coaching then you are an inferior team, full stop.
>>63951684
>still this salty over being exposed last year
>>63951799
>full stop
Back to your sharia island britbottler.
>>63951795
By what? Artificial human rankings that were exposed by reality?
1. Clemson
2. Oklahoma
3. Michigan State
4. Ohio State
3. Michigan State vs 4. Ohio State
You know you all want this to happen
>>63951843
By every ranking. Massey's composite yo
>>63951843
MY RANKINGS HAVE NOT BEEN EXPOSED BY REALITY FAGGOT
>>63951891
I'd like to see the inputs
Means as much as ESPN QBR to me
>>63951838
MSU is better, full fucking stop keknut.
>>63951888
tim beck would get assassinated before the game
>>63951888
I'd prefer iowa to be in. But I'd also like to see this happen
If Saban loses 3 straight NY6 bowls is he fired
>your team
>who you're rooting for in the relevant conference championships
>your most browses board other than /sp/
Illinois
Clemson, MSU, Stanford, Florida
/g/
>>63951614
Big 12 has won NY6 bowls each of the last two years. SEC hasnt won one in 3 years and is about to get swept again bcuz HURRlabama is you're only shot
>>63951971
No. As much as I hate Alabummer, Saban has won enough to basically secure his job until he eventually gets murdered by a disgruntled LSU fan
>>63951991
Tennessee
UNC (the one true champion), MSU, USC, RowTides
/tv/
>>63951971
I'm not sure the committee actually loves Bama, they could be choking on Sabans dick really hard.
Sounds like it could be a liability if he stays in the conference. (Which he will)
>>63952001
big ten championship? They get the 4 seed in the playoff
National championship?
>implying I have to worry about that happening
>>63951991
Iowa
Iowa, Florida, USC, Clemson
/wg/
>>63951991
Penn state
Florida, Stanford, MSU, UNC
/int/, /fit/
>>63951991
Iowa
Clemson, Iowa, USC, Florida
/lgbt/
>>63951991
>yes
>Iowa, Clemson, and Bama, the latter 2 because I don't want 2 big 10 teams in. Stanford if thats relevant.
>/mu/
>>63951991
>Iowa
>Iowa, UNC, Florida, Stanford
>/hm/
>>63951991
>your team
pic related
>who you're rooting for in the relevant conference championships
B1G: sparty. I like them. It's always a good game when we play them.
SEC: Florida cuz the tears would sustain me.
ACC: Clemson. It's their time, they earned it, they're not losing. I like Clemson too so I'd rather see them get in and deserve it than fluke out a loss and have Stanford, tOSU, or UNC edge in.
big12: whoops I fucked up sorry
PAC12: Stanford. I love upsets but I just have this baseless contempt for USC. I don't know why I dislike them, but I don't suprress it.
>your most browses board other than /sp/
/gif/ and /b/ when I'm spun on amphetamine and compulsively download porn.
>>63951991
Okie State
UNC, MSU, Stanford, Bama
/b/, /vg/, /his/, /soc/ (for the boobs desu senpai)
>>63951991
>tOSU
>Iowa Clemson bama usc
>/lgbt/ /hm/ /cm/ /y/
>>63951991
None
Iowa, Stanford, North Carolina, Bama, Air Force, Houston, Bowling Meme
>>63951991
msu
dont really care about other conf. champ games, i guess if bama or clemson somehow lost if would be better for us
/fit/ /sci/ and recently, /aco/ lol
>>63949773
Miss State is s good team
10
>>63950772
>Ole Miss good
>State questionable
What a meme boyo. I too love white and blue color schemes that look like everyone else's
to
...../cfb/......
I'm a nigger....
>>63952168
>Ohio State fan
>Rooting for Iowa
you're doing it wrong
>>63951991
>tOSU
>UNCheat, Iowa, Florida, USC
>/ck/, /vp/
>>63951991
>tOSU
>MSU / UNC / FL / USC
> /fit/
>>63952555
wtf dude we want MSU to win, the better they do the better our Retard Tim Beck No Zeke Run Fuck Up looks
>>63951843
Who has exposed Bama?
They've looked great since the Ole Miss loss.
>>63952701
If MSU wins you guys still get a rose bowl. If not you're out of the NY6 I think
>Maryland hires a literal who
>no head coaching experience
It's like they don't even care about trying to win games.
>>63952445
This. Passionate fans unconditionally wish pain and suffering upon a rival that not only beat them, but eliminated them from a championship.
"Fans" (read: bandwagoners who sprout due to their local team's recent success) try to make the best out of a season-ending loss and rationalize supporting the other team by saying it's better to lose to the best team in the country than relish seeing them get creamed and denied glory because fuck you, if I can't have it you can't either.
There's respectful rivalries (Nebraska vs. OU, Army-Navy) where you can cheer for your rival depending on the circumstances, and then there's the bottomless chasm of loathing that exists between two academic institutuions, each one willing the other to a season of suffering and sorrow (tOSU vs. Michigan, Florida vs. Fla St., Bama vs. Auburn, Nebraska vs. niggerfuckingLonghorns [fuck Texas]) regardless of how far apart one team may be from the other.
>>63952864
Actually the sad situation is that the loser of the B1GCG will probably get jumped by tOSU for the rose bowl bid
>>63953075
"fan - an enthusiastic devotee (as of a sport or a performing art) usually as a spectator"
It doesn't say anything about hating other teams senpai
>>63952896
Hey.
Hey, you.
Did your new coach have a FUCKING losing all-time record at his previous school? DOES HE?
Why the FUCK is USC still ranked?
>Terps hire Durkin
Fuck. Hopefully Greg Mattison just gets promoted and goes back to being out DC.
>>63952896
What the fuck are you talking about it? It could potentially be a great hire, he's had ELITE defenses everywhere he's gone.
>>63953297
Name one coach who went directly from assistant to relevant in a big conference. The best guys had to do their time at tiny ass schools with nothing.
>>63953345
Uh, Nick fucking Saban? Les Miles, David Shaw, Mike Gundy. I believe Bill Snyder and Bob Stoops went directly from being an assistant to P5 HC as well. I'm sure there's some others.
>>63953221
"passionate - showing or caused by strong feelings or a strong belief."
you were saying?
>>63951991
Ohio State
UNC, Florida, USC, and MSU (blowing out Iowa)
/k/
>>63953345
Saban started as a HC at Toledo.
not sure about Miles or shaw but Snyder, Gundy, and Stoops you were right about
>>63953345
>>63953928
woops wrong reply
meant to be
>>63953419
>>63953938
nothing about passionate+fan means you hate other teams
Reminder that if the "big" "10" is represented by Iowa in the playoffs they will be btfo by whoever they face and the "big" "10" will sink back into irrelevance
>>63954414
National Championships in the College Football Playoff Era
SEC: 0
B1G: 1
PAC 12: 0
BIG XII: 0
ACC: 0
>>63954446
You may as well say the B1G has two since it's pretty clear MSU is going to win it all this year
>fight song is so shit that they would rather play a song recognized as a southern song and not a school song
>can't even keep their harmless old man mascot
>take down state flags because pussy libs
The shithole campus of Ole Piss, located in the shantytown of Oxturd Mississippi.
Duba decide what college I go to for Football (DE)
I dont know how I feel about miami wanting mark richt. I am kinda scared of all this not winning the big game talk
>>63954672
SLIPPERY ROCK
>>63948927
Literally the least meme team in the country.
>>63953978
ok I'll be serious for a moment. I was focusing on specific rivalries in college football. For example, I maintain that a passionate fan of Michigan football has a not-insignificant amount of disdain for Ohio State football, especially when it involves Michigan in some way.
I believe one should never root for a rival that one's team lost to in hopes that the rival's success will downplay the severity of that particular loss.
pic related
I'd rather see my rival lose and suffer as my team did, than cheer them on so our loss to them doesn't look as bad.
>>63954672
Bama
>>63954446
>rooting for a conference
Fuck off.
>>63954672
Kansas. Enjoy suffering ;^)
>>63954840
Buttmad Pac12/ACC/Big12 fan detected
>>63954813
I'll defend quality in loss as it pertains to a possiblt CFP berth but i get what you're saying, HOWEVER. If my conference is in the CFP and my team isn't, Ill root for them even though im not really a conference fan.
>>63954672
Ohio State
>>63954868
Actually I'm a student at Ohio State. I don't want Sparty trying to take credit for our national championship. I thought we were better than the SEC. Win one this year then you can talk shit.
>>63954672
How good are you? Also go to Wake Forest.
>>63954894
>I thought we were better than the SEC
I tip my hat to you, good gentlesire! Dost thou comest from the fair pastures of reddit like myself?
>>63953419
>Uh, Nick fucking Saban?
Toledo
> Les Miles
Oklahoma state
> David Shaw
Fair enough, but he was an assistant at that school for a while .
>Mike Gundy
Same as Shaw
>I believe Bill Snyder
First started in 1989 and was trash his first few years. He would've gotten canned if it was today
>Bob Stoops
Literally the only example with success that showed up at a new school as an assistant
>>63954928
Lel. Top may may. Xdxdxdxdxdxd. I h8 ribbit
>>63953345
>>63954963
>>63953419
KLIFF FUCKING KINGSBURY
>>63954922
enjoy WF anon
So if Clemson Bama Stanford all lose, it has to be:
1. MSU
2. OU
3. UNC
4. Clemson
Clemson UNC rematch for the ttle
Just watched 30 for 30's Trojan War.
Great documentary, maybe not The U great but still a good moment since I was not too familiar with the story.
>>63951991
Michigan State
MSU, Florida, Stanford, UNC
/int/, /his/
>>63955067
>Clemson losing to UNC and staying in the top 4
>>63953345
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but is this applicable to Dan Mullen, Mark Dantonio, Paul Chryst, Pat Narduzi, Rich Rodriguez, Charlie Strong, and Les Miles?
>Mark Richt hired at Miami
>>63955216
good hire
FSU fans on suicide watch
222nd for go gators
>>63955216
>>63955226
Is it official? I saw that he told VA no and that his wife is ok with relocating to south beach but there was nothing official
>>63955216
Its good they did it now. But I am still worried that he has been saying that he wasnt going to coach this year. I hope that was his bargaining tool
It seems pretty official that richt is coming to da U.
>Dave Hyde @davehydesports 3m3 minutes ago
Confirming @PeterAriz report that Richt is taking the job. Final details being worked out. But he's coming to Miami.
>Mark Schlabach @Mark_Schlabach 43s44 seconds ago
I'm told his deal is very similar to the one he had at Georgia. Probably won't be announced until Thursday or Friday
Another day, another job opening that didn't hire Dan Mullen. Man wants out of Starkville so bad it hurts. He is begging anyone to hire him.
>Barry Jackson @flasportsbuzz 4s4 seconds ago
UM has begun telling high-level employees that Richt is taking the job. Other candidates not yet informed, but deal being finalized.
can you imagine kaaya with richt?
>Richt to Miami
fuck, just when I thought Tech wouldn't have to deal with that guy anymore, now he's in-division, with a better recruiting base and all his connections into Atlanta still intact.
>>63955489
We'll take him in Columbus as an OC.
>>63955216
Yeah I'd say this is a good hire if only for >>63955538 (that sweet Georgia recruiting). The main issue with him at Georgia is his inability to go from 9-10 wins a seasons to a natty contender.
At this point da U just needs a competent coach who can deliver that.
>>63955544
The problem is Mississippi State pays him a shitload. Other teams look at his track record and can't justify paying him 4 and a half mil. He probably would take a pay cut just to get out of there since the wheels are starting to fall off now.
He might end up an OC somewhere if he gets fired after next year. He does have a good offensive mind.
>>63955585
yeah I am really scared of that good seasons and winning nothing. In florida you need to win titles, not just be ok and winning bowl games.
>>63955216
Is Miami coming back?
Is Miami/FSU going to be a thing again?
>>63955538
>tfw should've waited a year to fire Pelini and hire Mark Richt
>Richt has ties to Tom Osborne
God dammit Nebraska is so fucking stupid.
>Barry Jackson @flasportsbuzz 2m2 minutes ago
Involved person said UM came up with "Southeastern Conference" type money to lure Richt. Was making $4 M-plus at Georgia.
FUCKING FINALLY THEY DECIDED TO PAY FOR A COACH. this is not the 90s anymore you need to pay some.
seriously in south florida miami in their sleep can get a top 25 recruiting class every year.
>>63955489
>Man wants out of Starkville so bad it hurts.
Can you blame him? Starkville is a shithole.
>>63955613
Yes
>>63955525
Odds on Richt starting Testaverde?
>>63955600
He's worked with Urban for every head coaching job Urban has had except Ohio State. I would live to see him turn JT into a hiesman winning qb be his senior year. Mullen is as good as devoloping a qb as much as Beck is as good at fucking one up.
>>63955585
He only needs to catch lightning in a bottle once, especially in the Coastal where his biggest challenges are GT, Beamer-less VT, and Duke/North Carolina.
He's just got to be decent in division and beat FSU and he's already further than he's got in the SEC.
It will be weird to think of a squeaky-clean guy like him at the U though.
>>63955618
I doubt Nebraska could have gotten him over Miami. I can't see any reason why anyone would go to Lincoln over South Beach.
Richt is a good pickup for Da U
>>63955618
What ties does rick have to Osborne? Osborne only coached at Nebraska, and Richt has only been to the U, FSU, EXU, and Georgia
>>63955618
you can't pay coaches with corn, anon
>>63955655
>He's just got to be decent in division and beat FSU and he's already further than he's got in the SEC.
what are you talking about? the early 90s were 2 decades ago. Al golden and randy shannon were hired because they were squeaky clean. they have been 0 problems with getting in trouble w/ the law
>>63955694
No disrespect, but I don't really pay attention to Miami. Wasn't the U having boosters pay for abortions and shit?
>>63955721
yeah they were hired because of squeaky cleanness. also shapiro was more with donna shalala and the ad
>>63954963
Saban was at Toledo for a whopping 1 (one) year and was a DC for 5 years after that, but before MSU. Also how do you not consider Ok-State to be in a "big conference" Big 12 memes aside. This was also when it actually was the Big TWELVE. Snyder was trash for his first few years because he was coaching at KANSAS FUCKING STATE, that would be like expecting someone to have immediate success at Kansas if they stepped in right now. It just wouldn't happen, even if they were Bear Bryant. Bob Stoops isn't the only example, because all of the others were perfectly fine examples.
>>63955206
>Dan Mullen
To be fair, we weren't relevant until he started winning 8 games a year here.
>>63955134
>he didnt see the qualifier that Sanford and bama also lost
>>63955489
Dan legitimately loves it here. His whole family has grown up here and he has taken the program to national relevance. Stay mad because you have coaches that don't enjoy their job.
>>63951991
>Mochogon
>USC, Iowa, Florida, Clemson, GripNSip, SDSU, Temple. Indifferent to NIU/BGSU
>/o/
daily reminder that Vincent Testaverde is a Kliff Babby
since when did florida get all this good coachs?
richt, McElwain, and jimbo.
I actually think UCF had a good hire of the Oregon OC
>>63955622
Man fuck you, Starkville is the perfect balance of small town home feeling and college party crowd.
>>63955823
Why does he interview literally everywhere there's a vacancy every year if he loves it so much?
Also
>national relevance
>>63955851
>ranked number 1 in the first ever college football playoff poll
Also, define interview. From what I understand, Georgia never wanted him, USC didn't call and Miami called him on the phone once. Not like he is out beating the trail like Saban after LSU
>>63955833
>Oregon OC
bad hire. it is evident how carried oregon was by memeiota. he will not have the talent to work with at ucf that he had at oregon either, the recruiting classes will be shit for the next few years unless he can work miracles. ucf is pretty much perma dead
>>63955833
And Mike White might turn out to be a great hire for UF basketball.
>>63955825
>/o/
faggot
>>63955653
>Mullen replacing Beck and coaching Barrett
Pls anon don't fill my head with things that will never happen. He probably makes like 2-3 million a year there's absolutely no way he'd want to go back to making like 600k a year just to be an assistant
>>63955820
>Ohio State
>>63955851
I've never seen any legitimate negotiation either. Always loose sources about interviews. Dan is getting paid a top 10 salary to win 8 games a year. He's beloved and the expectations are pretty low. He's slowly taken the program from bottom dweller to an Auburn/LSU tier contender in the SECW (this is to say still below Bama)
>>63955820
Ohio State would get in then
>>63955905
>>63955908
Clemson: 2 top 10 wins, 12 wins
OSU: 1 win vs 15, 11 wins
>>63955890
Jim Larrañaga is pretty good
>>63955882
I dont know. florida is a factory. the only problem is that the gap is spending is even more now that miami seems to finally pay up.
UCF will be pretty good on the mid major level
>>63955900
Try 4 and a raise to 4.5 this next year.
>>63955895
>asking the cops to get some "tools" out of your trunk as soon as they pull you over
>>63951991
>USC
>Clemson, MSU, USC, Bammer
>/pol/
whaddup
>>63955910
I'm not saying they'd deserve to get but they would
>>63955913
UCF is the least likely Florida school for recruits to go to right now
>FSU and UF obviously the big ones everyone wants to go to
>USF just had great season with a lot of young kids, interest peaking
>Miami rebuilding but it is a big name school, recruits will want to try to be part of a turn around for a school that gets national attention like UM
>UCF is complete shit and had 2 fluke seasons getting carried by Bortles.
>UCF has all kids that are so bad they cant beat DII schools
>UCF literally lost every game
I dont think they'll get the talent any time soon. UCF will probably get rid of the Oregon guy as a scapegoat since they wont get a winning record quickly enough. Then the cycle will start again. Cap it senpai, UCF is pretty much done
yfw Bama, Clemson, and Iowa win and nothing happens to the top 4.
>muh doomsday faggots
>>63955925
Who is the bigger dumb? Frosty or lex?
>>63955958
>this usf fan
oh come on ucf has sent more pros to the NFL. and its not just players hanging on to roster. but some good skill position players. They were doing that since the early 00s. USF has only had JPP and thats it.
I am not saying ucf will be winning a bcs bowl game but they wont be 0-12
>>63955838
Yeah but you also have to live in Mississippi, so there's that...
ANOTHER ONE
Did you guys notice that on this weeks coaches poll, somebody didn't even put Iowa in the top 25. Holy shit, that's a major difference.
>Highest: 3
>Lowest: NR
http://sportspolls.usatoday.com/ncaa/football/polls/coaches-poll/
>>63955992
I never said they weren't good once but they literally were bortles babbies. I also never said they'd go 0-12 again, but I seriously doubt theyll ever see the success they had again. Even conference champs is a stretch as good as the rest of the east is looking right now.
Am I the only one who thinks Richt is a bad hire for Miami? They needed to shoot higher. Miami is a championship caliber team even if they have been in a while, and the talent is roughly equal to Georgia. Richt spent 15 years proving he couldn't win championships. Miami has basically demoted themselves to a perennial okay team.
>>63956004
I wonder what coach could possibly be THAT bootyblasted by Iowa
>>63956028
who else was available?
>>63955983
As an entire human being definitely Frosty. What Lex did is probably more retarded than any single action Frosty has done though.
>>63956004
>>63956029
That means lowest this season.
>>63956036
yea that is pretty true. at least lex didnt come on here and call us faggots while saying we made bad life decisions only to get arrested for having a pontiac gran prix full of DUDE
>>63955993
I've lived in Mississippi, Florida, Virginia, California and spent time in New York (military brat). Mississippi is by far the comfiest place.
>>63956048
Ah that makes more sense.
>>63955613
One of the top SEC coaches in the ACC?
It'll be a goddamn massacre.
>>63956261
yeah cause its not like FSU/Clemson werent able steal recruits from UGA.
>tfw your school might sign Lincoln Riley
Cock Raid when?
>>63956284
>OC
>meme 12
>good
kek, anyone can look like an offensive genius in that conference
>>63952142
>Mizzou
>MSU, Clempsun, b12 is dumpster fire, USC, Saban
>/hoc/ for the memes
>>63956314
>rags
>laffs
>flim flams
>mashed potatoes and gravy
>>63951991
>Alabama
>Alabama, Stanford, Iowa (because lol), UNC (because lol)
>/a/,/his/
>mad at sandwich
>cantpucks
>dab lose
>kansas city
>snow
>fuk_ponek
>>63954877
>If my conference is in the CFP and my team isn't, Ill root for them even though im not really a conference fan.
Yes, agreed. I'll root for the team in my conference but I won't celebrate their success as if it were my team's success. The exception to supporting your conference is when the team representing it is a heated rival or beat your team in a way that particularly damaged your season.
Why is there irrelevantpuck shitposting ITT?
>>63956458
>calling other sports irrelevant when we're talking about glorified high school football
>>63950772
>mfw LSU's all white jerseys
>>63956479
*uniforms
>>63956471
>being mad
>at a post
>>63951971
Saban could lead Bama to an 0-11 season and keep his job.
Official list of teams that mitebcool to win: MSU, Iowa, Clemson
Fuck off tier: Bama, OU
No chance tier: UNC
Cant even get in without a miracle tier: OSU/Stanford
>mfw people keep talking about how Ohio State could still sneak in the playoffs but I know it won't happen because Bama and Clemson will both win in blowouts
>>63956508
>mad
>at anger
>>63956522
OSU needs TWO upsets saturday. If just bama or clemson loses, Stanford gets in.
>>63956471
College football is more relevant than Hockey
>>63956547
>mad at real sports
I love college football m8 but lets not be delusional
I am not around here so often but is that normal to have this shitposting?
>>63956559
>icefight
>a sport
let's not be delusional m80, shit belongs in /asp/
>people keep talking about tOSU somehow making it into the playoffs like it would be a good thing to happen
>they won't shut the fuck up about it
>>63956572
>commercial ball for 18-22 year olds
>a sport
>>63956567
>IMPLYING YALE ISN'T A BLOOBLOOD
>>63956515
>tfw best 11 loss team in the nation
And Bama will still be in the playoff
>>63956567
yes. welcome to any general on /sp/. people shitpost in generalys since individual threads are easier to spot and get banned for
>>63956581
I laugh that OSU fans think theyll get in over a one loss Clemson/UNC anyway, not to mention Pac 12 champion stanford
>>63956586
>shitposting on a taiwanese powerpoint presentation board
>a sport
Real talk: would bama be #2 if ole miss beat arkansas on that weird 4th down play and they were playing UF in the SEC game isntead of bama. Bama would be 11-1 still
Where's the /cbb//college hoops thread?
>>63956599
>tfw you will never get paid millions of dollars to shitpost on the internet
>>63956607
>WOODFLOP
NO THANKS
>>63956607
popping up randomly until march
>>63956607
>squeakfloor
>apehoop
>basketact
>a sport
>>>/asp/
Do you also post in /cbb/ if your school is good at apehoop?
>>63956602
There would be chaos. Who knows what would happen.
The committee has made it clear that winning the conference is of paramount importance. But Ole Miss would have been highly likely to be excluded based on losing to Memphis. Florida would be in roughly the same boat as a 2 loss team though their 2 losses wouldn't have been as bad.
>>63956602
maybe, but they would most likely get dropped out of the top 4 after conference champs are determined.
>>63956666
>Do you also post in /cbb/ if your school is good at apehoop?
no my team is a dumpster fire in bb, I just conference shitpost in the threads depending on who is posting more that day
>>63956666
I would if my school wasnt shit at nig nog dribble jog
>>63956666
no I could care less about college basketball. The regular season is pointless until championship week
>Josh Newberg @joshnewberg247 5m5 minutes ago
Source tells me Jeremy Pruitt will not be going with Mark Richt to Miami.
>Josh Newberg @joshnewberg247 2m2 minutes ago
I'm told to keep an eye on Randy Shannon possibly returning to Miami as DC.
that would be badass if randy comes back as DC
The U Part 3 begins. Cap it.
>There is no reason for Lincoln Riley to not take the SC HC job if he's offered.
>mfw
>>63956683
>I could care less
So do you?
How do y'all do it? I'm talking about coach anxiety. I don't think I can handle it, always worrying if my coach should get fired, or wondering what better school he might interview at.
I sure am glad I have the indisputable best coach at the indisputable best school.
Thanks for readin' y'all, and roll Tide!
>>63956666
Yes, but I usually don't trip unless I forget to take it off.
>>63956595
aOSU would get in over a 1-loss Clemson/UNC.
>>63956835
> coach anxiety. I don't think I can handle it, always worrying if my coach should get fired, or wondering what better school he might interview at.
CFB isn't about winning nattys
It's about memeing on bitches and winning Hesimans.
When your coach is the GOAT memer at the GOAT meme school. He can only downgrade.
Feels /coachsecurity/ man.
>>63956868
UNC is arguable, but not Clemson
>>63956835
>one day Saban will leave/retire and you might be left with some shitty coach
Same could be said for stoops, im scared as a future OU fan.
>>63956907
as long as Dabo keeps it up, Bama will scoop him up after Saban
>>63956907
Bama is a prestigious enough position that they'll have at least one great replacement to pick. Whether they actually pick the great one is another matter.
>>63956923
pretty much this, although Dabo is a bit too Jesus-y for my taste. Still a good coach and will come running when "mama calls"
>>63956923
I doubt he'd leave
Bama isn't probably a great fit for him
>>63956940
>Dabo is a bit too Jesus-y
Then hes perfect for bama
>>63956588
Only if those 11 losses are all quality losses
>>63956945
I could see Dabo leaving if he wins a natty at Clemson sometime in the near future.
>>63956654
>squeakfloor
kek
>>63956666
My school is bad at football and not very good at basketball and I post in both. Because I'm proud of my school (a.k.a. a "good fan").
>>63956973
Why?
That just sounds idiotic
>>63956953
Not in that way
>>63957000
he'll have accomplished all he could at clemson, so might as well take your dream job after with nothing else to regret leaving for
>>63957012
He could win more national titles
Plus would anyone be willing to be the guy after Saban?
Especially since he's like the complete opposite of him
Oklahoma is in
Bama, Clemson, MSU, and Iowa are in with a win
Stanford is in with a win and a Clemson/Bama loss
UNC is in with a win and a loss by Bama and Stanford
Ohio State is in with losses by Clemson, Bama, and Stanford
>>63956835
Feels great being a blueblood. The one season after our head coach was forced to leave, we went out and snagged one of the best coaches of all time.
>>63957029
Coming back to coach at your alma mater is huge for most people. Especially a blooblood. Which is why I was really surprised Les didn't go back to Michigan a few years back, but then again Les Miles isn't a normal person
>>63957112
>Les Miles isn't a normal person
neither is dabo. And I dont mean that in a negative way for either. They just both work where they are now. I dont think theyd work as well as they do at other schools.
>>63957112
He just doesn't seem to be one to leave a job for another one
This is a guy who took less money to get better coordinators
>>63957144
Especially with the culture that's at Alabama
He'd get ripped to shreds
>>63957154
> According to a source, Swinney keeps in touch with influencers at Alabama. It’s the belief among decision-makers in Tuscaloosa that Swinney would eagerly come if called. Bear Bryant famously declared after leaving Texas A&M for Bama in 1958 that “Mama called. And when mama calls you have to come running.”
From an SI article about a month ago. But we'll never know until Saban decides to leave/retire.
>>63957204
>"You don't ever say never. You don't ever know what the circumstances would be at any given time," Swinney said. "First of all, Alabama may never, ever call me and I would never have a problem with that. They've got to do what they've got to do. My deal is to be great where I'm at. I had opportunities to leave Alabama. I had opportunities to leave Clemson. But I've just never been that guy about the next job. I'm about the job I've got."
Why does everyone think Stanford is going to get the nod over Ohio State? the committee ranked Ohio State over Stanford, so they obviously believe Ohio State is the better team. Ohio State was only able to jump TCU and Baylor last year, because the three teams had the same record and similar resumes, so they went with the team that overcame their second major injury, and managed to completely annihilate a ranked team projected to beat them. The comparisons of 2014 Ohio State/TCU with 2015 Ohio State/Stanford are not the same. Stanford has two losses and Ohio State only has one. Stanford is playing in a conference championship, but USC is an un-ranked underdog, making the situation not comparable to last season. If Clemson or Alabama lose, then Ohio State will be the ones taking that fourth spot.
>>63957233
Why would he ever say "yeah I'd go to Alabama if they called me" when the job isn't open and he's having a great year at Clemson? If he'd drop it in heartbeat to go to Tuscaloosa he'd still never ever say it in the open.
I'm not saying he would or wouldn't leave, I'm just saying I wouldn't be surprised if he did.
>tfw that one little league anon didnt get hired for HC at UCF
>>63957261
>Wisconsin was projected to beat Ohio State last year
What? Ohio state is not your rival. Fuck off you clingy child. We are only rivals with Michigan, and vice versa.
You shouldn't have beat Michigan. We destroyed Michigan. We played a historically bad game and poor playcalling allowed you to have a fluke win and beat us on a field goal.
Other examples of HOW FUCKING LUCKY sparty has been all year? Rutgers spiking on fourth? Almost losing to fucking purdue? Indiana keeping it close?
Ohio State is objectively a better team and you know it shitposters. Academically, we're superior too.
Have fun getting btfo by Iowa and tOSU sneaking into that fourth spot.
>>63957261
because Stanford has another game to play and Ohio State doesn't
>>63957306
He's also said that about other jobs that were open
Like Florida last year
I think he'd go if he wasn't coaching at the time but with a job he wouldn't go
It just doesn't seem like him
>>63957328
Ohio State was an underdog going into that game since JT went down a week before.
>>63957347
Jesus Christ did you read any of that post? I explained why that isn't going to work.
>>63957261
Stanford plays another game and OSU does not. Stanford also will be a conference winner which OSU will not. If they get in over a Pac-12 Champion Stanford team with a 16 SOS schedule the playoff is a sham.
>>63957362
oh true
>>63950772
>**Questionable Tier**
>44. Northwestern
discarded
>>63957261
The committee has said that they will use a conference championship to break a tie between teams with similar resumes.
Given Stanford's better wins but one more loss, i'd say the teams would have similar resumes with a stanford win in the CGC this weekend. Therefore as a PAC12 champ they will get in.
>>63957429
Does anyone have this post 1950 or 60? Wins before facemasks are worthless.
>>63957429
Left out of top 10
>Yale
>Harvard
Lol Tenneessee-USC babbys are cute
post based uniforms
1960:
1. Alabama: 85-12-3 .865
2. Texas: 80-18-2 .810
3. Arkansas: 80-19-1 .805
4. Mississippi: 72-20-6 .765
5. Bowling Green: 71-22-2 .758
6. Dartmouth: 68-22-0 .756
6.Ohio State: 67-21-2 .756
8. Missouri: 72-22-6 .750
8. USC: 73-23-4 .750
10. Penn State: 73-26-0 .737
>>63957533
Not that variety. Their normal uniforms are god-tier. That shit was just ugly.
>>63957533
Wish Bama would go all white for a game again
1970s:
1. Oklahoma: 102-13-3 .877
2. Alabama: 103-16-1 .863
3. Michigan: 96-16-3 .848
4. Tennessee State: 85-17-2 .827
5. Nebraska: 98-20-4 .820
6. Penn State: 96-22-0 .814
7. Ohio State: 91-20-3 .811
8. Notre Dame: 91-22-0 .805
9. Southern California: 93-21-5 .803
10. Texas: 88-26-1 .770
1980s:
1. Nebraska: 103-20-0 (.837)
2. Miami (FL): 98-20-0 (.831)
3. BYU: 102-26-0 (.797)
4. Oklahoma: 91-25-2 (.780)
5. Clemson: 86-25-4 (.765)
6. Penn State: 89-27-2 (.763)
7. Georgia: 88-27-4 (.756)
8. Florida State: 87-28-3 (.750)
8. Michigan: 89-29-2 (.750)
10. Auburn: 86-31-1 (.733)
>>63957488
>http://bleacherreport.com/articles/413995-the-top-10-college-football-programs-of-the-past-50-years
1. Nebraska
2. A Ohio State
3. Penn State
4. Alabama
5. Oklahoma
6. USC
7. Michigan
8. Miami
9. Notre Dame
10. FSU
This list was compiled in 2010 so odds are that Bama (2 natties since) or aOSU (1 natty since) is #1 now with Penn State and Notre Dame dropping, FSU moving up with their natty, and Miami dropping too.
Keep in mind that this is bleacherreport and most likely shit but was the only thing I could find quickly.
1990s:
1. Florida State: 109-13-1 .(890)
2. Nebraska: 108-16-1 (.868)
3. Marshall: 114-25-0 (.820)
4. Florida: 102-22-1 (.820)
5. Tennessee: 99-22-2 (.813)
6. Penn State: 97-26-0 (.789)
7. Michigan: 93-26-3 (.775)
8. Miami (FL): 92-27-0 (.773)
9. Texas A&M: 94-28-2 (.766)
10. Ohio State: 91-30-3 (.746)
2000s:
1. Boise State: 112-17 (.868)
2. Texas: 110-19 (.853)
3. Oklahoma: 110-24 (.821)
4. Ohio State: 102-25 (.803)
5. Southern California: 88-26 (.772) (reflects victories lost in the 2004 and 2005 seasons)
6. Florida: 100-30 (.769)
7. TCU: 95-29 (.766)
8. LSU: 99-31 (.762)
9. Georgia: 98-31 (.760)
10. Virginia Tech: 99-32 (.756)
>>63957561
>that yellow
>good
>>63957582
>Less wins but two more ties
Glad they got rid of that tie shit
>>63957429
Can we all agree that you aren't a blueblood unless you have at least 800 wins and more than 5 naties?
>>63957560
>The city of Mishitstain and Notre Lame
>>63957631
>mfw waiting for the 2010s
>>63957789
So Alabama, Oklahoma, Notre Dame, USC, aOSU, Miami, Nebraska meet that criteria.
Miami is not a blooblood, Nebraska has lost blooblood status until they hit 13 wins in a season.
I'd also argue that Michigan is blooblood even with 2 natties.
>>63957533
I feel bad for all the plebs who need special black-out uniforms, Pro Combat faggotry, and the like.
>>63957631
>5. Southern California: 88-26 (.772) (reflects victories lost in the 2004 and 2005 seasons)
>>63957907
If Nebraska lost blooblood than Michigan definitely is not bb.
>>63958020
>muh gray facemask tradishin
>discarded
ucf fan looking forward to dat west coast offence in florida
also thank god recuiting sanctions are finally over
>>63957631
> UF one of two teams to be in the top 10 both decades
>>63957907
>Miami
They've only won like 600 games m8. The whole state of Florida was a little late to the college football world
>>63958130
>ESPN get yo hoe mang
>>63958020
My team has tradional unis that haven't changed much over time, but I'll take a blackout uniform every once in a while. It was fun to get everyone in the shoe involved in a black-out. Made the game more exciting. I would also love to see them break out these another time, or the throwback away uni's they wore at Michigan a few years ago. Those were awesome too.
>>63958420
Those are pretty ugly to me.
The helmets with the chrome red stripe and green weed leaf stickers should be the default helmets though. Your black unis should be in regular rotation too.
>>63958484
In terms of meme uniforms, I think I like Baylor's the best
>>63958558
>Baylor
I know Brown couldn't be less relevant but come on
>>63958124
see
>>63955882
>>63955958
you guys are pretty much done
>>63958704
anyone who watched the ucf games could see the young talent. everyone knew this year was going to be bad because the entire secondary went into the nfl
with recuitmnet sanctions finlly over and a big name attached to head coach I think UCF will recover
post your team and your favorite logo your team has had
>tfw they don't use this that much anymore
>>63958751
it's no longer the 70s friend
>>63958728
also this isnt the first season UCF has gone winless either, so its already proven they'll do whatever it takes for the program to win
>>63958728
I didnt watch most of them, but i had the gamecast up for most. Scoring seems to be a pretty big concern, and the defense was almost no existent in every game. Nobody is going to want to go to the 0-12 school even with a relatively good coach. he needs to make a statement of a turnaround this year to generate any interest. If UCF doesnt make a bowl game this year I don't think theyll get back into relevance for a long time
>>63958760
>they started using the logo in 1983
>>63958808
then they were behind the times
>ohio state
>playoffs
pick one
>>63958795
ucf never relied on recuiting to begin with either.
theyre pretty good at finding hidden gems in florida that the bigger schools over look
bortles came out as a 2 star TE from my highschool and brandon marshall was like a 3 star reciever
>>63958819
still an awesome logo.
post your favorite
>>63958842
I cant knock George, he did a lot with a little. Serious question though was he an alcoholic? He had all the facial features of a chronic drinker. Every time I saw a picture of him he had red face and that big puffy nose
>>63958845
hard-pressed off the top of my head, but I've always been a fan of mississippi's state logo
simple and clean
>>63958845
always liked that they based it off an actual tiger foot print
>>63958870
my best friends little brother played fullback and he said the guy used to drink from a flask at practice.
He was also pretty fucking crazy
>>63958845
>>63958878
oh and based Eastern Washington
>>63958878
Always liked the Bully logo they had
>>63958900
simple but iconic
>>63958913
I knew it. do you think that had anything to do with the team going to shit?
>>63958913
another story off the top of my head was when my friends brother showed up to a banquet with a beard and oleary sent him into the bathroom with strait razor and hand soap so he could be completly clean shaven
>>63958924
very cool logo. The same cannot be said for their field.
>mfw
>>63958963
nah he was just getting old, working two jobs, and brent key was starting to get to much power and interfering with everything.
when brent key took over as OC i knew the season was over
>>63955226
>suicide watch
Based South Dakota State
>>63958751
do they have to be official logos because i like florida's alternate of albert the best
At what point does a mascot just become a furry?
Washington is cutting it really fucking close.
>>63958420
Holy fuck those are hideous
>>63959187
it becomes a furry when the person wearing uses it for his/her sexual fantasies. Otherwise its just a suit.
>>63957631
>counting FCS schools
Marshall was FCS until 1997
>implying foosball isn't the devil
>>63959187
>them human eyes
>>63959271
>implying the devil isn't cool
>>63950482
Is he really leaving Alabama?
Will the media vote Henry in for the Heisman?
>>63959354
its either him or watson, and unless watson BTFO UNC henry will win
>>63951991
Florida State
Clemson, Iowa, Stanford, Alabameme
/b/
>>63954840
Jesus Christ people who root for conferences should be lobotomized.
>>63959362
Aren't a bunch of votes already submitted?
>>63959400
Yeah, plus some former winners have already announced their vote (Newton for Watson, etc.)
>>63954877
>>63956388
fuck that. If Michigan was in the Natty I would wish for them to lose with all my heart. I would want them to get embarrassed, fuck conference strength. The thing about conference strength is this: if you go undefeated, nobody gives a shit about it. Urban should've got his shit together before losing to MSU (every OSU fan knew we were going to shit the bed at some point after watching the offensive coaching all year) so that conference strength would be a non-issue and we wouldn't have to depend on all our faggot big 10 rivals. Now I actually have to hope MSU wins so we can have a sliver of hope for the playoffs? Absolutely disgusting.
that being said I like Dantonio because he helped us beat the canes
>>63959434
this. a undefeated P5 team gets in in this era. Fuck everyone else.
>>63959421
What are the odds Watson isn't very good but has a god tier receivers?
We should just start naming these threads for what they are, OSU circlejerks. You people are the reason the terrorists will win.
>>63959477
Clemson has had god tier receivers in the past and wasnt able to do shit with average QBs. Plus Watson has 750+ rush yards and 9 rushing TDs
>>63959504
So he has god tier receivers but is also an above average running QB(At least)?
>>63959547
alls im saying is hes a solid 2nd place
>>63951991
>UF
>don't care, don't care, don't care, and UF (pointless but whatever)
>/vp/
>>63959561
I'm really surprised it sin't closer.
No one is BTFOing everyone this year.
>>63959586
did you get hoopa at mcdonalds?
>>63959593
henry gets the bama bias even though any RB would do great with that line
>>63951991
>>your team
Florida State
>>who you're rooting for in the relevant conference championships
Florida, because the shit posting will be hilarious
>>your most browses board other than /sp/
/biz/
>>63957631
Meyer's going to have OSU at .9 for the 2010's lol
>>63959608
I thought I would be glad if a non QB won.
But if it just becomes a QB/Bama RB award that really isn't better.
>>63959608
Yeah
>>63959608
>henry gets the bama bias
Bama literally has ONE Heisman winner in their history.
Not much bias there. Amari Cooper didn't even win it and hes the best rookie in the NFL.
>>63959626
2010s wins so far is who?
OSU, Oregon, Bama, FSU, Northern Illinois, Clemson, ??
>>63959663
>and hes the best rookie in the NFL.
???????
Because he went to bama?
>>63947413
>We basically copied Oregon's meme offense but with better lineman.
Negative. You run Lincoln Riley's version of his old boss' air raid. Much more like Cal than Oregon State.
Henry is a lock for the Heisman. There's almost no way he doesn't put up a whole bunch of yards against Florida, if nothing else just because he's gonna get force fed the ball to the tune of 35+ carries like he has recently
>>63959818
no shit
>>63959837
rude ass bitch
>>63959846
fite me fagit
>>63959857
ill wreck ye yeh coont
>>63951635
With the possible exception of TTech. RRed RRaiders have lots of almuni there.
>>63959626
>>63959675
Since 2010
>>63951991
>Texas Tech
>Tiggers, Sparticums, Aggressive Trees, Gatards
>>63951991
Clemson
Clemson, MSU, Bama, Stanford
/fit/, /mu/
>>63955216
Bye bye Florida recruits
>>63956945
Dabo played for Bama, and won a natty as a player.
Ok Ok, here's the official complete playoff scenario picture:
Locks:
1. OU
2. Iowa/MSU
Alabama and Clemson are in with a win
Only three other teams remaining:
1. UNC: Win and look better than Stanford or win and Stanford or Alabama lose
2. Stanford: Win and look better than UNC or win and UNC or Alabama lose
3. tOSU: Stanford and Alabama both lose but Clemson wins.
Bonus maximum jimmie rustle scenario: Clemson, Alabama, Stanford all lose, UNC jumps to #3 and Clemson only falls to #4.
>>63960226
>Clemson/UNC natty
the national butthurt would be amazing
>>63960226
>Clemson losing but still making the playoffs
no
>>63960256
if bama and stanford lose they get in over ohio state
>>63960263
lol no they wouldn't
>>63960278
12 wins + wins over 8 and 9 > 11 wins and a win over 15
>>63960284
I'm not saying Ohio State would deserve to get in but they would
>>63960312
I hear stuff like this and I think it's because of what happened last year, but the reasons they got in last year are exactly the same reasons they won't make it this year except in one very specific scenario.
>>63960312
the only reason they memed in last year was the B1G title. They dont have that this year,
>Clemson, Stanford, Iowa and Bama lose
>Committee at a loss
>Top 4
>1. Oklahoma
>2. Michigan State
>3. North Carolina
>4. OKLAHOMA STATE
>Collective wtf from the whole nation
>They put the wrong OSU in
>They win the bedlam rematch and proceed to win the natty
>mfw
If only such a clusterfuck was possible...
>>63960330
>>63960341
the reason they'd get in is because money. They'd make a lot more money with Ohio State in the playoffs and if they had a reason to shoehorn them in this year they'd gladly do it
you now remember that at one point this year Georgia was favored to beat Alabama
>>63960415
why would they make more money?
>>63960488
ignore tinfoil hat posters
>>63960505
I mean seriously it's not like Clemson isn't gonna fill up a stadium lmao
>>63960541
Merch maybe
>>63960595
clemson fans winning a natty for the first time in 35 year? I think theyd buy a ton of shit for it
>>63960341
TCU, Baylor, and OSU all had one loss
OSU got in because they were the conference champ and won that tiebreaker
fucking Stanford has two losses and their "statement win" was a lucky scrape by an overrated ND team at home, that is not a comparable resume in any sane world, it's a tier below
>>63960620
Clemson's resume is still better than OSU. You can call ND overrated all you want, but theyre still 8 in the rankings, which is what matters to the committee, not your opinion that they shouldnt be top 10.
>>63959926
We're recovering from that shitty post-Tressel era
>>63960620
They got in because of all that and because they lost at the beginning of the season and OSU smashed a 2 loss wisconsin. If they had barely beaten them TCU would have had a cfb berth
Why are people even bothering to discuss these scenarios where Clemson or Bama lose when it's obvious they'll both win in massive blowouts?
>>63960636
don't think they're going to want to put you in after a loss to FCS UNC to end the season
>>63960681
OSU ended this season by smashing Michigan
>>63960819
yeah sure that's why Clemson scraped by South fucking Carolina
because they're just impermeable
>>63960823
My team is 9-3 and has no shot. All im saying is Clemson has a better resume than OSU even with a loss.
>>63960843
and UNC is so shit they actually lost to South Carolina
>>63960844
that would be debatable
OSU would have a better loss, would have beaten Michigan more handily even if Clemson beat ND, and doesn't have as many close games against bad opponents
and there is no way on Earth they are putting both UNC and Clemson in
>>63960843
its a rivalry game for them what do you expect? OU lost to their rival this year and Texas is just as bad as south carolina. Bama was only up by 6 the entire game against auburn until a garbage time TD was scored even though they could have taken a knee.
>>63960865
Clemson would still have a top 10 loss too, Clemson has two better wins, one more overall win, and has a bunch of wins over teams with winning records. Its not even close.
>>63960886
Wait, are you saying rivalry games should be given extra weight. Well then, OSU's big win against Michigan should only be weighted that much higher!
Are you telling me you honestly think they put UNC and Clemson in together if UNC wins? That is pure fucking delusion lmao
>>63960934
No. Im just saying that Clemson's resume is better than OSU, so OSU needs more than a clemson loss to get in.
Lets compare:
Strength of Schedule: Clemson (47) > OSU (61)
Total Wins: Clemson (12) > OSU (11)
Ranked Wins: Clemson (vs 8, 9) > OSU (vs 15)
Conference Championship: Clemson (0) = OSU (0)
>all these betamale losers sleeping on the Hawkeyes
can't wait to see your reactions when Iowa is the first team in history to go 15-0
>>63960947
Strength of Loss: OSU > Clemson
you know what, I don't even know why I waste my time bickering on here before Saturday, last year I spent hours arguing with delusional TCU/Baylorfags and look at how that turned out
if Clemson ends their season with a loss to UNC they are no longer in the conversation whether you like it or not, just cling to Clemson winning which is still happening in all probability
>>63960975
>Ohio State's only argument is strength of loss
kek how ironic considering that was the only thing TCU had over OSU last year and guess what happened there
>>63960975
When did I ever say Clemson would get in with a loss? If UNC wins, Stanford or UNC gets the call. Youre retarded if you think a better fucking loss trumps better wins and more wins overall.
Clemson is in with a loss in the maximum chaos scenario here:
>>63960226
>>63960226
>>63960226
>>63961029
B-BUT MUH QUALITY LOSS
>>63961037
yeah exactly, quality of loss is actually the same. both would have 1 loss to a top 10. if MSU loses Clemson actually has the better loss in this scenario.
>>63960975
What you fail to realize is that you are in the same position as Baylor and TCU were in last year.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/14239090/jimmy-sexton-college-football-power-broker-scenes
Anyone else read this? Thought it was interesting.
>>63958913
he was irish so yet
We keep talking about doomsday scenios
Bama losing, Clemson losing. For either Clemson or Michigan State to lose wouldn't surprise me in the least, but what would Florida need to do to even beat Bama? Florida's defense is actually pretty good IMO, so could its offense run on some successful/lucky meme plays? (trick plays, shots down the field, hail marys)?
>>63961296
Stop Derrick Henry and no turnover in offense.
desu I don't see Florida winning that game in any scenario.
>>63950928
It just rained before that picture was taken. Its still wet.
>>63961319
>no turnover on offense
Even then Florida would really have to meme hard to even score, they might as well through interceptions and get the game overwith cause they are going 3 and out every drive
>>63950482
So begins anew the traffic hopecycle of a Georgia fan.
![New_Sparky_medium[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/sslWiGX.png "New Sparky medium[1]")
