"Big Brothers" literally shitting in their pants about the broship that will be dominating College Football for the next 20 years
>Ole Miss
literally slavery: the school
>Michigan
only good for funny chimpout reactions
>Washington
Allowing a rival school to open a campus store in the middle of seattle, not even bowl eligible
Requirements for entry:
>State University
>Elite QB
>the relevancy rises
>Elite coach
SUB-EDITION: THE EL ESS >(You) DUMPSTER FIRE RISES
1 Clemson
2 Alabama
3 Iowa
4 Oklahoma
5 Michigan State
6 Notre Dame
7 Ohio State
8 Baylor
9 Stanford
10 Michigan
11 Oklahoma State
12 Florida
13 Florida State
14 Navy
15 North Carolina
16 Northwestern
17 Ole Miss
18 Oregon
19 TCU
20 Utah
21 LSU
22 Mississippi State
23 Washington State
24 UCLA
25 Houston
>yfw in best broship
1st for the improbable happening again
>>63769530
would this be the second best thing to happen to college football?
>>63769530
God damn I hope something like that happens again. The domino effect would be amazing.
>>63769530
Please no, if Alabama doesn't make the playoffs they're gonna let Notre Dame in. And if there's one team I hate more than Alabama, it's Notre Dame.
Roughly tenth for I KNOW YOU POST HERE LES MILES SON, PLEASE ASK YOUR DAD TO COACH ARIZONA!!!
This is not a meme. This is real. Do not copy paste this into chat.
8th for >Iowa
Also. Take a look at next year
http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-16/2016-iowa-hawkeyes-football-schedule.php
>>63769765
That's nothing. UF plays North Texas, UMass, and Presbyterian. PREBY-FUCKING-TERIAN
>>63769799
Well at least they'll probably scrape by North Texas. The rest of their OOC is pretty brutal
>>63769410
>Okie State
>10-3 Losing against the big three of Big XII
>13-1. Ogbah is back, becoming the most dominante défensive player in the history of the cfb. The Rudoplh / Washington is the Weeden / Blackmon 2.0. Bedlam is the first game between #1 and #2 in the Big XII history. Losing the natty against Alabama, Saban leaving the Tide for Texas.
>>63769896
Gonna do three based on where I'm applying to transfer (I'm applying for transfer at more than this but these are the only cfb relevant ones)
>Texas
>5-8, Charlie Strong is fired
>10-4, #24, Strong fired after 2015 season and replaced with someone competent OR Strong gets his shit together for 2016
>Washington
>5-9, shit year
>9-5, not-so-shit year
>Temple
>9-5, keked by Memphis, Cincy, and two OOC games
>12-2, #18, Lose the AAC CG to Houston
>>63770287
y'all know what I was replying to, fuck it
NUMBER OF RANKED TEAMS
B1G: 5
Big 12: 4
Pac-12: 4
SEC: 4
ACC: 3
AAC: 3
MAC: 1
>>63769410
>Ohio State
>Probably 10-2/11-1 and a Rose Bowl berth
>Undefeated Natty champs
Les Miles to be our lead-paint-drinkingly insane OC when?
I'm going to make the big bucks this week when Michigan beats Onigger state. But I feel like OSU fans are the type to not payout after a bet
Don't forget to check out the **GAME OF THE WEEK** featuring #3 Iowa @ #5 Nebraska on ABC for the "Star Warsâ„¢ Showdown" don't forget to dress up if you're heading to the game and of course go see Star Warsâ„¢ opening December 18th 2015 at midnight.
Bama.
2. Oklahoma
3. Iowa
4. Clempson (Very insecure about their school and their ranking btw)
5. Nebraska
6. BootyBlasters
7. Northwest Missouri St.
8. Jacksonville State Gamecocks
9. Harvard
10. Navy Semen.
>>63769760
Well, if you guys are just going to get rid of Rich Rod, c..can we have him?
>>63770423
>Hiring a Michicuk
>Les knowing anything about the spread
>Broship autism
So this is how /cfb/ dies
>>63771130
Well it was gonna die at the TTU-Wazzu National Championship next year anyways.
There are no broships in college football.
I summarily hate all of you
I hereby propose "The Air-Raid Broship".
Anyone from the Leach coaching tree is welcome to join.
Is Washington State truly the most based program in all of /cfb/ history?
Official OSU Offensive coordinator wishlist, complete with pros and cons
John Hevesy/Billy Gonzales:
Pros:
>extensive experience with Urban Meyer's system at Florida, Utah, and Bowling Green
>have both been factors in the development of players such as Aaron Hernandez and Percy Harvin (while in college who gives a shit what they did after)
>have helped foster the success of Dak Prescott, Tim Tebow, Josh Harris and Alex Smith
Cons:
>rising stars
>might not be willing to jump to OSU from Miss St under Dan Mullen
>will probably be head coaches themselves very soon
Brian Johnson:
Pros:
>experience with the Urban system in his days at Utah
>responsible for the development of Dak Prescott
Cons:
>no prior playcalling experience
Major Applewhite:
Pros
>major part of Houston's current success
>has extensive playcalling experience
Cons:
>was the OC when Texas began their downward slide
>may get HC offers before too long
Gregg Brandon:
Pros:
>worked with Urban back at Bowling Green
>extensive playcalling experience
>is 59, so he likely won't go anywhere any time soon
Cons:
>less impressive resume
>currently a head coach
>was available back when Urban hired Tom Herman, who he chose over Brandon
You may only reply ITT if your favorite team has quality wins
>>63771397
>Alabama
Is Mississippi State a quality win?
>>63771660
Of course
they beat Auburn Arkansas and almost beat LSU
Any SEC win is a quality win
>be Tim Beck
>inherit an offense that just blew the doors off Alabama, Wisconsin and Oregon
>Heisman candidate running back, who many agree is the best in the game
>2 (two) Big Ten player of the year winners on your offense
>an undefeated QB with an arm that can throw 1000 miles in four seconds
>as good a dual threat QB as you can find in the other
>an O line with NFL talent at 4 of 5 spots
>the best rate receiving corps in the game
And what do you do with it?
>spend 10 weeks trying to pick a QB, nerfing both of their seasons in the process
>be utterly unable to figure out how to give Braxton Miller the ball (it's called throwing a pass at him every now and then)
>literally forget that Michael Thomas exists
>focus your entire offense away from all this talent and instead make the primary focus calling the same QB draw play over and over again
>re-design the pass game that features a rocket armed QB around short shovel passes to a mediocre Tight End and ignore all the deep threats entirely
>refuse to use the best player on your team the entire second half of the game against the best opponent you played all year
>despite being gifted a cupcake schedule, only manage to be the 49th ranked offense in the NCAA with one of the most talented units ever created
How can someone fuck up such a sure thing this badly? It literally defies belief
I'VE BEEN WAITING 3 DAYS FOR THIS MOMENT
3 WHOLE DAYS
I WAS BUSY CUMMING INSIDE MY GIRLFRIEND AT HER APARTMENT ALL DAY SATURDAY AND SUNDAY
AND YESTERDAY I DECIDED TO TAKE THE DAY OFF OF WORK BECAUSE OF HOLIDAYS JUST SO I COULD CUM INSIDE HER SOME MORE
YOU SEE I'VE HAD A NON-STOP AND INSATIABLE ERECTION SINCE SATURDAY NIGHT AND IT STARTED WHEN A LITTLE BROWN FOOTBALL WENT THROUGH THE GOALPOSTS IN COLUMBUS, OHIO WHEN MICHIGAN STATE BEAT AN OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FUCKEYES
GET
FUCKED
CUPCAKE SCHEDULE EXPOSED
MIDWESTERN TEAMS EXPOSED
M-MUH ATHLETIC QBS THAT CAN'T THROW OR READ DEFENSES
M-MUH MEME OFFENSE THAT CAN'T DO ANYTHING AGAINST AN ACTUAL DEFENSE
M-MUH URBAN MEYER
M-MUH WINS AGAINST VIRGINIA TECH AND RUTGERS, WE ARE ELITE
GET
FUCKED
OHIO
SHIT
FUCKEYES
AHHHHHHHHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
>>63771990
>schedule is cupcake due to OOC games outside the midwest
>lose to team in the midwest
>midwest teams exposed
>>63769474
>bama is only legitimate SEC team
>Georgia, LSU, Ole Miss, TA&M, all exposed after being top 10
>SEC still will have 6-7 top 25 teams in next years initial rankings
when will this meme end?
>>63771397
>nebraska
is sparty a quality win?
>>63772005
>VIRGINIA TECH
>HAWAII
>NORTHERN ILLINOIS
>WESTERN MICHIGAN
>INDICATIVE OF THE GREAT TALENT OUTSIDE OF THE LITTLE 10
>OHIO SHIT FUCKEYES ARE USING WINS AGAINST NORTHERN ILLINOIS AND WESTERN MICHIGAN TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AND THEIR SHITTY FUCKING FOOTBALL TEAM FOR HAVING (2) TWO GAMES AGAINST SOMEWHAT MEDIOCRE OPPONENTS
>THEY CAN'T EVEN WIN BOTH OF THOSE GAMES
>THEY THOUGHT THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THE PLAYOFF
MY FUCKING SIDES
AHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
>>63772030
as a spartan i want to complain about this but i dont mind a flukey loss, its probably karma for having a flukey win against michigan
>>63772043
Nobody is defending OSU, I am just curious as to how you think the midwest got exposed by a team that played a lot of non-midwest cupcakes (Rutgers, Hawaii, Maryland, Virginia Tech) losing to a midwest team that has real wins on their resume outside of the Big Ten exposes the midwest.
Don't blame OSU for their SoS though, they can't do anything about V Tech's collapse and retards putting Maryland and Buttgers in their division. We have Oklahoma next year who might actually have their shit together
>>63772090
YOU SEE NAME FAGGOT, I WOULDN'T BLAME OHIO SHIT FOR THEIR STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE. I WOULDN'T BLAME THEM, THAT IS, IF THEIR PREMIER OUT OF CONFERENCE GAMES WEREN'T AGAINST DEVRY AND ITT TECH EVERY YEAR.
CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY THE LITTLE 10 CONFERENCE IS RELEVANT AT ALL WHEN THE BEST OUT OF CONFERENCE OPPONENT ACROSS THE ENTIRE CONFERENCE WAS A TOSS UP BETWEEN MIAMI, OREGON, PITTSBURGH, AND FUCKING UTAH.
I DIDN'T COUNT A FLUKE WIN AGAINST STANFORD IN THE OPENER BECAUSE WISCONSIN GOT IT'S CHEESE CURD EATING, COW SHIT SHOVELING ASS HANDED TO IT THE SAME DAY, SO WE CAN JUST CALL THAT A WASH
>Be Baker Mayfield
>Playing rival, last game of the season
>College Gameday is there, hyping up your Heisman hopes
>Mason Rudolph walks on the field
>Thinks nothing of Rudolph because the media said he was better.
>OK St. gets the ball first
>First play 82 yard TD pass
>OU's ball
>First play is handoff
Second play is a 67 yd TD pass
>OK St gets the Ball again
Rudolph runs it 75 yards for a td
>OU's turn, they go out and go 3 and out
>Stoops approaches Baker on the sideline
Stoops: It's all on you to win Baker, it's time to prove yourself
Gayker: Prove myself? Win what coach?
Stoops: Just go out there and be the best QB kid
>Gayker storms off of the field of Gaylord stadium and into the stands
>Chris Collinsworth announces 5 mins later after Knights 3 int of the game that Baker has transfered to Texas citing "I felt like I already earned to win that game", "Miscommunication between him and the coaching staff", and a "Lack of free cars from boosters".
>Baker Suits up for his only game at Texas, last game of the year
>Loses to Texas Tech 38-3
>>63772186
Well, OSU schedules a marquee opponent every year. V Tech, USC, Oklahoma, Miami, etc so on and so forth.
The problem was that they scheduled Miami when they were the best team ever assembled, and ended up playing them finally in the Jacory Harris era. They scheduled V Tech during the early 2000s when they perennially played in New Years 6 bowls, only to have them turn to shit by the time they actually played. They scheduled USC when they were winning NCs, only to have them go on Reggie Bush-related sanctions and Pete Carroll to leave.
How does OSU schedule better opponents than who they scheduled at the time they scheduled them? They made multiple contracts with teams when those teams were playing in the NC (Oklahoma, USC, Oregon, Miami). Not their fault that some teams didn't remain good.
>>63772285
>V Tech
>marquee opponent
Apparently an Ole Piss security guard physically "assaulted" Rashan Gary's mom because she didn't have time to get her credentials
>>63772361
Are you new to football? V Tech went from 2004 to 2011 straight with 10 wins each year. Nobody else accomplished that feat. They went to 6 BCS Bowls, the same number Alabama did in the BCS era.
Virginia Tech up until recently was indeed very good. Frank Beamer got old and couldn't recruit for shit anymore, and V Tech fell off the map.
>>63772364
That's an interesting recruiting tactic
>>63769623
your butthurt on both counts is delicious.
>>63772518
Nobody likes Notre Dame, even fans of programs that have been far better than ND in our lifetimes. Walmart fandoms suck, and ND has the most Walmart fans
>>63772450
>winning games in the All Cupcake Conference
>meaningful
>>63772450
That was in 2004 to 2011. The Fuckeyes lost to a shitty VT team in 2014. Much history isn't a argument AP poller
>>63772285
PERHAPS THAT IS TRUE, NAME FAGGOT. PERHAPS.
PERHAPS ALL OF THIS HATRED TOWARDS OHIO SHIT IS BASELESS AND UNFAIR. PERHAPS THE HATRED SHOULD BE DIRECTED AT THE MEDIA AND THE VOTERS FOR ASSUMING THE LITTLE 10 IS STILL A GOOD CONFERENCE DESPITE THE FACT THAT THEY PLAY NOBODY EVERY YEAR. PERHAPS IT SHOULD BE MORE OF A QUESTION AS TO WHY THE LITTLE 10 IS REGARDED AS A PREMIER CONFERENCE WHEN UP UNTIL THREE YEARS AGO THERE WAS ONLY ONE TEAM COMING OUT OF IT THAT WAS WORTH A SHIT AND UNTIL LAST YEAR THAT TEAM WOULD REGULARLY GET FUCKING DESTROYED IN BOWL GAMES.
OHIO STATE GETTING BLOWN THE FUCK OUT IN BCS BOWLS WAS AN ANNUAL TRADITION OF THE SAME THREAD AS CHRISTMAS. I WOULD WAKE UP ON GAME DAY WITH A BIG SMILE ON MY FACE, MY HEART BRIMMING WITH EXCITEMENT, CHEEKS ROSY WITH ANTICIPATION.
I'D DO A LITTLE HOP ON MY WAY TO WORK.
WHILE EVERYONE ELSE WAS ON THE POST HOLIDAY SLUMP, I WAS STILL RIDING HIGH. MY CO WORKERS THOUGHT I WAS A STRANGE BIRD. "WHY ARE YOU SO HAPPY, ANON? WE DON'T GET ANOTHER DAY OFF UNTIL MEMORIAL DAY AND IT'S BITTERLY COLD AND DEPRESSING OUTSIDE!"
I WOULD SIMPLY SMILE SERENELY AND SAY "NOT SO, DEAR FRIENDS. FOR TODAY MARKS ANOTHER DAY THAT OHIO STATE AND THE LITTLE 10 CONFERENCE GETS THEIR ASSHOLE WIDENED THREE SIZES TOO BIG. IT'S THE ANNUAL LITTLE 10 RAPE DAY!"
LAST YEAR THE GRINCH WAS SUCCESSFUL IN STEALING RAPE DAY FROM ME, BUT IT WON'T HAPPEN THIS YEAR. SANTA WORKED OVERTIME TO MAKE SURE RAPE DAY CAME EARLY FOR ME AND SENT ME A JAR OF BRUTUS' TEARS SUNDAY MORNING. I WAS ECSTATIC.
SO PERHAPS, NAME FAGGOT, WE SHOULD ALL BLAME THE MEDIA AND THE VOTERS. BECAUSE OUTSIDE OF 2014, THE LITTLE 10 HAS BEEN A JOKE OF A CONFERENCE FOR ALMOST 20 YEARS. BEFORE LAST YEAR, THE LITTLE 10 HADN'T WON A LEGITIMATE NATIONAL TITLE SINCE JERRY SANDUSKY WAS DIDDLING KIDS ON THE SIDELINES IN THE 1980S.
BROKEN CLOCK. BLIND SQUIRREL. FLUKE. AND YET THE CONFERENCE IS HERALDED AS LEVEL WITH THE SEC, THE PAC 12, EVEN THE BIG 12 AND ACC.
>>63772670
Holy shit can this be copypasta
I fucking HATE Drew Sharp
>pick on MSU all season long
>rant all week about how they stood no chance against OSU
>Get BTFO
>try writing an article to lessen the blow but only gets BTFO more in the process
Literally can say without a doubt the worst sports writer I've ever seen.
http://www.freep.com/story/sports/columnists/drew-sharp/2015/11/23/michigan-state-football-drew-sharp/76257958/
>>63769523
>OU lost to Texas
>Have them ahead of ND that beat Texas
Nice bait, got me to bite.
PERHAPS THAT IS TRUE, NAME FAGGOT. PERHAPS.
PERHAPS ALL OF THIS HATRED TOWARDS GAYKER GAYFIELD IS BASELESS AND UNFAIR. PERHAPS THE HATRED SHOULD BE DIRECTED AT THE MEDIA AND THE VOTERS FOR ASSUMING OU IS STILL A GOOD TEAM DESPITE THE FACT THAT THEY PLAY NOBODY EVERY YEAR. PERHAPS IT SHOULD BE MORE OF A QUESTION AS TO WHY OU IS REGARDED AS A PREMIER TEAM WHEN UP UNTIL THREE YEARS AGO THERE WAS ONLY RB'S COMING OUT OF IT THAT WERE WORTH A SHIT AND UNTIL LAST YEAR THAT TEAM WOULD REGULARLY GET FUCKING DESTROYED IN BOWL GAMES.
OU GETTING BLOWN THE FUCK OUT IN BCS BOWLS WAS AN ANNUAL TRADITION OF THE SAME THREAD AS CHRISTMAS. I WOULD WAKE UP ON GAME DAY WITH A BIG SMILE ON MY FACE, MY HEART BRIMMING WITH EXCITEMENT, CHEEKS ROSY WITH ANTICIPATION.
I'D DO A LITTLE HOP ON MY WAY TO WORK.
WHILE EVERYONE ELSE WAS ON THE POST HOLIDAY SLUMP, I WAS STILL RIDING HIGH. MY CO WORKERS THOUGHT I WAS A STRANGE BIRD. "WHY ARE YOU SO HAPPY, FUCK THE COLTS? WE DON'T GET ANOTHER DAY OFF UNTIL MEMORIAL DAY AND IT'S BITTERLY COLD AND DEPRESSING OUTSIDE!"
I WOULD SIMPLY SMILE SERENELY AND SAY "NOT SO, DEAR FRIENDS. FOR TODAY MARKS ANOTHER DAY THAT OKLAHOMA AND OU GETS THEIR ASSHOLE WIDENED THREE SIZES TOO BIG. IT'S THE ANNUAL BIG 12 RAPE DAY!"
LAST YEAR THE GRINCH WAS SUCCESSFUL IN STEALING RAPE DAY FROM ME, BUT IT WON'T HAPPEN THIS YEAR. SANTA WORKED OVERTIME TO MAKE SURE RAPE DAY CAME EARLY FOR ME AND SENT ME A JAR OF BRUTUS' TEARS SUNDAY MORNING. I WAS ECSTATIC.
SO PERHAPS, NAME FAGGOT, WE SHOULD ALL BLAME THE MEDIA AND THE VOTERS. BECAUSE OUTSIDE OF 2008, OU HAS BEEN A JOKE OF A TEAM FOR ALMOST 25 YEARS. BEFORE LAST YEAR, OUHADN'T WON A LEGITIMATE NATIONAL TITLE SINCE JERRY SANDUSKY WAS DIDDLING KIDS ON THE SIDELINES IN THE 1980S.
BROKEN CLOCK. BLIND SQUIRREL. FLUKE. AND YET THE TEAM IS HERALDED AS LEVEL WITH THE BAMA, YALE, EVEN THE PRINCETON AND NOTRE DAME.
>>63772670
You know OSU is tied for most BCS bowl wins, right? 2006, 2007, and 2008 was a bad stretch for them, but that's all.
The Big Ten was the second-worst of the big 6 during BCS era. That's not really even disputable. It's much better now than it has been for years though, nobody disagrees with this.
The nickname for the Big Ten for most of the past few decades has been the Big 2 and the rest, nobody disagrees about that.
Why are you mad that dynamic has changed?
Maryland-Rutgers tickets are going for almost 3x as much as PSU-MSU tickets.
Why are MSU fans so terrible?
>>63772775
>BUT WE WON THE SUGAR BOWL
>AND THE FIESTA BOWL
>THOSE BOWLS MATTER
ANON I AM SORRY
ALSO I APOLOGIZE IF YOU THINK I AM MAD, I AM SIMPLY ECSTATIC OVER THE RESULTS OF THE WEEKEND. PLEASE DON'T MISUNDERSTAND.
PERHAPS WHAT MAKES ME HAPPIEST EVERY YEAR IS WHEN LITTLE 10 FANS REALIZE THE KOOL-AID THEY'VE BEEN DRINKING IS ACTUALLY MASHED SHIT AND CORNFLAKES.
SEE, THE AVERAGE LITTLE 10 FAN IS A REAL TROOPER THOUGH, NAME FAGGOT. BECAUSE THE AVERAGE LITTLE 10 FAN WILL REALIZE THAT IT'S NOT ACTUALLY A REFRESHING FRUITY DRINK THEY'RE HOLDING, BUT A CUP OF SHIT AND PENCIL SHAVINGS.
BUT UNLIKE THE REST OF US, WHO WOULD SCREAM IN TERROR AND FLEE FOR OUR LIVES, THE AVERAGE LITTLE 10 FAN WILL MAKE A HERCULEAN EFFORT TO SMILE AND STILL SAY THAT STEAMING PILE OF DIARRHEA TASTES AND LOOKS GOOD.
SOME SAY THAT'S LOYALTY. ME, I JUST CALL IT INSANITY.
>>63772896
>mashed shit and cornflakes
Lost it here, 10/10
>>63769523
ND won't be in. The CFP bylaws won't let them. Join or die faggot. No one wants another 2011.
>>63771363
As an OU fan I legitimately hope that tOSU picks up one of them before we start our home and home series.
>>63772214
can't believe you wrote all this and not a single person bothered to call you a faggot
1. Alabama
2. Clemson
3. Iowa
4. Michigan State
>>63772759
I remember the last time we played in a NY6 bowl after losing to Texas.
>>63773048
>adrian peterson doing the ric flair while Aj's wife looks like she just watched a trainwreck
>>63770719
>Iowa above Clemson
get a load of this retard
>>63772877
MSU fans can be pretty annoying. I live on campus and I definitely have run into my fair share of douchebags. No all of us are like that though were just excited since everyone has been doubting us and we beat OSU/UoM in their stadiums.
>>63773048
I miss watching McCarrons wife.
They always interrupted her with football anyways though.
>>63770719
Oh look, you moved Oklahoma up
>>63772687
>be from Michigan
>hate every team in Michigan
you guys can take him nobody here likes him at all
>>63773270
The only thing worse than a Lions/MSU loss is the article Drew Sharp is sure to put up after the game. I actually love this article though, he's getting completely torn apart by MSU fans and his responses are not good enough.
>m...my job is to analyze guys...stop being so mean....I really though MSU would lose....y...you are lying if you thought other wise...
Is OU/Ok Lite really the best game this week?
>>63771289
Sooners decline
>>63772214
faggot
need more College Gameday sign ideas (OU @ OK St)
>>63773354
what ideas do you have?
>>63773048
Requesting the shop of the Jetski's on Oklahoma players. That was pure comedy gold.
>>63773328
Nigger, first of all.
You cant decline an invitation to a party you aren't invited to.
Second of all, Nebraska, Iowa is game of the week.
>>63773395
that wouldnt even make sense
>>63773401
kek
>>63773273
Look how badly they bite on this play action and then jump on the Perine swing. Is there any other team in the nation that has two every down backs?
>>63773436
Do you not remember everyone making a big deal about how Alabama's QB that year almost got killed in a jetski accident when he was a little kid?
>>63773446
The weird thing is, Lincoln Riley didn't do much of these types of plays against Texas. He had them in position a lot, but didnt through to them, or play action, or even use them to block. Great improvement though.
>>63773436
>that wouldnt even make sense
>>63773462 this and after the scoop n score, someone posted a hilariously shopped image of Oklahoma players with Red Jet skies shopped on their heads . It got like 50 replies.
>>63773462
Yes, but Aj Mcarron isn't playing for Ok Lite, and noone outside this board remembers
>>63769474
Post your record against other broship members rivals
>>63773514
see
>>63773515
"Look how good we did against Alabama 2 years ago Gameday! Do you see?"
>>63773534
Who cares what you think? You're a bandwagon casual who openly admitted to cheering for Okie Lite in Bedlam last year. You're no better... no, you're worse than all the Poke fans who went to Stillwater because they couldn't spell "Oklahoma"
>>63773534
I just requested the image because it was funny. I don't give a fuck about Oklahoma state or even the fact that you even won that game it was referring to. Jesus Christ.
>>63773514
I dont have the original but I put everything in a collage so you dont have to know the backstory anymore
>>63773048
>#scoopnscore
>>63773531
What website is this family
>>63773580
winsipedia
>>63773497
The big problem to begin the season was the lineman couldn't handle game speed temp and complex blitz packages. Both perine and mixon had fumbles early on in the season which really hurt their touches as well
>>63773446
I think OU has a chance against anyone. If you crowd the line like TCU did here you get obliterated by Swagfield and if you play off with your safeties Sterling Shephard is going to humiliate you. That kid had over 130 all purpose yards against Bama as a sophmore
>>63773572
Thanks m8
>>63771990
>AHHHHHHHHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
i think he just came again
>>63773048
man.. i would have loved to comforted aj's momma that night.. make her forget all about that trainwreck of a ballgame with a trainwreck of a sexual encounter
>>63773671
I could seriously watch dat ass all day.
>>63773328
Of course it is. Winner getting in the Playoffs. Marj my words.
>>63772759
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_Sooners_football#Record_book
>Oklahoma is one of two schools (Ohio State) to have appeared in all five BCS bowl games (2001 Orange, 2003 Rose, 2004 Sugar, 2007 Fiesta, 2009 BCS NCG), but they are the only team to win all five awards in the BCS era (2001 Orange Bowl and BCS National Championship, 2003 Rose Bowl, 2011 Fiesta Bowl, 2014 Sugar Bowl).
:)
>>63773781
After this play I smoked a bowl and went out and had a drink for the first time in over a month. My nerves were so shot
>>63773713
I wouldn't go that far. Let's assume Notre Dame beats Stanford. In that situation Oklahoma MIGHT jump/stay ahead of them depending on this week's rankings. Oklahoma State is probably too far back to jump them in that situation.
Oklahoma getting in is somewhere between toss-up and likely if they win. Oklahoma State would need some 2007-tier chaos to get in at this point. On top of winning Bedlam, they'd probably need Stanford to beat Notre Dame then have Michigan win the Big Ten since that would mean Iowa, Michigan State, and Ohio State all pick up another loss. Even that might not be enough if TCU doesn't beat Baylor. They controlled their own destiny until three days ago, now they're at the mercy of about half a dozen teams.
>>63773815
Notre Dame is not getting in. Stanford would have to be a one loss team for that to even be on the table.
The committees bylaws CLEARLY state that an independent must be head and shoulders above a conference champion to get the nod and the fact that its even a debate indicates that this is not so.
With your schedule you have to go undefeated. That's dem breaks kid.
Besides there's still a legit chance that pretty much every team in the top 5 could lose so
>>63773851
Yeah any chance of ND getting in took a fatal hit when Stanford lost to Oregon.
>>63773851
>pretty much every team in the top 5 could lose so
Iowa and Nebraska will both lose?
Nope
>>63773851
I'm not a Notre Dame fan by any means. I went to Colorado so I don't have a dog in this fight. I was just saying that whoever wins Bedlam shouldn't be penciled in just yet, especially not if Oklahoma State wins.
>>63773881
Oklahoma can be, Okie State needs help, Baylor might get in if Okie State wins. The only sure thing is ND is out imo
>>63773881
OU is the better team by far and the committee recognizes that. OU needs to win to completely atone for their one loss. I dont think OSU winning will get them in the playoff
>>63773716
OU/tOSU bro-ship when? Can't wait for the series next year!
>>63773920
I won't say anything's certain until I see the final rankings. I thought TCU was as good as in last year when they were 3rd in the second to last rankings then they got dropped all the way to 6th.
>>63773920
If Okie State beats OU Baylor is winning the Big 12. Does that mean that Baylor has to be the Big 12 playoff contender?
>>63773881
If Ok St. wins.
By the fagget committee's standards Ok St. has a stronger schedule than OU if they win.
>Muh Quality losses.
>>63773977
Wont matter as Baylor owns the tiebreaker over Okie Lite. If Baylor and OSU both win out then Baylor is the conference champion which would fucking infuriate me
Not a single team I hate worse in this conference than Baylor
>>63773967
Well, you were dumb for thinking that. It was painfully obvious they would be #6 based on massive resume differences. It's the same case this year. ND has an awful resume and quality of loss wont get you in the playoffs
>>63773973
Not necessarily, but they'd probably get the higher ranking. When two teams are close to each other the committee looks at head-to-head. Since Baylor won by 10 in Stillwater they have a significant ranking advantage unless they view Oklahoma State as the clearly stronger team.
>>63773973
I think so. Okie St lost their head to head so that would put Baylor ahead due to similar resumes
>>63774005
But does the committee care about who gets the conference champ title if no game is even played?
They could still have OK St. ranked higher afterwards. OK St. can jump with with a win over OU.
I don't know if it will happen that way, but it wouldn't be unreasonable.
>>63770719
The OU-Texas game has been renamed to the AT&T Red River Showdown.
http://www.fbschedules.com/2014/04/oklahoma-texas-att-red-river-showdown/
Name a more overrated team in the history of collegiate football.
>Professional advice: You can't.
>>63774045
I don't see how a champ game changes anything. Having a round robin system will get us in over any other non alabama one loss team.
>>63774054
Northern Illinois went to a BCS bowl.
>>63774054
Penn State before the kiddie diddling
>>63774075
>us
What position do you play for the "big" "12", m8?
>>63774051
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>63774111
>AT&T
Is there a more keked rivalry in college football?
>>63774108
I work in the media department. Hence the shitty webms.
>>63774075
Championship game is another game against a highly ranked opponent. That helps quite a bit.
>>63774051
The jews have won
>>63774111
did you rename the file to sponsored content or did you literally download it like that
>>63774075
What I said has nothing to do with "adding a championship game".
Ok St. can end up ranked higher after beating OU since Baylor won't play another tough team. If Baylor beats TCU then Texas Beat TTU, and Baylor beats Texas maybe they're higher. But I doubt Texas wins.
The CFB isn't ranking on head to head. If They think OSU is better when OK St. beats them than OK St. was when Baylor beat them conference champ won't matter. Because it actually doesn't.
>>63774157
Changed it
>>63774135
I'd put Cal's 2007 team ahead of USF's on the overrated scale. Both got as high as #2 in the rankings but USF at least rebounded to get 9 wins while Cal fell apart to finish the regular season 6-6 with losses to the two worst teams in the Pac-10.
>>63774147
But they're already playing everyone in their conference. I see what you're saying about adding to SoS, but it's not like a round-robin champion didn't have to beat good teams to be a conference champion.
>>63774147
Ok so what happens if its a rematch? Does that regular season win not mean anything?
Only school I'd add at the drop of a hat is ND.
>>63773945
>anyone
>wanting a bro-ship with an ohio state university
>>63774230
If it's a rematch, like Oregon v. Arizona last year, it just bolsters the schedule with another win over a ranked opponent.
>>63774205
True, though it still hurts their SoS losing out on a full game against a great opponent. I don't think it's cripplingly so, but it does make it really hard for a team like Baylor who has such a soft OOC to get in the playoffs any given year. I'd say Oklahoma can always make it with one loss, and Okie St can usually make it woth one loss, and with TCU future schedules they can probably make it with one loss, but Baylor will almost every year not be able to make it unless they go undefeated. A championship game would give them cushion they don't have now.
2016 Big 12 OOC Slate
TCU - Arkansas
OU - tOSU
UT - Cal/ND
TTU - ASU
KSU - Stanford
WVU - BYU/Mizzou
KU - Memphis
ISU - Iowa
Okie Lite - Pitt
Baylor - Northwestern State, SMU, Rice. 9 of Baylor's 12 games are in Texas.
This is why Baylor and Okie lite do not get respect
>>63774280
>Ohio State
>wanting a broship with anyone
Seriously though, fuck off with this broship stuff, it's literally worse than letting a pack of elephants trunkfuck your gf til she dies
>>63774324
>Even KU tried to make a realish schedule
I'm sure it's tied in with Basketball games, but still.
>>63774324
Pitt is okay.
Baylor though, Baylor deserves to be held out of the playoffs on principle until they fix this shit.
>>63774324
>>63774324
this tbqh flam
that's pretty embarrassing for gaylord
>>63774054
ANY TEAM FROM THE LITTLE 10 AFTER 1990
>>63774324
To be fair, Pitt is a better team than Arkansas, Cal, ASU, BYU, and Mizzou this season. I know they're most likely losing Tyler Boyd but it's not like they have any semblance of a passing game anyways, so who's to say they won't be better than those teams once again next season?
>lose to the worst non-Kansas team in the Big XII
>barely beat the worst team in the SEC
Oklahoma is a literal meme, cannot wait until they win out and still get snubbed
>>63774324
SEC is interesting
BAMA VS USC TROJANS
LSU VS WISCONSIN
AUBURN VS CLEMSON
OLE MISS VS FSU
GEORGIA VS NC
TAMU VS UCLA
Arkansas vs TCU
Msst vs BYU
All the games in caps are the first week of the season. Looks like the SEC is trying to minimize the damage of an OOC loss
>>63774345
This desu senpai. Michigan/Slippery Rock is the only acceptable permanent broship in cfb.
post yfw Nebraska, Penn St, and Michigan all win on Saturday.
Bonus round: post yfw Auburn and South Carolina win, too.
>>63774480
>Bonus round: post yfw Auburn and South Carolina win, too
>>63774422
They have a better record but in their division that doesnt mean anything, their 3 losses came to good teams but they havent really dominated anyone nor even beat anyone that matters. The GT win looked good early
>>63774480
Better yet, post >yfw Michigan State loses to Penn State, OSU beats Michigan and then Iowa, FSU beats Florida, Stanford beats ND, and Clemson and Alabama lose
>post yfw Ohio State becomes back to back national champs
>>63774575
but then all of those Ohio State fans would have to return the MSU jerseys they bought at WalMart yesterday
>>63774324
Baylor schedules those games because of the old SWC conference rivalries that used to mean something.
It's definitely hurting their credibility but it's not exactly easy to just stop scheduling those games. If they started scheduling an SEC or Pac-12 opponent every year instead of Northwestern State, they'd probably be fine.
>>63774516
Putting records to the side (which I normally do when saying x team is better than y team) I still think Pitt is better than all of those teams - I could see an argument for Arkansas possibly playing better football this weekend, but the rest I don't think even have an argument really.
>>63774575
>Pretending the National Championship isn't going to be between Notre Dame and Michigan
Honestly just stop Nuts
>>63769474
>mississippi state
>elite
What?
>>63774613
OSU isn't a bandwagon fanbase though, they're just extremely large and obnoxious. You'll be hardpressed to find a fanbase more loyal, even if a lot of diehard fans are rednecks in rural Ohio.
Alabama fans don't bandwagon either
>>63774664
plz
the last game was such a bad way to end the rivalry, I have literally been aching for a chance for us to curbstomp them again.
>>63773571
I thought you meant for the gameday sign thing, I somehow thought you replied to this guy >>63773354
sp yeah just ignore me
>>63773564
I like how you conveniently left out the part where I said I had family at both universities. So yeah, it would look like that im a "bandwagoner" because you're retarded
>>63774629
Mizzou and BYU have definitely fallen off this year and who knows with Pinkel leaving and Taysom Hill dead
>>63774625
If they wanted to do something like that they could at least schedule the better former SWC teams like Houston or Arkansas every now and then instead of constantly beating up on SMU and Rice.
Oh God I can't wait to be Saturday.
(Or Friday for TCU / Gaylor desu)
>>63774792
Oh yeah, OU is playing Houston next year too. I think Bob is trying to put a G5 air raid offense on his schedule early in the year so he can get the defense used to it.
Playing Tulsa early one really helped prep the team for WVU, TTU, Baylor, and TCU
>>63774625
>Baylor schedules those games because of the old SWC conference rivalries that used to mean something.
That's not true. Look at their future schedule. They continue to schedule FCS teams and shit teams. They just announced a series against Louisiana Tech and one against Abilene Christian last year. They are still seeking out this shit schedule and they don't play the same shitty teams every year, just shitty teams.
>>63774792
Don't forget how bad and irrelevant Baylor was until like 5 years ago
They were literally Rice/SMU tier until the 2010s
>>63774743
Having family at both universities doesn't fucking matter. In terms of fans and alumni my family is split almost down the middle between the two schools and you won't catch me cheering for Okie Lite, especially not against Oklahoma. So, yes, you're still a bandwagon faggot who shouldn't be using an OU-related name if you cheer for one of their rivals to beat them.
>>63774929
You're literally talking to Baker Gayfield.
>>63774860
ok yeah scheduling liberty and incarnate word is kinda dumb, i'll give you that.
still the big 12 is usually strong enough in conference that if one team goes wire to wire they're gonna be in the CFP, the problem is always this time of year when the conference cannibalizes itself and the sooners win by default
>>63774929
Bedlam is not a real rivalry though
>>63775017
It's not like Texas is or Nebraska was, but it's still inexcusable to pick Little Brother over your own school when they're playing each other for any reason.
who /hastoplayashitschoolonRivalryWeekbecausenootherteamcaresaboutyouenoughtoconsideryoutheirmainrival/ here?
I swear it's like going to prom with the 5/10 after you almost made it with a 10/10, but then later that night you look into her eyes and realize she really cares about you, and you actually feel happy for a moment, and then you go and break here heart anyway and now you're all alone and you realize the last time you were truly happy was that night, and you wonder if you should just lower your standards, but you don't want to, because you're always so close, but you also think that you should have loved her despite the fact that she wasn't the prettiest girl in the world, I mean, she wasn't ugly for god's sake, and you wonder what she's up to, but you know she's hundreds of miles away now, and having fun on her own, and you're alone in your apartment browsing /sp/.
Anyway yeah that's what playing Vandy to end every season is like.
>>63773781
When he broke out for that run I bet he was thinking "SHIT, I have to run so fucking far on this bum leg." You could see his anguish at the end.
>>63773806
I couldnt' sleep that night
>>63774929
My cousin is a trainer at Ok Lite, is it too much to want Ok Lite to go to a bowl for his sake? Jesus christ. and I wasn't "cheering" for OkSU, I just didn't really care if OU won. Cocksucker
>>63775003
Yeah, but notice how Oklahoma will be pretty much guaranteed in this year if they win out by everyone, where Baylor got held out last year, and will likely get held out in favor of ND this year? Or how UNC over in the ACC likely won't make it at 1 loss due to OOC? Or how people question Iowa because the B1G West is weak this year?
All of these are why an OOC strength of schedule matters
>>63775017
Idk man, is Teemco a legit sponsor?
Is this here the low point of Miami football?
>>63775235
I can't imagine a lower point than the Clemson game
>>63775140
>I wasn't "cheering" for OkSU, I just didn't really care if OU won.
Bullshit. In another thread you flat-out said you wanted them to beat OU. Besides, this is their 10th year in a row of making a bowl game. One 5-7 year wouldn't have been the end of the world for your cousin.
>>63775235
when they lose it will be
>>63775164
Is Oklahoma garanteed? Im pretty sure the committee will put Notre Dame in over Oklahoma if the ND wins. I think Oklahoma will have to blow out OSU to jump Notre Dame, but we'll see later tonight. What do you think the chances are that Michigan State jumps ND or Oklahoma?
>>63775301
then the U will have something in common with Michigan.......
....then again it wouldn't have been at home
>>63775288
Having to travel TO Appalachian State?
>>63775164
SOS matters but it's also the name of the uni, which is what your post lends credence to more than anything else IMO
Baylor gets held out last year despite having an objectively better resume than Ohio State because it's Baylor, UNC gets held out because 1A. they're UNC (and not say ND) and 1B. they're not an undefeated ACC team (even though the ACC is pretty much a B1G clone these days and CFP and voters will suck every dick in sight if it meant having a B1G team in the playoff).
if anything it just speaks to some kind of "tradition" outweighing what happens in a given year. say what you will about computers but they never gave "tradition" or overrated teams any credit, that was all the coaches poll.
CFP i think overall is a good thing but without expansion to 8 or 12 (to include every conference champion and a few at-larges) the tradition meme will always fuck over some other school every year, and this year it looks like notre dame will likely be fucking over a big 12 team unless the sooners win out (even though baylor and oklahoma state will both have a better resume than notre dame assuming all 3 have 1 loss)
>>63775123
Miami here
I guess we are trying to start some day after thanksgiving rivalry with Pittsburgh because we've done it the past 5 fucking years it seems like. But both teams suck by then so it doesn't matter at all
>>63775289
It wouldnt have been the end of the world for me if Oklahoma lost the game either. I just didn't care at that point in the year. Right now, if Oklahoma lost it would probably ruin my week and hurt every time I thought about it.
>>63775363
Pretty sure Michigan was a heavy favorite
Not sure if Miami would necessarily be
>>63775345
Honestly it all depends of the quality of the wins.
OU booty blasting OSU while Our Lady struggling against the Cardinal? They're in
OU struggling against OSU while Notre Dame booty blasted Stanford? They're out
Same shit with tOSU.
>>63775397
I like the "BlooBloods Loyalty College Football Royalty" rankings.
If you don't you're from some shit non blue blood school and shouldn't be allowed to talk about /cfb/ or post here.
>>63775345
It's guaranteed. There's no way ND gets in over Oklahoma.
>>63775397
>Baylor gets held out last year despite having an objectively better resume than Ohio State because it's Baylor
Literally and unironically, wut? Baylor wasn't even close to OSU in strength of schedule and the Big 12 was horrible. OSU blew the doors of Wisconsin, MSU, and Minnesota, all ranked teams. Baylor barely beat TCU and their only other win was K State who had 0 (zero) wins against ranked teams
>>63775288
It's gotten so bad that no one besides FSU/UF fans find it funny. It's just sad. Still, most U fans can probably remember winning a championship so it's not like I feel bad for them.
But it is kind of sad.
>>63771302
Yes.
>>63775412
Not letting them "make" their season against you should be motivation enough. It's like 2001 when they finished 3-8 or 4-7 but won in Norman to keep OU from playing Colorado in the Big 12 championship and getting a shot at playing/getting bootyblasted by Miami. (let's be honest here, Miami probably could have beat the Carolina Panthers that year). They didn't get a bowl game, but winning Bedlam made their season. Last year a loss would have put them at 5-7 but they won and got bowl eligible so it made their season.
>>63774471
Based Rock
>>63775572
Ohio State lost to Virginia Tech at home by two touchdowns.
Baylor lost by the same amount on the road to West Virginia.
Ohio State played two ranked opponents all season, one of which was Wisconsin, who was hilariously overrated. Baylor played and beat three ranked opponents, two of which were in the top 10.
Come on now.
>>63775943
we're (meaning miami fans) all kind of pissed, but the talent level is still there in the skill positions.
it's a combination of coaching (which is a major factor) and the inability to recruit a good defensive front and one or two guys on the secondary.
miami will be good again when it has a good defense. they still recruit some of the best athletes in the country but they're letting talent bleed out of south florida and until that stops happening they won't be "back".
get the right head coach in there and stop trying to recruit 3.5 gpa players, plant the flag in south florida the way schnellenberger, jimmy johnson, and butch davis did and they'll be back to a perennial top 10 program in no time.
>>63776137
>schnellenberger
Now there's a man who taught me the meaning of disappointment.
>>63774809
>tfw only 6th in the group
>>63775966
Thats totally different, OU got denied a chance to play for an NC. Even if OkSU was 5-6 that year and was competing for a bowl I wouldn't have wanted them to win. I don't care if that made their season, I care that it "ruined" ours. However last year, it really didn't do anything other than place us in a game against a lesser bowl, and then we still ended up getting smashed.
>>63775966
2001 miami would've probably gone 4-12 in the NFL that year even with ken dorsey at QB
the entire defense was like a pro bowl roster
>>63776171
Oklahoma fans know that schnellenberger feel
>>63776061
OSU played and beat 3 ranked opponents, Baylor beat two. across the board, OSU's opponents were better than Baylor's. West Virginia ended the season ranked below Virginia Tech by everybody.
Your facts and numbers are wrong which is why you came to an extremely inaccurate conclusion.
>hilariously overrated Wisconsin
>both MSU and Wisconsin win in their bowls while K State loses to a lesser opponent and Baylor loses to MSU
It wasn't close and it was quite apparent. Cincinnati was ranked higher than over half of Baylor's schedule.
Kansas State was not in the top ten
>>63776177
Okie Lite making their season by winning Bedlam is just as bad as them ruining Oklahoma's season by winning Bedlam. It still gives them that feather in their hat. I'd rather lose to fucking Kansas and be a laughingstock than give the Pokes that kind of bragging rights.
>>63775397
I'm going to lay some truth on you here:
Oklaholma is the only Big12 school that is remotely good. Your entire conference is a joke. Winning against TCU means nothing. Winning against Baylor means nothing.
When you start scheduling good out of conference games, you might make it to the playoffs, until then it's all delusion.
>>63776222
Howard Schnellenberger's debut was the first OU game I ever went to. I was also at John Blake's last game. Those were a painful few years.
>>63776295
That's a lot of butthurt.
>>63776061
None of that is accurate. V Tech was considered better than WVU by season's end, Wisconsin was not at all overrated and beat an SEC West team despite not even having a coach, the actual overrated team was K State who lost to the team Wisconsin beat without their coach, OSU had 3 ranked opponents (MSU, Wiscy, Minnesota), Baylor had 2 (TCU, K State). OSU played 11 teams that went to bowl games, Baylor played six and played an FCS opponent. Literally no room to even argue on that one
>>63776259
you can't count what happened after the fact. obviously ohio state deserved to win the national championship last year and no one is disputing that, they won the playoff.
when these discussions are had, we're transporting ourselves back to selection sunday.
keep in mind that the week prior, #5 baylor beat #9 kansas state, while #6 ohio state beat #11 wisconsin.
if we start there, there is no logical reason for ohio state to have leapfrogged baylor other than traveling fans and/or a conference title game.
>>63776341
>>63776295
Here's what a real, non joke conference looks like:
>>63776295
i'm not a big 12 homer, i just really don't like how the big 10 gets their semen slurped by everybody when that conference does fuck all every single year
notre dame gets the same kind of treatment
when you consider where the top 3 big 12 teams were ranked this season until they started losing to each other, and that if they all end the season with one loss they will still get fucked over by notre dame (whose best win is against...navy now?), its really hard to like any big 10 school or notre dame
>>63776176
I'm 5th :3
>>63776463
But 7th in the Big 12 beat Arkansas head to head.
Big 12 7> Sec 7
>>63771289
bear raid here
>>63776179
Best college football team in the history?
>>63776701
That would be 1971 Nebraska
>>63776701
Quite possibly. The only team I could think of who would even be close is probably Nebraska's 1995 team and I'd still give that one to Miami 8 or 9 times out of 10.
>>63776435
It's their ranking at the end of the season that counts, not at the time of the game. At the end of the season, Minnesota was ranked. Oklahoma was no longer ranked, and in fact ranked below another OSU opponent, Cincinnati, in several measures.
Only half of Baylor's games were against top 100 opponents. Baylor had an absolutely dreadful schedule. The top end of OSU's was slightly better than Baylor's, but the meat of it isn't even comparable. FCS schools and bottom 100 teams hurt your SoS significantly.
This graphic was displayed on ESPN using the SoS measures the committee used to explain to retards why beating 2 ranked teams handedly and blowing another out, while playing a much tougher rest of your schedule, is better than barely beating one ranked team and beating another close and playing a shit ton of teams not in the top 100 in the NCAA.
>>63776701
i would say the most complete football team. some say the 1995 huskers were as good or close but they ran a meme offense and miami ran a pro-style which is why people say they probably would've been at least somewhat competitive in the NFL (in addition to all the NFL talent that team had).
most people would say they are the best team of all time because of the average margin of victory and the sheer dominance they showed outside of one road game against boston college when they squeaked one out.
>When asked about his favorite Egg Bowl moment, Laquon Treadwell responded with "Dak's flip last year"
Dak was hit after the whistle blew and he had stopped running. There wasn't even a flag because it was in Oxford.
Is there a worse fanbase than Northern Mississippi?
https://youtu.be/gImbR7_0ur8
>>63776801
>>63776435
More graphics to educate the dumb
>>63776801
still doesn't explain why baylor was #5 and buckeyes were #6, both beat their opponents in the same week while baylor's was better by the same committee, and yet ohio state jumped them
if all that shit applied baylor shouldn't have been #5 to start with full stop, and the fact that they were #5 and got leaped over for doing their job makes zero sense.
tl;dr if that shit held any water the committee wouldn't have put ohio state behind baylor before the week of december 6
>>63776512
well if you added a couple of teams to make a championship game people would try to take your conference seriously
>>63776463
>Tennessee at 16
toplel
did espn make this list
>>63776933
for the 50th time im not a big 12 homer, i dont give two shits about it
im an objective observer, i agree the big 12 should have a conference title game but that doesn't mean they didn't get robbed last year just like they're about to get robbed this year.
>>63776701
95 Nebraska team. Only reason some people even rate the 2001 Miami team higher is because of muh pro talent which Osborne would still would wipe the floor with.
>>63776463
>one top ten team
>>63776933
That would be a band-aid when you need a tourniquet. Even if they add a couple schools to get to 12 or are allowed to put in a deregulated title game I still can't see Oklahoma or Texas staying past the grant of rights. There's no way they're making up for the prestige hit they took over the last six years. In terms of brand recognition and historical success there's no one they could realistically add that would replace the loss of Nebraska or even Texas A&M and Colorado.
>>63776931
The committee remakesrankings every week. It's not BCS standings where it's informed by the week before, at least not theoretically. Therefore, nobody actually got jumped. However, I would assume that the fact that Minnesota became a top 25 opponent, Cincinnati won their conference championship, and TCU's value dropping due to the drop of K State's respective value, along with the fact that 59-0 over an opponent ranked close to an opponent another team beat 38-27 represents a better win.
Also, half the Big 12 played and lost a game that final week. Those losses all hurt Baylor's SoS.
>big xii fails to make the playoffs for a second year and dissolves
sorry just fantasizing out loud
>>63774324
Are you trying to say that BYU/Mizzou and Memphis are generally better than Pitt?
>>63777212
We can all hope.
>>63777212
If they make the playoff, expansion isn't happening
the Big XII teams make too much money to care otherwise
>>63773851
the committee's bylaws absolutely do not state that. Please provide evidence otherwise with citations. They certainly strongly consider conference championships, but they consider a number of other factors. I'm open to other sources, but I think this link is pretty reliable.
http://www.collegefootballplayoff.com/selection-committee-protocol
>>63777025
1995 huskers ran the same offense 2001 huskers ran and miami obliterated them
it wasn't the same talent level but that meme option bullshit would have been destroyed by the 2001 canes.
>>63777214
not him but BYU has a better mascot so yes
>>63777212
>Alabama gets memed by Auburn
>beats Florida in SECCG
>Michigan State loses to Penn State
>Ohio State loses to Michigan
>Iowa loses in the Big10CC
>Notre Dame loses to Stanford
>baylor and Oklahoma clean up TCu and OK lite and both get into the playoffs as #3 and #4 seeds
>win they're respective games
>Big 12 champ game
>SEC teams panic
>Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee, and LSU join the Big 12
>Kentucky and Venderbilt join the Big 10
>SC, jawjaw join ACC
>2017 remaining former B12 SEC teams finally cave and return to big 12 (missouri, texas AM)
>rest split between ACC
>Alabama/auburn and the mississippis stay in independent limbo and play 3 fcs teams a year
>>63777125
can we just drop the charade and admit ohio state's fans travel better and that's why they got in
again i'm willing to concede that they deserved the championship last year if you're willing to concede that ticket sales are the reason they were there in the first place
>>63777024
those ranked teams played terrible schedules, that's why they were ranked so high. That isn't necessarily evidence that they were great, their schedules were all backloaded. TCU could very well finish the season unranked with 0 impressive wins.
>>63777686
>m-must've been a conspiracy
>>63777515
the 2001 huskers were a 1 loss team that was far less talented
1995 Nebraska was far more dominant than 2001 nebraska
>>63777439
The whole conference champs thing is perpetuated by idiots who don't understand Strength of Schedule and latched on to the nearest meme as to why Baylor was left out for OSU. The Big 12 SoS was hurt by not having a conference championship because an extra game against another ranked opponent would have given TCU or Baylor a clear edge, not because the committee explicitly penalized for lack of conference championship games.
The whole conference champs thing is totally overblown. There's a reason SoS graphic is always displayed every week and the rankings of the teams in question often fall according to the graphic. The committee is practically yelling at you that this measure is what matters
>>63777737
Your theory ignores the part where Baylor (and TCU) were ranked above OSU until the last game of the season
>>63777737
I think winning a conference championship game is important because its an extra win against a quality important, which it seems like you agree with
I think the status of conference champion is only explicitly used to separate two teams from the same conference trying to get one cfp spot.
>>63777821
his theory actually accounts for that perfectly. Ohio state stacked on another high quality win.
>>63777894
Not if it was supposedly apparent that OSU had a better schedule all year.
>>63777952
unless it was close and then clearly better. SoS only takes into account games already played.
>>63777694
so is losing to clemson an impressive win?
even if you count navy for ND as an impressive win the top 3 big 12 teams finish with better resumes assuming they all win out.
you can't call the big 12 OOC schedule trash and in the same breath think notre dame deserves a CFP spot over one of them.
>>63777724
how is this a conspiracy
its a documented thing that happens every year, they're just more candid about it in lesser bowls
>>63777894
>another
you mean one of two, while TCU and Baylor both beat 3 ranked teams.
>>63777686
If the big 12 would have had a conference championship instead of their meme round robin shit, to give TCU and Baylor a chance to solidify their ranking, the winner of that game would have made it in over OSU.
>>63778166
Baylor is not a great win for Oklahoma. It's a decent win. TCU is also not great.
So it's closer than you think. But if Oklahoma beats OSU than they should easily get in over Notre Dame, and it would be a joke if they didn't. OSU on the road would be a great fucking win.
I am a Temple fan so no bias here.
>>63777952
The last week of the season featured several events that made their schedule definitively better and nerfed TCU, which in turn somewhat nerfed Baylor.
Most notable events that occurred on December 6th:
>OSU beats Wisconsin, 59 - 0.
Adds OSU ranked blowout win, increases their SoS.
>Baylor beats K State.
Adds ranked win for Baylor, but also hurts TCU's strength, which also, in turn slightly affects Baylor's strength
>TCU blows out Iowa St
This does almost nothing for TCU because Iowa State is so bad, but it also slides another Baylor opponent out of the top 100.
>Cincinnati beats Houston
Clinches Cincinnati a share of the AAC title. Gives OSU a boost in their SoS.
>Oklahoma loses Bedlam to Okie State
This one is the killer. The reason Baylor and TCU still had a stronger ranking was simple: Oklahoma was still a ranked opponent. Bedlam caused a few things to happen:
>Oklahoma slid out of top 25
>they were replaced in the top 25 by Minnesota
>Cincinnati's win coupled with Oklahoma's loss likely put them close to or possibly even above Oklahoma in rankings
Before December 6th, TCU had two ranked wins and played 3 ranked teams, while OSU had played just one ranked team. Baylor had beaten two ranked teams. After December 6th, OSU now had 3 wins against ranked teams, Baylor 2, and TCU 2 and a loss.
The teams don't exist in a vacuum, and other events, particularly Bedlam, changed the landscape
>>63778239
so you're saying that the winner between baylor and tcu deserved to get in over ohio state if they played each other
So what is it like having uncertainty every year over whether your team will even make it into the playoff?
I don't think I could stand it. Roll tide yall.
>>63778310
I'm saying that the winner between the two of them in an extra game with big 12 championship hype surrounding it to ensure fans traveled well, would deserve it over The tOSU.
>>63778166
losing to impressive isn't good, but it did prove that ND can play with the best team in the country.
As someone pointed out yesterday, the big 12's most impressive OOC win was tennessee, which is worse than the AAC's most impressive OOC win (the conference you are casually discrediting). I think OU gets the edge over ND if they win, but I actually think Baylor won't. Baylor's best win will be over OkSt, who will be top 10. Their next best win will be over TCU, who will quite possibly be ranked below Navy (who is currently a top 15 team), Stanford, Temple, Pitt and USC. A lot has to play out yet, obviously. This might all be irrelevant in a week, but ND could easily have a better resume than Baylor, who has Lamar on their schedule.
>>63778310
If they played each other again, yes. Playing the same ranked team twice is two games against a ranked opponent instead of one game.
>>63778226
they also compiled wins against dogshit
>>63778259
even if you said baylor isn't a great win for oklahoma, its a better win for them against any win notre dame would have outside of stanford
oklahoma beating baylor, ok state, and tcu makes it absolutely no comparison. i guess what i'm saying is its fucking bullshit that one school has to beat 3 ranked opponents to justify being ranked ahead of another school that only had to beat two, one of which is ranked for the sole reason of their record which is entirely against g5 schools and shouldn't even be discussed.
navy would get demolished by any team in the top 10, that fact alone should stop them from being considered a quality win. if you take them away, right now notre dame has nothing except hoping to beat two loss stanford. consider all that and tell me how the fuck they're even in the playoff conversation.
its fucking ridiculous.
>>63776701
Top 3, not in any order:
'95 Huskers
'01 Canes
'71 Huskers
>>63778226
>while TCU and Baylor both beat 3 ranked teams.
Why do you keep repeating this?
>>63778371
>>63778401
>play each other
>team a wins
>playoff selection time
>if team a would beat team b, they should get in
>team a already beat team b
>we meant beat them again
never change /cfb/
>>63769623
You obviously haven't been around Alabama fans
>>63777515
>the 2001 huskers were as good as the 1995 team
>without Osborne
"no"
>>63778424
Go look at the AP/Coaches/CFP rankings and look at the "also receiving votes" section, and stop being retarded. You can ramble about "eye test" of Navy, but all of the objective rankings have ND right there with the Big 12 teams in terms of SoS, its not a big gulf like you are pretending.
>>63778443
see image here
>>63776435
>>63778482
>running the same offense = as good
i even said the talent level wasn't as good. doesn't mean that 1995 nebraska was 23 points better than 2001 nebraska.
anyway how the fuck would tom osborne calling read options be any different than solich calling read options?
>>63778483
i guess when you're a fan of notre dame you have to be a math major and calculate the weighted honorable fucking mentions every week to justify the ranking they have instead of seeing the obvious
temple =/= baylor
navy =/= tcu
USC =/= ok state
period
>>63778483
Neither team is bad. ND, OSU, and OU are all about even. But if you think DeShINT Kizer would survive a Big 12 schedule you're insane.
He's not even a meme qb, he's just shit.
>>63778518
Wikipedia lists rank at time of the matchup, not rank at end of the regular season in cfb committee rankings. The distinction is important, as the committee uses their final ranking, not their ranking at the time of the matchup.
Baylor ranked wins:
>TCU
>K State
TCU ranked wins:
>K State
>Minnesota
Ohio State ranked wins:
>Michigan State
>Wisconsin
>Minnesota
>>63778472
It's more about having a tie breaker between them, and allowing both teams the chance to demonstrate they earned the better spot.
Both teams had black marks on their record. Baylor lost to the fucking mountaineers of all things. TCU lost to baylor. The fact that Baylor beat TCU isn't demonstrative of Baylor being better than TCU, any more than it would be of the Mountaineers being better than Baylor.
Having a championship game lets both teams have one more chance to erase those black marks, and prove they deserve the playoff nod.
>implying Memorial Stadium won't become BSFS East on Saturday
>>63778548
They are when you have a QB like Tommie Farzier who could cut through defenses like a hot knife through butter.
>>63778614
so because minnesota snuck in at 25 for being idle that week ohio state deserved to get in over baylor.
this is fucking stupid.
>>63778716
you mean like the guy that won the heisman in 2001?
speaking of where the fuck are both of them now?
meanwhile 3 or 4 guys from that 2001 miami team are NFL hall of famers, maybe more
So /cfb/
There's 80 bowl slots and I'm seeing 75 teams.
How does make you feel?
>>63778774
Do the teams *have* to have won 6 times? Is that an actual requirement by the NCAA, or is that just what the bowls themselves decide? Sponsors aren't going to want their money going to waste.
The meme round robin doesn't suck because because of no conference games.
The meme round robin sucks because everyone plays everyone in the conference.
If Florida played everyone in the SEC west, everyone's records look a little shittier. This makes you end up with a bunch of 1 and two loss teams on top.
This problem used to happen in the Big 12 south all the time. It was solved by using the highest BCS ranking as a tie breaker after head to head(Which sucked, but it put up your highest ranked team to help them get to the Natty).
Now the entire Big 12 is like the South, but you cant put them against a North team after everyone fucked up eachothers records.
A conference game would help. But the nature of round robins destroy the conference, and the more teams you put into it the harder they destroy themselves.
A ten team round robin sucks ass. most teams don't leave 6,7 and 8 team round robins undefeated. And I doubt anyone will ever go undefeated through the Big12's.
>>63778608
>>63778608
he's also a backup
>>63778594
with your fine big 12 education i'm sure you recognize that 25 is an arbitrary threshold and the difference between the 20th-30th team is pretty small and those ranks get shaken up every single week.
And stop bitching about the difference in schedule quality. Here's ND vs. OU, OSU and Baylor ranked by opponent quality. Obviously the Big 12 champ would have an edge on best win, but none of them played a team ranked close to clemson, either. It's a murkier picture than you're admitting.
>>63778811
It's a "requirement" until less than 80 teams reach 6 wins, then some 5-7 teams start receiving invitations.
>>63778725
It's more complex than that; but you can say that Oklahoma losing Bedlam definitely sealed Baylor's fate. At that point it didn't matter if Minnesota had played or not because Cincinnati would be one of the teams that would slide anove Oklahoma if not for Minnesota anyways.
TCU's fate was sealed by K State losing, and Baylor's was sealed by Oklahoma losing.
Also saying Minnesota was idle is misleading. Minnesota played the same number of games as Oklahoma. Oklahoma just played their final game a week after most everyone else was done for the year.
Had Oklahoma played their whole schedule one week earlier the end result would be the same.
>>63778811
They have a selection order
http://mweb.cbssports.com/general/writer/jerry-palm/19720653/gotta-fill-the-bowls
It's the first time they reached the limit
>>63778829
>none of them played a team ranked close to clemson, either.
just to be clear, we're calling losing to clemson a quality win here, right?
>>63778772
Blood Clot issues kept Frazier from ever being 100 pecent healthy so scouts didnt want to take the risk of drafting him.
>>63778886
no. nor was that ever implied. you want to carry on being a retard, go ahead. It's not going to make your point compelling.
ND showed they can play with the best team in the country, but did not demonstrate they could beat them. The big 12 champ will have demonstrated it could beat a top 10 team, which ND cannot boast. But the big 12 champ also hasn't shown it can play right to the death against an elite team outside of their own conference.
>>63778772
NFL sjccess doesn't matter when talking about college football. No one disputes that Herschel Walker and Archie Griffin are college legends, despite limited NFK success. In the cfb world, Reggie Bush is one of the best to ever play and names like Lawrence Philips and Maurice Clarett actually mean something
>>63778916
all that shit still sounds like we're calling losing to clemson a quality win
>>63778951
only if you're stupid.
>>63778944
>Maurice Clarett
So many weed stickers
>>63778774
There's too many fucking bowls and that's why teams are more likely to schedule FCS teams. It's stupid. They keep adding more and more bowls. 80 bowl slots but only 128 teams of course not all of them are going to have 6 wins.
>>63778965
>it can play right to the death against an elite team outside of their own conference.
>team lost but they're still really good for losing!
and i'm stupid for seeing it that way how?
>>63779006
We are talking about SoS, and you started nitpicking. And your tangent is especially irrelevant if we are talking about a scenario where OU loses bedlam, where people were suggesting that ND's resume can't even compare to Baylor's. That idea is laughable.
Moreover, the CFP looks at everything in context. I think OU's schedule and wins will be enough better than ND's to make ND's much better loss irrelevant, but that's not the case for Baylor, who doesn't have a great schedule and also has a worse loss.
>Quality losses
Is this the meme of the year?
>>63779064
its no different from last year.
>>63778944
>names like Maurice Clarett actually mean something
>>63779072
BITCH DID I SAY IT WAS?!?!
>>63779106
you did not
FUCK THIS WE'RE BRINGING THE BCS BACK.
WITH G5 AND IVY'S.
>>63779044
Do you think ND's resume is better than Florida's?
>>63779169
probably. but UF, ND, Bama, bedlam winner, and Baylor might all be much closer on paper than people want to admit at the end of the year. This year's kind of a shitshow.
>>63779169
Notre Dame's resume is better than Florida's.
>>63779064
notre dame is about to fuck over the big 12 because it has a quality loss.
just get ready for it. if oklahoma loses they will put notre dame in ahead of ok state or baylor for beating fucking stanford and a bunch of high schools.
>>63779206
i should say SEC winner. potentially throw MSU in there too, though I think they have some really good wins, especially if they beat 12-0 Iowa
>>63779169
HARVARD'S RESUME IS BETTER THAN BOTH.
>>63779223
ND slammed the team that's like the 4th best team on Baylor's and OSU's schedules. It's the 7th best team ND will have faced.
>>63779223
I HOPE SO, THEY SUCK BABY BLOO BLOOD DICK, SO SO SO HARD THOUGH.
THEY WOULD LOVE TO FIND A WAY TO JUSTIFYING PUTTING BOTH OU AND ND IN.
>>63779273
>FSU beats UF
>UF beats bama
>ND and OU win
improbable, not even crazy though.
>>63777439
>http://www.collegefootballplayoff.com/selection-committee-protocol
It's literally in the first fucking paragraph of the ink you posted you tremendous faggot.
>The criteria to be provided to the selection committee must be aligned with the ideals of the commissioners, presidents, athletic directors and coaches to honor regular season success while at the same time providing enough flexibility and discretion to select a non-champion or independent under circumstances where that particular non-champion or independent is unequivocally one of the four best teams in the country.
>IS UNEQUIVOCALLY ONE OF THE FOUR BEST TEAMS IN THE NATION
ND is not unequivocally one of the four best, erego, enjoy your Cadillac Cheese bowl you fucking retard
>>63779223
>a bunch of high schools
Can this meme fucking end? Just because a team isn't a P5 team in the top 10 doesn't mean they're a "high school." Year in and year out Notre Dame plays one of the toughest schedules. They only played 3 non-P5 teams and two of those were fucking Navy and Temple which are better wins than most teams have. I hate Notre Dame as much as anyone (more than most actually) but /cfb/ being eternally bootyblasted by them is fucking sad.
>>63779326
>Can this meme fucking end? Just because a team isn't a P5 team in the top 10 doesn't mean they're a "high school."
According to the CFP they are high school. Unless they get a coveted "Quality loss" to Notre Dame.
>>63779320
that's to accommodate a 2nd team from a conference, which is pretty obvious. It makes no mention of independents, as you suggested.
>>63779355
nope nvm. I've gone full retard
>>63779326
Actually, yes it does.
Source: NIU
>>63779355
>to select a non-champion or independent under circumstances
>>63779320
>>63779355
>>63779368
though I would say you were stretching to definitively eliminate ND based on those criteria.
>>63779355
>hile at the same time providing enough flexibility and discretion to select a non-champion or independent under circumstances where that particular non-champion or independent is unequivocally one of the four best teams in the country.
are you even fucking reading the paragraph idiot? the word independent is used directly when referencing a non champion like thee fucking times
>>63779376
i'm hoping you weren't too young to recall the magic of Utah and Hurr state
>>63779391
No, I'd eliminate them on the fact that their schedule is piss and their qb is trash.
The committee will have no choice but to eliminate them as they have not demonstrated to be unequivocally superior to anyone and that is with a win against stanford
>I met a traveller from an antique land
>Who said: "Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
>Stand in the desert. Near them, on the sand,
>Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
>And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
>Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
>Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
>The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed:
>And on the pedestal these words appear:
>'My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
>Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!'
>Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
>Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
>The lone and level sands stretch far away
>>63779392
i'm driving and on my phone, but I already acknowledged my own mistake. dunno why you bothered with this post, if you scroll up.
>>63779407
stop posting
>>63778829
>>63779417
>browsing fucking 4chan while you are driving
>>63779402
Utah was special. They were the first Non-AQ team to EVER win a BCS bowl. Boise State's run was also special. There's no Boise State or Utah in the AAC.
>>63779443
it's all i have left m8. sittin in traffic, no new podcasts.
>>63779417
>i'm driving and on my phone
Have some self control lmfao
>>63779433
Is this the same reddit retard that told me I was wrong and to provide a citation for what I was referring to and then he himself posted that exact citation without even fucking reading it to confirm what I had originally claimed and then, once being shown his error, DID IT AGAIN?
Yeah ND isn't getting in. Good luck in the Stuckys Bowl
>>63779433
>le hang season on win against temple team
>le get into cfp because of record and golden helmet team
fuck notre meme
>>63779481
that citation also explicitly retains flexibility to let an independent in above a p5 conference champ, so I don't know why you think its a trump card. Later in the same passage, it goes on to allow the committee to consider elements that would give ND the nod over OU, though I doubt they'll be used.
And the worst ND winds up in is NY6
>>63779490
you've brought some real insight to the board today, upvoted.
>>63779523
i dont give a shit what bowl notre dame gets as long as its not a playoff game over a big 12 school with one loss.
its hilarious because two weeks ago no one gave a fuck about navy but as soon as temple implodes and everyone realizes notre dame has no justification whatsoever for being ranked as highly as they are this fucking navy meme starts taking off as well as the quality clemson loss meme.
nuke the midwest.
>>63779609
these memes you speak of, are they different from rankings that are universal across AP/Coaches/CFP?
>>63779623
All of those rankings sucks.
Even my fucking rankings are better than those.
>>63779630
fair enough. but this clown is mocking ND's schedule without realizing that its better than Baylor's or OSU's. Look at where Texas falls in their respective hierarchy of opponents.
>>63779417
>shitposting while driving
Jesus fucking christ man
>>63779623
>coaches poll
>ap poll
>notre dame turns the ball over 5 fucking times against a 3-7 team and wins by 3 points
lets quote polls instead of what we actually see on the field guys.
>>63779643
What the fuck does Oregon State have to do with Baylor and Texas?
>>63779650
oh, so your opinion is based on 1 game where ND dominated every metric, committed a ton of terrible turnovers, and still won. Totally sound.
>>63779609
>as long as its not a playoff game over a big 12 school
But Notre Dame deserves it more than any Big 12 school at this point.
Daily reminder that against common opponents with Oklahoma, Notre Dame has a comparative +42 point differential.
>>63779653
puncher's chance to sneak into the cfp desu
>>63779666
>666 confirms
Also my bad, meant to say +42 point differential *per game*
Dear God,
This Saturday is a big day in college football. There are a lot of games to be played. A lot of them are important. But the most important one is Stanford against Notre Dame.
God, you did all of us a huge favor last weekend by allowing the Ohio State meme to end. We are all very thankful, Lord. But we come to you again and ask for your favor once more. Lord, we need You to give Stanford the divine authority to blow the fuck out of Notre Dame and their heretical Catholic asses. God, please, give us this last prayer so these cheese curd eating Rudy fuck boys will kindly fuck off back to 41-14 and remember their place in the world. Lord, we ask this of you so a more deserving team, like Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, or Baylor can get into the playoff and actually give us a good and fair show. Oh God please grant us all this as normal sane people who love to watch faggots get their shit pushed in and hide in shame.
It's what they deserve for christening your mural "Touchdown Jesus". Please Lord let these heretics burn.
Amen.
Who /asspained/ here? Because UF fans are at the top of the list
http://www.inallkindsofweather.com/blog/why-you-should-hate-fsu.html
>>63779804
>cheese curd eating Rudy fuck boys
>>63779913
>5 reasons to hate fsu
>the first four are sjw horse shit
>urban meyer era at florida was full of thugs beating women and getting popped for robbery and drugs
why would florida even try to elevate itself above miami or fsu as far as player conduct
its no secret that the only time any of the florida schools win nattys is when the rosters are full of criminals
>>63779913
UF is gonna get bootyblasted so hard
>>63771990
>>63772043
>>63772186
>>63772670
>>63772896
holy shit, taking no prisoners
>>63769474
>broships edition
good to see our benevolent moderators are letting this place go the way of quality generals like /nba/ and /hoc/
are CFP rankings at 7ET this time or will apehoop delay it until midnight today?
>>63780102
7 senpai
ALRIGHT EVERYONE!!!!!
SHUT THE FUCK UP, IT'S TIME TO BITCH ABOUT RANKINGS!!!!
>>63780106
thanks pham
>>63780107
I can't wait for the asspained Notre Dame bitching from them falling not just to 5th, but to 6th
>>63780122
maybe theyll fucking join a conference
reminder that if ND was in the ACC they wouldnt even be in the championship game
>>63780122
WOULD YOU SAY THAT THEY ARE, GOING TO GET BOOTY BLASTED?
>>63780122
i am also hopeful but don't count on it
their meme is strong
>>63780136
I've always wondered, does booty blasting mean that the booty itself gets blasted or that the booty "blasts" things, as in targets them with explosive diarrhea?
I need clarification on this.
>>63779913
Lol you're so mad.
>>63780157
booty blasted is a later incarnation of butthurt which implies the subject was raped
so to answer your question, it would be the former.
>>63780162
Sneak don't be like this bb
so regardless of the tamu-lsu outcome, les is 100% out?
>>63780157
it means that the booty itself gets blasted, i.e. if team x bootyblasts team y then team y's booty is blasted by team x.
>>63780130
I hear the Big 12 is lookng for openings
>>63780174
yup. retarded. who the fuck are they gonna get that will be better
>this theme music
2spoopy
>>63780181
>CATHOLICS
NO THANKS
>>63780181
Big XII isn't to be honest
and they would go after mormons first if they did
>THE SELECTION COMMITTEE IS /CFB/ IF WE MET UP IN REAL LIFE
>Twitter not working
>ESPN stream not working
Welp, guess I'm gonna find out the rankings by seeing everyone's asspain here
WE BACK NIGGAS
>OHIO SHIT BELOW GAYLOR
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
25. Temple
24. Toledo
23. Utah
22. UCLA
21. Mississippi
20. Wash State
19. TCU
18. Ole Miss
17. Oregon
16. Northwester
15. Navy
14. UNC
13. FSU
12. Florida
11. Okie State
10. Michigan
9. Stanford
8. OSU
7.Baylor
Top 6 coming
>Okalahomo at 3
WHAT
IS
THIS
BLUE
BLOOD
BIAS
HOLY FUCK
Is Clemson a blueblood?
ND BOOYBLASTED
1. Clemson
2. Bama
3. Oklahoma
4. Whyowa
5. Michigan State
6. Notre Dame
7. Baylor
8. aOSU
9. Stanford
10. Michigan
11. OK State
12. Florida
13. FSU
14. UNC
15. Navy
16. Northwestern
17. Oregon
18. Ole Miss
19. TCU
20. Wazzu(!)
21. Miss State
22. UCLA
23. Utah
24. Toledo
25. Temple
25. Temple
24. Toledo
23. Utah
22. UCLA
21. Mississippi
20. Wash State
19. TCU
18. Ole Miss
17. Oregon
16. Northwester
15. Navy
14. UNC
13. FSU
12. Florida
11. Okie State
10. Michigan
9. Stanford
8. OSU
7.Baylor
6. Norte Dame
5. Michigan State
4. Iowa
3. Oklahoma
2. Alabama
1. Clemson
What the fuck is W-L strength and how does Iowa have a top 5 stat in that? They haven't played anyone good.
>B1G CANNIBALIZES ITSELF
>Oklahoma Alabama rematch
I'm OK with this
>iowa
>#4
I'm also OK with this. B1G championship is a must watch game.
NOTRE DAME BTFO
> 3. Oklahoma
what?!
> 6. Notre Dame
all is right in the world
>>63780283
Pretty tame, all things considered. I don't really get FSU above UNC, but that'll fix itself one way or the other this coming week.
NODURR LAME BLOWN THE FUCK OUT
>SIX
LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHAT THE FUCK?
WHY ARE WE AT #6 NOW?
WHAT THE FUCK?????????????????????
>Iowa at 4
Colin Cowherd on suicide watch
Tomorrow's show is gonna be good.
I'm ok with this ranking
personally I feel ND is better than Iowa but they haven't proved it on the field to be honest
that B1G championship game will be interesting
>>63780342
because ND just barely beat a 3-8 team
BOOTY BLASTERS JUST GOT BOOTY BLASTED
Even with Oklahoma at 3, I think I can say this is the best list so far this season
>10. Michigan
>9. Stanford
Honestly what the fuck
Also >iowa
tybi
>all these guys turning on ND
Fucking fags
>>63780357
>ND loses to Clemson
>6
>Oklahoma loses to fucking Texas
>3
Guess its time to join a conference fags
>STEAL FTC'S TOP 4
>FLIP SOME TEAMS AROUND
FUCK OFF SELECTION COMMITTEE
I was pretty close for the most part. Had Iowa over OU and Ohio State over Baylor.
>blow lead to TCU
>playing the best out of anyone
>>63780347
Haven't listened to that idiot since his Sportsnation days. Is he really pro-Iowa or anti-Iowa?
How hard will Iowa get blown out in the B1G championship game?
>1 loss bama #2
>1 loss OSU #8
fuck the SEC bias
>>63780396
*the Nebraska game
Quick /cfb/, lend Nebraska your powers so we can end the Iowa meme on Black Friday!
\o/
>>63780394
He had a rant the other day about how Iowa doesn't deserve anything because they schedule literally whos
>>63780351
This pretty much. The B1G CCG is now pretty much a play-in game and I love it.
ND fan with no problem having OU above us, though I think a 3 spot discrepancy is a bit harsh. The real head scratcher to me is Bama.
>>63780396
>>63780406
I'M GIVING NEBRASKA -3.5
>No.1 Clemson would play No.4 Iowa in the Orange Bowl
>No.2 Alabama would play No.3 Oklahoma in the Cotton Bowl
reminder that clemson and bama can lose this saturday and will both still make the playoffs if they win their conference
Notre Dame got booty blasted
>>63780394
Hes been shitting on Iowa since the first rankings came out.
>>63780399
Ohio State has zero quality wins
z-e-r-0
e
r
0
>>63780399
>team playing like shit most of the season
>lose one game at home and have a complete meltdown from their spoiled as fuck players
They deserve to be even lower.
>>63780399
>ONLY CONF. WITH TWO TOP 6 TEAMS
>MUH BIAS
>>63780333
It hypes up the the UF-FSU game more, and if UF wins, makes the SECCG a heavyweight battle.
Fuck big ten west haters.
Big ten west is beating the big ten east this year btw.
Why has no one asked why osu and msu schedule is weak for not playing iowa, nw, and wisconsin?
Because you dumb fucks watch too much espn.
On Iowa, fuck the police, burn the whole motherfucking system down. These wins are for you mid major snubs! Iowa natty lite champs.
Bitch I am OUT.
wait how the fuck is a 3 loss team with an FCS loss ranked above Houston and Toledo?
I Houston or Toledo had so much as almost lost to Portland State they wouldn't even be ranked at all.
fucking P5 circlejerk bullshit
>>63780483
Root for Iowa, burn this mutherfucker down.
>>63780369
>yfw when clemson gets 41-14'd in the first round of the cfp
ND hasn't beaten any good teams
>>63780369
>muh quality losses
BOOTY
BLASTED
>>63780483
reminder washington state and it's flags are cancer
>>63780478
Question, if Nebraska beats Iowa this Firday and Michigan State wins, would they be the de facto B1G Champ since they would have beaten both division winners? :^)
>No great teams in cfb this year
>lose NFL caliber DT, staring qb, starting rb, starting TE, NFL caliber CB, starting safety, starting RT
>still 1 loss top 6
what could have been
>>63780495
>clemson in top ten statisically in nearly every catagory.
Clemson meme team suxors!
>>63780478
lol get a load of this kek
stanford just got boned. they're going to stomp the shit out of ND but ND is no longer top 4.
>>63780510
No sense you make.
Also MSU is Iowas bitch.
>>63780510
they would be the 2014 KC Chiefs of the big ten west
>>63780377
Baker Mayfield means more to OU then any other player in the country does to their team. Him going out completely destroyed their offense.
With him OU is easily a top 3 team.
>>63780495
>discrediting a conference with a better OOC win than the big 12
god i wish jeff long would fucking die i hate the way he talks, how he looks and each week he tries to sell us on different bullshit nothing is consistent in this committee
>>63780538
>Baker Mayfield means more to OU then any other player in the country does to their team. Him going out completely destroyed their offense.
had less to do with how good Baker Mayfield is and more to do with how incredibly bad Trevor Knight can be.
>>63780510
NO BECAUSE THE B1G CANT MEASURE HOW TEAMS PLAY AGAINST GOOD TEAMS WORTH A SHIT.
BUT THEY WOULD MOVE UP TO 4 IN MY RANKINGS.
>>63780519
You lost to Clemson, remember? I know it must be confusing since you've probably gotten used to being credited for it for some reason.
>>63780533
good the pac 12 is bad and deserves nothing
>>63780557
It's a combination of both, doesn't make what I said any less true.
Lads, what are some teams that Notre Dame would booty-blast?
>>63780570
Lots of parity in the Pac-12...plenty of good teams, but no elite ones. That's a recipe for getting left out of the playoff.
>>63780562
>that must've been an ND fan not a clemson one
you're insanity is in full overdrive.
>>63780562
Wtf are you on about? Clemson is clearly the best team in the nation.
>>63780577
hi /wooo/
>>63780577
Rutgers?
>Official outsider playoff scenarios
>14. UNC
Trash little brother by 40, do the same to Clemson, and hope Alabama and Notre Dame shit the bed.
>13. FSU
No chance. They aren't playing in a CCG.
>12. Florida
Everyone ahead of them but Alabama shits the bed and they blow out the Tide by 20+
>11. Okie State
See above, but they booty blast Oklahoma and hope that's enough
>10. Michigan
Michigan State chokes, then they trash tOSU and an undefeated Iowa. Probably need Notre Dame and Baylor to slip up
>9. Stanford
Booty blast the booty blasters, then hope the South winner is ranked and do the same. Likely need the B1G to cannabalise itself
>8. Ohio State
Pretty much Michigan's road, though they won't need as much chaos to get in.
>7. Baylor
Utterly trash TCU and Texas, then hope for Oklahoma and Okie Lite to both look like shit in an Okie State win. Clemson/Alabama slipups would help
>6. Norte Dame
Booty blast Stanford, and bribe the pope to bless them with B1G shenanigans.
>5. Michigan State
Win out. Simple as that, really.
>>63780592
Why else would they respond to that post saying that when Clemson wasn't even mentioned in it?
>>63780626
which post do you not think clemson was mentioned in?
Reminder Toledo is probably not even playing in the MAC championship game
just not entirely sure how anyone can justify iowa over Mich State where the latter has three top 25 wins and a last second loss compared to one quality win for the hawkeyes. if going undefeated against shit-tier opponents means so much then why wasn't houston in the top ten when they were kicking ass?
Who is worst FBS logo and why is it New Mexico State?
>Cowboy and worm hybrid
>>63780323
Compared to my rankings...
1 Clemson
2 Alabama
3 Iowa
4 Oklahoma
5 Michigan State
6 Notre Dame
7 Ohio State
8 Baylor
9 Stanford
10 Michigan
11 Oklahoma State
12 Florida
13 Florida State
14 Navy
15 North Carolina
16 Northwestern
17 Ole Miss
18 Oregon
19 TCU
20 Utah
21 LSU
22 Mississippi State
23 Washington State
24 UCLA
25 Houston
I swapped Iowa and OU, Baylor and Ohio St, Navy and UNC, Oregon and Ole Miss, Utah and Wazzu, and then LSU and Houston instead of Toledo and Temple. Other than that I was pretty close!
>>63780697
literally who fucking cares since they have to play each other anyway to get in
>>63780656
This guy
>>63780495
says ND hasn't beaten any good teams.
This guy
>>63780519
responds by saying Clemson is top ten statistically in nearly every category, implying that Clemson was a quality win even though ND never beat them.
>>63780708
looks like he was just saying clemson is a good team and not a ND fan trying to justify that
>Clempshit
>No. 1 still
WHAT THE FUCK?
THIS MEME SHOULD HAVE BEEN FUCKING DEAD ALREADY
>>63780708
clemson was mentioned in that post, insinuating that Clemson's reputation was inflated due to ND's own inflated reputation. Also, nobody implied that clemson was a quality win. Only through your insane lens should that exchange have been interpreted that way.
You're an idiot, senpai
>>63780730
yfw when they lose this weekend but still get in after beating UNC for the ACC championship
>>63780717
Why? Nobody claimed that Clemson wasn't a good team so the sarcastic response was completely unnecessary.
>>63780738
dunno senpai, im too busy watching wake get booty blasted to care
>>63780738
>nobody claimed that clemson wasn't a good team
>>63780495
">yfw when clemson gets 41-14'd in the first round of the cfp"
you are straining pretty hard m7
>>63780732
>clemson was mentioned in that post, insinuating that Clemson's reputation was inflated due to ND's own inflated reputation
What the fuck are you talking about? The only reason Clemson was mentioned at all is because the original ND poster was claiming that their loss was better than OU's loss and thus should be ranked higher.
>/cfb/: semantics
>>63780753
I just realized I never actually read the green text which is why I've been so confused, my bad senpai.
>>63780764
NO WE'RE ANTI SEMANTIC
>>63780759
someone tried to disparage clemson, saying they will get btfo in the cfp. Someone else pointed out they are undeniably good.
For some reason, you assumed this meant someone was trying to claim a loss was a win, a flawed interpretation you've strained to make throughout this thread.
>>63780732
I was the
>ND hasn't beaten anyone
when some replied
"clemson meme team...."
it sure seems like they think ND won the game or something.
I think Clemson is deserving of a playoff spot, even though I think they're untested. ND is undeserving because the lost to the only decent team they played, but their fans treat it like a win. ND hasn't beaten anyone good, or anyone near good for that matter.
>Iowa ranked higher than any B1G East
CFP committee has been drinking the kool-aid
>>63780791
only undefeated B1G team
If Michigan, OSU, or MSU were undefeated, they'd be ranked higher than an undefeated Iowa team.
>>63780784
MY BAD, I THOUGH WE WERE TALKING ABOUT JEWS.
I'M ANTI SEMETIC
where all the notre dame fuccbois at
real talk: in the old system would clemson play alabama or iowa if the season ended today?
>>63780788
>b-but muh navy
>b-but muh temple
oh my god thank you CFP for refusing to be meme'd on
join a fucking conference or stop scheduling fucking navy and temple and all the shitty teams in an already shitty conference (ACC)
>>63780811
ALABAMA VS FLORIDA
>>63780811
Iowa always loses
I seem to remember a few time when Iowa was a threat to go to the BCS game and then they shit the bed
>>63780811
Iowa.
The BCS system greatly favored undefeated P5 teams regardless of SOS. It would be Alabama after Iowa lost in the CCG tho.
>>63780788
>it sure seems like they think ND won the game or something
yes, that's more likely than a clemson fan or anyone who isn't a retard pointing out something obvious.
LETS JUST TAKE A MOMENT AND ENJOY THE FACT THAT THE EYE TEST IS ACTUALLY FUCKING WORKING THIS WEEK.
ALSO CASUALS SEEM REALLY BOOTED BLASTED ABOUT A #3 OU. EVEN THOUGH THEY CANT FIND TEAMS BELOW OU THAT COULD BEAT THEM.
>>63780867
Texas isn't even ranked and can beat OU.
>>63780873
yeah but they didnt lose in november
>>63780839
If Stanzi doesn't get hurt that 2009 team goes undefeated. Nobody will ever convince me otherwise.
>>63780873
If they played again OU would win 63-7
>>63780873
BUT WHO ELSE BELOW THEM CAN BEAT THEM?
>>63780867
Why the fuck does anyone give Clempshit a top 50 ranking is beyond me
>>63780839
last time was back in the early 2000s when brad banks and that one RB was there, the RB was actually pretty good i though
shonn greene, just looked it up, he was after banks. i remember that one year with banks though. was a lot of fun.
>>63780893
this meme is getting stale
>>63780883
*undefeated in the regular season*
is what I mean
>>63780885
while that hypothetical is helpful, I'm talking about something that actually happened. Meanwhile, OU beat TCU's 3rd string qb by 1 point, really instilling their clear dominance.
>>63780900
Absolutely
One week would have been fine for the keks, but then they should have given Clempshit their real ranking
It's getting old
>>63780697
>emphasizing last second loss
>literally their two biggest wins were last second wins
>>63780897
Hell yeah it was
>yfw iowa would go to the rose bowl, but makes the playoff
>yfw michigan state goes to the rose bowl
>yfw ohio state goes to the gaylord hotels emerald pine nut concrete block bowl sponsored by godaddy dot com
>>63780827
Why do people always bitch about ND's worst programs scheduled? The worst 3 teams on their schedule are generally among the best worst 3 in the nation. They never play FCS, and Navy is an above average P5 program. They play USC and Stanford every year, had previously played Michigan and MSU every year, and have played the best ACC team basically every year since.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
GET FUCKED NOTRE DAME
>>63780732
I was that person and you are a fucking retard for missing the /s....
>>63781011
wut
Still a respectable season considering all of our injuries. 10-1 going into Palo Alto, I'll take that any day.
ND is dare I say it, r-relevant again?
>>63780993
12-0 in 2012 against a "good schedule"
college football allowed itself to get meme'd on
never again
>>63781050
they beat the pac 12 champ and won on the road against the big 12 co-champ. The best big 10 team was ineligible and played an inferior schedule.
>>63780839
Iowa went to two bcs games, they won the second in 2009, and if there had been a playoff would have beat some ass.
is clemson the warriors/patriots of college football?
>>63780697
careful anon, if you start shitting on your own conference you'll begin to see the truth about the little 10
New thread when
>>63781065
Oh sorry I meant BCS TITLE game
I forgot that there are programs out there who consider going to a loser bowl to be an achievement
Iowa sucks m8
>>63781083
make one
>>63780416
\o/
>>63780533
>boned
>ranked one spot ahead of a team that has the same record and shit stomped one of the teams Stanford lost to
Stanford is ranked too high.
New thread
>>63781120
>>63781120
>>63781120
New thread
>>63781120
>>63781120
>>63781120
>>63781068
Because the east schools are always full of themselves.
Whenever wisky, Iowa, or NW beats their asses they go into douchebag mode.
>>63781126
this desu senpai. daily reminder that against common, ranked opponents Michigan averages 48 points more per game than Stanford. Not to mention we are objectively much, much better than Stanford in the >"quality losses" department
>>63780510
they would be champs in my eyes