>>540695
le downvote army

>>540695
Tons of butthurt from people like you who keep creating threads to whine about it. I say that's good enough reason to keep it invisible.

Stupid bitch-shits stopped whining about saging when it is done the right way.

>>540709
It comes up more than weekly. He literally created a thread about it under half an hour ago. >>540695

My response is the same as it was then. >>540704

>>540695
It appeased the hoard of savage Mongols who had no fucking idea what the function was and instead listened to m00t on the topic, who was a fucking idiot and didn't himself demonstrate a proper understanding of this function.

Stopped people from using it as a downvote.

That's about it really. I wish they brought it back.

"Sage is not a down vote" babies stopped crying.

>>540716
Who are you responding to?

>>540720
>Stopped people from using it as a downvote.
Really didn't, hey.

>>540722
The problem is that very few people appear to understand the concept and it's functionality. Here is an example of one of the few anons who have demonstrated an actual understanding of it.
https://desustorage.org/qa/thread/515992/#516073

>>540723
Are you retarded? The quote function exists so that you don't have to ask this question, yet here you are.

>>540741

Was that a response to me?

Bring back sage
Remove (you)
etc

>>540695
Discouraging a redditesque culture of sage'ing threads you don't like

>>540704
>Tons of butthurt from people like you who keep creating threads to whine about it.
How is that a benefit?

Surely this isn't sarcasm, because then that would actually reveal that it is in fact you who is butthurt

All sage haters are.

>>540798
You just don't really know what sage is.

>>540827
>You just don't really know what sage is.
Not him but that is how most people used it outside of /jp/. Just like how people use the quotes for greentext stories and >implying.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯