Do you want a /leftypol/?
I sure do!!
Leftist threads are growing in power on every board and yet /underageb&/ mods are deleting these completely on topic threads! For instance, look at the communism general on r9k that was just deleted. It was full of a lot of serious discussion and was doing very well, not violating any of the boards rules.
It's clear that a /leftypol/ is needed.
>>507877
There is no reason why you can't post leftist threads on /pol/. If you want leftypol then go to 8gag.
>>507877
/pol/ is already a board for politics.
>>507880
>>507882
>get constantly barraged with 'muh trump' 'muh ametica' 'muh race war' memes
No thanks. /leftypol/ is for serious academic discussion of left-wing politics. We would have no home among the alt right.
VIVA LA ЯEVOLUCION
>>507885
You don't get it. /pol/ isn't partisan like you think it is, only politically incorrect. You are supposed to have to defend your ideals. If you are looking for circlejerks then look elsewhere. You're going to have to come up with a better reason besides "I don't like the memes on /pol/" if you want to be taken seriously.
>>507885
/pol/ is home to many people on the right but you leftists could go there more often, it might make more interesting discussion and less circle jerky. You want a board for circle jerking of leftists just go to reddit.
Without /leftypol/, 4chan has no place for dear sempai Stirner-san! You are oppressing the proletariat with your ideological spooks!
I think this resource had enough with politics.
/pol/ is already too much to handle and its getting out of hand. Making containment board for leftists will only make situation worse, and /pol/ will lose last sane minds that will quickly escape from shitposting there.
/pol/ was always about politics, not natsoc, its just most leftists went into becoming retarded feminists and cuckolds, so you got no place there. Try to explain your views better and maybe you can take over /pol/ from racist Hitler sympathizers.
Stop pretending like there aren't leftists on /pol/ already
>>>/pol/72055261
>>507893
>>507887
It's impossible to have any serious discussion on /pol/ because the retards on that board just shitpost everything they disagree with to death. Even if you try and engage in debate, it will always devolve into "hurr hurr fuck off lefties". A /leftypol/ is needed.
>>507887
>>507889
What's to keep /pol/ mods from claiming we're just posting bait threads or banning us for not being right-wing? Everyone knows /pol/ is Stormfront central. It's like girls entering a boys only treehouse, or even better, Israelis and Palestinians living together. Nobody is happy with such a situation.
If /pol/ mods are censoring us then it is obvious we need ./leftypol/. there is really not much else that needs to be said.
>>507897
If you was on a political debate in real life, you would escape into your precious safe space, where no arguments of the opposing side would get to you? By running away you are showing everyone that you fear your views being criticized.
/pol/ isn't tumblr.
>>507902
>/pol isn't tumblr
>tumblr spams all opposition with reports to the moderators and cries of MY SOGGY KNEE
>/pol/ spams all opposition with reports to the moderators and cries of MUH JUICE
hmmmmmmmmmmm
>>507902
Shitposting is not criticism of any kind. And quite apart from that, I imagine a /leftypol/ would be open to people from opposing views, because we don't get triggered by people actually have differing opinions unlike the fags on /pol/
>>507897
see >>507895
>>507898
>What's to keep /pol/ mods from claiming we're just posting bait threads or banning us for not being right-wing?
Because being right wing is not required for posting and is irrelevant to the point of the board.
>Everyone knows /pol/ is Stormfront central.
Get with the times, Grandpa, it hasn't been Stormfront Central in over 2 years now. If anything it's alt-right central with a sprinkling of tinfoilfags from infowars, but that doesn't mean there aren't communists, socialists, democrats, progressives, proud liberals, "leftist" agitators, etc..
>>507902
Not running away, merely not living in the same house as your opponent. IRL I do live with my right-wing parents (because they're disabled and require looking after) and they love to get into a screaming fit whenever I disagree with them politically. I'd rather not deal with such hassle online.
Now I'm sure /pol/ will raid us and we'll converse then, but nothing ever gets done when one side wants a conversation and the other side wants to shut down the conversation.
>>507911
>I'd rather not deal with such hassle online
Then go back to /r/politics.
>>507909
>implying these threads are not in response to the lefty thread that was just deleted on /r9k/
>>507916
Why would you make a politics thread on /r9k/?
>>507921
I didn't make it personally, but it's not against the rules of /r9k/ or anything and the comrades there are very willing to talk about leftism.
ITTY BITTY BABY
ITTY BITTY BOAT
>>507923
I don't believe it.
>>507912
>Go to reddit
>which is owned by Porky
No thanks
Current leftist threads on /pol/:
>>>/pol/72066959
>>>/pol/72063568
>>>/pol/72064439
>>>/pol/72067284
>>>/pol/72065300
>>>/pol/72055261
and also the one the OP of his thread made whining about how his /r9k/ thread got deleted.
>>>/pol/72065009
tl;dr there is no reason for a leftypol on 4chan.
>>507941
> >>>/pol/72064439
>MSNBC
>leftist
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>507946
read the thread jackass, it's a Bernie and Hillary town hall.
>>507941
>Hitlery
>Identity politics
>SJWism
>leftist
Leftism isn't the same as liberalism. A common mistake among the uninformed.
>>507948
This is America bub, not Australia. If you are a leftist you are a liberal whether you like it or not.
/pol/ isn't for politics. It's for Current Affairs.
>>507952
Nobody uses that.
>>507947
>american presidential candidates
>"""leftist"""
i'm not gonna go "HAHAHA..." again but there are parts of the world that would like to discuss actual leftist politics without having america and its ronald mcdonald-tier excuses for candidates shitting it up, please and thank you
>>507954
Well then why don't you start a thread about it on /pol/ then. Whether you started it here or Twitter or Kik or Omegle there will always be Trump supporters.
It seems as though the people complaining ITT are either too much of a pussy to post on /pol/ or too intent on circlejerking in some sterile leftist hugbox to get that pol is for politics in general and there is no reason for another politics board, especially after making /news/.
>>507950
>this is America
For you.
>leftypol
So... left-leaning politically incorrect?
Politically Correct? A /pc/ board?
>>507955
>too much of a pussy to post on /pol/
>intent on circlejerking in some sterile leftist hugbox
let's assume this is true, and let's assume that /pol/ isn't a sterile meme-alt-right wankbox.
why does this mean we shouldn't make /leftypol/? wouldn't you HEAVY METAL ALPHA MALES enjoy invading us and bullying us pussies? you invade everything else. seems like we'd be a sweet target!
I support this
>>507955
I post on /pol/ all the time. They're just too unintelligent to say anything but "Back in the oven, schlomo" or "I wonder who could be behind this post"
They have created a hugbox and echochamber in which everything that isn't supported by the likes of Trump or Glenn Beck is 'durr juden!' They cower in fear of an enemy they see behind everything - we would be nothing but rabbis and happy merchants in their eyes.
It's not a matter of cowardice, it's a matter of academia. You can't study political science when a mob of angry protestors are spamming your threads because they fear a boogeyman, and no matter what you have to say, unless it echoes their sentiments sufficiently (which is impossible due to being on opposite sides of the political spectrum) they will see you as such.
>>507975
the left isn't pc and hasn't been for decades
>>507975
>leftism
>regressive liberalism
Pick one, tovarisch.
>>507975
>implying the political establishment views workers standing up for themselves as correct
HA
First it was the ponies
Then it was the furries
Then it was the weebs
If we do not get /leftypol/ we will spam all of 4chan with Dear Leader until we get /leftypol/.
You have 2 hours.
>>507991
>If we do not
>until we get /leftypol/
Who is "we"?
>>507996
me
>>507996
The proletariat, of course!
/leftypol/ is a long ass name, you guys should think of something shorter.
>>508005
/lp/
leftist politics
>>508005
/lib/
it'll sit right next to /lit/, appropriately enough
>>508005
Hm. /lol/?
>>508005
/stal/
/tank/
/len/
/lpol/
/spook/
/prol/
/red/
?
>>508010
the first three are shit
kill yourself tankie
>>508012
I'm not a tankie, I just like goose stepping military parades ;_;
Just like not all of /pol/ is neo-nazi, but everyone still loves Hitler.
>>508017
tee hee i'm lol'ing bc0z ur so funneh! xD
Threadly reminder that if OP wasn't a faggot who posted a politics thread on /r9k/ then he wouldn't be here whining in the first place. The thread on /r9k/ got deleted by the mods, then he posted a thread whining about how it got deleted on both /pol/ and /qa/.
>>508020
>posted a politics thread on /r9k/
what was his tripcode?
>>508020
OP is always a faggot, this is a law of the universe.
But this time, OP is kind of a cool faggot because he's inspiring revolution!
Kind of like how Castro didn't make the big leagues, or Hitler didn't impress the art critics. Disgruntlement can lead to big changes!
FOR THE PEOPLE!
>>508024
Ask the op of this thread:
>>>/pol/72065009
/leftypol/ is needed
>>508030
No it isn't. By who?
>>508035
>by who?
the workers of the world.
>>508035
the working class
>>508035
Everyone, really.
>>508035
>By who?
The autistic OP who keeps spamming it because he's too much of a pussy to go to /pol/ too talk about his politics.
We already have a politics board. Get over your partisanship and post there already.
>>508057
/pol/ is not a board where much meaningful discussion happens. It is not a board where people with significantly different political views tend towards discourse rather than tantrums and shitflinging.
/leftypol/ ends up being the thinking man's politics board, regardless of whether he leans right or left.
>>508057
>posting McCain
>on a thread dedicated to communism
Ebin
>>507877
no one of the majority wants a /leftpol/ for valid reasons comrad
>>508065
This is truth. Academic study of politics is the end goal, something difficult to achieve over the cries of 'muh racemixing' 'muh sjws' 'muh jews'
>>508074
This 100%.
Maybe there should just be an /ip/ - intellectual political discussion
where only verbose posters are allowed.
>>508065
>/pol/ is not a board where much meaningful discussion happens
This is your subjective opinion though. You can post anything politics related there. You can discuss what you want, you're the one asking for a circle jerk with a politics board specifically for the left.
>>508070
There's tons of reasons for a /leftypol/, tovarisch!
>>507885
>/leftypol/ is for serious academic discussion of left-wing politics.
Is this why 8gag leftypol is a bunch of tankies (even with the anarchists on the board often taking tankie positions) circlejerking over much they hate liberals and SJWs and how Gamergate did nothing wrong?
>>507897
>It's impossible to have any serious discussion on /pol/
>there are people
>on 4chan
>right at this very fucking moment
>who come here for serious discussion and on politics of all fucking things
Seriously, just kill yourself. 4chan is a alternate fun discussion site. If you go to a board to be serious instead of having fun and discussion, you should kill yourself.
Don't reply to this post with
>4chan is for shitposting!!1!111!11 :P
tier shit as well. We all know that isn't what I meant as shit isn't as extreme black and white as you want it to be. Have you ever considered the notion of shitposting AND discussion existing at the same time? I know! It's amazing! But it is possible, but I guess you are too stupid to even manage that. As expected of someone who takes modern politics so seriously that he comes to 4chan of all places and expects high quality super serious discussion on it and whats a hug box board just to do that so he can validate his own opinions.
There is no point to a politics board in the first place if it doesn't hold every political side in it. Even if one side dominates most of the board
>>508005
/hug/box
>>508098
>leftypol
>Gaymergoobers
Yeah no. I dislike GG. They went into identity politics instead of fighting corporate corruption.
>>508081
oh but that gif sure is convincing
>>508119
>4chan is a alternate fun discussion site. If you go to a board to be serious instead of having fun and discussion, you should kill yourself.
Tell that to /pol/. Also
>People have to use 4chan how I want them to use it.
>Have you ever considered the notion of shitposting AND discussion existing at the same time? I know! It's amazing!
Except it's not possible, when there is a 20-30 shitposts and image dumps to actual discussion ratio.
I don't think you have a clue what happens to Leftist threads on /pol/.
>There is no point to a politics board in the first place if it doesn't hold every political side in it. Even if one side dominates most of the board
Again, tell that to /pol/.
And there is points, because even within political ideologies, there are numerous facets. You can have people discussing action, others discussing economics, others discussing theory and philosophy.
Within the left there are numerous sects like Luxembourgists, Anarchists of different stripes, Feminists, Council Communists, Post-Marxists, Leninists, Maoists etc.
Why in fuck should the alt-right/stormfront get their own fucking board because they shitpost /int/ to oblivion, while the left gets shitposted off /int/, /his/ and wherever by /pol/faggots who get triggered theres people who hold different views to them on this website?
Funny that people who shitpost everywhere get their own boards (Wrestling faggots, Bronies, Stormfront etc) while people who actually engage in discussion yet get shitposted against get nothing.
>>507887
are you saying that the defining factor of /pol/ posts isn't being right wing? well i'll be!
>>508144
>Gamergate went into identity politics
How?
>>508144
>Gamergate
>Literally ever giving a single fuck about corporate corruption
>>508153
>>>/rules/pol/
I don't see anything about you having to be right wing to post. In fact the language seems all-inclusive to me.
>>508152
>Why in fuck should the alt-right/stormfront get their own fucking board because they shitpost /int/ to oblivion, while the left gets shitposted off /int/, /his/ and wherever by /pol/faggots who get triggered theres people who hold different views to them on this website?
I hope the irony here isn't lost on you.
>>508155
That's literally what the whole thing was about. It was a "consumer revolt" against the corruption in gaming media.
>>508080
>You can post anything politics related there
You can! then it gets dogpiled/shitposted to oblivion if it doesn't agree with the groupthink.
>You can discuss what you want
Sure, but this is like saying you can discuss whatever you want in a deafeningly loud and noisy bar full of drunken fratboys. You and your philosophical counterpoint can try to have a meaningful discussion, but you're so badly drowned out that it doesn't really happen.
>you're the one asking for a circle jerk with a politics board specifically for the left.
/pol/ is already primarily a circlejerk echo chamber for the alt-right and natsocs. The goal of a /leftypol/ isn't an echo-chamber for the other tune (that's tumblr's job), the goal is for a place where people can actually talk to each other without eighty percent of the board getting triggered by people having different ideas and outlooks.
>>508152
>Feminists
HOLD UP.
AYYY...
For SJWs who be thinkin we soft
WE DON'T
PLAYYYY
Identity politics is sumthin we scoff
HOLD UP
HEYYYY
We're more about proletariat
TAKE A
SEAAAT
Take a tip from Stirner my son
HEYYEYAYAEEAY
IdPol's really spooky
>>508152
>why do people have fun on our super serious garbage on a website were fun was its key word since its very creation
Because you are stupood.
>Why in fuck should the alt-right/stormfront get their own fucking board because they shitpost /int/ to oblivion, while the left gets shitposted off /int/, /his/ and wherever by /pol/faggots who get triggered theres people who hold different views to them on this website?
Fucking hell, this is funny.
The board is called POLITICALLY INCORRECT. How the fuck do people make the mistake that the board is fucking serious in any way, shape, or form? No one gives two shits about what your fucking political opinion is you uptight cunt.
>>508164
>Gamergate
>Corruption in gaming journalism
Which is why they only attacked people who did critical and social analysis of video games. Which is why they teamed up with one of the most outright corrupt media organizations in the west, Briebart, why they teamed up with the Republican front group The American Enterprise Institute, why they ignore almost every actual scandal in the industry, why they attack people like Noah Cadwell, MrBTongue etc, why they actively side with cancerous devs like Mark Kern who are known for abuse of staff and fraud, why their figureheads all happen to be alt-right figureheads as well, why all their conspiracy theories have been proven false, why most threads on KiA are about "THE FEMINAZIS"
Gamergate was just an alt-right movement trying to chase any social criticism of gaming out.
>>508169
Says /leftypol/ who have literally no fucking clue what they are talking about . Feminists have been part of Socialism before even Marx, Engels himself wrote groundbreaking feminist works.
Because /leftypol/ is a bunch of GG retards that get triggered by Feminists and then, incorrectly use base-superstructure to try sideline social issues, doesn't mean that Feminism has not historically be a core position of the left.
>>508177
>make the mistake that the board is fucking serious in any way, shape, or form?
Are you fucking serious?
The fact that /pol/ has been involved in hate crimes and attacks in the real world, the fact that /pol/ was involved in the killing of two people by DDOS'ing the police during a crisis situation, the fact that /pol/ actively works with the Trump campaign and is even being named on FOX news as one of the major right wing communities online?
>>508184
>The fact that /pol/ has been involved in hate crimes and attacks in the real world, the fact that /pol/ was involved in the killing of two people by DDOS'ing the police during a crisis situation, the fact that /pol/ actively works with the Trump campaign and is even being named on FOX news as one of the major right wing communities online?
What the hell are you talking about, Cletus?
>>507887
>You don't get it. /pol/ isn't partisan
Stopped reading there.
>>508190
Exactly what I have fucking said.
All of those have happened. If you think /pol/ doesn't take itself seriously, you're full of shit.
>>508182
We're not against feminism as long as it promotes equality and isn't set up to create a new ruling class, but we don't get into identity politics either. Bigger fish to fry.
>>508167
Everytime I try to reply to you it thinks I'm spam what the fuck
>>508184
Are you fucking serious?
/b/ used to cause people to kill themselves and it was all in jist. Are you new here? Just because idiots like you take the place seriously, it doesn't change the fact its all a giant gag for fun.
>he fact that /pol/ actively works with the Trump campaign
Man you ARE retarded. You do this is no different to every other time, right? It's because its FUCKING FUNNY. Just because people take it seriously, it doesn't change the original reasons and intent. Fuck, I'm apolitical as fuck and EVEN I shitpost about trump winning simply because its fucking funny and pisses people like you
>FOX news
Fucking lol.
Seriously, you are just cancer. Have you ever wondered why /pol/ is a right board? Have you ever read the boards FUCKING NAME? People like you are the reason the board is so fucking bad. Because you are such an uptight cunt that you take it all seriously and ruin all the fun. It doesn't matter if people take the board seriously, you aren't to be and /pol/ was never a place you to to seriously discuss politics. Politic boards are like one of the most anti-4chan thing there is, simply because of stupid people like you who actually take them seriously.
>>508198
leftpol is outright against feminism, there are numerous threads every day strawmanning feminist theory while circlejerking over "Feminists getting BTFOed". Pretty much everyone who has ever used that "Anarcho-Feminist" star on the board has been banned. I've seen entire threads where people actually believe society is in reality misandrist and take outright MRA positions and defend the MRA/Redpill movement.
Leftypol is absolutely ridiculous when it comes to social issues and the humanities in general. FFS they want to fucking "convert" Sargon of Akkad to their side.
>>508196
I think you're blaming /pol/ for shit /r9k/ and /k/ did.
>>508167
Dogpiled? Maybe your point is shit, maybe it's not, but you can keep discussing it. What's wrong with many replies? Also you seem to think of contrary points of views as shitposting. It's not.
>Sure, but this is like saying you can discuss whatever you want in a deafeningly loud and noisy bar full of drunken fratboys.
You're over exaggerating and using the fact that your points don't hold under scrutiny to get your own leftist circlejerk. pol isn't one person either, you can post there and they will actually discuss why they agree or disagree with you. The majority would probably welcome more leftists to argue with.
>pol is already primarily a circlejerk echo chamber for the alt-right and natsocs.
No it isn't stop using that as a cop out for not participating. It's your fear of your ideas being shit.
>The goal of a lefty pol isn't an echo-chamber for the other tune (that's umblr's job), the goal is for a place where people can actually talk to each other without eighty percent of the board getting triggered by people having different ideas and outlooks.
What the fuck does that even mean? If you have a politics board for one specific spectrum (no matter how wide) of politics then you are engaging in a circlejerk. You're aware the lefty pol at eayyghtchan gets more right wingers arguing with leftists than /pol/ gets left wingers because more leftists want to stay in their hugboxes whether it be on leftypol or where contrary viewpoints are downvoated and banned.
>>508195
Get some reading comprehension and look at the rules of /pol/ and tell me where it says partisanship is required.
protip: it doesn't say that
>>508202
>Man you ARE retarded. You do this is no different to every other time, right? It's because its FUCKING FUNNY. Just because people take it seriously, it doesn't change the original reasons and intent. Fuck, I'm apolitical as fuck and EVEN I shitpost about trump winning simply because its fucking funny and pisses people like you
"LOL ITS NOT SERIOUS, WE ARE JUST WORKING WITH THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN BECAUSE ITS FUNNY THAT WE'LL HAVE A FASCIST RIGHT WING REACTIONARY PRESIDENT FOR 4 YEARS WHO COULD COMPLETELY FUCK THE ECONOMY, DRIVE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE INTO POVERTY, START WARS, KILL THOUSANDS IF NOT MILLIONS OF PEOPLE OLOLOLOLOLOL"
Fuck off, you're retarded. This is the most pathetic defense I've seen for /pol/faggots working with real world politican campaigns and media organizations.
>>508202
>The pool has aids
>"Lol people are stupid they actually believe people think this!"
Totally the same as
>"Vote trump"
>"Here's charts with cherrypicked information from stormfront as to why we should subjugate black people and kill the Jews"
>"Lets do phone banking for Trump"
>"We are on Fox news guys, keep up the good work"
God newpolfags.
Absurdism, what is it.
>>508206
Hey
Hey anon
Anon guess what
Guess what anon
Anon
Anon Guess
.
.
.
>/leftypol/ is one person
>>508214
Welcome to 4chan, cumstain. I hope you don't enjoy your stay.
Did you miss the part were anons used to cause others to kill themselves? Why would anyone here care that their actions here might cause the entire world to fuck itself? Pull that stick out of your arse or maybe it is just a dick up there.
>>508223
Fucking EDGY.
Slit your wrists faggot.
>>508182
>Which is why they only attacked people who did critical and social analysis of video games.
They've attacked far more people than Anita or Macintosh, come on.
>Which is why they teamed up with one of the most outright corrupt media organizations in the west, Briebart,
Proof that Breitbart is corrupt?
>why they ignore almost every actual scandal in the industry
Like?
>why they attack people like Noah Cadwell, MrBTongue etc
Literally who?
>why they actively side with cancerous devs like Mark Kern who are known for abuse of staff and fraud
I don't know who this guy is but you do realize gamergate is a consumer revolt. They are fucking with people who mess with video games and the media that reports on them. Why would they give a shit about some employees plight?
>why their figureheads all happen to be alt-right figureheads as well, why all their conspiracy theories have been proven false, why most threads on KiA are about "THE FEMINAZIS"
There are no figureheads in gamergate. It was completely leaderless. The "alt-right" boogeymen are usually the ones who make the most sense so that's probably why people gravitate towards them. What "conspiracy theories" have been proven false specifically and how?
>Gamergate was just an alt-right movement trying to chase any social criticism of gaming out.
It was a movement trying to shine the light on collusion between the press and game devs and the massive cover up and irrational hatred for the target demographic of gamers as soon as shit hit the fan.
>>508164
>That's literally what the whole thing was about. It was a "consumer revolt" against the corruption in gaming media.
Buddy, a conspiracy theory about some woman sucking off dudes for non-existent good reviews doesn't count as a revolt. Gamergate was a reactionary clusterfuck immediately used by alt-right online personas to peddle hatred online. Gamergate was constantly obsessed with trying to prove it was a legitimate movement, but it couldn't ever successfully do prove that to anyone but the saps who fell for it in the first place.
>>508222
>Feminism/idpol is a bannable position on leftypol (except /pol/fags still are free to post freely)
>The mods and admin are all gamergate retards
>Almost everyone on the board is outright hostile to their "idpol" boogyman
>>508223
My satan trips caused someone to drink 36 mountain dews within 45 minutes and then puke it all out, then fail to show up as promised the next day - or ever again for that matter, as far as I know. So I can confirm that people here don't give a shit as long as it is done for Lord Kek.
But /pol/'s a little different. They actually want to have an effect on the world. They want race wars, purging, the rise of the third reich, the works. You can't call what they do pure shitposting.
>>508226
Only after you.
>>508230
>Buddy, a conspiracy theory about some woman sucking off dudes for non-existent good reviews doesn't count as a revolt
No, but the boycotting off gaming press after the "gaming is dead" and "Gamers are scum" coordinated headlines was.
>Gamergate was a reactionary clusterfuck immediately used by alt-right online personas to peddle hatred online.
That's a lot of buzzwords. The most hate I saw was from regressive leftists who were the real reactionaries.
>Gamergate was constantly obsessed with trying to prove it was a legitimate movement, but it couldn't ever successfully do prove that to anyone but the saps who fell for it in the first place.
The only people who think the whole thing was about hurting womens feelings and silencing women in tech are idiot regressive leftists who eat those retarded talking points right up.
paди тpaхaeтcя!
It sure got spooky quick in here!
>>508242
>No, but the boycotting off gaming press
I've been boycotting "gaming press" since I was born, can I get some sort of medal for it? Or does it only count if you're also lavishing money and attention on the "correct" journalists?
>>508254
>I've been boycotting "gaming press" since I was born, can I get some sort of medal for it?
You're trying to trivialize it with sarcasm but that's literally what Gamergate was, boycotting Gawker and other gaming media for being corrupt while exposing how invested these people were in shifting goalposts and having a victim complex.
>Or does it only count if you're also lavishing money and attention on the "correct" journalists?
You're trying to mock people for what journalists they support now? Gawker and it's associated press did end up revising their ethics policy without admitting they fucked up so at least that was won. Albeit too late for gawker. That didn't just happen at random.
>>508260
>You're trying to trivialize it with sarcasm
No. What I mean is that I have always thought that most "gaming journalists" and the people who read "gaming journalism" were a bunch of corporate shit-eaters.
>You're trying to mock people for what journalists they support now?
Your ability to read arbitrary shit into people's posts is truly second to none.
>>508263
>What I mean is that I have always thought that most "gaming journalists" and the people who read "gaming journalism" were a bunch of corporate shit-eaters.
Explain?
>Your ability to read arbitrary shit into people's posts is truly second to none.
Maybe but I don't think so. You seem pretty contemptuous.
>>508269
>Explain?
Why do you need writers for mainstream websites to tell you how to think about video games?
>Maybe but I don't think so. You seem pretty contemptuous.
Obviously, but that's not what I said. I would repeat it but the question I asked is pretty obvious.
>>508271
>Why do you need writers for mainstream websites to tell you how to think about video games?
It's a multi billion dollar industry. A lot of people want to read news about their hobby and upcoming reviews on these expensive video games.
>Obviously, but that's not what I said. I would repeat it but the question I asked is pretty obvious.
What? I know outside of /int/ we're suppose to speak English but my understanding may then be wrong so please clarify.
>>508280
>A lot of people want to read news about their hobby and upcoming reviews on these expensive video games.
If you have a handful of individuals whose taste you respect you can follow what they have to say. Why anyone would trust the average compensated reviewer is beyond me.
>What? I know outside of /int/ we're suppose to speak English but my understanding may then be wrong so please clarify.
Boycotting something means not supporting something. That's apparently something you support. But I don't think that you actually care about "boycotting the gaming press." I think you only care about supporting the "gaming press" that you approve of and slamming the "gaming press" that you don't.
>>507880
Yeah because it won't be swallowed but a stream of DA JOOZ
>>508283
>If you have a handful of individuals whose taste you respect you can follow what they have to say. Why anyone would trust the average compensated reviewer is beyond me.
This comes down to the individual, an example like Kotaku might not be trusted anymore but they definitely have broke a lot of news first and report about the tech aspects pretty objectively.
>Boycotting something means not supporting something. That's apparently something you support. But I don't think that you actually care about "boycotting the gaming press." I think you only care about supporting the "gaming press" that you approve of and slamming the "gaming press" that you don't.
Nuance and context is important here. Gamergate boycotted specific gaming media that they felt were corrupt. I don't see the problem with this?
>>507893
>/pol/ was always about politics
And its a breeding ground for right-wing propaganda and retards
>Try to explain your views better and maybe you can take over /pol/ from racist Hitler sympathizers
If we don't somehow scream something about cucking or the jews, how are they ever going to listen?
>>507950
>I'm going to redefine words to fit my worldview
You just went full Tumblr.
>commies need to wall off their own board to ban anyone who disagrees with them or shows logic
>thread started by someone who couldnt even use /pol/ and decided to go to /r9k/
makes sense
>>508300
>he thinks it's just my worldview
You try telling 320 million Americans they're wrong.
>>508214
people dont actually belive everything MSNBC says about Trump do they? This is just meta shitposting, surely no one could be this ill informed?
>>508310
>right-wing
>logic
>>508317
Only geriatrics use cable television news as their only news source. On both MSNBC and Fox News the average viewer age is above the retirement age. It's made for them, you can tell by what commercials they show during the breaks.
Even the drudgereading kneejerkers are a tier or two above that level of ignorance.
>>508287
I guess there are people with all sorts of hobbies in the world.
I still maintain that GG was a great example of how not to carry out a respectable boycott but tactics are tactics.
>>508156
yeah yeah I know, I've hung out there before. I was just making a joke about how people think they can identify /pol/ on other boards by the posts evincing right-wing opinions, when of course, that's not the defining criterion of a post being /pol/ now is it :^)
>>508328
>mfw
>>508065
>/pol/ is not a board where much meaningful discussion happens.
No fucking shit. It's satire, all of it. Even when they start to affect the real world it's still satire.
Are you saying you want your own ironic communist board?
>>508345
>satire
Are you retarded?
>>508355
Explain how it's not.
>>507885
I'll say it again: the solution is not to split the board but to give /pol/ a minimum post length.
>>508010
>/stal/
why don't you fags just refute the claims pol make on other boards (and provide alternative answers), better yet not use fucking 4chan as a place for serious political discussion?
>my ideas are terrible
>MOOOOOOOOODDDDDDSSSS PLEASE CREATE A BOARD JUST FOR ME YOU FUCKERS I HATE YOU
Leftypol will never happen that would be like admitting that pol is far right and you know that is not true
>>507877
>communism thread
>on r9k
You're doing it wrong...
Signed your faggy thread but I think yous should just post on /pol/.
Here's an idea if the mods or admin actually wanted to fix shit.
Make /pol/ 15 pages again
Remove flags
Reintroduce a cooldown timer between posts
Active mods to delete the same shitpost/bait threads that are posted daily
All you left/pol/ faggots come back
>>507897
If they're just shitposts, surely you can easily disprove them.
>the only type of racial pride leftists will fight a against is white pride
Why do leftists hate white people so much even when they claim they aren't SJWs?
>>508424
Flags are fun
>>508465
Flags were fun for a few weeks. Now flag 'bantz' makes up a large portion of all posts.
>>508426
Because if you bothered to read a few things instead of jacking over Trump then you would realize that we despise SJWs as much as /pol/. The only different being we don't replace it the "patriarchy" and "cis scum" narratives with our own "muh heritage" and "yurop is ded" narratives.
>>508472
thanks to the flags middle eastern people stopped filling /pol/ with anti jewish memes...
I thought in /leftyqa/ you were happy about this...
i'm wrong
![[EXPLOITATION INTENSIFIES].gif](https://i.imgur.com/7pY7Bhn.gif "[EXPLOITATION INTENSIFIES].gif")
>>507946
LOL
>>507897
>It's impossible to have any serious discussion on /pol/
>A /leftypol/ is needed
you don't seem to understand, /pol/ is a containment board, why would you want to be there? why would you want to be associated with them in any way?
What does /leftypol/ even mean?
>Politically Incorrect Leftests
>Leftest Politically Incorrect
?
People who suggest /lpol/ apparently don't think about this one too hard. Must be a trait of people who take politics seriously on 4chan.
>>508426
>implying
The only pride parade worth having is one celebrating human achievement.
Race, gender and orientation do not deserve pride parades.
>>508503
It's possible to be leftist and still hate the jews and SJWs, you know
>>507885
>serious academic discussion
>4chan
>>507979
This enrages my boner. I love qa. Full of meta disucussions of autists thinking cuckhan is a place for serious business.
It'll always be a site for funposting
>>508492
Why would anyone want to listen to your sjw shit?
>>508627
Hello leftypol
>>508572
i've seen it mein freund
>>508631
I'm /news/, not leftypol. I have no dog in the hunt.
>>508621
same could be said about #rwnj s
>>507885
So you want a hugbox where you never have to see different opinions from your own?
>>508791
>literally /pol/
>>508791
we've seen them
day of the rope for liberals, socialist ,uppity women, browns ppl ect. race war now.
idiotic economic ideas for a world that has never existed.
controlling ppl's sex lives.
the right has given us trickle down, a renewed love of endless war and actually said they would dumb down the country
and that was just reagan
>>508812
the party that doesn't do social engineering
the wing nuts said money is free speech,
look how well that worked out.
they believed it the freedom of corporations (people) to do whatever they wanted.
so they moved all the jobs over seas.
endless whining about tax cuts will creat jobs
so we gave them tax cuts and they gave the jobs to china
and they still wanna give more tax cuts
even if they don't pay taxes give them muli million dollar rebates
I hate /pol/'s hypocrisy
>'yeah we don't report anything reporting is for reddit fags who want their own circlejerk the free market will fix it :)'
>can't stop reporting left threads on /pol/
almost every corporation is on welfare but they hate welfare for ppl
>>508827
Welfare for people IS corporate welfare. It's a way to get well-off ("middle class") workers to pay the wages of other ,less well-off workers.
only 10
http://usuncut.com/class-war/10-corporate-welfare-programs-that-will-make-your-blood-boil/
CLASS WAR NOW
almost 4 million to billionaire trump
http://subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/prog.php?parent=trump-organization
more then most will ever make
>/POL/ ISNT A CIRCLEJERK
>/POL/ NEVER SPAM THREADS THEY DISLIKE UNTIL BUMP LIMIT
>not wanting leftist shitposting board
wew lad
it won't happen tho, weeamoot is a spooked closet fascist
>>508313
But they are, objectively so.
>>508823
>post lefty thread on /pol/
>you were banned for posting low quality b8
>>508808
>>508823
You can go to /pol/ at any time being a leftist, you won't be reported or banned for being a leftist. Have you ever been to /pol/?
>>508860
>Spammed
It's called replies. There are more right wingers on the board so expect your thread to gain many replies. It's natural you'd hit a bump limit sooner. If it's one big circle jerk why do you want your own circle jerk? Why not add your opinion to whatever discussion?
>>508913
>You can go to /pol/ at any time being a leftist, you won't be reported or banned for being a leftist. Have you ever been to /pol/?
Yes, and that post makes me think you haven't.
It's either that or DA JOOS over and over.
>>508914
Obviously there will be some shitposting but you're over exaggerating greatly. Sift through the shitposting like every other thread. They will debate with you. In fact they probably want too.
>>508005
/readzizek/
>>508005
/cuck/
>>508918
t. lying stormfag
>>508926
>stormfag
What is this, 2009?
>>508924
You know, after seeing this /pol/ meme for so long, I decided to look up some cuck porn to see what all the fuss was about.
It was boring, pretty bland and nothing special.
What attracts you stormies to a bbc railing your wife anyways?
>>508927
oh shit you're right, we should change it to stormcuck
>>508939
>What attracts you stormies to a bbc railing your wife anyways?
says the guy who admittedly watched cuckhold porn
>>508951
Cuck is a term for leftists, sorry.
>>508954
I only knew it existed thanks to /pol/. How'd they find out about it?
>>508956
nah, ideology wise it doesn't make sence. Your ideology is getting cucked by blacks and muslims.
Leftism is uncuckable as an ideology.
>>508958
>I only knew it existed thanks to /pol/
Doubt that. You cuck.
>>508959
The left are the beta cucks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VbHUI1R3IA
>>508963
>no u
>>508963
the black women are probably more leftist than sandman, who is a social democrat aka centrist
>>508964
>>508965
I bet you look like this
>>508963
cucks, no.
Other fetishes maybe.
You illiterate rightcucks forget that to be a cuckold you must hate the big cock bull aka the blacks.
>>508967
no, I am not white
>>508963
>this is what the right wing thinks is leftism
Fence sitter centrists are always beta.
Now go to gulag.
>r9k moderator deleted yet another leftist r9k thread filled entirely with intellectual discussion
can someone please deal with this fucker already?
>>508975
r9k are classcucked neets
>>508975
Huh, just checked in on it. 404, was up just a few minutes ago.
Mods = Porky
>>508980
They are actually quite class conscious.
Some of them are at least.
There is definitely a higher concentration of leftist on /r9k/ than on most boards.
>>508983
What about /g/?
>>508987
I thought /g/ no longer cared about gnu/freedom? They seem to be all about consumerism now.
>>507877
Hiroyuki, if you read this, do not make a liberal pol. The idea of 4chan is to avoid hugboxes.
Liberal and conservative pol on 4chan is a disaster waiting to happen.
I can already imagine the board wars that are going to start over this.
These newfags here seem to think 4chan is some sort of safespace.
>>508991
we do not want a liberal board
read the fucking thread
>>508993
Do you want a /leftypol/?
I sure do!!
Leftist threads are growing in power on every board and yet /underageb&/ mods are deleting these completely on topic threads! For instance, look at the communism general on r9k that was just deleted. It was full of a lot of serious discussion and was doing very well, not violating any of the boards rules.
It's clear that a /leftypol/ is needed.
Lolwut. Fuck off. You're idea is stupid. Kill yourself if you want a 4chan hugbox
>>508988
Say it ain't so! I haven't been on there in forever, why'd they give up the fight for freedom?
>>509003
I have no idea. I left for 8ch for a year or more, and when I started posting here again /g/ was just gone. it's fucking dead man. I doubt half the posters even know what gnu stands for.
I like how the right wing on 4chan are so triggered by the idea of a left pol because they know their homogeneity on 4chan would be challenged.
Seriously, in what way would a leftypol affect you if it was created unless you realize the propaganda value of having the only politics board on 4chan dominated by the alt-right/stormfaggots.
>>509037
nice meme pic, Cuck
>>509064
>Seriously, in what way would a leftypol affect you if it was created
Why would we have two /pol/'s? The first one is already leaking, why would we want your shitty leftist politics too? At least sometimes the right wingers on /pol/ can be funny
>>509066
>Why would we have two /pol/'s
because it's not fair the right wing get their own board because in reality, they just shitposted /v/, /int/, /b/, /co/, /a/ with "AMIWHITE?!?" shitposting. While pretty much the left has been purged from 4chan by both mods and other users shitposting any left leaning threads.
For example, /lit/ was a heavily left leaning board, but then over the period of about a year, it became /pol/faggotry again because /pol/ fags would just come in and shit up the board and threads with shitposting and image dumps, mods eventually cracked down on the leftist threads as well for god knows what reason.
>At least sometimes the right wingers on /pol/ can be funny
In what fucking universe is /pol/ "funny" unless you're some 12 year old edgelord? WOW HE SAID NIGGER TO A BLACK MAN, SO HILARIOUS.
Fucking lame. /pol/ has never, ever been in the spirit of 4chan because they took the absurdism of old 4chan completely seriously and hijacked 4chan absurdism to spread actual political agendas and propaganda.
Also again, it's not fucking fair the right got their own board by shitposting, as much as /pol/fags claim they are totally inclusive on their board, it's simply not true, leftist threads get deleted for "shitposting", leftist threads get spammed to oblivion.
Also when in fuck have the left shitpost all over 4chan like the right has? Never. It's always been right wing faggots, from when 4chan was Ron Paul, too Stormfaggotry too GG faggotry, that it was the right shitposting everywhere.
Honestly, it seems the only way leftypol will ever happen, is if the left just starts shitposting every fucking board until we get our own "Containment board"
>>509066
You think /pol/ is funny
Just wait until we unleash /leftypol/ memes upon you
Then you die laughing
Or maybe you just die
Then we laughing
Haha Amerifat is now a burgers
>>509071
This is next level Autism man. Mods have never purged the left, you just escape to your hugboxes of reddit and tumblr. I agree /pol/ is leaking but I don't want two /pol/s to leak into other boards. If you can't see the comedy in some of the racist shit from /pol/ you take things too seriously. I'm not even white.
>>507885
>get constantly barraged with 'muh trump' 'muh ametica' 'muh race war' memes
But that would happen on leftypol too!!!! Don't you guys get it? This isn't 8gag where you can moderate your own board.
we need a board now
>>509079
who is "We"?
>>509071
>being THIS mad
>>509077
The mods rarely have to delete threads on 8ch /leftypol/. The stormfags just pop in every once in a while and get discouraged by their lack of arguments.
>>509085
But this isn't 8gag, this is 4chan.
leftypol would be overrun quickly, so much moderation would be needed.
Why not start moderating the existing politics board instead?
>/leftypol/ gets created
>everyone from /pol/ floods in and starts satirizing the left now
>both sides crumble with in months in an ironic nuclear war
Make it happen.
>>509123
this is why it'd be good desu
>>509076
they deleted marxism threads on /lit/ man
>>509071
there are still a lot of far-left people on /lit/, the politics has just died down a bit, which I don't mind at all.
also I'd find it hilarious if /leftypol/ memes started to get posted site-wide
We must create a /centerpol/.
Or not.
Your choice.
>>509129
Because those threads typically dispensed with any connection to literary theory and went full /pol/ within the first few posts, if they were even ever /lit/ to begin with.
>>509138
what about interpol
>>509218
or /leftypol/, as it stands. I know they were shit and all, but y'know just saying.
>>509138
/pol/ is already center, considering they support Trump.
>>509234
for the first turm maybe
3-4 tillion more to the national debt so far from the bush tax cuts
https://beta.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/2011/08/12/apocalyptic_crisis_budgeting.html
hahaha!!
http://livestream.com/theNYPL/VaroufakisAndVaroufakis
>>509254
say 1 thing and do the opposite
well, at least it will be funny to watch the wing nuts calling trump a secret liberal, and they knew it all along
takes a few minutes to start
http://livestream.com/theNYPL/VaroufakisAndVaroufakis
>>509310
they lie
>>509327
And?
>>509328
I guess you knew all this?
>>509331
Who fucking cares who said what, it's /pol/ none of it matters.
>>509335
Explain
>>509336
this is why i left pol
the fucking stupid is annoying
>>509336
Im not going to bother now
night all
>>509339
You never should have been there in the first place retard. None of it is serious.
>>508426
>Why do leftists hate white people so much even when they claim they aren't SJWs?
Leftypol is againist all color-based prides. We are againist Identity Politics. They are a distraction that only helps the bourgeoisie keep their power and control over people. SJW are despised as much as full-/pol/tards
So don't play that card againist us. We are not Liberals.
