How has some hack comedian from Bongland been able to dismantle Trump's bullshit twice while the American media has completely failed to do over the past 8 months? What the fuck
All he's done is regurgitate shit already written by other news sources, throw in some old lame jokes and classic liberal ad hominem.
>IMPLYING he has stumped the Trump
>IMPLYING all he has done was not make jokes and broad innacurate statements as way to sway mainstream sheep
>>68246912
Well whatever he's done it's worked, while fox and cnn have been shooting blanks
>dismantle
>watching this retarded brit
Get the fuck out reddit
>>68247100
Has it tough? How many people actually watch his show? How many of his viewers are even americans in voting age?
We must remember that demographicas are very fickle things. You can interview 1000 people to try and predict the outcome of an election, but unless they are very different people the result will be wrong.
Just look at Bernie Sanders. The support for him on social media was almost as strong as the Support for Trump, but he reached nowhere near the numbers the internet predicted because most of those people were not voters/americans or both.
>>68246432
>Trump
>Bullshit
Pick one
>>68247729
kek
>>68246432
>John Oliver
>able to make a valid point about anything ever
Report and hide, guys. This is like clockwork, coordinated effort. Something is awry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42jpuXJPk0w
oliver supports immigration
why do people listen to him, he wasn't funny over here in bongland
guess he moved to where simpler humour is applauded
"fucking waffles lmao!!"
People who vote for Trump are stupid and Nazis
>>68248202
At least they're not Swedes
>>68246432
>""""""""""""""""""comedian"""""""""""""""""""""
>>68246432
BEADY
>ITT: people simply dismissing his argument because he's John Oliver.
>>68246432
>comedian
>>68246432
>implying
>>68246432
>>68247110
Is it even worth watching?
I know it's just Liberal bullshit and they wouldn't bring up the point pretty much every country, even Mexico, has a border fence
>>68248477
wheres the argument though? If Israel can build wall so can we.
>>68248753
>wheres the argument though?
It's the CURRENT YEAR!
We are currently LIVING in a YEAR!
>>68246432
>>68247100
What does he say exactly? What destroys Trump?
>>68248842
Well it's official Trump is stumped i'm now
#JewsForCruz
Trump. BTFO with a Home Depot ladder and some rope.
>>68246432
>dismantle twice
>>68246432
John Oliver is an unfunny ultra-Anglo quasi-kike who couldn't argue himself out of a paper sack.
The only thing John Oliver dismantles are the chances of millions of impressionable young Americans to actually understand a single fucking thing about how things work.
>>68246432
he hasn't done anything just pandered to people who have the exact same beliefs as him, to stump trump you have to get trump supports to turn on him which cobert jr. is incapable of doing
have any of you actually watched the video?
>>68248686
No. He's a libcuck, which means he's practically a woman when it comes to comedy.
>>68246432
Because he works for the media you twat
>be john stewart
>retire right before Trump runs for president
JUST
has anyone ever fucked up so badly?
>>68246432
The only way to take on Trump is to lower the dialog to his level. The other candidates tried this, but it looked unprofessional. Only a comedian can do this while still remaining respectable.
>>68248072
HYPOTHETICAL REALITY
>>68246432
English people are smarter than Americans. That is why in America television, intellectuals always have a british accent.
>>68250341
>"congratulations on your white penis"
>>68250341
is he a jew?
>>68246432
I hope Trump deports him.
>>68250084
The guy was on the verge of a breakdown from ahilling so hard. Trump wouldve sent him into cardiac arrest with impotent rate and blathering.
while this sounds kinda cool, he'd be a fucking martyr to the anti-trumps. They would say "he literally killed job stewart", they would have Stewart on a cross changing "he does for trump's sins".
>>68250084
>Be john stewart get gassed when trump becomes potus
Man i hate this hook nosed kike so much
>>68248686
>>68248753
>>68248843
If you disregard unfunny jokes and calling calling Trump racist, xenophobic, small-fingered etc here's what you can take out of it:
He points out how the wall goes up in price each time Trump talks about it.
He says that even though Mexico has a 50bi+ trade deficit with the US it's ridiculous to think that Mexico will pay for it.
He showcases some sad stories of people who have been stripped off of their property by the government in favor of previous walls.
He claims that besides everything else, the wall will be ineffective anyway because criminals can still use ladders, ropes, dig tunnels or just throw drugs over it anyway.
There. Now you don't need to watch it.
Stumped?
>>68246432
>haha I got the joke! I feel smart that I got it that means it's a good idea.
Why are leftists so easily brainwashed?
>>68250963
And yet they're incredibly effective when used elsewhere.
They just magically lose any and all usefulness when they are out on the us/Mexico border. .
>>68249771
He shows clips of Trump saying the wall will cost 4 billion at first, then cuts to him saying it will cost more and more until he says it will cost 12 billion.
Then Oliver quotes and unspecified construction specialist guy that says the wall + maintenance would cost at least twice that much.
Then you have some clips of disgruntled people living near the border saying the small fence that is there already doesn't work, which by his logic means the wall will also not work.
Doesn't mention how much illegals cost.
At the end proposes that instead of spending billions on the wall the government should buy every person in America a 75$ waffle maker.
An apt summary.
Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Border Wall (HBO)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU8dCYocuyI
Related thead
>>68246212
Pic is a collage of key points made in the video.
A 31 foot ladder.
Rope
Fucking hell, Trump. Refute this !
>>68248843
Didn't you hear? They're calling him 'Drumpf' now. It's over man, you can't recover from that.
>>68251343
Trump’s dubious claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/02/11/trumps-dubious-claim-that-his-border-wall-would-cost-8-billion/
>Under the Secure Fence Act of 2006, the United States has already spent $2.4 billion for fencing across nearly one-third of the border (670 miles).
>The Government Accountability Office in 2009 said the cost to build a mile of the fence initially averaged between $2.8 million and $3.9 million. But that was in the easiest areas, near metropolitan centers; other areas in the desert or mountains could cost as much as $16 million a mile.
>So 1,000 miles of fences is at best $3 billion, and certainly much higher than that. A concrete wall would clearly be an order of magnitude. (The Corps of Engineers estimated that the 25-year life cycle cost of the fence would range from $16.4 million to $70 million per mile; the total cost of the fencing so far has been $7 billion, according to the Congressional Research Service.)
>We can also look at the Israel’s experience with building a separation barrier between Israeli-held areas and Palestinian-held areas. For the first 525 kilometers (326 miles), the cost was $2.6 billion. A simple calculation of expanding that to 1,000 miles yields a calculation of $7.99 billion, suspiciously similar to Trump’s estimate.
>But only one-tenth (33 miles) of the Israeli barrier is an eight-meter (25-foot) concrete wall. The other 90 percent is a two-meter (six-foot) high electronic fence. Trump says he wants a 1,000-mile long concrete wall.
>Assuming the cost of the fence was equivalent to the U.S. fence ($3 million a mile), that suggests about $1 billion of the cost was for the fence; the other $1.4 billion was for 33 miles of the wall (which was built in mostly metropolitan areas). Believe it or not, that translates to $42 billion for 1,000 miles of a 25-foot wall. (Recall that Trump wants a 35-to-40-foot wall.)
>>68251061
Why are Right-wingers so narrowminded and stupid
>>68246432
I like the point he made about women's orgasms during rape, they really enjoy it that much.
>>68251343
STOP MAKING THESE CLICK BAIT THREADS YOU FAGGOT SHILLS
>>68251490
Obviously Trump's going to get it done
O N T I M E
N
T
I
M
E
and
U N D E R B U D G E T
N
D
E
R
B
U
D
G
E
T
>>68248843
The episode summed up:
The wall will be expensive and difficult to build. We knew that already which is why Trump has made Mexico paying for it a meme but whatever, it fills time.
The wall would be largely ineffective against the most common form of illegal immegration - never leaving the country after your travel visa expires. I'm surprised the writers didn't bring up numbers from other countries with border barriers to demonstrate their effectiveness but I guess that would be too much work and/or go against their agenda.
Stretch those aguements out for 30 minutes and sprinkle in some jokes and forced memes.
All in all, the same weak and tired shit John Oliver's writer staff always vomits up when the jew overlords at Time Warner wants to direct public opinion.
Can we talk about how Alex Jones made a video about how Trump wants to bring down the Illuminati instead?
>>68251570
not an argument
>>68248202
>A fucking yellow cross
>>68247100
>it's worked
He's flat lining newbie!
>>68250963
Well people don't understand that by making mexico pay for it he means taking it out of their foreign aid we send
>>68246432
He's right. The wall is stupid
I rather employ local militias with orders to kill
>>68254160
Edgy.
>>68246432
S4P
4
P
DO
O
IT
T
FOR
O
R
FREE
R
E
E
>>68248842
>It's the CURRENT YEAR!
>>68254447
It's called solving the problem, spic
Nothing more deterrent than risking your life
>>68246432
Trumplets don't care that Trumps policies are inconsistent at best and that the few plans he has gotten at all specific about (building a wall) is completely retarded. Everyone paying attentions knew these things months again.
>>68251194
And elsewhere, they don't have a giant river going through nearly half of the border.
Name one thing Johnny got wrong in the video. One. Thing.
>protip: You can't.
>>68248753
Its expensive as fuck (25 billion just in materials, design, and construction) mexicos not fucking paying for it, you'd have to sieze a whole bunch of private land via eminent domain, it would be disastrous for the environment, and (even if you don't care about any of those things), IT WOULDN'T WORK. Most illegas and almost all drugs enter through established boarder crossings which a wall will do nothing to stop. Also tunnels, theyve been building tunnels for years.
>>68253865
>spend same amount of money on something different
>this saves money
??????
>dismantle
The whole Drumpf fiasco literally did nothing, it probably even helped Trump in the end.
He's just a failed comedian exploiting the trump media frenzy to gain attention. He just regurgitates what liberals already have been thinking.
>>68256624
Didn't like Illinios deport all illegals and then bitch about how they couldn't function without them too?
xD
>>68250084
satirizing someone who knows everything they are saying is bullshit isn't actually that interesting.
for satire to work there has to be some kind of standard against which a person's behavior is meant to be held. the Republicans and Trump have been in full "whatever helps our ends" mode for two decades now.
>>68246432
>How has some hack comedian from Bongland been able to dismantle Trump's bullshit twice while the American media has completely failed to do over the past 8 months? What the fuck
he hasn't you cuck
>>68246432
simple, he hasn't. no has and no will ever dismantle the CEO and god emperor, no go build the wall you faggot.
BUILD THE WALL OF OVENS
>>68256778
everyone has realized for months that Trump's supporters are immune to reality-based criticism. Oliver is just doing the job of neatly arranging the various cases against him for the general. it's not an attempt to stop Trump's nomination.
>>68249029
That's way funnier than the actual comic.
>small hands
>drumpf
LITERALLY NOT AN ARGUMENT
Btw how much business and construction has John Oliver done?
GO BACK TO BONGISTAN FAGGOT
>>68247100
> it worked
> trump's polling at all time high
> trumps ratings go UP whenever this limey piece of shit releases a video
>>68253865
He would need congress to approve that, its not fucking happening. Mexico has to actually pay for the wall or else congress has to approve spending on it, and thats not going to happen.
>>68251343
How can an illegal immigrant be less crime prone when by just being here they are committing a crime?
>>68255226
Much of the boarderland is privately owned property, nobody is going to go for deathsquads patrolling private property.
>>68246432
>dismantle Trump's bullshit twice
>twice
If you think you destroyed someone twice then, odds are, you didn't even destroy them once.
>>68258269
why wouldn't congress aprove spending for it?
especially if so many people want it.
Remember, Repub's have control of congress rn and if trump gets in they'll also have majority scotus
>>68246432
>1776
+ 240
>2016
you have 10 years to prepare for the upcoming british invasion
>>68246432
You guys just love him don't you?
I think we all know that the wall is stupid, but to be honest if you think the wall is just a physical wall you are stupid. The wall was always just Trump's way to say we are not going to be the world's bitch anymore. It is also to show that America will be more nationalist under a Trump presidency. The actual wall is more of a symbol of American nationalism and an attempt to distance ourselves from the rest of the worlds globalist agenda.
How will a wall stop mexicans from digging tunnels or using ladders?????
>>68259212
the wall won't actually be built along the border, it'll be built along the mexican coast
>>68246432
Mondays on this board have become unbearable.
It's fucking redditors flooding the board with John Oliver's stupid, unfunny, forced memes that die by Wednesday.
>>68259212
Free fire zone. Rednecks will guard it voluntarily for target practice.
>>68258447
a.) Not as many people want it as you think (anybody who has spent any time studying the illegal immigration problem will tell you it won't work)
b.) Congress (especially republicans in congress) can barely approve the funding needed to keep the government running as it is, what makes you think they'll fall all over themselves to approve funding on a massive public works project that is of dubious benefit at the begest of a man that many of them have come out as saying they don't like and won't work with.
c.) The republican party might not control both chambers of congress after the election, SCOTUS has absolutely nothing to do with this.
>>68259620
>tunnels
>>68246432
How come you guys always seem to have these limeys on your tv haranguing you and dissing the Yank Way of Life? What's behind this?
>>68256757
>not realizing illegals cost us 100b+ a year
get out shill
>>68259678
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIMfir6r1Rc
>>68246432
He hasn't hurt Trump once, he's just been loud and annoying. Anyone watching his garbage show isn't voting Trump anyways.
HBO owns John Oliver -> Time Warner owns HBO -> Timer Warner founded by Jew
>>68260214
do they very dead
>>68260413
Yes, it's basically a fuel air explosive. The heat and pressure destroys the lungs.
I remember another uppity brit cuck talk show host shitting all over your burgers a while ago.
How'd you deal with that faggot again?
RELEASE THE KRAKEN!
>>68260465
cool
Can we ban faggots that post LE CURRENT YEAR man? No one here gives a single fuck about that kike's Marxist propaganda show
>>68258445
This, john oliver has failed endlessly trying to stop trump. He's outright desperate to gain notoriety which makes him go full spastic dumbass.
>>68248202
nah they just want to say fuck you to everyone
>>68257245
>reality based criticism
Man I fucking wish. Especially since they're for illegal immigration I want them to give articles supporting that. Instead I see them linking articles in support of immigration in general, not illegal immigration.
>>68258445
love you
>>68259071
This honestly. But your point will be ignored by the shills and redditors.
>daily reminder that George Soros is one of if not the biggest threat to the freedom of the Western world today
>daily reminder that Soros has made it his solemn duty to prevent Trump from getting elected
>daily reminder that if Trump wins, the tide turns back and Soros will be ousted within 6 years.
This IS a movement. Regardless of what the regressive left, establishment right, or illuminati jews say.
Donald Trump is the first step in pulling this country back from the brink
Make America (and thereby the World) Great Again
>>68261488
And I love you, random Freedom Land citizen.
>>68249054
>john oliver
>anglo
man is more jew than marx.
>>68246432
>Donald Trump would use eminent domain to rob American Citizens of their land to build his wall
sure is Making America Great for those people isn't it?
>>68260214
Unrelated but I hate this kind of thing.
>inb4 'bleeding heart liberal faggot'
Yeah, gophers can be a pest. Is frying them really the best thing to do?
Fragile ecosystem, people. They eat smaller pest insects. Your lawn can suck a fuck, gophers are cute as shit.
If I weren't so weak willed, I'd stop eating animal meat all together.
>>68261840
>Buy land on the border
>Expect there to be literally no security
If some uppity dipshit starts making noise about the wall, I suggest building it around the other side of his property so he can have fun being overrun with angry cartel members.
>>68261995
Short of pulling them out of the ground then stunning them before decapitation you're not going to find a quicker execution method. Poisons are pretty horrible in how they kill.
>>68246912
All Oliver can do is drive anti-Trump protesters to increasingly lulzy fits of frustrated humiliation.
He's literally instigating the violence, and making Trump more popular in the process.
>>68246432
>believing comedians
good goy
>>68261995
You should try maintaining a garden of vegetables for a year.
>>68262092
They probably had that land in their family for generations.
also it's not just about putting the wall on their property. It's about the fact that they'd basically need to bulldoze down all their property to make the roads to do the construction of the wall.
In essence the Government would just condemn the person's property, forcefully take it over, possibly fining the person or arresting them if they don't just leave, bulldoze down everything and then build their wall.
That family loses EVERYTHING, their home, the land they own, their livelyhood, and they get nothing for it.
>>68246432
>implying hes a comedian
>implying hes actually stumped the trump
>implying the media doesnt actually give a fuck and are just in it for the money
>>68247729
Saved.
Why does this twat have two first names?
>>68262577
A small price
>>68262577
>It's about the fact that they'd basically need to bulldoze down all their property to make the roads to do the construction of the wall.
I'd imagine Trump knows (or has people who know) more about construction than you. They didn't bulldoze for 3 adjacent blocks in every direction when they built Trump Tower.
>>68263664
>it doesn't personally affect me so I don't care
what a shitty mindset.
>>68263751
Roads are already built that they could use for the construction of that. This is construction companies saying they'd need to build more roads to haul in the rebar and concrete necessary to build the wall.
Trump isn't thinking about this because like you faggots, Trump doesn't care about anyone else but Donald Trump and doesn't care about anything that doesn't personally affect him.
Ranchers living on the border suddenly made homeless and unemployed because I used eminent domain to steal their ranches? Not my problem.
On the one hand, you have the following: 1. costs of building the wall are immense, even if you recover say, 25% from mexico, which you wont. 2. possible net rise in immigration, prompted by fear if being trapped in mexico (as we have seen in Europe) 3. possible de-stabilizing knock on effect to an already fucked mexican government (compounds no.2)
4. questionable benefits... wont help much with the drug/crime problem
OTOH
1. atm, US border w/ mexico (essentially a failed state since early 000's) almost impossible to police. regardless of bullshit, tens of thousands of people end up in america every year, a wall will do NOTHING but help. 2. possibility, albeit slight, that mexico will actually get a better foothold in the war on cartels b/c of this wall (less drug income... hopefully) 3. long-term decrease in peeps making the exceptionally dangerous (MUCH more dangerous than say, over the med into europe) journey to illegally immigrate to america, potential for these countries to improve their situation goes up in the absence of brain drain.
what have i missed? does anyone really believe the wall will help?
>>68264333
Building a road doesn't use that much space, generally it's the width of the road then another metre either side. You could even build the road then work from the centre outwards, putting the wall where the road was or, at most, you'd build the wall next to the road and run access between the borders of two properties.
What kind of rancher owns a property so tiny that a wall and a road will render all their land unusable?
>>68250963
>He says that even though Mexico has a 50bi+ trade deficit with the US it's ridiculous to think that Mexico will pay for it.
>Begin shipping millions of illegals across the border at will.
>Mexico fires up a storm
>Trump laughing .jpg
>Mexico caves and pays for the wall in full.
He claims that besides everything else, the wall will be ineffective anyway because criminals can still use ladders, ropes, dig tunnels or just throw drugs over it anyway.
I highly doubt the wall Donald intends to build will be so shitty that a fucking ladder is going to be easily used against it. I also assume that the wall is going to be garrisoned with actual border patrol guards, who no longer have to live hundreds of miles away from their area of operations and respond to intrusions far faster and more effectively.
>>68265220
it depends on the lay of the land and where the engineers have designed that the road and wall need to be built. you can't just cut a staight line along the boarder and say okay we're dropping the wall in here. This isn't sim city.
>>68265721
also did you watch the video? When they were building A FENCE along the border they condemned a rancher's lands and took the entire property from them, so they could build the fucking fence. That's just how eminent domain works. They confiscate the entire property and you don't see a wooden nickle for it.
>>68265896
They typically pay above market value
>>68262577
>they get nothing for it.
that's not how eminent domain works
>>68246432
Wow Trump can't actually build a wall.
Guess I'll just vote for Hillary "we will end deportations" Clinton because fuck laws and borders and shit.
>>68265896
>They confiscate the entire property and you don't see a wooden nickle for it.
That's terrible, I was under the impression that money was exchanged for the land and that the value could be disputed if it were too low. Please do provide some sources so I can spread the message. Everything I've turned up indicates people are paid.
>>68246432
because he cherrypicked those statistics and grossly over exaggerated the costs of the wall.
>>68258279
that pick says immigrants so they mean legal ones which is probably true because they don;t want to be deported. Remember the left tries to trick you with language because they are fucking manipulating assholes
>>68266265
my mistake, the use of the word "condemned" doesn't indicate that the people are paid but in the legal text of the how eminent domain works, they use the term condemnation even though they ARE compensating the landowners for it.
The way I thought it was they "condemned" the property declaring it unfit for habitation and then just took ownership without compensation.
Like if your house is condemned for asbestos or something you're just not allowed to live there.
libs can keep pretending he's jon stewart but he's not.
but Jew liebowitz wouldn't fare any better against Trump since of late his only schtick was "are you serious??"
wow......
so this..... this the power..... of john oliver.....
Implying a physical wall is necessary to rain down a hail of business regulations that would make hiring illegals unimaginable. Implying a physical wall doesn't already exist making patrolling much easier in those areas
>>68267472
wow good job cropping out the search terms faggot
>>68261840
Americans within 50 miles of any border do not have all of their rights. Look it up
>>68267784
>make hiring illegals unimaginable.
Do you not know who runs your cuntry?
>>68246432
>works for HBO
>which is owned by Time Warner
>who are one of Hillary's largest donors (guess why)
Anytime you see some faggot sheep quoting John Oliver or trying to force that cringe inducing DRUMPFLOL meme, just point that out to them and tell them they are literally parroting big-lobbyist agendas.
>>68246432
All that guy does is give Trump more votes.
Please Mr. Current Year - keep giving Trump more free advertising.
>>68268167
>>>68267784
>>make hiring illegals unimaginable.
>
>Do you not know who runs your cuntry?
At least it's not weedman.jpg
>>68268031
and this is why I want a smaller government that doesn't have the power to fuck over its people like this.
>>68261687
His great-great-grandfather was a bishop...
He hasn't dismantled anything. He's headbutting a wall and people giggle and join in because he has a British accent.
>>68268327
>At least it's not weedman.jpg
no, it's business interests and they love the cheap unregulated labor force that is the illegal immigrant population
>>68246432
>walls totally don't work you guys
>just fork over the money so we can build this wall for greatest ally
>>68268334
Eminent domain would be a part of smaller government as well.. Land owners are compensated for their land. Sorry your view might change or a train might come through your property.
>>68250711
Worse, he is a beady eyed Anglo.
>>68248910
>Trump. BTFO with a Home Depot ladder and some rope.
LEL and Trump even supplied the rope to stump himself.
>>68268031
>50 miles of any border
It's 100 miles, but it only affects 200 million people so it's not that big a deal.
>>68268533
Who Mexican restaurants? General laborers. Hardly big business. Farmers yes. But we have bigger problems there. Mainly droughts that will reshape the industry soon.
The only foregin labor that matters is the h1b problem.
>>68248105
Failed britbongs come to America and prosper. Simon Cowell, Cuck Oliver, and Piers Morgan to name a few. Dumbasses think the accent makes them more intelligent.
>>68249029
whats the actual comic
>>68268469
This
>>68268230
This
>>68268566
also this
>>68266168
Ogylvie Ge-vehgylboye
>>68250341
if your thinking come on online harassment doesn't like that big a problem well congratulations on your thick skin
>>68269215
Farming, fishing, mining, forestry, etc are hardly small businesses and do have lobbies in DC.
Illegals drive down the price of lowskilled labor which is good for business and that is the reason they are allowed.
If illegals were bad for business you would have an 80 foot wall built by next Tuesday.
>>68259640
>b.) Congress (especially republicans in congress) can barely approve the funding needed to keep the government running as it is,
>(especially republicans in congress)
Get out, you dumb uninformed faggot.
Oliver's bit about costs being higher than expected do not phase me.
Illegal Immigration according to federal sources costs the US over $100 billion dollars a YEAR. If the wall can curb even 5% of that cost, it'll have paid for itself in half a decade by their worst estimates.
However, one bit he brought up did make me ask /pol/: would the wall be that effective in keeping illegals out?
>1/2 of all illegals come through the access points with false visas, or come by plane/boat into cities not on the border and stay there
The wall would not prevent these. So is the wall going to be that effective? Will it even curb the aforementioned 5% a year in costs for illegal immigration?
He mad a lot of a points but none of them made any logical sense.
>Trump is stupid. 40% of illegal immigrants come by plane, a wall would only stop 60%
okay so we can't do anything unless we stop 100%?
>Mexico says they won't pay for it. So his plan won't work
Ever been with a friend when they get a parking ticket? sometimes they say "i'm not paying for this fucking ticket". Does the city just say "okay sorry about that we'll leave you alone ".
I've been a democrat for a long time but because I always considered their arguments the most logical. Has it always been this bad?
Calendar Man stumps himself whenever he fails to spread a forced meme
Fucking /pol/ is better at making Oliver memes than Oliver himself.
>>68270343
>you are the dumb uninformed faggot.
republicans haven't threatened to shut down government, not raise debt ceiling, etc dozens of times over the last two decades?
>>68271340
That second big spike is obviously the Drumpf debacle
but what's that second big spike just to the left of Jan 2016? Seems too late to be the Paris attacks...
>>68271580
*that first big spike just...
The wall just got an alligator moat
>>68271580
A debate? Can't be sure.
>>68252850
"The wall would be largely ineffective against the most common form of illegal immegration - never leaving the country after your travel visa expires."
It's not. The 50% is an upper-limit estimate. It's probably a good deal lower than that. It also doesn't include the number of people who've come through illegal means and have been deported, were caught at the border, went back voluntarily etc. etc.
What you have to consider is the number of people who've come into this country ACROSS TIME, not those currently here now.
>>68271498
No. You're referring to both parties not being able to agree and so a budget isn't passed for a while, sometimes shutting some parts of the government down.
Both parties. It isn't just the Republicans.
And you act like raising the debt ceiling is a good thing.
>>68247501
A lot of dumbass college-graduate Americans watch his show. It's annoying really, A lot of college-grad idiots get all of their political information from facebook memes, & comedians. Jon Oliver pretty much replaced the role that the Stephen Cobert & Daily Show fags used to fill among the 20s to early 30s American demographic.
>>68270707
>1/2 of all illegals come through the access points with false visas, or come by plane/boat into cities not on the border and stay there
He said that nearly half come legally with visas. Now think about it for a second. Which kind of illegal immigrant do you think it's most likely to be a criminal: the one that was accepted already once (albeit temporarily) or the one that didn't even try the legal process and paid a criminal smuggler? The border hoppers are most probably criminals with records, the rest are just your normal wage-dumpers. Besides 50% it's still a ton of people.
>>68271973
>No. You're referring to both parties not being able to agree and so a budget isn't passed for a while, sometimes shutting some parts of the government down.
Most of the recent ones have been by republican controlled congresses. Dems did it a few times during Reagan's presidency
>And you act like raising the debt ceiling is a good thing.
Why do you need a debt ceiling in a addition to a budget?
It's the reason credit rating is shit.
>>68270835
no, I voted for obama in 2008 and would have voted for gore in 2000 but the dems have not always been the vapid little shits they are now. They have just gone insane from the logical conclusions of affirmative action and saying that opposing illegal immigration is racist.so many ugly undercurrents in the party are coming to the fore now.
>>68259640
>a.) Not as many people want it as you think (anybody who has spent any time studying the illegal immigration problem will tell you it won't work)
This is such bullshit
>>68251343
>>68261584
Yeah, it's sad that people don't understand the Trump movement. People say that every election is the most important of all time but this one truly is. It is not even about Trump anymore. It is about the people versus the people who own the world. If we win, it is the people taking back their voice and hopefully taking back their freedom from the Soros and Kochs of the world who have enslaved us. It brings a tear to my eyes to be honest.
>>68268469
This too. It's irksome how so many Americans will fawn over some buck tooth moron simply because he has a goofy sounding British accent. (Sarcuck of Mossad.)
I for the life of me can never understand why the fuck Americans love Brit accents so much. Americans seem to think of the Brit accent as higher-class & intelligent. Which is amusing considering that the American accent is what the British accent used to sound like before the USA was created.
I'm not a White American, but I much prefer good ol' American English. They don't sound like nasally faggots like Brits often do. The American accent sounds manly. Although that's possibly the reason why the American accent is labeled as ignorant & trashy. The modern Western world hates anything that could be labeled as manly.
>>68246432
Care to summarize? I'm not giving the dude even one hit.
>>68272973
>Most of the recent ones have been by republican controlled congresses. Dems did it a few times during Reagan's presidency
No, you dumb fuck. When the budget doesn't get passed, it's both parties not coming to an agreement. Both parties are responsible, not just one. Let me give you an example you can understand of how the media spins it so the Republicans are made out to be the sole party shutting down the government.
>Repiblicans: we need $4738833 gorillion dollars for the wall
>Dems: what the fuck? No! That's ridiculous! Here, we can approve $1million
>Republicans: no, we're not negotiating. Sign our damn bill.
>Dems: No, that's insane.
>OY VEY THE DEMS SHUT DOWN THE GOVERNMENT BECAUSE THEY WOULDNT JUST BLINDLY SIGN A BILL THEY THOUGHT WAS RIDICULOUS
This is what happens but always against the Republicans.
>Why do you need a debt ceiling in a addition to a budget?
Gee I dunno, Billy, how do you stop from spending all your money?
>we spent $30 mill on X last year
>but fuck it we need $30 more
>no, you hit the debt ceiling. Find some other place to cut to find your money
>but mommy I want to spend $30million more!
>no, cut something else
>>68256258
>implying we won't take some of Mexico's land to keep all of the Rio grande within the U.S.
>someone summarize
>it's liberal bullshit
>oh, ok. Nevermind then
Keep living in that echo chamber guys.
>>68247100
Fox fueled his rise, CNN/MSNBC are aiding and abetting at this point. They are aware that they're only drawing more attention to him and at this point it's a symbiotic relationship.
>>68246432
For a moment I thought the looks were hereditary but the truth is even more twisted. His bull a cuckold to someone else.
>>68274947
great argument shill.
>>68275302
Who am I shilling for by pointing that out?
>>68250341
Liberals are practiced professionals of doublethink.
>>68256258
That looks so fucking painfull
John Oliver owes Trump a lot of money
>>68260711
Do people understand what a wall is?
A wall is not a 10 foot high block of concrete that is 1 ft deep, it is a series of about 30-40 bricks deep all sealed in mortar and is about 10 m high.
You ain't throwing anything over. The wall's shadow will consume your entire deserts.
>Wall wouldn't work
>NO BERLIN ISREAL AND IRELAND ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SHUT UP STUPID GOYIM WALLS DONT WORK CUZ I SAY SO
And from now on, Oliver will never again be relevant on /pol/.
>>68256624
>expensive
I'm sure if you stop waging pointless wars you should be able to pay for it
>eminent domain
valid point, but not unsolvable
>environment
honestly, should that really be a priority? Doesn't matter if your soil is preserved if your country isn't
>wouldn't work
there are examples of countries builing walls that are efficient, like Israel
>twice
When was the first time? All I remember is him teaching his viewers about his grandfather's former surname.
>>68273610
It's kinda sad. I remember all that chaos about someone affiliated with someone affiliated with Soros (or something like that) trying to give $10K to anyone who destroyed a pinata on Trump's TV appearance. It's so sad that people buy into all the "Donald Trump is literally worse than Hitler" rhetoric that the media spews because Soros tells them to. Colleges are going batshit over political correctness. There was a speech I saw of the leader of the American Nazi Party at UCLA in 1969, and there's no way that'd happen today. Milo and Christina Hoff Summers were protested, and they have much less publicly intolerated opinions.
Anyway, yeah, I agree. It's just sad how people don't get WHY this is important. Luckily, many do (hence many on the Republican side voting for Trump).
>FFWD to 2017
>Great Wall of Trump to be completed ahead of schedule, underbudget and 10 feet higher than expected
>>68246432
Hope he enjoyed it. His Jew bosses are going to fire him after today's AIPAC speech.
>>68248477
Trump could have the same views as Oliver and he would still find ways to try make fun of him simply because he's Trump, besides his show is garbage and he needs the ratings
>>68251570
>be Swedish
>it's 8 am
>been raped 10 times already
>>68246684
Always the same, first post best post
Nothing more to say
/thread
