>I vote Republican and Donald Trump "tells it like it is".
>>68236337
Lets get this started
>POLITIFACT
>politifact
>politifact
>no-bias
pick one faggot
>>68236337
>politifact
>Politifact
Hey OP, tell your boss to get you some more believable bullshit to shill with.
>>68236441
>>68236443
>>68236447
>butthurt
>Star Tribune
this is why i read pioneer press
>politifact
>>68236570
>defending politifact
>>68236644
>facts hurt my feelings
>politifact
>Mexican intellectuals
>>68236570
>Leaf
>A
>>68236337
>politifact
Politifact is run off Hillary's email server.
>>68236337
>Shilling for establishment candidates
>Bernies granddaugther works for them
>Bernie also being shilled
Hmmm, not expected at all.
>>68236337
>Hilary Clinton
>mostly true
oy vey
>>68236694
>facts
>>68236337
>politifact
>>68236337
>politifact
>BUT IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY STATEMENTS!!!!
This is literally what you have to believe to be a trump supporter
>>68236694
>It says fact so it must be a fact
>>68236337
>politifact
>>68236337
>Politifact
>>68236337
>Hillary telling the truth ever
cmon man
even democrats dont trust her
>politifact
>>68236443
>>68236441
>>68236447
>>68236543
>>68236549
>no rebuttal
I guess it's true, reality has a liberal bias
>>68236694
>polifact
>fact
Kill yourself you faggot.
>>68236991
>literally
faggot detected.
>politifact
Trump: the sky is blue
>false: the sky is black at night, and red in the evening.
Sanders: the sky is blue
>correct: the sky is blue most of the time.
>""""""""""""""""""""""""politifact""""""""""""""""""""""""
>>68236570
LEAF
E
A
F
>politifact
>>68236870
Jesus, Politifact. You're embarrassing yourself.
Is that real? They called the Missile's statement false because it's not an official holiday?
>politifact
>>68236337
>Transgender girls aren't boys.
>>68237067
see
>>68236784
BTFO
>>68237074
>>68236870
>>68236784
>>68237067
Sighting the "ministry of truth" gives you no legitimacy cuck.
>>68236784
>Jon Greenberg
/pol/ is always right.
>>68237074
>the numbers are valid
>but we're going to say he's mostly lying
jesus fucking rabbits on a stick christ is this site real
>>68237074
>the number is correct, but...
But all he said was a number, and it is correct. Jesus Christ guys
>>68236337
>politifact
>>68236337
>POLITIFACT
>>68237315
>the number is correct but it hurts our feelings so
PANTS ON FIRE
>>68236337
>politifact
this is a bait thread
>>68237074
LOL
> Number is correct but fails to list the cause
SO THAT MAKES IT PANTS ON FIRE???
Omg unbelievable
>>68236337
>politifact
>>68236337
>politifact
>>68236337
>>68236337
That thing was as biased as it gets.
>Hillary Clinton: Dinosaurs are alive today.
>Result: Half true! Certain types of turtles can be considered to be dinosaurs.
>Donald Trump: Syrian refugees consist mostly of men.
>Result: PANTS ON FIRE NIGGA. He's lying. We won't prove anything, but we're telling you, he's lying.
>politifact
>>68237441
Kill yourself Carl
>POLITIFACT
trump was talking about publications like politifact when he said he wanted to improve laws against libel and slander
>>68236337
>not biased
>>68236337
>echo Date('Y");
>>68236337
>false to who?
>all true candidates left wing.
Gee I wonder.
>politi''''''''''''''''''''''fact''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>>68236337
kasich is funded by soros, as is hillary
and sanders is a straight up kike
so yeah, fuck off, we all know who youre working for buddy, dont you have divide and conquer threads to be making?
>>68236570
A FUCKING LEAF
When is /pol/ going to stop falling for the same politfact bait thread that pops up once or twice weekly?
>>68237074
>>68237300
>>68237315
>>68237441
I don't think that evaluation of Trump's quote is real. The other two (Cruz and ForAmerica) are real, but here's what Politifact really says about the Trump quote:
"Trump tweeted an image that made various statistical claims, including that blacks kill 81 percent of white homicide victims. Almost every number in the image is wrong. The statistics on white victims are exaggerated five-fold. The police-related deaths are off as well.
We rate this claim Pants on Fire."
They don't talk about "cause" at all. The font in that photo also looks slightly different compared to the other two evaluations, but I'm no pixel expert.
>>68237315
Eh be careful that picture is disinfo. That site is bullshit but they didnt post those
Politifact is as bias as bias get..
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.document.no%2F2016%2F03%2Ffaktasjekk-av-faktasjekkerne%2F
Originally in Norwegian, used google translate. It's therefore a bit shit, but understandable in English
>>68237622
>>68237637
for fucks sake
>>68237074
>transgender girls aren't boys
JUST
>>68236337
>politifact
>star (of david) tribune
>>68236337
>Hillary Clinton mostly speaks the truth
Not biased at all.
>>68236337
>Politfact
>>68237074
>number is correct
>pants on fire
>water is wet
>correct but can also be solid or gas
>pants on fire
>>68236337
>I vote Bernie because I like free stuff :DDD
Tell me Burger-san, how do you propose you get
>free healthcare
>free college
AND ON TOP OF THAT
>$15/h minimum wage
The last one alone will destroy your economy
>politifact
>MUH FEELS = FACTS
>>68236337
Easy to make anyone into a liar. Selection bias in the comments chosen for analysis, for example.
>>68237750
They did more or less say "transgender girls aren't boys" and "comparison is questionable" but the Trump one is completely made up.
>>68236337
There are a couple of screens out there that show what they qualifies as false is mostly true and sometimes at least a half truth.
>>68236570
>canadicucks trying to dethrone aussies at shitposting
Thought this was funny.
>>68236337
>False, you don't need to be born a girl to be a girl.
>>68236337
>Politifact
Discarded
>FALSE, 1/4 IS A LOT
>>68237888
They show their work.
Which you would know, if you had actually tried to objectively look at the situation rather then just having a feeling and then displaying that feeling to us as if it was a fact.
>b b but truth doesn't count if I don't like it
>>68237300 >>68237315 >>68237400
>>68237441 >>68237844
not a politikike shill but the image is shopped.
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/pants-fire/
Here's the article:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/nov/23/donald-trump/trump-tweet-blacks-white-homicide-victims/
>>68236337
>politifact
>reality
choose one m8
>>68238545
There's millions of refugees you retard, so even if only 10% were children, that would still be "many" children.
Also, you don't even speak English so fuck off our board.
>>68237718
Good catch. I think the pixels look the same, though.
>>68238545
I've been to Hungary and seen youtube videos of "syrian" ""refugees"" and seen like maybe 10 women.
That alone would make this fucking politifact bullshit a worthless source to use AT ALL.
>>68236337
>politifact has been empirically proven to call Republicans liars more often
>>68238597
It feels like the people who write this are not from this world to be honest.
>politifact
>>68237718
Then politifact are lying assholes, as the numbers were only slightly fudged from the truth in the first place.
Go be a nigger elsewhere
>>68237275
>sighting
Is there a fact checker that you /pol/acks trust?
Or is it just impossible to know things?
>>68238667
>the quote says "that many"
leftists in charge of reading
>>68238566
update: pic related, taken from link above
>>68237718 >>68238711 >>68238942
see above post
>>68236337
Except every time Hillary or Bernie say a larger government is good for the economy, it's all lies. So pretty much every one is a liar except kasich.
>>68236784
>majority is female
Oh fuck me, I remember that one. They said "UNHCR SAYS MAJORITY IS FEMALE!" and direct-linked to the UNHCR website which showed 77% were male.
So it wasn't just a lie, but the laziest fucking lie I've ever seen. And liberals, guaranteed, never actually clicked the link Politifact supplied which refuted their own article.
The hubris of the Left is astounding.
>>68239009
/pol/ is the fact checker.
>>68238566
What a load of BS, you can't fact check any of these except the "I did/didn't say"'s
>politi""""""""""""fact"""""""""""""""
>I trust politifact
>>68239759
>not a politikike shill
not debating the illegitimacy of any of their claims but posting shopped photos is politifact-tier
>>68236337
>PoliFacts
>actual source
fucking LMAO that's like citing Wikipedia as your source
>>68237300
numbers are raysis and racism is lying.
>>68237115
And the one post that BTFO polifact is ignored. Get bent shills.
>>68236337
Hurr our editors and reporters fact check things durr.
It's not like it will be heavily influenced by our agenda as that is the thing you'd most likely do subconciously.
>POLITI"fact"
>>68236337
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((POLTIFACT)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
>""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" P O L I T I F A C T """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
>>68238965
>politifact
>politifact
Kill yourself roodypoo candyass
>FALLING FOR THE INFO JEW
Fuck you cunts i was ready for a Politifact thread
http://imgur.com/a/SdFAY
http://imgur.com/a/SdFAY
http://imgur.com/a/SdFAY
If anyone actually uses this site ironically, you should seriously think about killing yourself
>politi """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""FACT""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
>>68241763
Did you read the two articles?
Sanders is rated as half true because he used data from a think tank, albeit a left leaning one.
They did real research and published results.
Trump's source is speculation in a column written by a former Reagan staffer, who includes this caveat in his article:
>"Yes, we have to allow for non-working wives, students, the disabled, early retirees and coupon clippers. We also have drifters, grifters, welfare cheats, bums and people between jobs, enrolled in training programs, on sabbaticals and much else.
You can't just look at headlines
>>68241906
**unironically
>OP posts an infographic with a blatant hoax source
>110 replies telling him "POLITIFACT XD" with various reaction images
>Gonna go to thread limit and have a part 2
/pol/ why are you so easy so slide? holy shit. Get your shit together please.
>>68236337
>Politifact
