>Weapons stolen from a National Guard armory in MA
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2015/11/15/worcester-armory-break-in-fbi/?cid=facebook_WBZ_|_CBS_Boston
>ISIS may target Washington DC next
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/619371/Islamic-State-ISIS-Britain-London-Paris-attacks-Twitter
Any fellow DC fags here? Is this something to be concerned about?
yup, this is a false flag in preparation
>>55863479
>Go to catalog
>Half the posts are about Sanders, degneracy and feminism
>Nothing about weapons being stolen from a military facility
What the fuck /pol/ ? Aren't you all supposed to be on top of this shit?
>>55863166
How the fuck does someone break into a military armory?
>>55862630
Someone on the inside
>>55863166
It's only a matter of time before DC gets hit
HAPPENING
Checking in, Takoma Park
>>55863166
Probably the faggots in the armory fucked up the books. I forgot it is an impossibility that the fat fuck Specialist's that work in them to do any wrong.
>>55864539
If the dog doesn't bark, it was an inside job. (Old quote referring to how a dog who is familiar with a person doesn't bark when that person sneaks around.)
So, it was less of a break-in and more if a *come on in" then "who's gonna fabricate the lie to cover this up to the American masses?"
I don't actually think this, but its certainly not impossible in this universe for that to be the true story.
What were those arrow codephrases again?
>6 semiautomatic rifles and 10 pistols
It's fucking nothing. You can literally go to the gunstore and buy this shit.
>>55865002
The quantity of goods stolen is nothing.
The breach of our military's security is a pretty BIG SOMETHING.
So shut up
>>55865002
"Hello, I'm Mohammad Khalid Ibn-Jihad and I'd like to buy 16 guns from you right after Muslims just killed scores of people in Paris."
>>55863166
PURE COINCIDENCE
http://www.katc.com/story/30522922/first-syrian-refugees-arrive-in-new-orleans
>>55865002
Yeah, but they didnt take them from a gunstore. They took them from a "secure" military armory.
Not sure if you ever served, but thats basically impossible....unless you have an inside guy.
If they have an inside guy, the inside guy is the US Government. And if thats the case, we're fucked.
>>55864866
Fuck man I hope so. Wouldn't it only make sense for them to announce something like this if they were absolutely sure? Also:
>"Break in"
Doesn't that imply that there was in fact a robbery? That being said the press is absolute shit.
>>55863166
Shit goes missing everyday from the government. No fucks given
>>55865175
Maybe the soldiers needed some weapons to defend themselves...
It's like these materialistic idiots can think of nothing but what objects are being stolen.
It's not WHAT was stolen that's important, but from WHERE and HOW it was stolen that's important.
Please enlighten yourselves, idiots
>>55865376
But why would they have broken into the building? Why would they have stolen weapons? Couldn't they just use their own?
Thread theme:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meU2gAU7Xss
>>55864834
Are you avoiding metro?
