I'm a fast food restaurant manager who has developed a bit of an amphetamine habit as of late. My location is currently staffed with about 50 employees, but based on our sales volume we need at least 100 to reach optimal levels. While, we've been trying to recruit more people, I've been working longer and longer hours to compensate. In order to do this, I consume multiple 30 mg XR adderall tablets to keep me going for the 20-30 hour shifts that I've been doing 1 or 2 times a week lately (in addition to regular shifts, paper work, food cost, projections, etc. etc.)
I want to know what you think about the legality of such a situation. Should I be allowed to voluntarily sacrifice my wellbeing to increase my productivity? Do you think the laws should reflect my free-will to control the chemicals in my body or should I be restricted from this activity?
I'm 27 years old. I exercise daily (lifting 4-5 days a week, running even more) and completed a marathon last year. I value my health but think this temporary measure is not an unethical one despite the determination of the law.
I think you're going to die over a fucking fast food business.
>but based on our sales volume we need at least 100 to reach optimal levels.
Complain about a lack of staffing, threaten to move to a different company. Management looks good on a resume, instead of killing yourself with drugs for this job which will never get better why not move on to something less stressful?
>>69553972
Regardless of my health, shouldn't it fundamentally be my decision though? I could never condone mandatory drug use, but voluntary performance enhancement is a totally different concept, right?
> While the rates of obesity have leveled off in some countries where it's already a public health concern, other places are seeing their obesity rates increase, helping to prop up the global average, according to a study published in The Lancet late Thursday.
>"Over the past four decades, we have transitioned from a world in which underweight prevalence was more than double that of obesity, to one in which more people are obese than underweight, both globally and in all regions except parts of sub-Saharan Africa and Asia," the researchers wrote in their study.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/31/obese-humans-now-outnumber-the-underweight-study.html
Feels good the world is becoming American
>>69553710
Man there are more and more fatasses here by the day.
>>69553710
The new America: fat, gay, and brown.
Worst thing is that most obese americans got fat by eating disgusting pink slime McDonalds and kfc "chicken"
ITT: Post historic figures from countries other than your own that you respect.
Ned Kelly related.
>>69553567
>not the first post
I'm absolutely ashamed of this board
>>69553754
Nigga, the Hitler worship is getting stale.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/03/slaughter-bridge-uncovering-colossal-bronze-age-battle
this + much earlier 1995 Felice Vinci's " The Baltic Origins of Homer's Epic Tales. The Iliad, the Odyssey and the Migration of Myth".
Not even mentioning that most probably real Aryan homeland was nearby (most probably central-east Poland, due to genetic, linguistic and cultural tracing).
I'm not trying to boast, but I'm seriously stumped as the myths and "german" lies are gradually unfolding.
It might rewrite history and cause a HUGE shitstorm over time.
Think about it - Hitler's and Bismarck's shenaningans are a result of 600-800yrs of black PR against the Central Europe.
"Germans"and Muslims(Golden Age) hailed the "Poles" et al. in pre-1000s/1200s as their equals, even superiors. It's all written in their Chronices.
It's changed over time as the Slav kingdoms fell one after another ( divide et impera) and the loathing culminated in 1840s-1940s(but really, current year).
The future is bright.
pic somewhat related. It's said they've only mapped max 4% of the site and their archeo findings are on par with those of the largest battle of Medieval Europe (1410, Tannenberg/Grunwald).
Who cares about white history?
>>69553430
how similar are poles genetically to those of the past? weren't a ton of your smartest killed by the communists, and you guys mixed with them under the USSR?
this sounds awesome though. i've predicted that if Poland is to stay strict on immigration, and not commit suicide like the west, they'll rise within a few decades as the strongest nation in europe
>>69555121
very similar. It's weird really.
>weren't a ton of your smartest killed by the communists,
yes. and germans/Russians(XIX century)
and you guys mixed with them under the USSR?
no. it's the eastern problem.
but
we have a problem with Leftists Communist Jews and their breed (really....) and German sympathizers(Western parts....really.), even after this 200 years of socioethnic buttfucking.
It's like communism never ends ,now masquerading as progressive West-EU.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUXwDMqjC-A
Where were you when libertarianism and the free market triumphed over the economically illiterate socialist?
>>69553407
I assume Rand does not take private insurers' cash. On the basis of it being slavery and all. Just like his buddy Ayn who took security on her deathbed
>>69553407
This is why Rand Paul is a fool and no one, literally no one, takes him seriously.
>>69553480
yep
Hi /pol/. I want to share something with you. I spent a few months in London. Some week ago I moved
back to Bratislava. I am still enjoying that feeling. There are days when I do not spot any arab or nigger in the half-million European capital city! An I basically travel all the city.
This is so awesome to see 99% of all peoplae are white (the rest are asians)!
Even our hobos and homeless people do not increase my blood pressure so much as in the past.
/Pol/, would you like to experience such feelings?
bump
CROATIA NO!!!
>>69553831
haha, typical amerifag
Hey, /pol/ have you seen it : https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=94&v=HMQkV5cTuoY ? What do you think about this video ?
Germans... are you sane?
I'm just really glad I don't live in Europe and have to deal with this shit.
Sadly it will come to America at some point in the near future, so I feel the pain of my European brothers as it relates to Islam spreading like a cancer infection.
man rammstein fucking sucks now
>>69552929
/thread
https://media.giphy.com/media/5mBE2MiMVFITS/giphy.gif
I'm holding my doubts. It is April Fools day after all.
Would be crazy if it happened
>>69552870
Hopefully it goes to trump and not lying ted.
>>69552788
no that's fucking stupid
make a real militia, not a meme ISIS knockoff that'll fail immediately
>>69552788
No because God would not want that
>Thou shall not kill
>Annual student cruise of some 1,700 persons.
>As the ship returned to Stockholm, all male passangers were organized in a line and 4 of the suspects were arrested.
>Everyone are expected to be over 18 y.o
>1 female reported to be raped
http://www.iltalehti.fi/ulkomaat/2016033021343922_ul.shtml
>Before the ship set off, Aftonbladet was making a article regarding this cruise and interviewed some students. Among these students were 2 of the rapists, whom stated on a video, that "They are going to 'Party Hard' as they are graduating from high school/collage"
>This video was later removed from Aftonbladets website.
>The 4 rapists live in "southern Sweden"
>2 of their faces and identity was given out by the video.
>It is clear on the video that they are immigrants
(I am unable to find the video)
>Also 2 of the rapist are suspects IN A HOMICIDE CASE. Not as the killers but as collaborators. This case happened near Stockholm.
http://www.iltalehti.fi/ulkomaat/2016033121348419_ul.shtml
>tl:dr
>4 immigrants rape a swedish woman on a cruise
>2 of them are under investigation in a murder case
>Sweden yes!
>>69552622
lolwhocares
>>69552622
Sweden Yes
>>69552656
>is this degenerate?
Does /pol/ approve of a free Scotland?
fuck off aussie it doesnt effect me
>>69552471
Oi, ya fucking drongo. This is a politics board, so let's talk some fucking politics, yeah cunt?
>>69552423
Nope they're a bunch of leftie cunts
>normalfags actually believe this is legit argument to why "diversity" is good
https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/4crwl5/eli5_why_is_diversity_said_to_be_a_good_thing_for/
>>69551679
Rebbit is literally owned by Jews and now they're giving your comment history to the FBI and NSA
I wish people would let that shit hole die already
But that is a proven fact.
They simply aren't mentioning that race mixing only produces better offspring when both parents have worthwhile genes to pass on, which niggers do not 99% of the time.
Greetings great men of /pol/.
I'm looking to buy some books, what are some essential ones? I have been told to buy the way of men and why we fight all ready.
culture of critique series
>>69551595
Revenant
i wsh i cl d rad
THE GLOBAL ECONOMY IS FUNDEMENTALLY BROKEN AND NEARING ANOTHER CRASH
/pol/ is very good at piecing together information. /pol often picks up on things the general public is missing out on. But I do think that there is a serious lack of economics comprehension here. I think this is yuge because there is a strong case to be made that a crash is inevitable and immanent
So for whoevers interested, heres an economics lesson. Bear with me if you just want the juicy habbening fuel. Im first going to explain what I think economics is good for and some basic econ
>>69551432
----PART ONE: HARD AND SOFT SCIENCES-----
If you think of science as a spectrum from hard science to soft science. Far on the hard side I think people would place things like physics and chemistry. Down the line but still hard would probably be sciences like geology or biology. Soft sciences might be sociology, psychology, and anthropology. The softest science would probably be some applied gender studies shit.
Hard science tell us in definitive way how our universe works. Understanding hard science allows us to directly manipulate our universe. It is possible to do that because hard science has a controllable number of variables that we can reliably expect to yield the same results every time. The data of a hard science is objective and exact.
Soft sciences don't use objective and exact measurements of the universe. The data is a result of someones subjective inferences based on subjective observations. These observations can help us understand why things are the way the are, but can't be modeled with absolute certainty because of their infinite variables.
As you probably have noticed, the soft sciences have a habit have being warped to astounding levels of bullshit. They are usually grounded in reality, but can be manipulated to enact vast social change. They are of course not always bad. It is undoubtedly useful or just nice to have an interpretation of our place in the world. We just need to remember that they are subjective inferences about the world and not exact, manipulable data.
>>69551517
-----PART TWO: ECON'S PLACE-----
That explains what is wrong with the field of Economics. It is too often treated as a hard science, when it is absolutely a soft science. Economics started out as simple observations of the way people use commerce to trade with each other. But today it is frequently used as if it can be manipulated like a hard science. State economists are given immense powers and influence despite being consistently wrong. They get away with this by using convoluted charts and equations that make people think economics is a hard science and that if we use the right equations we can directly manipulate our world like we do with hard science. They are not idiots and they aren't deliberately evil. Its just that the last few generations of economists have been taught to treat econ like a hard science. It often looks like it works because the current economic models are generally configured after the recent past. But infinite variables eventually catch up and break the models. So they are remodeled after newer data until another unforseen variable comes in and breaks it. This would continue for eternity since there are infinite variables in an economy. Economics is great at helping us understand abstract ideas such as how wealth is created, what value is, what money is, how prices are determined, etc. The truth is, basic economics is actually very simple. Problems that seem complicated can often be explained with a few principles.ii
>>69551628
----THE ABSOLUTE BASICS----
When humans combine land labor and capital they create products. Products can be traded. The value earned in that trade is revenue. Revenue minus the land labor and capital cost of producing the product are profits. Profits are distributed to individuals that contributed to the production according to their contributions of land labor and capital.
The price that the product is traded at is determined by the interaction of two functions. Supply and Demand. Supply represents the quantity of a product that a firm is able and willing to sell at a given price. Demand is the quantity that individuals and firms are willing and able to buy that product. Higher prices mean more supply and less demand, while lower prices mean less supply and more demand. Neither one determines the other. The functions are codependent on each other to determine a price. The price is where the functions intersect. Many failed economic theories have made the mistake of thinking one determined the other.
Why have you not converted to Odinism?
>>69551424
because most people on /pol/ don't even lift
>>69551424
Too cringy m8, convince me if you can.
![NedKelly1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/2olmDot.jpg "NedKelly1[1]")
