Made this a little more accurate.

>protools
laughed

>>66196633
a little more shit*

actually a lot more... the lines look bad and highlight how bad you are at formatting text. also none of the pictures or captions are funny. it's just a trainwreck all around

so...which one should i use?

>>66196775
>actually a lot more... the lines look bad and highlight how bad you are at formatting text
yeah I just pasted shit over the original. Does it matter
> also none of the pictures or captions are funny. it's just a trainwreck all around
you clearly aren't in the industry

this was more about accuracy than humor

>>66196824
Ableton obviously

Sorry, OP. >>66196775 speaks sense. You suck.

>>66196633
>Logic Pro X
NO FUCK OFF THAT ONE'S NOT EVEN FUNNY >:(

>>66196854
Can I see the original?

>>66196854
you think protools is for hipsters who work in bike shops, that shows how much you know about "the industry" lol
>this was more about accuracy than humor
lol you're just saying that because it's shit

>>66196854
Different anon here, if this was more about accuracy than humor, than you've missed the mark even further.

>>66196890
see
>66194508

>>66196931
>you think protools is for hipsters who work in bike shops
that's a foley artist.

show's how much you know

>>66196932
I'm trying to pinpoint the implied user

>in all of the years of it's existence, /prod/ has finally achieved a common consensus on a subject
>this image sucks

>>66196961
actually it shows how shit your picture is that i had to make it full size to even tell... also the fact that you think protools is primarily for foley also shows how little you know about the industry lol

>>66196971
this desu senpai

>>66196939
see
>>66194508

>>66196971
sure.

>>66196961
>I'm trying to pinpoint the implied user
That's why I said you've missed the mark.

>>66196988
I'm actually in sound design myself, that's why I used it.
I was making fun of the fact that a pretty decent majority of pro tools users aren't mixing music at all.

Sorry it wasn't done in adobe illustrator.

>>66197040
>Sorry it wasn't done in adobe illustrator.
any image editor can make properly sized pictures lol

>>66197099
lol!
XD