I know "burger" has been a stupid name-calling maymay on 4chan for a few years now, but did you ever stop to think it was a reality? Because I discovered that it is real.
Let me explain; I live in Southern California. There isn't a single eatery in this town where I can go, and know that the people making or bringing or eating the food (at adjacent tables) isn't a native Spanish-speaker. Oh sure, they speak English now, but it isn't their mother-tongue. Even something disgusting like a Denny's. It's all dressed up in Americana, with it's diner-kitsch. I was the only white in the building. Nobody within ear-shot was speaking English. The waiter asked me for my order in Spanish, then apologized like he'd just shit on my face. And he did.
But here's where the worm turns: There is a burger joint in town that I never gave a second glance. It's a fucking burger place, what is there to it? One day, I wanted a burger, so my wife and I didn't feel like Fast Food, and wandered into the one place we'd never been.
The only things they sell are Burgers, fries and alcohol. Also sports, on the TVs, I guess.
There wasn't a single spic in the place. We've since been back. It wasn't until the third time, that we noticed: There isn't a single spic in the place. There was one black woman. Nobody had an accent. Not a single thing about it was Hispanic. Maybe the cooks were, I didn't see them.
Could the memery be true? That burgers are so intrinsically American, that illegals and their spawn absolutely refuse to partake?
>>66415093
You call that a burger???
>>66415093
I could do with a nice burger about now.
>>66415093
>hating Spanish speakers for being Spanish speakers
You're no different from the people in 1880 who wouldn't hire "those sing song talking fucks from Ireland".
If that business is tax compliant they don't have illegals working there they've got legal immigrants, in that case good for everyone.
Aside from that, I applaud you for finding a great local hole-in-the-wall local business and you should keep going there because that's a small business keeping the local community together and keeping wages in your community.
Businesses that hire illegals don't put them in customer service positions, this is especially true in the time of the Trump electorate.
Why should someone who hasn't yet experienced very basic human interaction be allowed to make choices that influence the entire society?
I say that 20+ year old virgins should not be allowed to vote.
What do you guys think?
I like poop!!!
>>66414955
Cucks shouldn't allowed to post or vote so gtfo
Manginae and simps shouldn't be allowed to exist
>in sociology class
>wrote short paper on why "black lIves matter" should really be "all lIves matter"
>entirety of paper talk about how people from all socioeconomic backgrounds are killed by the police in America every day
>teacher doesn't read it
>gives me a 0
>get called out in class
I'm going to fucking kill myself
>>66414866
>go to dean
>report teacher
>get him fired
>you get 100 as compensation
>>66414866
>>in sociology class
Stopped reading there. Go kill yourself you faggot.
>>66414912
>required humanities credit
What else was I supposed to do asshole?
If one of these commies wins is it truly the end of America?
>>66414833
>giving amnesty to 35 million foreign criminals who love socialism
Yes
>>66414833
No. It will just be another miserable 4 years of liberals fucking gloating all over the place, though.
>>66414833
Yes
How does /pol/ feel about martial arts? Do you currently train? Have you had training in your life? are you ready for an attacker to subdue you?
P.S. Conor McGregor was too fucking arrogant during his card, forgetting that he gained 25lbs(11Kilos) of weight in a time parameter that can't result in fine tuned fighting muscle
Entertaining to watch but I wouldn't do martial arts. It's pretty pointless.
What ranking in which martial art do you fags hold
It looks gay as fucking watching them hug and grab each other on the floor.
I follow boxing. It has its flaws, but I enjoy it.
Dear white people.
Your ancestors have done something
You have done nothing.
You have no reason to act superior because YOU as an individual have done nothing at all.
You are no matter nor worse then any other race and there is no reason for this white pride bullshit.
If you want to act like you are superior and take credit for things because OTHER white people did something which you had no contribution for then go ahead and also take credit for all negative things.
cruz missile etc
You're right, my family and I aren't famous so I should abandon it! :^)
I am born superior.
>UN passed sanctions
>North Korea launched rockets in defiance
>Nork cargo ship was seized by Philippines
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-35735263
Could it be happening?
>NK habbening
AKA Sunday
>>66413202
We can seize a ship? Impressive..
Just saying, this "Trump" fad is so over now.
Cruz got 64 delegates today... Trump only got 52
And guess what? California will vote Cruz
Say it with me everybody "PRESIDENT HILLARY CLINTON" because lord knows Cruz won't be able to take her on
>>66412304
>California will vote Cruz
Since when do they vote biblethumpers?
I live in CA and there are tons of Trump supporters and very few Cruz people.
>>66412347
Since every retard in california thinks Trump is the next Hitler and will probably switch parties just to make sure he loses
libertarianism sounds good on a superficial level: leave us alone and let the economy grow. Unfortunately they don't put much scrutiny on their economic positions; they have such a simplistic understanding of the economy and especially the savings-investment, employment, and banking functions that it is almost child-like.
To start: they believe that higher savings leads to higher loanable funds and this will lower the price of credit. The cheapened credit will thus then flow automatically back into the economy via loans to industry so that the supply of goods is increased and everyone becomes wealthier.
If this were true, I would probably be a libertarian.
This analysis has some gaping holes in it. The first is the equities market. The vast majority of all equities bought and sold are on the secondary market, meaning that the proceeds of the sales of the equities don't go toward the business, but toward whoever sold them, i.e. stock brokers. Understand? The stock market is a gigantic sinkhole for capital; none of the money on the stock market is helping businesses to expand or buy materials, inputs, or labor. Most people prefer to put their money in the stock market naturally because, in comparison with investing in individual companies as a venture capitalist, the risk and uncertainty are much much lower. Since the stock market is pretty much guaranteed by the way the monetary system works to inflate consistently, it's a no-brainer: invest in stocks, not in companies.
The second hole here is about investment via banking. OK so if people put a lot of money in the stock market then that's a fair chunk of capital that industry is deprived of, but what about banking? The vast majority of banks' loans are not to private businesses, they go to households. Banks don't like to lend to industry, they like mortgages, auto-loans, credit cards or they like lending to hedge funds. Why? The answer is simple: collateral. If people default on their mortgages, the bank gets land and a house. If hedge funds default on a loan, the bank gets assets. If a business defaults on a loan, the bank gets ... ??? some illiquid business inputs in what was an apparently unprofitable venture? See my point? So, left to its own devices, the banking system will not lend to industry, allowing the economy to expand by producing more goods and paying workers in wages. Instead, the banking system will lend our own purchasing power to us as debt so we can access the existing stock of goods. The former is positive and pro-growth. It occurred in the past in the free market because alternatives like equities and mortgages and all that shit wasn't available, so all of the savings-capital was pumped directly into industry. The latter is negative: it means that, in comparison to the alternative, we get lower supply of goods, lower wages, and higher debt.
The third hole is about investment in land. Basically if you don't know who Henry George is, you have a fuckton of learning to do about land / real estate / housing and the economics of it. The long and short of it is: land, left to its own devices, will swallow up capital as an appreciating asset but provide zero contribution to the economy. It's fucking land. You can't make more of it. You need it for anything you do and spending $1 on it or $1,000,000 on has 0 effect on what the quality or quantity will be. Compare this with anything else in the capitalist system; spend $1 on a car and you get a shitheap, spend $1,000,000 on a car and you get a Ferrari. See how that works? Supply and demand. But supply and demand is broken in the market for land because you can't fucking produce it. Investment into land creates a positive feedback loop where credit (mortgages) inflates the price, leading people to think of it as an appreciating asset, leading to more credit being pumped it, higher prices, more speculative credit, and so on. Supply and demand in land markets is broken and requires guidance or caps on the size of mortgages or high property taxes or SOMETHING to devalue land.
So in sum, if libertarians get their way about the economy, and the savings-investment function is left to its own devices, all of the nation's capital will get sucked in to equities, into non-business loans, and worst of all, into land prices. This means that businesses are deprived of credit, we get our own purchasing power as debt rather than cash from wages, there's a smaller supply of goods, less economic growth and the nation's capital becomes psychotically devoted to making housing unattainable without more debt. Compare this to an authoritarian system of investment guidance and you have credit flowing in to industry, leading to growth, higher output, purchasing power as cash-wages rather than debt, and reasonable housing prices due to restrictions on capital flowing into land where it gets completely absorbed and has no positive impact on productivity or output.
Libertarianism is exactly what the elites want: freedom to control capital against normal people. It's literally the biggest psyop con that has ever been pulled in history. Don't be a fool.
Even the greatest comedian of our time Luis C.K. called trump out for being racist.
It is over ladz. We lost. Accept it and move on like true conservatives.
>>66412038
time to pack our bags and move to interracial breeding grounds
Who? He's still alive?
>faked Italy flag
>"we"
busted
Ausfags Channel 7's Sunday Night are currently running an hour long story on Martin Bryant, showing never before vision.
>>66411938
>never before vision
Was it interesting m8?
>>66411938
The fuck are you talking about and why should I care.
>>66413783
It's still on - they showed his interrogation. He was a legit retard.
Why did he lose?
Hardmode - no Joooos
A war of 3 fronts isn't a good idea m8
Because chocolate syrup poured out of his head.
>>66411776
Also
>Glorious CCCP
http://www.zaikeinews.com/articles/1413/20160106/births-turn-upward-5-years-japan.htm
source data: Japanese government
http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/list/81-1a.html
Good job, Abe
Good job, Abe
>>66411363
Good job, Abe.
Gas the humanities departments, Abe.
1- Is being gay a choice?
2- is gay pride a first world privilege?
3- Can gays ironically be redpilled?
4- Have you ever had a gay friend?
5- have you ever gotten in a lot of trouble for not being pro-gay right
No
Sure?
Yes
Yes
I literally don't care about "gay rights."
>>66411061
>1- Is being gay a choice?
I don't think so, I don't chose being straight
2- is gay pride a first world privilege?
Of course, se how's Africa.
3- Can gays ironically be redpilled?
Yes, I don't see how being gay is a ''Blue Pill''
4- Have you ever had a gay friend?
Yes, they're bro-tier
5- have you ever gotten in a lot of trouble for not being pro-gay right
I support gays f.a.m
>>66411061
1. Not always but yes. A lot of them are total attention whores. I'm in Washington State. No way that many in Seattle are that way biologically.
2. It's not just a priviledge, it's a right. In America they are free to be faggots, just as I am free to call out their bullshit.
3. Gays can be all over the spectrum. There are based gays like Milo Yiannopolis, but most suck and conform to liberal hypocrisy, much like women and niggers do.
4. I've known gays. I was kinda friends with them till they got too bitchy because they're too fucking sensitive. You can't have any meaningful conversations about anything relevent without triggering them.
5. I stay low key. I've had people in my face for basically every political belief I have I have ever had. Living in this liberal shithole sucks.
Why do you want Trump as president?
Seriously tho, EDUCATION is cheaper than a FUCKING WALL!
/pol/ BTFO
racists on suicide watch
>>66410485
Because morons like you dont read his actual fucking website where it says it will cost 75 BILLION A YEAR
>>66410485
In all honesty we should reduce schools to K-9th grade, and 6th-9th grade people learn a trade.
I like how Berniefags are so bad at money they mistake 10 billion with 10 trillion
![img-large-burger[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/66CpPvD.jpg "img-large-burger[1]")
