>one 6pin connector
>$199 (though probably not with aftermarket coolers which you should get since stock is HORRID)
>two of them for $498 beats a 1080 for $700 (at least in one benchmark)
>150w
>drivers are getting somewhat better
HOLY SHIT
NVIDIA IS DONE FOR
AMD FINALLY WON
>>54848433
that 6 pin position looks so weird with the cooler extended from the pcb
>>54848433
>1070 better than 980ti performance
>Our card is only about 980ti performance
>Better drop the price and hype it up as much as possible since we cannot compete head to head with the latest
>>54848497
>the 480 is now the 490x
>>54848497
yes, you are correct.
what point are you trying to make
>>54848526
This. I could give two shits about anything else. Where the fuck the 490
Where the fuck Zen
>>54848433
>two for $498
can you do math? 199*2= $398
>>54848757
The 4 GiB variant is $199 and the 8 GiB variant is $249.
>>54848789
minor thing but wccftech is saying $229
http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-480-polaris-10-launch/
>>54848809
yes but the actual stream showed 498 dollars for dual 480 so that means they are 249 for the 8gb version
RX 480 confirmed for similar performance to 390. Dont get too excited.
>>54848869
it said <$500, no?
>>54848930
now that im thinking about it, you might be right
so yeah thats even better actually if its only 230
>>54848902
for 200 dollars though, it's not too bad
>>54848952
you might be right about the $249 thing, idk
>>54848902
>half the price
>half the TDP
>newer architecture
still great senpai
>Driver issues
>No gameworks
>Less graphical features
>No CUDA
>Disgustingly ugly
>Thinking it actually beats the 980ti or 1080 at all
Fucking retard. Kill yourself.
>>54848992
>it doesn't have all this proprietary shit nvidia made so it's bad
how about you kill yourself?
t. 560ti user
>>54848992
>>Driver issues
huh?
>>No gameworks
is this a bad thing?
>>Less graphical features
such as?
>>No CUDA
real world application?
>>Disgustingly ugly
it goes in a case and it's a reference card
>>Thinking it actually beats the 980ti or 1080 at all
it's not meant to
>>54849014
Who cares? You get those extra features with nVidia. You don't get them with AMD. Maybe instead of crying about it AMD should one up them, hmm?
>>54849038
>extra features
useless shit not worth the price warrant
> Maybe instead of crying about it AMD should one up them
200 dollars for a 390 is a good thing. vega will most likely be 1070/1080 levels with a lower price. that is passing nvidia.
>>54849038
One up them with free software alternatives, sure. I don't use any of the things you listed, though. Except maybe CUDA since that's basically a hardware thing.
>>54848992
>1070 is the most reasonable new card from nvidia
>$379
>amd card that can apparently do stable 90fps vr
>$200
nvidia btfo, and all my pcs have nvidia cards
>>54849038
>cuda
opencl
>gameworks
oh you mean that thing that will make previous gen cards lose 50%+ of their performance as soon as new cards are released, yeah I love that
>>54848647
>>54849029
>>54848433
>>54847048
>>54847291
And this was all on just the first page of /g/. The AMD shilling is strong tonight.
>>54849149
and how many fucking thread were made when the 1080 was announce?
fucking idiot
>>54849035
>>>54848992
>>>Driver issues
>huh?
He's referring to amds driver history
>>>No gameworks
>is this a bad thing?
Yes. I certainly want exclusive graphical options since they exist and will continue to exist.
>>>Less graphical features
>such as?
Mfaa, physx, easy refresh rate over clocking and supersampling
>>>No CUDA
>real world application?
>>>Disgustingly ugly
>it goes in a case and it's a reference card
>>>Thinking it actually beats the 980ti or 1080 at all
>it's not meant to
Where is their flagship then? This is it. They arent prepared.
>>54849261
>He's referring to amds driver history
Driver overhead is approaching zero
>Yes. I certainly want exclusive graphical options since they exist and will continue to exist.
They aren't exclusive, simply the implementation is. Devs can choose to run with TressFX/ShadowFX as well, and you will likely complain about it because they are "AMD specific exclusive graphics options".
>Mfaa, physx, easy refresh rate over clocking and supersampling
But AMD has their technologies too. Where's FreeSync, Eyefinity, TrueAudio, Async, bridgeless CF, etc.? Understandably people can weigh in on which features they prefer but there are not outright fewer graphical features between AMD/nVidia.
>CUDA
OpenCL does the same thing and now the language gap is bridged, along with more libraries than CUDA.
>disgustingly ugly
Personally, I think the FE looks worse.
>Thinking it actually beats the 980Ti/1080
We don't even know this yet, and it's subjective, for all we know it could when a 1080 throttles down to the lowest clock compared to a 480 overclocked to the same clock. GPU boost clocks can greatly skew raw performances.
>Where is their flagship then? This is it. They arent prepared.
If you're worried about a "flagship card" then by all means blow it on a 1080 for 700 bucks. But keep in mind that neither company has released a "flagship card" yet and the 16/14nm architectures still have a long way to go. These are affordable cards that belong in a OEM box or a budget builder's box and still be very satisfied with the performances.
>>54849261
Mfaa is snake oil and physx is rarely used in newer games anymore, Most Publishers has to outsource the PC version to someone who knows how to implement that all those superfluous proprietary bs.
Any news on the 460x?
>>54849168
>Two wrongs make a right
Grow up?
I've still got a 6950 so no matter what I upgrade to it will be amazing.
>>54848902
>RX 480 confirmed for similar performance to 390
More like performance of a Fury and its a locked gpu, so an unlocked polaris could compete with the 1070.
>>54850220
>an unlocked polaris could compete with the 1070
>have to be unlocked in order to compete
>higher electricity bill
>>54851623
good job pajeet, +50 rupees for you
>>54850220
>its a locked gpu
Where was this mentioned?
>>54851623
>5¥ off of a 1200$ 3.5 GB VRAM Nvidia card coupon have been sent to you
>>54850135
Also still running a 6950;
Been dancing around with the idea of getting a 380 for a while now; Would now be the time to do it, or should I try to hold off for the 400-series?
Keeping DVI-I is one of the things I'm trying to hold on to, if possible.
http://prosjekt.eidvgs.no/ovedvik/
>>54848433
Actually it is worse for everyone if amd or nvidia is "done".
Look at CPU market: Slightly progress for 5 years and CPU prices for Intel are insane.
>nvidia makes 1080 with one 8 pin
>talk shit about underpowering
>amd makes card wit one 6 pin
>praise for low power consumption
what the fuck is wrong with this board.
>>54853790
AMD gets a free pass every single time because people are shit scared of monopoly situations.
Also 12 year olds.
Wrong
$199 only gets you 4GB
4GB in multi-GPU and high res? Enjoy your shitty frametimes & stuttering as Radeon Pro Duo shows
You'll be paying closer to 560 for $229 8GB cards which means it's not much cheaper than $599 GTX 1080
>>54853790
>what the fuck is wrong with this board.
Summer and fanboyism.
>>54848992
Very well structured arguments, novidyot
Nvidia has pretty much won
GTX 1070 150W TDP faster than RX 480 HOUSEFIRES 150W TDP with no overclocking because it's already maxed out with single 6pin
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2016/05/27/from_ati_to_amd_back_journey_in_futility
>In the simplest terms AMD has created a product that runs hotter and slower than its competition's new architecture by a potentially significant margin.
>>54853853
I've seen this exact post in another thread
the shilling is real
>>54853790
Well, one is a $200 card and the other is a $700 enthusiast card. You'd expect to get your value's worth for a $700 card, wouldn't you?
>>54848433
should I upgrade from a 670 to this?
>>54853820
The 8gb cards will cost $229, and the conclusions you draw about stuttering may not apply to Polaris 10
>>54850029
Not him but I think the point is more that people make more threads when there's an announcement. How many threads are there each and every Intel release? Apple release? And so on and so forth.
It's part and parcel of dealing with humans, I'm afraid you're going to have to deal with it. Even stickies don't help.
>>54853853
>>54853872
>BUTTMAD AYYMDPOORFAG DETECTED UNABLE TO ACCEPT THE BITTER TRUTH THAT KYLE WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG
>>54853877
Wait until both camps have their entire new lineups out. This shit is barely a paper launch.
>>54853904
>BUTTMAD AYYMDPOORFAGS DETECTED
>>54853790
One costs $200, one costs $700.
>>54853820
>You'll be paying closer to 560 for $229 8GB cards
Nice maths there, Pajeet. Too much poo for you today I think.
>>54853853
>Look may I posted it again!
>>54853790
Well, one is mid range and the other is high end but I have to agree that caring about power consumption on a desktop is pretty retarded, with the exception of extremes like the FX 9590.
>>54853938
$199 is for 4GB card
Your math is bad and you know it
>>54848902
For 200 dollars, it's not bad.
>>54853906
>>54853921
Why are you so emotionally invested in this
>>54849261
>>54849716
TOLD STATUS:
[ ] NOT TOLD
[ ] TOLD
[x] FUCKING TOLD
>>54853951
Yes. And what is $229 x 2, Pajeet? Feel free to use a calculator app to help you, but I can tell you now that your initial poo of $560 was incorrect. Please do the necessary and re-evaluate your sums.
Nvidiacucks are getting BTFO holy shit savage as fuck
>>54848433
25% of the card is the fan. They need to cut itttttttttt This would be perfect for a NCASE build.
It's the fucking price that does it boys. Clearly none of you fags are old enough to remember how much of a bargain the HD 4800 series was for AMD. Those cards utterly demolished nvidishits garbage at the time.
AMD is going back to really going for the $:performance market with this card it seems and that is great fucking news. Fuck buying $500 cards. This $200 will probably be fine to play most games just fine at 1080p.
>>54854083
>HD4800
Enjoy your overheating HOUSEFIRES
Just google HD4800 overheating
TOP KEK
AYYMD, THE ORIGINAL HOUSEFIRES BACK IN 2008
>>54854057
After market coolers will get it done
>>54854083
>HD 4800 series
I still have my old 4870 1gb even though it doesn't work anymore. It surely beats the GTX 260 back in the day.
I still remember the Fermi housefires and 1.7 meme. Good times...
>>54854057
Fan has dual intakes top and bottom so it should provide more airflow even in reference designs.
>>54854093
Literally used an HD 4870 in Australian summers with no air conditioning and had no problems. rekt yourself mate.
>>54854083
HD6000 series was pretty good for the price too, and not a housefire like thermi
>>54848433
>$200
Surely this means fury prices are going to plummet, right guys?
>>54854273
nope, if anything they'll go up due to scarcity
>>54848433
490 when??
Cmon one of you under the NDA. Just give us a little glimpse at the benchmark. plssss.
>>54854149
It also forgo a DVI port to provide better exhaust airflow. I hope a DP to DVI adapter will be provided as a norm from card makers. I'm already using an HDMI to DVI cable and need another DVI port.
Anyone got a pic of the ports?
Meanwhile Im sat happily with my 1080 running like a champ.
Yep lets watch people think these cards will come anywhere close
>>54854170
i used it in finland at winter and it overheated
>>54854364
It has little below 390 performance.
>>54848433
I've never bought an AMD card but this is very tempting.
Would I be able to run a cheap Nvidia card at the same time just for Shadowplay?
>>54854477
No but AMD packs playTV for screen recording. I use playTV but people say shadow is better. So far I had no problems with playTV
>>54848497
>10% better
>200% the price
Nvidia has never been in such a shitty position before. They should have released the 1070 first
>>54854477
isn't obs exist? performance is really good though,it even werks with igp like intel hd 4600.
>>54854474
so this is hd 4000 5000 6000 and 7000 all over again, cheap powerful gpu.
>>54854083
built my pc here when chinklong and gayinelite still around that was hd 4870, kek happened when hd 5000 & hd6000 were popular here because buttcoin.
There is no point in getting an aftermarket card.
It already runs very cool no doubt due to the much lower clocks and 14nm finfet. Case fans should be enough imo.
Unless you want to OC and get better performance than the 980/390x tier it already runs at sure. But I like the non-gaymin simple design. No fancy led shit, no color clashes, just good old elegant design.
>>54848497
It was always said that it would not compete with the 1080/70. It's a mid-range card (mid range, high, and enthusiast grade -- this, vega, and navi, respectively).
>>54854474
Man, you faggots are hilariously desperate
I wish I saved the posts of that one guy who was convinced that the 480 would cost $329 or more.
>>54854497
>>54854549
Well I meant shadowplay because its the only one that can record the last 1-5 minutes of play. I love being able to hit a button and catch anything I missed from not already recording.
>>54853872
It really is. Both companies hire shitters to post here.
Too bad AMD won't spend that extra cash on driver development, nor will NVIDIA spend theirs on learning how to not be scummy slant-eyed jews.
>>54848902
But that's amazing, considering it's like a $150 price drop for the performance with such low power draw.
>>54854523
Fucking sick move by AMD. Wait for the 1080 hype. Release a card for $200 for the budget people and tell them they can CF to get near 1080 performance. Now every one is looking at the 1080 like why even? Nvidia is now pressed to get the 1070 on the market asap.
pic unrelated
>>54848433
Nvidia won. It doesnt matter which is the best product. Pepsi might be a healthier choice over coke...
>>54848497
Dude the 980ti isnt even 200$ i dont even care if its less powerful than current gen the performance to price is so good, i can still get two for less than current gen and match it.
>>54854575
>AMD won't spend that extra cash on driver development
AMD spent money on Mantel/Vulkan they are trying to let the dev gain more control of the hardware so they don't have to driver patch every game as much as they have been doing. It would seem that AMD woke up one morning and said how can we fix all 100 problems that we have with the money we dont have. Overheating and Drivers are #1 on the list and they seem to be doing good at it.
>>54848460
It's a blower that intakes from both sides of the fan
There is no point in getting an aftermarket card.
It already runs very cool no doubt due to the much lower clocks and 14nm finfet. Case fans should be enough imo.
Unless you want to OC and get better performance than the 980/390x tier it already runs at sure. But I like the non-gaymin simple design. No fancy led shit, no color clashes, just good old elegant design.
>>54848497
It was always said that it would not compete with the 1080/70. It's a mid-range card (mid range, high, and enthusiast grade -- this, vega, and navi, respectively).
>>54848433
That's just sad.
Pretty much everyone has a GTX970 or R390 already and for us the RX480 offers no improvement. If we want something faster we have to get the outrageously priced 1070 or 1080.
>>54854696
I still have a GTX 260.
>>54854696
>Pretty much everyone has a GTX970 or R390 already
Nigger what the fuck are you talking about?
>>54854349
Seconded, is the 480 the top of what we're getting from AMD this year? If this is what the 480's like, I guarantee the 490 is going to be great. What about the X cards, next year?
is HDR a meme?
how long till you have monitors and games that support it?
does it really look that much better?
>>54854718
There's Vega which will compete with the 1070/1080 at a very precisely calculated pricepoint. Then Navi next year as enthusiast grade against the 1080ti.
>>54854731
I have a 10bit panel
>>54854780
>muh speshul snowflake
Fuck off seriously
>>54854715
the 970 is the most prolific card on steam moron.
>>54854780
do games actually use it correctly yet?
>>54854796
>most prolific
5%
not "pretty much everyone" by a longshot
don't call people moron when you're talking shit, kid
>>54854796
I don't care what the fuck it is, what you said is not true. Most peopel do not have 970s or 390s
>didn't buy in at 2.46
Kill me now
>>54854797
I don't think games need to specify 8bit vs 10bit colors/graphics/whatever. It all happens automagically.
>>54854796
Who the hell uses Steam when Piratebay exists?
>>54854834
People who aren't thieves?
>>54854822
Buy it now then you fag.
>>54854822
>>54854850
My mom saw me writing this and she'd like me to to apologize to you for calling you a fag. I am really sorry for calling you that. Will you forgive me?
>>54854845
To be a thief you have to physically take something first
NVIDIA WON
GTX 1070 150W MUCH FASTER THAN AMD RX 480 150W HOUSEFIRES WITH NO OVERCLOCKABILITY BECAUSE MAXED OUT 1 6PIN
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2016/05/27/from_ati_to_amd_back_journey_in_futility/
>In the simplest terms AMD has created a product that runs hotter and slower than its competition's new architecture by a potentially significant margin.
>Where the plot thickens is when you look at the Koduri’s unwavering ambition. Koduri’s ultimate goal is to separate the Radeon Technologies Group from its corporate parent at all costs with the delusion that RTG will be more competitive with NVIDIA and become a possible acquisition target for Koduri and his band of mutineers to cash in when it's sold. While Koduri is known to have a strong desire to do this by forging a new relationship with Apple on custom parts (no surprise there) for Macbooks, the real focus is on trying to become the GPU technology supplier of choice to none other than Intel. While this was speculated some time ago I can tell you with certainty that a deal is in the works with Intel and Koduri and his team of marauders working overtime to get the deal pulled into port ASAP. The Polaris 10/11 launch, and all of its problems, are set to become a future problem of Intel’s in what RTG believes will be a lucrative agreement that will allow Koduri and his men to slash the lines from Lisa Su and the rest of AMD.
Good luck with that, Pajeet
>>54854866
Only if you suck my dick.
>>54854866
Only if she'll give me a handy the next time I take her out to dinner.
>>54854866
Yes, and send your best to your mother. She sounds like a good lady. Always listen and cherish her wise advice, she won't be with you forever.
>>54854872
I honestly can't see why you're posting this in every single thread. It runs cooler than the 1080 housefire and in CF it beats it (for cheaper).
>>54854898
>300W
>cooler
Good luck with that, Pajeet
>>54854872
>Buttblasted nvidia shill is pooper pulverised because AMD told him to fuck off
>Pulls absolute nonsensical bullshit out of his gaping anus to get back at AMD
>Doesn't know that AMD's TDP is always higher than the actual TDP by 10 - 20% while Nvidia's TDP is always lower than actual TDP by 30%
Stop grasping at straws, Nvidiot, and just accept that it's over. AMD won.
>>54854888
Seriously this, I wish my mom was here to cook for me as my wife is completely terrible at it.
One of the big turn-offs for the 390/390X is the fact it's a power-hungry and (sometimes) hot card, and despite the GCN 1.2 improvements in the Fury/Fury X being pretty good - especially when it came to fixing heat and power issues - they were plagued by a couple months of iffy drivers and weird pricing, so a cheaper set of cards that do a little more of what the Fury/Fury intended to do are great for people that need an upgrade, and don't plan on future-proofing for 4k, because despite the fact it's being pushed, a lot more people are more than content with the 1080p ballpark, which is where these cards will absolutely dominate in terms of performance and value
If I were to guess, AMD probably made these cards around a perfected Tonga GPU, which was in things like the R9 285, a cheap and cute GCN 1.2 card that ran cool and performed a lot better than what the specs would imply, but fell under the radar given it's niche
>>54854907
>TDP=watt
>watt=heat
Might want to check yourself in a retard clinic bruh.
Besides, it runs cooler than the 1080. Both cards do.
>>54854924
No, 300W is more than 180W
DEAL WITH IT
AYYMD, POWER INEFFICIENT
Is the 380 a good buy right now at ~$200 or so, or should I hold off and see if the new cards push it down further?
>>54854936
Embarrassing.
So would this be a good upgrade from my 7970?
>300W
>Frame pacing issues everywhere, inherent to multi-GPU
Yeah, Nvidia pretty much won in performance & power efficiency
>>54854942
>buying ANY new card right now
look, if you need a new card TODAY, buy a used one for $70. I bet you can get a 7950 for that much if you look hard enough
>>54854834
People that play multiplayer games?
>>54854944
Not worth it. Get a 1070 if you want a real upgrade.
The new Polaris cards are basically overclocked rebadged 390X cards at a smaller node with slightly lower power consumption.
>>54854942
You've got to be shitting me, lurk moar
>>54854936
And 400-500$ is less than 700$.
>>54853752
Wait, the newer tech in this case is a massive leap in efficiency. plus display port to vga/dvi exists man, I have a drawer full of them.
>>54854981
$599 is well worth it to avoid multi-GPU stuttering issues
180W is still less heat than 2 150W cards, deal with ti
>>54854969
>The new Polaris cards are basically overclocked rebadged 390X cards at a smaller node with slightly lower power consumption.
The entire card has been redesigned and it's $200
>>54854969
>over $500 Canadian
>for a 7 year old computer
No thanks
>>54848433
That's pretty good news. I'm still rocking a GTX 460, and was seriously hesitating between getting a 960 and a 970 + PSU, but this seems to be the sweet spot.
Everytime Amd releases something, people hype it , then comes release day and nobody buys it.
>>54854947
Some points to consider
>1080 is 180W
>RX480 isn't meant to compete with the 1080, the benchmark was just to prove that it can, for cheaper, and a sign of things to come
>RX is a VR-capable 980/390X tier performance low-power card for $199
If you want to spend 300% more money for 1-10% the performance gain and 20% higher power consumption and much higher heat output, with gimping all but guaranteed down the line, go right ahead.
>>54854992
>$599 is well worth it to avoid multi-GPU stuttering issues
Unlike Nvidia, AMD doesn't have problems like this
>>54854997
Not me. I have an R9 390, but I've always regretted that purchase.
Should have gone for a Fury instead.
>>54855013
http://www.pcper.com/files/review/2016-04-29/GTAV_3840x2160_PLOT.png
>AYYMDPOORFAGS ARE THIS DELUSIONAL
TOPPEST LELKEK
All Nvidia need to do is release the 1060ti or something, that runs better than the 480 and is around the same price.
>>54848433
$200 card
$500 for two
what
>>54855054
Math is hard
>>54854564
obs does that
>>54854696
HD7970-DC2T-3GD5
sadness is sad for 280/380 owners
>>54854956
Where would you suggest I look? I've never been one to trust used PC parts, mainly due to coming from an unknown source for the most part.
>>54854988
My main issue with those adapters is they limit what you can do with certain displays, CRTs to be specific. That's my main reason for wanting to stick to cards that still have their own RAMDAC and VGA compatibility.
GTX 1080 is $599
AYYMD is pretty much a liar and got fucked by Pascal's performance & power efficiency
>>54855054
there's a 4GB version and a 8GB version, and you can note the '<'
So this'll be like $300 in Canada. Should I get this or get a 390x on Kijiji?
>>54855073
except it is maxwell on new architecture
>>54855096
No, it's not Maxwell
Maxwell does not have Graphics Preemption, Compute Preemption, Simultaneous Multi Projection, Conservative Rasterization Tier 2, 4th Generation Delta Colour Compression, DisplayPort 1.4, HEVC & VP9 hardware decoding
Keep on lying though, AMDPOORFAGS
>>54854936
again powerdraw =\= TDP
the more efficient the architecture the less energy is wasted in creating heat.
since the AMD cards haven't been heat tested nobody has any idea what the AMD's TDP will actually be.
What is known is the 1080's TDP is REALLY FUCKIN' HIGH.
>>54855073
>GTX 1080 is $599
Where?
>>54855073
No async compute, higher tdp, costs 3x, can't overclock for shit, runs hot, can't hit the advertised clocks (you're paying for), rigs competition, destined to be gimped.
Also all the 1080s cost over $700 and the aftermarket ones cost even more (more lies).
No thanks.
>>54855013
That was a stupid thing to say, the worst thing you can do is bullshit to make your argument seem better.
AMD cards tend to have less stutter from how they design their hardware. provided the software is high quality, AMD cards have a greatly reduced stutter.
Though at the moment nvidia has changed how their SLI works with the 1000 series so for all we know, SLI could be better by default now.
>>54855123
What happens to the drawn power that doesn't become heat?
BTW the 480 has been confirmed as Polaris 67DF:C7. That means according to the leaked benchmarks, it's on par with the Fury, for $200.
The 480x will be even more powerful. Polaris 67DF:C4? Still outperforms the GTX 970, and of course will be EVEN LESS than $200, meaning performance per dollar has effectively doubled this generation from the last. Bravo AMD.
>>54855158
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKkFqG77-x4
>15-20% faster with async compute
U MAD, AMDPOORFAGS?
WE DID IT
I feel bad for nvidiots. 1080 and 1070 are complete disasters and now AMD has dropped this megaton.
Nvidia is finished. RIP in piece.
>>54852970
He's talking about the Fury
>>54855179
It's slower than GTX 1070 150W and it will be 200W just like Tonga, inefficient and pretty much a joke
>>54854564
playstv does the same too
>>54855169
Used in the actual calculations before being fed back out to the main power. think of it like a leaky water pipe, the water mostly flows through, but the bits that leak are your heat.
Under certain circumstances, LED's can be made to draw heat from their surroundings to produce light, rather than producing heat in the conversion. it's all very interesting physics.
>>54855182
Sorry but that is not async compute.
>>54849038
GPUOpen
>>54855189
>complete disaster
>Nvidia is significantly faster and significantly more power efficient
>Selling out every card that is on the market and making great profit
STAY MAD & DELUSIONAL, AMDPOORFAGS
AMD can't compete with Nvidia at all, period
>>54855195
>believing Nvidia ever
>believing an 8-pin GPU will draw the same or less power than a 6-pin
Stay buttmad Nvidia faggot.
>>54855208
It is async compute, both graphics and compute are done
A moron like you thinks AMD's inferior, inefficient async compute requiring 8 ACES to get 5-10% more performance is the only right implementation
>>54855201
That's not how electricity works. Actually take a physics lesson someday.
>>54855195
The fuck are you talking about it's gonna be 150W
>>54855179
I'm pretty sure the 67DF:C4 is the mobile card
>>54855201
To add to this, all of the logic gates are like miniture obstuctions in the water pipeline, shaping where the water goes, the more there are, the higher pressure the hose becomes, and that leads to more leakage. the way to compensate: make them as small as possible so your water can pass through with as little resistance as possible.
overclocking would be like turning up the hose, faster flow - more pressure - more leakage!
>>54855195
>It's slower than GTX 1070 150W
okay, but 1070 is three times more expensive and only what 50% more powerful?
>>54855238
Metaphor, Also I'm an electrician.
>>54851623
>an unlocked polaris would be around the same TDP as a 1070.
seems pretty good to me.
>>54855266
>50% more powerful
15%
>>54848433
perfect price spot. hopefully the card will end up in all the systems that usually feature a GTX 960, somewhat in the 800-900 bucks price range
>>54855280
we don't know how well it overclocks
1080 is garbage overclocker on practice
how far can this thing jump from 1.3ghz
>>54853820
229 + 229 = $458
>not much cheaper than a 600 dollar card
>$142 less expensive
nice math
>>54848497
If it causes Jewvidya to drop their prices in response, it's a win for everyone. Same if Zen ends up beating Jewtel on price/performance or price/watt.
>>54855312
you can't buy 1080 for 600 though
>>54855219
>Nvidia is significantly faster and significantly more power efficient
lol
If nothing else works, Nvidiots just stick their fingers in their ears and substitute reality for their weird delusions. It's kind of pitiful really.
It will be interesting to see how Nvidia will price the 1070
>>54855195
Stay mad. Nvidia is lying about 150W. The card has already been shown to consume much more. Meanwhile the 480 is a 6-pin card, so it's 150W MAX.
>>54855339
>379 MSRP
In reality 450+
>All these comments about gayme engines and framerates
>All these mad AMDrones and Nvidiots
Y'all niggers:
>>>/v/
>>54855195
>Still trying to deny the housefire
Nvidia get rekt by AMD
>>54855324
Intel fanboy here, and it seems they fucked up big on the new 6900's. I do hope Zen manages to deliver.
I am also eagerly awaiting a itx size Polaris, this is when sff will be a great option.
>>54849261
I can't comprehend you faggots. Do you realize neither amd nor nvidia are political parties? They're both after your money, and yet you defend one or the other as if you were part if the company.
Pathetic and sad desu
>>54855072
Why not run both cards in that case then? You don't have to throw the old one away. And $200 is barely anything considering it's compared to r9 fury in performance. I paid $550 for 6 months ago and I max out games in 1440p.
>>54854912
Are you me?
Miss you mum.
>>54855353
How are they lying? That graph corroborates nvidia's claims.
>>54855377
The 6800k would be sick if I didn't have to buy an overpriced x99 motherboard
rx 480
>199/229 for 4gb/8gb respectively
1070
>379
Benchmark: >>54855179
Even if the 480 could exceed 150 watts i don't see why you'd spend almost double the money on a nvidia card when these exist
AMD already showed the real power consumption of Polaris and it was 54W less than Maxwell.
>>54854912
>getting married to a woman that can't cook
what the fuck
>>54854888
This is actually the nicest thing i've ever seen on the internet.
>>54855422
dubs speak truth
>>54853960
Probably doesn't have anything else going in life
>>54855422
>doesn't cook himself for maximum comfiness
>>54855424
You should check out my cock rate thread on /soc/
>>54854924
lol at this post
all power becomes heat in a graphics card
>>54855435
This. Only you can make right dishes for your taste.
>>54855408
>Comparing 28nm to 14nm at MEDIUM
TOP KEK
>>54855454
they compared mobile chip to desktop chip
>>54855182
>believing Nvidia lies
That's just a demo synthetically prepared to fake something. A Nvidia faked 15% is a 3-5% real time result. Ask yourself why they didn't show a game doing that, and the answer is that they actually lose fps when actual asyc compute is on, as seen in benchmarks.
>>54855182
Pretty sure AMD offer the most expensive GPU on the market m8. Have fun with your 750ti
>>54855471
Polaris 11 will also be on desktop to replace the Oland cards.
>>54854460
Has a lot to do with what case you're using as well. My gtx 460 was a house fire in my small shitty case. Bought a new one and temps have been great since.
>>54855359
This please
>>54855450
> your GF doesn't know your tastes well enough
>>54855384
Wait, what are you even suggesting at this point? Running a 480 and 6950 in the same case, or?
How the hell would that even work?
>>54853086
Nice memes kiddo
>>54848497
Now you're grasping after shit that doesn't exist. What your point? That it's not stellar performance for cheap?
>>54854584
There's an afterburner joke in there desu
Is there any chane any non-reference 480 models will have a couple of DVI ports instead of Displayport?
ITT
>gtx 1080 rich man's memecard
>rx 480 poor man's memecard
>>54855570
It's possible yeah
>>54855377
Look at the size of the PCB underneath the cooler. It's already a ITX card, it just needs a shorter cooler
Not even a race at this point.
>>54855679
Most conclusive benchmark I've ever seen on this board
>>54855689
>2016
>not using your gpu to play angry birds
fucking kill your self m8
>>54855772
>Not benchmarking Bad Piggies
>Fucking kill YOURself m8
>>54855799
>implying didn't buy all the bird packs and had mommy take to see the movie with my gbp
>>54854665
a reference design that i may actually buy, would be nice to have more air pushed out of my pc.
>>54855879
>amd 2016
>finally realized that most of their fan base are just traps that love the fuck out of small things
at lest they know their fan base
i hope that they release Vega for october and then maybe I can upgrade my monitor for this babe;
37,5 inches / 3840x1600 /freesync
>>54855914
>falling for the curved monitor meme
>>54855923
>2016
>fat shamming a monitor
boy I going to fuck you up
>>54855937
If you want to feel as though the porn is all around you just get a vive
>>54855914
who is this cutie patootie
>>54848433
>(at least in one benchmark)
>in a game sponsored by amd
>>54855986
Some chink
>>54855914
I fucking hate ultrawide, it's actually too wide
>>54855997
>>54855679
fixed
>>54850220
>CROSSFIRE
>>54853877
probably. I'm considering upgrading from my 680
>>54856026
I fucking love that game. Hours upon hours of fun times
>>54848497
>480 is only a small step below in performance
>almost half the fucking price
be gone jew
>>54854822
>Tfw bought at $1.90
>>54856026
>Not benchmarking the Housefire level
Ishiggydiggy
>>54855991
a game that properly uses an api's full spec you mean
remember they spent more time working with nvidia on it then amd.
>>54855179
isn't the c4 the 4gb version and the c7 the 8gb?
>>54856013
I feel the same way. I would kill for a ultra-tall monitor.
And I'm not talking about a 16:10 panel rotated by 90 degrees.
>>54849038
>MUH GAMES ARE SO MUCH BETTER WITH GAMEWORKS FOR BETTER GRAPHICS AND MUCH MUCH MUCH WORSER PERFORMANCE BECAUSE THE INTEGRATION COSTS MORE THAN THE OPTIMISATION
>>54855383
one is evil, and the other isn't
>>54855542
with dx12 and vulcan you can crossfire/sli amd and nvidia together
>>54854549
obs sucks dick on how much processor it takes up compared to shadow play or even a lossless compressed codec and dxtory
>>54856550
that's why you use amd dvr
>>54851623
muh $20 a year extra
