Kraut Space Magic edition
This thread is about the appreciation of watches, as well as the micro-engineering and materials engineering that is required to make a fine watch.
Required viewing for newbies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=508-rmdY4jQ&feature=youtu.be
Strap guide:
http://pastebin.com/SwRysprE
Previous thread:
>>54162084
>>54199850
First for autism
Any strap suggestions for this? Really not sure what to go with. Came with brown faux croc leather but I both dislike brown and croc.
I've tried black suede and a perlon but neither of them look great imo.
>>54199910
Not autistic enough.
>>54200036
Brown leather with white contrast stitching.
Eulit straps are lovely and comfy, got an NOS one from the 60s. Made in West Germany it said on the tag.
>>54200270
>tfw when still waiting on the mesh strap
Fondled a bunch of watches and met John Carmack. It's all p good.
>>54200569
2blu4me
>>54199910
I've noticed that autistics seem to like to collect Seikos. I also prefer Seiko watches. I'm worried.
Hamilton reporting in.
redpill me on G-Shocks
I've got a $500 budget and I'm kinda leaning towards a G-Shock
Recommendations?
>>54199850
Has anyone used an analog diver watch for a dive, how do they compare with digital ones?
>>54201205
Get the 5600 series.
Small and comfy.
>>54201215
I took one for diving a couple of times, but what exactly do you mean by use?
For timing?
>>54201215
Nobody use diver watches to dive anymore, they use a diving computer watch(it is required by law to do so), and some people wear also a diver watch just in case.
So, where can I get my hands on a Komandirskie 1965?
I'm late to the party for the black one, but I just love the way it looks.
>>54200792
Most autists are weeaboos too.
what's the consensus on kinetic watches?
I want something durable with an everlasting battery for the least amount of money possible.
sup
>>54201612
Wow, a russian watch!
How edgy! How new! How different!
I hate these threads so much.
>>54201750
But I'm russian.
>>54201794
What does your nationality have anything to do with it?
>>54201429
There's one for sale on /f29/, is somebody didn't take it by now.
>>54201802
What the nationality of the watch have anything to do with?
>>54201750
Perhaps Reddit is more up your boicunt, fag.
>>54195051
I got most of my pieces from Yahoo Japan Auctions using a proxy service, you can find WAY better deals there if you know how to read the tea leaves of listing translated with google translate and a few small grainy pics.
I got the LM Special for $70 USD, the Presmatic for $77 USD and the KS Special for $130 USD (all plus shipping).
>>54201612
I'm disappointed they didn't keep the old scuba dude dial. That blue is too flat.
>>54202104
>blue
The new one is teal.
>>54199850
Sinn 756 is better
>>54201834
Only ships to the USA and the watch is not working.
Anyone know a retailer in the us of a that sells Junker watches?
>>54202357
Odd.
There was another one with a fully working one.
Guess it was sold by now.
>>54201571
Get solar instead, kinetic was a terrible idea.
I've heard that the bracelets on the ministry Amphibia cases are slightly better than the regular ones. Does that really mean anything or are they still shit?
Thoughts? Should I?
>>54202533
Got both it and the 420 case bracelet.
Never really tested either, immediately threw them into the drawer since the slight difference ain't worth it.
>>54202135
>using faggy names for blue
>>54202575
It's more along the lines of green than blue.
>>54202444
how so? in concept it seems to me more practical than solar
>>54202533
I doubt. The design would good if the links were solid, reminds me of the bracelet of the Semenmaster Pro, but it's still folded and the built quality is total shit.
The problem isn't so much the rattling, but the hair pulling. And I don't trust it not to pull apart after some time or start to rust.
>>54202533
No. The bracelets on the special editions are decent though.
>>54202536
I would feel weird not buying a new watch like that in an actual shop.
If you're sure the warranty will work though, then go for it.
>>54202536
There are more interesting pieces in the price range, but you could do worse. I understand that the movement is exceptional.
I don't much care for the dial or the hour markers.
>>54201070
I'm thinking of picking one of these up but can't decide between 38mm or 42mm for my 7" wrist.
Any advice?
>>54200053
I want an OKEAH or a Shturmanskie so badly.
>>54202886
Steal one.
>>54202907
I don't know any OKEAHs near me
>>54202601
More moving parts to fail, especially a big heavy rotor which is generally what breaks on an automatic watch, They take forever to charge up fully swinging your arm like a doofus, I had one and quickly grew to hate it.
>>54202886
A nice Sturmanskie is cheaper to get and still military-issued. There's the early to mid-80s one with the 3133 inside, then 1986 on with the 31659 movement (3133 plus hacking). I prefer the 31659.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/272188425947
This is a decent-looking one.
Thank you to the anons who posted stuff about wearing your nato "down under style".
Tried it and now won't return to the classic way.
The cushion that forms from the strap, like in pic, does a very good job, holding the watch firmly in place.
But it's not as tight and uncomfortable like when i tightened the strap, wearing it the normal way.
Here the instruction from the fat fukka.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGo-Xixr6WU
>>54201205
G shock is good for price, but you shouldn't be needing 500 bucks for I've
>>54202536
Going to blow 5 figures on a Royal Oak that isn't a 15202? Questionable decision, sir.
>>54200270
I just got one of these from sydneystrapco, fuck me is it ugly. Why did I choose brown?
>>54203053
But I want good condition, some of the hour markers are missing from that one. But I don't want to spend so much extra for one of those Poljot.de ones, though I assume those will sell out soon anyway.
I wish I could go back in time and convince some Soviet to give a newly issued one to me in exchange for food or something.
Best cheap field watch? Something I can use as a beater almost everyday? Waterproof is a plus but sometimes it's too expensive.
>>54201571
I recommend Citizen's Eco-Drive watches. I've got 2 and they keep excellent time, I had them both in a drawer for years but when I found them they just needed a few minutes in sunlight and they started working perfectly.
>>54202536
I'd rather have a Patek Nautilus in that style watch. I'm not a fan of the exposed screws.
Saying that a Bagel is the nearest I'll come to the Nautilus.
>>54203355
>exposed screws
They're not screws, they're fake. You wouldn't be able to screw down those hexagonal screws in that hexagonal hole if they were real.
They're only there for bling factor.
>>54203387
That's part of the reason I don't like them.
Anyone have recommendations for a small dress watch? I really don't mind if it is manual wind/quartz/auto. I have been thinking of an orient bambino, but its size seems relatively larger than others (its at 40.5 mm diameter).
>>54203452
Vintage omega seamaster.
>>54201205
Get this and a cheaper G-Shock.
The latter will be useless to you if you don't work/live in a rugged environment.
>>54201352
Is the Casio frogman considered a dive computer?
It has all the functions of one
>>54202387
Long Island Watch
>>54203312
how about durability though
I don't need no dress watch
also I'm not an americlap, would I suffer the citizen eco-drive stigma?
>>54201571
Solar or just a regular battery movement would be much more durable.
Seiko kenetics have a history of shitty capacitors.
Eco-Drives tend to have hit or miss movements as well.
The most proven durable movements come from casio.
>>54201960
PVD movements are the devil incarnate
>>54202536
>Buying a piagay
Waiting for this badboy to be delivered.
I just love its design, and also I'm poor.
It's an automatic tho.
>>54203897
Hopefully you get one that can be regulated to wearable accuracy anon
Most commiederskies are +/- 1min a day
>>54203897
Odd, that looks like a Dirskie case from that angle.
>>54199910
>diver diver diver diver diver diver diver
wow looks like my collection!
>>54202536
hellno
>>54203259
what the fuck is going on here
>>54203878
>The most proven durable movements come from casio
well since we're on casios I wouldn't mind if it was digital
I just want a relatively flat, durable work watch with shower/light swimming water resistance that keeps good time and ideally would never ever have to change battery
I don't really care if it's analog or digital
I've been using casio w59 for ages and I might just as well buy a box of them to last me a lifetime
>>54203878
>PVD movements are the devil incarnate
got something against corrosion resistance?
>>54203958
>>>54203897 (You)
>Odd, that looks like a Dirskie case from that angle.
>>54203958
Thats because it is a Dirskie?
What do you guys think about this?
>Titanium
>Comfy bracelet that can be swapped out for leather
>All the bells and whistles of a digital (stopwatch, timers, alarms etc)
>Perfect accuracy
>Durable casio internals
>Pretty clean look
All for ~150.
Should I go for it?
>>54203966
>never ever have to change battery
Batteries do not work that way. If it has a battery, it will need to be replaced periodically.
There is no such thing as a maintenance-free watch.
>>54203993
the new komandirskies are usually fitted with handwind movements and not automatic
>>54204003
analog+digital looks stupid
>>54199850
Sexy What model is that ?
where to cop?
>>54204013
well that's why I was asking about kinetics/eco-drives/solar ones
I don't claim I know anything about those, just asking about
I assumed if a watch is self winding/charging it wouldn't require much tinkering
I mean my w59 does about 7 years on a single battery
>>54203872
Mine held up well, it's a field watch not a dress watch.
Also I'm a Britfag and I've encountered no stigma. Mundies seem to quite like it in fact.
>>54204033
>analog+digital looks stupid
This is so wrong.
>>54204088
hey that looks alright
>>54203966
G-Shock GW-5600 series sounds like it may suit your needs. I have a 5610 and that has solar, it also isn't fuck huge like a lot of G-Shocks.
>>54204088
nato helps it
what model is it exactly?
>>54204085
>I mean my w59 does about 7 years on a single battery
Batteries will fail after a number of years whether they are being used or not.
>>54204124
actually this doesn't look half bad either, unlike most g-shocks
>>54204033
fuk u
>>54204168
yeah that's bad
>>54204192
How exactly?
>>54204150
well most things break eventually
what interests me is a watch that will run reliably almost indefinitely should nothing break
like >>54204124 for those the spec sheet says it runs 8 month from full charge but used - that is charged regularly - might as well run indefinitely I'd assume
>>54204109
Thanks.
>>54204138
It's a BM8180-03E it comes with a really stiff canvas strap, bin that &put it on a nato of your choice and it's a great watch.
I've had mine for around 13 years & it has been faultless.
>>54203993
Meant to say that if it's a dirskie case then it's a handwound movement.
Or it could be a franken with a very similar looking Generalskie case.
>>54204168
That one is fucking awful.
>>54204199
in the looks department
>>54204205
I fully expect that G-Shock to outlast me.
>>54204205
>what interests me is a watch that will run reliably almost indefinitely should nothing break
No such thing.
>like >>54204124 for those the spec sheet says it runs 8 month from full charge but used - that is charged regularly - might as well run indefinitely I'd assume
lol no.
It will still need it's battery replaced every few years.
Batteries are not magic. They are containers for a chemical reaction, and that reaction will always get weaker with time.
Why did Casio and Seiko discontinue their best models?
>>54204243
>>54204124
>>54203966
Yall niggas talkin bout gee-shuckz therez plenty otha modelz of Cas-ay-oh out there, check sum OutGearz and yo ProTrekz
>>54204406
You forgot the Lineage and Oceanus lines
>>54204033
Take that back nigger
>>54204516
Why does Fred Perry make ana-digi-temps now? I don't understand.
>>54204550
Who the fuck is Fred Perry?
>>54204573
You mean the tennis player with the line of clothes that low class British people really love for some reason?
>>54204573
He was a tennis player. Fairly sure he's dead and not making watches though.
>>54204573
British sportswear brand that for some reason has a Japan only Ana-digi-temp selection.
Also for some reason really expensive clothes for the lower class, popular with football hooligans, casuals, skinheads and more.
http://www.fredperry.jp/featured/ana_digi_temp/
>>54204622
fuck those look really nice
>>54204622
Take out the Fred Perry logo and they look actually pretty nice.
>>54204690
>>54204676
They should, it's the same exact fucking watch as the original Citizen.
>>54204033
How about fully LCD ana-digi?
>>54204792
Absolutely disgusting
>>54204792
why
>>54204792
I love anadigis but this is just silly.
>>54204033
How about a mechanical ana-digi?
>>54205001
>>54205012
>>54205059
plebs pls
>>54205001
Kill yourself
Looks like a prop rather than a real watch. Anyone know anything?
>>54203387
>AP
>Fake screws
the reason the screws are in this hexagonal shape is that this is their anchor point. The nut that tightens these screws (the bit that twists) is through the case back.
best ana-digi right here
>>54203963
Look at the vid in my post, try it. I was a sceptic before, then tried it and it's nicer to wear it down under style.
>>54205591
Then they don't need the slot in the screw itself.
Bling factor, nothing more.
>>54204040
Sinn 856
>>54204003
So should I go for it?
It looks like a good versatile watch for everyday use.
Is this the most useless feature ever ?
>>54205958
Yes, i'm giving it a shot but the strap feels kind of bukly when i lay my wrist on the table and all the shit is under the wrist instead of laying on the side.
>>54206188
Yep nothing should ever be more than functional, design is retarded, you're so smart
>>54206291
>weeb day
now i understand
>>54206390
Do you think leap year indication is a more useful feature than month?
>>54206466
Why not?
>>54206631
ana-digi looks bad
get one or another, not both for fucks sake
>>54206390
It's just more memecanical wankery to drive prices up for rich cunts to fellate their tiny cocks.
>My watch has a day complication!
>Well mine has a MONTH complication!
>B-but honey, my watch has a gyrotourbillon! Don't leave me for Jamal!
>>54205367
It's a God-awful piece of crap
>>54206735
End it familia
where to get Seiko Pepsi meme? And what are other versions of the meme diver? I feel like getting a diver and the Seiko meme isn't bad
>>54206794
Now that's a nice fucking watch.
any good looking tech casio watches?
>>54206797
It's called SKX009 or SKX013 (but then you got to look after pepsi bezel'd ones).
>>54206797
Just get a Casio MDV 106.
More reliable and you don't have to deal the 7s26 shitting out on you
Also for 10 bucks you can get a bracelet that's better than the tin can links that come with the SKX.
>>54206836
>>54206852
It seems like I was too late to jump on the meme.
w2c Seikos in the EU anyway?
All this Casio shilling is getting fucking annoying
>>54207089
SKX009 and SKX013 are still in production AFAIK.
People were saying they were getting discontinued because of the Turtle series (which also has a Pepsi model) but i don't see any real proof
>>54207105
Yeah but they're more expensive than I remember.
>>54207105
I hope they don't
The turtle is $150 more expensive than it should be has awful alignment issues.
>>54207102
Problem?
Sup guys, just bought my new breitling navitimer. R8 and h8 m8s (inb4 butthurt Seiko fags)
>>54206852
>7S26c
>shitting on anyone
The meme must end. The self-shitting 7S26 were the "B" variants only. All the problems are non-existent on "A" and "C" (the only one available now) variants.
>>54207379
I r8 it 8/8 on a scale of 88, m8.
>>54202536
hell yeah dude
>>54201612
How comfortable is that strap ?;
No date
No complications
No bullshit
>>54200569
More to the story? How did you meet Carmack when fondling watches?
>>54208059
>maxi case
I'm so sorry.
>>54207138
You can buy a 007 and change the bezel i guess.
I like my 013, shame i scratched the shit out of the bezel and i don't use it too much now because of it. All because i was making out with a girl once, not worth it.
>>54208092
I'm fine with it not being a pepsi, where could I get a 007 on the cheap?
>>54208059
i've never noticed the little crown watermark above MADE
>>54208059
>six lines of text
>ugly engraving all the way around
>not bullshit
Also why are maxi cases and ceramic bezels so god damn ugly? How could Rolex fuck up such a flawless classic design?
>>54208092
The 007 has a black dial though not blue like the 009.
Does anyone have a seiko 5 with a red, white, and blue NATO strap? I bought the strap for an America themed party, but I don't know if it'll look okay. If anyone has both of those and would be able to post a picture of them together, I'd really appreciate it.
>>54207379
Nice aliexpress special m9
>>54203970
Afaik DLC is superior to PVD, and PVD+moving parts = flaking, which would be fatal for a movement
>>54208180
It depends on what model it is, there's like a fucking million kinds
>>54207379
Really digging the breitling navitimer look.
I have been wanting the Parnis one in navy blue but I can´t find it anywhere.
>>54208112
Pretty sure that's the crystal
>>54208163
The 009 has blue dial? My 013 doesn't (or it's a very dark blue)
>>54208113
ceramic bezels are awesome.
>>54208180
If it's for a theme, it doesn't matter how they match. I have a fucking orange and blue nato for my snk803, doesn't go with the watch but goes with what i chose it for.
>>54208112
Its inside the crystal.
>>54208112
Those engravings have been used for a while, it helps ensure that you're being a good goy and paying lots of money for authorized servicing with OEM parts that are impossible to purchase anywhere else because FUCK independent watchmakers.
>>54208086
>>54208113
Personal taste IMO.
I prefer the maxi case ad ceramic bezel to more classic models, but i see the appeal.
>>54208434
You have no taste. Like 90% of people buying Rolex nowadays anyway, so don't feel too bad about yourself.
>>54202594
Not that anon but I am really starting to think Im color blind.
>>54208465
What's wrong with ceramic bezels? Haven't seen any real life to compare, but on paper they seem superior ?
>>54208606
Ceramic bezels? Nothing, except they crack.
Now the maxi case? That's a real problem. Shit design.
>>54207432
The 7s26 is very very sensitive to shock (even the C)
It's a cost cutting measure.
It's a good movement if you pay 50 bucks for a seiko 5, it's not good when they want 200 bucks for it in an SKX
Even fucking invicta only charges you like 80 bucks for a 4r.
The turtle is also a huge scam. Sure it's a historical design but the movement, crystal and the alignment problems do not merit its price tag.
The Duro one of the best divers in the low end market because Casio doesn't jew you like other companies do.
>>54208059
Wow that's fucking disgusting.
Literally an eight thousand dollar turd on your wrist.
>>54208671
>The 7s26 is very very sensitive to shock (even the C)
No it isn't. I own one. It's not Vostok levels of shock proof, but has a very good performance in that department.
Price and whatnot aside, I'm just talking about the movement capabilities.
>>54207379
The best thing about that is the subdial hands are glued on and don't function
>>54208606
They're just ugly, really shiny and blingy looking. I guess they're technically superior to anodized aluminum but I think they just look cheap.
>autists triggered by maxi case
>>54208826
Now the real question is, why do you have such a shitty car?
Don't tell me you're like archie, splurging on expensive watches and staying poor because of that.
>>54208872
ye just do the opposite
>>54208826
m8 it's bulky and ugly. Nobody cares that you splashed out on a Rolex. At least get a half decent one.
Like the explorer for example
>>54209016
That car was not his, that anon is a driver.
Derailed the whole thread when that picture was originally posted, good times.
>>54209032
Now that's a good looking Rolex, even the newest version.
>>54209039
ye I drive a lexus
I'm looking for a pair of watches for my brother and his fiance as a wedding gift. I'd like a man's and woman's version of the same watch. Ideally automatics, budget of max £1000. All I've seen so far are Tissots and I think I can do better.
>>54209032
>explorer
>decent
>>54209073
Good cars and quality interiors, but goddamn that front grille...
>>54209089
nice argument you sure showed me
>>54208872
Company vehicle. Also not everyone that wears a Rolex drives a ferrari. Whatever my car is you autists will bash me for (insert reason) not playing that game.
>>54209079
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-Geneve-Vintage-Ladies-Gold-Plated-Self-Winding-Wristwatch-Rare-Swiss-Made-/322083210322?hash=item4afda7c452:g:KpMAAOSwubRXGViK
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Omega-Seamaster-Winding-Men-Wrist-Watch-Swiss-Made-Collectabe-/131788136417?hash=item1eaf2f5fe1:g:F18AAOSw5VFWJRf1
>>54209093
not a new one
its an 09 ls460
people who buy new are probably just as retarded as people who finance cars
>>54209079
This for the man...
>>54208826
>Nigger Rolex
>Fucking cloth seats
Return the watch Jamal
>>54209137
And this for the lady :3
>>54209144
>cloth seats
That's my leg you imbecile. Try harder
>>54209149
You're in the wrong thread
>>54209144
That's clearly a leg with jeans, retard.
>>54209130
Your watch is still ugly anyway, I'm not playing any games, just voicing my opinion.
>>54209144
Personally I prefer cloth seats greatly because unlike leather they aren't awful when either cold or hot which is like the whole fucking year in Wisconsin
>>54209216
Have you tried asking in the right thread?
>>54209079
How about you buy them a proper wedding gift and not some chink/low end swiss shit?
I highly doubt they would appreciate anything the autists on /wt/ would recommend.
Watch thread, anon posts decent watch, flaming ensues.
Way to go, /g/
>>54209228
he isn't the only person here with a decent watch
so I think he is the problem
>>54209268
Rolex is a different brand now, if you want something utilitarian get an SKX, but hey, most divers now copy the Submariner design anyway, so why not get the real thing if you can afford it.
>>54209268
What do you mean? This is a GREAT tool watch.
>>54208722
But my friend, the subdials actually are functioning day, 24 hour and date hands left to right. Lucky you are anonymous, or your reputation on this Taiwanese leather working forum would be forever tarnished!
>>54209309
>>54209016
Posting my Japanese automatic in a Japanese automatic.
>>54209420
>not having a japanese manual and a japanese manual
Check out this faggot
>>54209560
>new_hand_wound_credor_springdrive_inside_NSX.jpg
>>54209420
swiss auto in jap manual
>>54208292
>ceramic bezels are awesome.
I've never seen one that didn't look godamn terrible.
>>54209815
>no date windows frame
DOGSHIT
>>54209815
>lume in darkness
ftfy
>>54209815
Chink manual in 'murican automatic
Sort of old photo, though.
>>54209941
Nice celadon. Should be getting my own imperial soon enough.
>>54209941
hnnnnnnnng
>>54201205
Got this as my first G-Shock second hand for $140. You can get it on Amazon now for a little over $200. It's a great ABC watch if you need it want all the sensors. It's too big for some. For $500, though, could get you 2 or 3 nice watches. Hell, you could get 10 or more different G-Shocks. If you want something a little more understated, there's the GWM5610 for like $100. Or the DW5600E for $40.
>>54210619
what happens when you hit the protect button?
does a bubble surround you and keep women away?
gotta keep your virginity safe I guess
>>54210649
Oh, look!
I found you mom.
>>54210739
pajeet is that you?
............I don't wear a watch on the grounds that I hate being reminded that my life in this world is finite. Besides, everything seems to have a clock built into it already...we're already living like machines. It's a bit unnerving really.
>>54208872
where I live, you are lucky to not park on the street
even then, some retard is still going to hit you every couple months while you are parked
I'm not buying a new car until I move and even then why bother when my current car will go for another 100k miles
>>54210868
Cool story bro
has anyone here ever been mugged for your watch?
particularly rolexfags
>>54210882
only 100k more miles?
you crossed half a million yet or did you just buy a shit car?
>>54210949
if someone ever tried they would be dead
>>54210977
what are some nice watches that come with acrylic crystals? (<$1k)
>>54211042
not even edgy
im well within my rights to defend myself and my property
>>54210949
Never. I try not to display my watch to the world like some asshole who's looking for a mugging, it's under my cuff or sleeve if I need to tell the time; not to flash it about, begging for it to be torn from my wrist by some sub-human piece of shit.
I believe a namefag here lost his Rolex in an airport whilst they were searching his luggage or some shit, he got a Grand Seiko GMT after it.
>>54209941
What strap is that?
>>54211256
cock ring
>>54211274
>>54211083
>Grand Seiko GMT
MUH
DICK
>>54201836
...what?
>>54211313
>>54203569
w2c
>>54211256
looks like some hirsch dogshit
>>54211072
Not really, no.
>>54208059
u got the wrong watch
>>54211047
Acrylic is shit-tier material for a watch crystal.
>>54210977
The fact that you believe this should be your first hint that you are, in fact, completely and utterly clueless.
>>54211477
2nd best Rolex design ever
>>54211543
1st*
>>54211477
>>54211606
Holy w2c
>>54211612
good fucking luck
1980s milgauss
http://www.chrono24.com/en/rolex/ref-1019.htm
>>54211506
>>54211441
im sure both of you know more about my states legislature than I do
>>54211606
Funny.
I was thinking Milgauss as well.
>>54211650
Probably, but legislation has nothing to do with it.
You're an idiot, thus vulnerable.
How did I do /g/
>>54211685
im sure you know everything about me
>>54211701
what brand is polex?
>>54211727
Fuck you it's real.
>>54211744
im sure it is a real polex
>>54211701
I really like the worn submariner look
the new ones are nice and all but they just look too sterile
>>54211480
Ur mum is a shit-tier material for a watch crystal.
Acrylic is lightweight, easy to polish, cheap, can be molded into cool dome shapes, doesn't get smudged with fingerprints easily, doesn't reflect as much glare, and won't shatter.
>>54211713
I know you that can't punctuate a sentence and have power fantasies about fending off violent criminals with your sidearm. I can infer pretty much everything else there is to know about you. You have a shitty job which you hate, or are unemployed. Your gun is probably a .45. Etc.
