Is there an alternative to Qualcomm which produces such open and well documented SoCs?
I know Samsung Exynos and MediaTek are very closed and shit.
>>53603178
I've been doing research into this for months.
The answer is No. Get your hands on a list of Qualcomm's qfuses, that will unlock loads of functionality.
If you do get your hands on a list, specifically the MSM8974.
No one will provide you with the source for the PBL.
>>53603751
*If you do get your hands on a list, specifically the MSM8974 post it here.
>>53603178
There aren't other choices, there's is no development for huawei devices using Kirin's SOCs
>>53603178
Mediatek has overtaken qualcomm in performance and efficiency, Just not documentation.
>>53603961
I don't think huawei or samsung would release documentation for their own chips, since so few would actually buy them outside samsung or huawei devices
>>53603178
Intel.
>>53604137
>Mediatek has overtaken qualcomm in performance and efficiency, Just not documentation.
Not in their gpu nor modem performance which matters more
>>53604137
Documentation? What documentation?
I don't see sources for the modem on the SoC? Or the sources for the PBL, SBL and ABOOT.
>>53604278
Does Intel provide sources for their Modem and PBL/SBL?
>>53604295
Exactly.
>>53604278
Not really. Pretty much any modern gpu can drive a 1080p screen for every day tasks and mobile games.
>>53604532
Both Qualcomm and MediaTek are doing LTE channel agg. I think its like 2 20Mhz channels.
Any Ex-Qualcomm employees willing to leak some documentation on the modem and/or qfuses would be amazing.
