>cycles >blender is quite capable, you suck

Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-03-08 03:47:08 Post No. 515040
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: AAA graphics.png (569 KB, 960x540) Image search: [Google]

569 KB, 960x540

Anonymous 2016-03-08 03:47:08 Post No. 515040 [Report]

>cycles
>blender is quite capable, you suck

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-08 06:02:54 Post No.515044
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-08 06:02:54 Post No.515044 [Report]

>making a counter-argument post
>supporting the argument with your counter-argument post

Took the bait. Here's your reply.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-08 11:26:15 Post No.515051
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-08 11:26:15 Post No.515051 [Report]

Dump cycles and use superior Luxrender.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-08 11:54:12 Post No.515054
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-08 11:54:12 Post No.515054 [Report]

>>515051
^^

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-08 11:55:13 Post No.515055
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-08 11:55:13 Post No.515055 [Report]

also not even using a bump map for the wood, are you even trying?

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-08 11:58:14 Post No.515056
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-08 11:58:14 Post No.515056 [Report]

>>515040
If you're gonna post a thread about Cycles being competitive with other renderers, at least set your materials up in a half convincing manner you mongoloid.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-08 12:48:16 Post No.515061
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-08 12:48:16 Post No.515061 [Report]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDRTjzLNK0g

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-08 13:00:09 Post No.515063
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-08 13:00:09 Post No.515063 [Report]

>>515040
>10 samples
:^)