>cycles >blender is quite capable, you suck
You are currently reading a thread in /3/ - 3DCG
>cycles
>blender is quite capable, you suck
>making a counter-argument post
>supporting the argument with your counter-argument post
Took the bait. Here's your reply.
Dump cycles and use superior Luxrender.
>>515051
^^
also not even using a bump map for the wood, are you even trying?
>>515040
If you're gonna post a thread about Cycles being competitive with other renderers, at least set your materials up in a half convincing manner you mongoloid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDRTjzLNK0g
>>515040
>10 samples
:^)