Because it won't
>>17925564
because it was supposed to happen every year since 2006.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OALssKFLw0
Because it does every few months and every few years and every few decades and every few centuries and every few millenniums here.
>>17925564
Most people will be looking down at their phones so it's a good time I suppose. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, pokemon go(I love it even if it is a distraction) all have people looking at screens and not the sky. At least it would be a surprise or swift end to most.
I thought it was coming September 23rd last year. Didn't see shit captain.
I'll just leave this here
https://brussellsprout.blogspot.com.au/2013/11/gigantic-wrecking-ball-headed-toward.html
Nibiru passed over this solar system back in March 2012.
The formal designation for this incoming dwarf star system is called: X-1204-1X. It is a designation not a name.
Further, this incoming dwarf star system will not have a close brush with planet Earth.
Though, Earth may experience some trembling, tremors, due to the contained magnetic forces that will be exerted during its passing.
Yes, people may be able to take great notice of it, and the trail of debris that it has, as it passes by our planet.
This dwarf star actually has a few pieces of debris in front of it. Though much its quite large, extensive debris field trails in back of it as it heads our way.
They can't look up and see for themselves unless they see it on the news of Facebook or something similarly stupid.
Peer pressure. People are weak and stupid animals.
>it's definitely coming this time guys
>>17925564
because it was also coming in june.. july.. last novemeber, this upcoming september. Random times in 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015. I feel like something is happening anon, but the nibiru stuff is nonsense. A nemesis dwarf star flinging comets from the OORT cloud in a cyclical manner is way more likely than the new-age annunaki stuff.
>>17925590
>le technology sheeple meme
50 years ago people were just looking down at newspapers instead.
>>17926141
this
>>17925564
>implying nibiru exists
What did they mean by this?
>>17925564
>>17926144
>>17925564
To further my point: OP's picture shows what NEMESIS's orbit looks like. However OP called it nibiru. Which one is it? I thought Nemesis was the sun of Nibiru? In the OP, your picture is showing the estimated orbit of nemesis. It cannot be both things. Nibiru can't be nibiru and nemesis, not nibiru. Please at least somewhat connect 2 and 2 before shit-posting.
I don't think nibiru is real, but let's stop calling nemesis and nibiru the same thing, please?
>>17926176
*Nibiru can't be nibiru and nemesis, only nibiru.
>>17925605
>calling someone a tin foil on x
