Planet X / Nemesis is here, when will people see and understand.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_NBdHEARI0
How big will this thing look to the most near point to earth?
they wont because the chemtrails governments use is hiding it from plain sight.
That's. The sun dumbass
>guy makes fun of nibiru retards
>nibiru retards think he's being serious
Can't make this shit up.
This is trolling, or clickbait for money, right? Nobody can be that stupid, to simultaneously be so obsessed with sky phenomena yet so ignorant about it.
>>17900816
What surprises me is how quickly people forget what horizontal alignment is after CRT TVs disappear from the market.
Part of an object disappears on the left side of the screen and reappears on the right? Oh, it must mean there are two identical objects!
>>17900710
Rapture must be soon.
>>17900856
Haha.
Perhaps.
Perhaps it's Wormwood.
"The third angel sounded his trumpet, and a great star, blazing like a torch, fell from the sky on a third of the rivers and on the springs of water— the name of the star is Wormwood. A third of the waters turned bitter, and many people died from the waters that had become bitter."
>>17900710
Nemesis is not a planet. It is a brown dwarf star (theorized) orbiting our sun, as a binary, and is probably 1-3 ly out there. It orbits about every 65-100 million years and causes a gravitational clusterfuck in our solar system at perigee. So, unless the keiper belt is starting to lob things toward us, I wouldn't worry.
>How big will this thing look to the most near point to earth?
It's a brown dwarf. You won't see it
>>17900935
That's not how orbits work. Also according to this, the sun gets within 3 l.y. of proxima centauri. Which it doesn't. Also they're all in a line for no reason.
>>17901193
1. The top drawing is not to scale.
2. Both bodies orbit their common center of mass, marked at the "X", which is how orbits work.
3. Nowhere does either image show the Sun getting significant closer to Proxima. It wouldn't since the Sun has a significant larger mass than a Brown Dwarf (Nemesis). Brown Dwarf masses are only 15-80 Jupiter masses.
4. The bottom portion of the image simply shows proposed Nemesis distance from the Sun and shows Proxima for scale. They are definitely not in a line since Proxima is 60 degs off the ecliptic.
>>17900935
T and Y class brown dwarves have been detected from hundreds of light years away. L class dwarves would be visible to the naked eye from 0.5LY, so there aren't any.
>>17901305
>it's not to scale
No shit, but it's got a scale on it.
>bodies orbit their center of mass
Again, no shit. And according to this imaginary diagram, the center of mass for the sun if over a light year away from the Sun at its apsis, which means the Sun orbits around a center of mass which brings it much closer to proxima centauri.
This is a load of shit, since the motion of the sun is well known, and it goes through no such orbit.
>it's a brown dwarf
According to the diagram, it's nearly as massive as the sun. No way in fuck that would be a brown dwarf.
>it's a brown dwarf, you wouldn't see it
Not in the visible spectrum, but you sure as shit would in infrared, and there's no such object.
>>17901356
>so there aren't any.
"...it's a big ass sky" (Billy Bob Thorton - Armageddon) and we don't have the capacity to search all of it. The topic was Nemesis. I provided information on the theory. You may continue to nitpick all you want because; yes, it is a theory, and yes, there is no empirical evidence to support it.
>0.5LY
which is less than the proposed perigee of 1 ly.
Have a blessed day.
>>17901393
Okay, I'll stay for a minute
>but it's got a scale on it.
The scale is for the bottom drawing only
>And according to this imaginary diagram, the center of mass for the sun if over a light year away from the Sun
No. The top portion of the image HAS NO SCALE. It is a simple explanation of how orbits work for the readers of space.com.
>since the motion of the sun is well known, and it goes through no such orbit.
Please note that in the bottom portion of the image (with the scale), the Sun DOESN'T MOVE. I am not going to crunch the numbers but it is likely that the center of mass is INSIDE the Sun.
>According to the diagram, it's nearly as massive as the sun
IT"S NOT TO SCALE. I have already point out that brown dwarves are only approx. 15-80 Jupiter masses. Once again, a pretty picture for Space.com.
> but you sure as shit would in infrared, and there's no such object.
"Beggin' you're pardon Mr. President, but it's a big ass sky."
>>17901411
There's looking for a tiny, icy Pluto sized object from thousands of AU away and then there's looking for these.
>>17901451
>it's not to scale
The diagram of the orbits clearly shows them forming a "figure 8". This wouldn't happen with a low mass brown dwarf.
Jupiter and the Sun both orbit around a common center of mass, but they don't fucking do this.
