Do you guys believe in remote viewing?
>>17883725
Nope.
>>17883725
You mean like drones and reconnaissance satellites?
>>17883754
>this anon probably thinks, unironically, that NASA actually has a drone entering Jupiter's atmosphere, instantly and live transmitting the data back to Earth.
>it believes that remote viewing is more far-fetched than that insane "scientific reality"
Anon....
>>17883725
i can heal myself, so maybe
>>17883781
The transmission time isn't instant, since the signals travel slower than the speed of light.
Even the light travelling from the sun takes about 8 minutes to cross the distance from the Sun to the Earth. The measurement of that distance is known as an Astronomical Unit, abbreviated AU, and varies depending on Earth's orbital phase around Sol. Jupiter is 2.5-5 AU's from Earth, depending on the status of each planet's orbit.
You do know that the Juno probe was solar powered, correct? Its mission marks a significant advance in solar panel technology, as it is the first successful solar-powered probe, not utilizing a nuclear reactor for propulsion, to travel beyond the asteroid belt.
Prior to Juno, the 1989 shuttle-launched Galileo probe orbited Jupiter from 1995-2003.
None of these technologies are particularly new or noteworthy in the year 2016, and photographic/video proof of their existence and operation are readily available to the general public.
>>17883725
Sort of. I've read some accounts that were pretty amazing. I think like most things /x/ there's some truth to it, but it's not something everyone can do and I'd bet most people claiming to be able to are full of shit.
>>17883725
Plz, any tips?
>>17885181
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing
