Is sinister good /x/ lore or is it ridiculous?
Curious to know /x/'s opinion.
I mean I know the writer made up baghul himself. I know it it's fake. I just want to know /x/'s opinion
I thought the movie called was good except for the baghuul crap. He wasn't scary and seemed design to appeal to 14 year old boys who think they're badasses.
>>17823357
It's not a bad use of tropes as far as lore quality is concerned.
Baghul was basically an image-based version of Moloch.
But do your own fucking research OP.
>>17823357
It has some pretty loud jumpscares. The tapes are pretty creepy, which is easily the best part.
It's honestly just very generic, with some interesting ideas peppered throughout.
>>17823445
Google doesn't index concepts that come up in horror films.
>>17823498
Google does, however, lead you to reviews, articles, wiki pages, etc. You know, like what it was designed specifically to do.
http://villains.wikia.com/wiki/Bagul
>>17823357
I liked the first movie, because it was laid-back, a guy investigating shit and him and his family becoming insane, and some mystery. the second one just screamed: "look at the kids, aren't they fucking cruel?!" I hated that, it was pointless.
>>17824943
The movies were a weirder version of children of the corn
