>>17810458
OP admitted he made the whole thing, I can't remember what it actually said, but it was kind of stupid.

Still, it was a pretty cool book.

>>17810458
It was odd-parity hexadecimal ascii encoding. /sci/ figured it out. Said some shit about having fun and being mindful plus OP's gay name and 2016 on the first page. I'm glad I didn't put much time into the actual decoding.

>>17810509
This is why I only glanced at the thread from time to time and left the code-cracking to the hardcore fanatics.

Just think how much better it would have been if OP wrote something cool or meaningful. It was a really neat concept.

>>17810528
He felt it was meaningful to him. It was definitely some pseudo-metaphysical tweet material. I'll pull it out of the archive for ya.

>>17810509
>/sci/ figured it out

lolno. They found the forum where OP posted the solution because nobody figured out. Unless that was OP posting the link, too.

File: 1464695017950[1].png (15 KB, 720x268) Image search: [Google]

15 KB, 720x268

S I M O N
M E N Z

2 0 1 6


L O C K -
E D I N
T H E
A P E X
O F A
M A Z E ,

T H E
W I S E
Q U E R Y
B U T
N E V E R
J U D G E

Z E S T
A B O U T
L I F E
C A N
V E X
D E A -

T H ' S
W A R Y
Q U A L -
M S ; G O
J O K E ,
P L A Y .

It was the semi-colon and apostrophes that confused the decryption software

>>17810500
What did /x/ expect from a white background pic ?

>>17810574
Thanks.

>>17810561
>It was definitely some pseudo-metaphysical tweet material.

Yeah, I could have written something better in junior high.

>wow the only interesting thing on /x/ in a long time was a hoax
well thanks guys