>>17731462
www.google.com

>>17731472
Kys.

I've read the tao de ching and clearly understand the impossiblity of the question I pose but what does it correlate to.

Is it a god?

>>17731480
``abstract bullshite''?

>>17731558
Not really.
I've felt something remarkably similar to what is described as the Dao during meditation.

Many other beliefs also speak of this unable to be understood power.

>>17731462

The Tao that can be spoken of is not the Eternal Tao.

>>17731480

It's not a god. It's the impersonal ground of being.

>>17731462
the heartbeat of the universe.
you don't "understand" tao, you feel it.

>>17731462
are you provoking me?

>>17731462
Natural law

I asked my Chinese gf she said

"Eh this one is hard to explain. They have old people and they have some sort of belief and this is one of them"

So there you have it

>>17731462
'Dao' is the way(/path) to understanding the laws of the universe, how they work, their nature and how these laws were created too

>the pursuit to understand the origin, and its endless origin.

>In other terms it would be, the path one walks in search of understanding The "ALL" and The "ALL" for(and by which) The "ALL" exists.

>>17733390
Sorry typo, to "Comprehend" not "understand".
Mind cannot understand nor really express True "Dao" in wholeness, the only way it can express a bit is in approach or in natures patterns, it can only be comprehended in feeling.
The Dao expressed in our world(our whole universe) is only a minuscule part of the True "Dao".

I thought it was some kind of stock market theory