So, whats the deal with Shroud of turin /x/ ?

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-05-23 14:44:11 Post No. 17726214
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: fullcolrweb72dpix.jpg (164 KB, 1200x307) Image search: [Google]

164 KB, 1200x307

Anonymous 2016-05-23 14:44:11 Post No. 17726214 [Report]

So, whats the deal with Shroud of turin /x/ ?

>>

Father of (ID: !LIES0m9gt2) 2016-05-23 14:45:45 Post No.17726221
[Report]

Father of (ID: !LIES0m9gt2) 2016-05-23 14:45:45 Post No.17726221 [Report]

>>17726214
Confirmed fake

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-23 14:47:31 Post No.17726225
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-23 14:47:31 Post No.17726225 [Report]

>>17726221
sauce ?

>>

Father of (ID: !LIES0m9gt2) 2016-05-23 14:50:34 Post No.17726231
[Report]

Father of (ID: !LIES0m9gt2) 2016-05-23 14:50:34 Post No.17726231 [Report]

>>17726225
Just read the wiki article

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-23 15:15:50 Post No.17726282
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-23 15:15:50 Post No.17726282 [Report]

>>17726231
But that carbon dating was wrong anon

>>

Father of (ID: !LIES0m9gt2) 2016-05-23 15:20:27 Post No.17726298
[Report]

Father of (ID: !LIES0m9gt2) 2016-05-23 15:20:27 Post No.17726298 [Report]

>>17726282
Who is this anon you are referring to? I am a glorious tripfag!
There were at least 2 carbon dating tests on it, and it is newer than 33AD

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-23 16:47:58 Post No.17726539
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-23 16:47:58 Post No.17726539 [Report]

Even if it was 2000 years old, why would you assume it belonged to Jesus? I don't get it.

>here's a piece of old cloth with a bearded mans imprint
>must be Jesus

Seriously, what am I missing here?

>>

Father of (ID: !LIES0m9gt2) 2016-05-23 17:36:37 Post No.17726686
[Report]

Father of (ID: !LIES0m9gt2) 2016-05-23 17:36:37 Post No.17726686 [Report]

>>17726539
Why, you are missing the image of a white, fluffy critter that goes
>BAAAAAAH
and poops candy.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-23 18:09:43 Post No.17726757
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-23 18:09:43 Post No.17726757 [Report]

>>17726225

if the image on the cloth had really been the result of it being wrapped around a bloody corpse it would have been 3d
like, the face would have been wider, more like a mask than a painting, which this thing probably is anyway